C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Corvette makes worst reliable list.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2015, 10:16 AM
  #201  
69L79
Le Mans Master
 
69L79's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Hamilton Square NJ, Ocean City N. J. Key Biscayne Fla.
Posts: 8,244
Received 849 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DaveFerrari458
............ I think GM needs to stop obsessing over keeping the Corvette ridiculously under-priced and bring up the quality & QC one notch. A few thousand dollar more for the car would not kill sales!!

Its naive to think that an increase in the price of a Corvette would directly correlate to an increase in Quality Control. GM would pocket the extra profit. And, continue to produce problematic cars. There is no evidence to the contrary.
The following users liked this post:
pdiddy972 (11-15-2015)
Old 11-15-2015, 10:25 AM
  #202  
punky
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
punky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 8,084
Received 3,862 Likes on 1,912 Posts

Default

Recently looked at a 911 Turbo S with a $196,000 price tag. The salesman told me that it was a little bit faster than even a C7 Z06. Damn that really makes you wanna bust open your wallet for that one. What exactly does one get for an extra $110,000? Do those ugly little Porsche emblems cost that much?
Old 11-15-2015, 10:44 AM
  #203  
OVR60
Burning Brakes
 
OVR60's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Posts: 987
Received 105 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SublimeZ06
I agree with your point. I think the Corvette team is trying to do way too much rather than just focusing on an outstanding chassis and drivetrain. They are severely overcomplicating what could be an outstanding car. WiFi hotspot??? Eco mode???? Seriously ridiculous. The cynic in me thinks that this overcomplication is on purpose and part of "engineered obsolescence" to 1. sell more extended warranties at huge profits, and 2. have more people dump cars earlier (2-3 years) and buy new ones again at huge profits for GM.

For owners like me who like to take care of our cars and keep them well past the warranty period, this profit-maximizing mentality while sacrificing the soul of the brand doesn't sit well. The C7 will be a nightmare to maintain past the warranty period and the C7Z even more so.
Well said, its all about selling more cars and keeping the production line moving at any cost. Where will the C7 market be in the fall of next year when the 14's come out of warranty and you do not have a service contract. With winter coming the market for 2014 C7's right now is in the high 40K low 50K range. If GM comes out with some surprises in 2017 the next cycle will start all over again.
Old 11-15-2015, 11:19 AM
  #204  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SublimeZ06
I agree with your point. I think the Corvette team is trying to do way too much rather than just focusing on an outstanding chassis and drivetrain. They are severely overcomplicating what could be an outstanding car. WiFi hotspot??? Eco mode???? Seriously ridiculous. The cynic in me thinks that this overcomplication is on purpose and part of "engineered obsolescence" to 1. sell more extended warranties at huge profits, and 2. have more people dump cars earlier (2-3 years) and buy new ones again at huge profits for GM.

For owners like me who like to take care of our cars and keep them well past the warranty period, this profit-maximizing mentality while sacrificing the soul of the brand doesn't sit well. The C7 will be a nightmare to maintain past the warranty period and the C7Z even more so.
This post misses the point on many levels, to the point of being extremely naive. GM REACTED to what OWNERS wanted in the new generation (C7) car. Feel free to read literally years of complaints in the C6 section about the lack of this electronic doodad or that (my Honda Accord has....why doesn't my Corvette). As far as "planned obsolescence", well, that is the standard of the car industry, not just Corvette. Most folks don't keep their cars for many years, and "profit maximizing" is what EVERY car company is in business to do (just like Apple, etc). I am shocked that you don't understand the most basic parts of business. Maintaining ANY old car is a nightmare, with a C7, it will be LESS of a mechanical nightmare and more of an electronic one, but a nightmare just like everything else.

As far as AFM, GM has a little entity called the EPA that they answer to. Want a really fast car? No problem. Want a really fast car that is SUSTAINABLE in today's regulatory climate? Well, that's a lot harder.


PS. There are numerous posts complaining that the C7 doesn't have blind spot warning, lane departure warning, etc. While you may want the Corvette version of the Lotus Elise, the market very clearly doesn't.

Last edited by jimmyb; 11-15-2015 at 11:29 AM.
Old 11-15-2015, 11:57 AM
  #205  
Dif
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Dif's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast MA & Mad Beach FL
Posts: 4,101
Received 716 Likes on 436 Posts

Default

Wow, interesting thread
I must be the luckiest person in the world with GM products.
Have had nothing but GM vehicles since 1970 and all of them were the most reliable vehicles I owned.
My 1st ever New vehicle, a 1986 GM Pickup went 60K miles in 10 years with nothing but basic maintenance.
Traded it in for a new 1996 Pickup truck.
Traded that in for a new 1999 Pickup truck.
Traded that in for a new 2002 Avalanche.
Traded that in for a new 2004 Escalade EXT.
Traded that in for a new 2007 Escalade EXT.
Sold the 2007 EXT in 2012 and bought a used 2007 Envoy.
Granted, most of them I didn't keep for long, but none of them had any problems what so ever.
Bought my 1st Corvette New in 2009 and drove it for 25,000 trouble free miles.
Last month, traded that in for a 2016 Z51 Stingray.
So far with 1,000 miles on the 2016 it had one computer glitch around 400 miles when the 8 Speed Trans stayed in 4th gear until I shut off the engine and restarted it.
Yes it's early yet and Only Time will tell how things go with this 2016
But IMO, I would have to think it's been more than just Luck considering all the GM vehicles I've had without any problems
Old 11-15-2015, 12:20 PM
  #206  
Ajaste
-----
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ajaste's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,162
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kdavis69
5 out of 4 people don't even understand fractions.
10

Originally Posted by Dif
Wow, interesting thread
I must be the luckiest person in the world with GM products.
Have had nothing but GM vehicles since 1970 and all of them were the most reliable vehicles I owned.
My 1st ever New vehicle, a 1986 GM Pickup went 60K miles in 10 years with nothing but basic maintenance.
Traded it in for a new 1996 Pickup truck.
Traded that in for a new 1999 Pickup truck.
Traded that in for a new 2002 Avalanche.
Traded that in for a new 2004 Escalade EXT.
Traded that in for a new 2007 Escalade EXT.
Sold the 2007 EXT in 2012 and bought a used 2007 Envoy.
Granted, most of them I didn't keep for long, but none of them had any problems what so ever.
Bought my 1st Corvette New in 2009 and drove it for 25,000 trouble free miles.
Last month, traded that in for a 2016 Z51 Stingray.
So far with 1,000 miles on the 2016 it had one computer glitch around 400 miles when the 8 Speed Trans stayed in 4th gear until I shut off the engine and restarted it.
Yes it's early yet and Only Time will tell how things go with this 2016
But IMO, I would have to think it's been more than just Luck considering all the GM vehicles I've had without any problems
Dif, I'm happy for you but for every story like yours there are probably at least a couple guys whose GM vehicle came "pre-f*cked up by the factory"

Bo

Last edited by Steve Garrett; 11-15-2015 at 09:21 PM. Reason: Merged Posts-please use the Multi-Quote button in the lower right hand corner of each post!
Old 11-15-2015, 12:47 PM
  #207  
Dif
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Dif's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast MA & Mad Beach FL
Posts: 4,101
Received 716 Likes on 436 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ajaste
Dif, I'm happy for you but for every story like yours there are probably at least a couple guys whose GM vehicle came "pre-f*cked up by the factory"

Bo
I have friends that have Not been as lucky if it has anything to do with luck.
But in reality, IMO, it doesn't matter if it's GM, Ford, Chrysler, or whoever.
There's going to be Really Good things happen and/or Very Bad things happen with their Products.
In my personal experience in life I've been a mechanical enthusiast since my youth and Tool Maker by Trade.
When it comes to anything mechanical, all anyone can do it try their best and hope for the best.
No matter how well something is designed or made, there will always be something about that thing that will Not be known, even after testing it.... until it is built and put into production.
IMO, the reality/history of NEW vehicles throughout time, is it takes a few years before all the bugs are worked out.
That's not to say the first few years are not going to have good results.
But it's the nature of the Beast and certain things do not rear their ugly head until it's actually put into production and released to the public into the hands of the abusers .... I mean Users
Old 11-15-2015, 01:10 PM
  #208  
Ajaste
-----
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ajaste's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,162
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dif
I have friends that have Not been as lucky if it has anything to do with luck.
But in reality, IMO, it doesn't matter if it's GM, Ford, Chrysler, or whoever.
There's going to be Really Good things happen and/or Very Bad things happen with their Products.
In my personal experience in life I've been a mechanical enthusiast since my youth and Tool Maker by Trade.
When it comes to anything mechanical, all anyone can do it try their best and hope for the best.
No matter how well something is designed or made, there will always be something about that thing that will Not be known, even after testing it.... until it is built and put into production.
IMO, the reality/history of NEW vehicles throughout time, is it takes a few years before all the bugs are worked out.
That's not to say the first few years are not going to have good results.
But it's the nature of the Beast and certain things do not rear their ugly head until it's actually put into production and released to the public into the hands of the abusers .... I mean Users
Good points all
Old 11-15-2015, 03:33 PM
  #209  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
This post misses the point on many levels, to the point of being extremely naive. GM REACTED to what OWNERS wanted in the new generation (C7) car. Feel free to read literally years of complaints in the C6 section about the lack of this electronic doodad or that (my Honda Accord has....why doesn't my Corvette). As far as "planned obsolescence", well, that is the standard of the car industry, not just Corvette. Most folks don't keep their cars for many years, and "profit maximizing" is what EVERY car company is in business to do (just like Apple, etc). I am shocked that you don't understand the most basic parts of business. Maintaining ANY old car is a nightmare, with a C7, it will be LESS of a mechanical nightmare and more of an electronic one, but a nightmare just like everything else.

As far as AFM, GM has a little entity called the EPA that they answer to. Want a really fast car? No problem. Want a really fast car that is SUSTAINABLE in today's regulatory climate? Well, that's a lot harder.


PS. There are numerous posts complaining that the C7 doesn't have blind spot warning, lane departure warning, etc. While you may want the Corvette version of the Lotus Elise, the market very clearly doesn't.
News article from 2012......

"The latest data compiled by global market intelligence firm R.L. Polk & Co has found that Americans are now holding onto their new vehicles for a record 71.4 months. On the used vehicle side, that interval has risen to 49.9 months, a figure that also represents a new high mark. Collectively, the ownership period currently stands at 57 months, up from about 38 months back in 2002."

Now, would the person that buys a new Corvette toy, plan to keep it longer than 71.4 months? I bet so. Not being a daily driver, I bet that most people that buys a new Corvette plans on keeping it for much longer than the 3 year warranty period.

Not only did Consumer Reports give the C7 a bad rating, so did J. D. Power.

Last edited by JoesC5; 11-15-2015 at 04:14 PM.
Old 11-15-2015, 04:26 PM
  #210  
xmonger
Intermediate
 
xmonger's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 45
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Car and Driver's long term C7 test mule needed an engine replacement early on. Recently, a Z06 had engine issues in their comparison testing. What the odds of that? Scary stuff as most C7 users don't put their cars through the pace a CD tester will.
Old 11-15-2015, 07:13 PM
  #211  
stingraymyway
Race Director
 
stingraymyway's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Out of Site...Out of Mind. Corvette: anything else is just transportation.
Posts: 11,173
Received 134 Likes on 103 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20


Default

Originally Posted by hammersavette
Oh man, I just saw the news this mourning. It don't look good for the Chevrolet Corvette. We made #3 on the most unreliable list. Looks like the chevy engineers need to tighten up, that is not good.
Every dealership has a parts and service department for a reason.
Old 11-15-2015, 07:21 PM
  #212  
punky
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
punky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 8,084
Received 3,862 Likes on 1,912 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dif
Wow, interesting thread
I must be the luckiest person in the world with GM products.
Have had nothing but GM vehicles since 1970 and all of them were the most reliable vehicles I owned.
My 1st ever New vehicle, a 1986 GM Pickup went 60K miles in 10 years with nothing but basic maintenance.
Traded it in for a new 1996 Pickup truck.
Traded that in for a new 1999 Pickup truck.
Traded that in for a new 2002 Avalanche.
Traded that in for a new 2004 Escalade EXT.
Traded that in for a new 2007 Escalade EXT.
Sold the 2007 EXT in 2012 and bought a used 2007 Envoy.
Granted, most of them I didn't keep for long, but none of them had any problems what so ever.
Bought my 1st Corvette New in 2009 and drove it for 25,000 trouble free miles.
Last month, traded that in for a 2016 Z51 Stingray.
So far with 1,000 miles on the 2016 it had one computer glitch around 400 miles when the 8 Speed Trans stayed in 4th gear until I shut off the engine and restarted it.
Yes it's early yet and Only Time will tell how things go with this 2016
But IMO, I would have to think it's been more than just Luck considering all the GM vehicles I've had without any problems
Identical experience here. 7 Corvettes, 13 Cadillacs, IROC Z, Envoy Denali, Grand Prix. Never had a single problem with any of them and my 1st Corvette was an '84. We had a Lexus, Mazda, and 2 300 ZXs. Had problems with every one of those. The Mazda was an absolute disaster. Paint actually peeled off the both of the 300 ZXs. Please don't tell me about how good imports are. My neighbors love their Mercedes. I see them up and down the street on ramp trucks on a regular basis.
Old 11-15-2015, 08:00 PM
  #213  
MikeLsx
Drifting
 
MikeLsx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 1,630
Received 200 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drmustang
Recently looked at a 911 Turbo S with a $196,000 price tag. The salesman told me that it was a little bit faster than even a C7 Z06. Damn that really makes you wanna bust open your wallet for that one. What exactly does one get for an extra $110,000? Do those ugly little Porsche emblems cost that much?
its without a doubt a better made car. its also going to hold up much better at the track.

But its not 110k better. if i am spending 200k on a car, better believe its not going to be a 911.

Last edited by MikeLsx; 11-15-2015 at 08:00 PM.
Old 11-15-2015, 08:59 PM
  #214  
HAD2HAV2
Melting Slicks
 
HAD2HAV2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2001
Location: MOORESVILLE NC
Posts: 2,968
Received 292 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

In all my 43 years of driving I have never had a water pump to fail at 15,000 miles usage. Had I not been installing side skirts and saw the coolant leak I would most possible be stuck on the side of the road somewhere on my daily commute. Love the car, but?
Old 11-16-2015, 09:46 AM
  #215  
SublimeZ06
Instructor
 
SublimeZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Posts: 122
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
This post misses the point on many levels, to the point of being extremely naive. GM REACTED to what OWNERS wanted in the new generation (C7) car. Feel free to read literally years of complaints in the C6 section about the lack of this electronic doodad or that (my Honda Accord has....why doesn't my Corvette). As far as "planned obsolescence", well, that is the standard of the car industry, not just Corvette. Most folks don't keep their cars for many years, and "profit maximizing" is what EVERY car company is in business to do (just like Apple, etc). I am shocked that you don't understand the most basic parts of business. Maintaining ANY old car is a nightmare, with a C7, it will be LESS of a mechanical nightmare and more of an electronic one, but a nightmare just like everything else.

Don't play village idiot. You know exactly what I was refering to. Read my post instead of just trying to attack me, A$$hole.
Old 11-16-2015, 10:22 AM
  #216  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SublimeZ06
Don't play village idiot. You know exactly what I was refering to. Read my post instead of just trying to attack me, A$$hole.
Who's attacking who?
And I give, what are YOU referring to? That C7's will be difficult to maintain 20 years from now? I agreed. I suggest YOU learn how to read.

Jimmy
Old 11-16-2015, 12:12 PM
  #217  
Ajaste
-----
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ajaste's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,162
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HAD2HAV2
In all my 43 years of driving I have never had a water pump to fail at 15,000 miles usage. Had I not been installing side skirts and saw the coolant leak I would most possible be stuck on the side of the road somewhere on my daily commute. Love the car, but?
Old 11-16-2015, 12:58 PM
  #218  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drmustang
Identical experience here. 7 Corvettes, 13 Cadillacs, IROC Z, Envoy Denali, Grand Prix. Never had a single problem with any of them and my 1st Corvette was an '84. We had a Lexus, Mazda, and 2 300 ZXs. Had problems with every one of those. The Mazda was an absolute disaster. Paint actually peeled off the both of the 300 ZXs. Please don't tell me about how good imports are. My neighbors love their Mercedes. I see them up and down the street on ramp trucks on a regular basis.
I love my Mercedes. Not only has it never been on a ramp truck, wrecker, or rollback truck, it has never been in the shop except for a defective battery when new which was replaced under warranty. And that's with 17 years of ownership. I have not had that kind of trouble free ownership from any new American car that I have owned(and I purchased my first new American car in 1964, a 1964 Malibu SS).

My 7 year old C6 Z06 has been a trouble free car(my C5 was a disaster) with only one trip to the dealer for minor warranty service, but I did, proactively, replace the original GM heads with aftermarket heads at a cost of $4300, two days after my 5 year warranty expired.
I might have been able to run my Z06 for a 100,000 miles, but with all the reported problems with the LS7 heads, I wasn't going to take a chance on blowing a $15,000 engine, to find out if I might be one of the lucky ones.

Oh, and the problems with the C6 Z06 heads have definitely lowered the resale value of the C6 Z06's. There is even a class action law suit against GM because of the heads. So, just because my Z06 hasn't spent a lot of time in the shop, it still has cost me a lot of money, that my Mercedes has not.

Last edited by JoesC5; 11-16-2015 at 12:59 PM.
Old 12-27-2015, 07:30 AM
  #219  
wrecker3
Melting Slicks
 
wrecker3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: NEW WINDSOR NY
Posts: 2,380
Received 1,471 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

My 2016 Z-51 C7 has no issues in 3 months and 1052 miles and so far has exceeded my expectations !!!!!



Quick Reply: Corvette makes worst reliable list.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.