C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the Z51 completely useless if no track use?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2016, 08:34 PM
  #141  
Philr56
Pro

 
Philr56's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: Kathleen Georgia
Posts: 582
Received 67 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheMidnightNarwhal
Ok thank you very much. That seals the thread. I will definitely not go for the Z51, though I do like the rims with the Z51 but I suppose I can get them separately on a non Z51, correct?
Yes, you can get the ZF1 package or whatever they called it after 2014. I have a base with the Z51 look, but not the Z51 ride. I don't track my car either. There are no bad choices with the Stingray.
The following users liked this post:
Skid Row Joe (06-06-2016)
Old 06-06-2016, 08:41 PM
  #142  
Skid Row Joe
Team Owner
 
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 27,319
Received 4,001 Likes on 2,888 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheMidnightNarwhal
But it's just how some people aproach it... like what the hell. Like your comment, "First you don't need a Corvette there other cars that will get you where you are going" that's not the point. The point is some people say you need a Z51 package to drive spiritied.,, that's just no, a corvette is a sports car, you can drive spirited without the Z51 package.
True.
Old 06-06-2016, 09:53 PM
  #143  
Woodson
Le Mans Master
 
Woodson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 5,688
Received 1,365 Likes on 790 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
Not enough to buy one @ $5K or so more. IMO. The base, non-Z51 is all you'll ever need on the street.
You know this how?
Old 06-06-2016, 10:06 PM
  #144  
Randy G.
Race Director
 
Randy G.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 14,692
Received 552 Likes on 378 Posts

Default

We got the Z51 option because you never know where life takes you. Otherwise, the Prius works fine.



Last edited by Randy G.; 06-06-2016 at 10:07 PM.
The following users liked this post:
promocop (06-06-2016)
Old 06-07-2016, 11:37 AM
  #145  
TheMidnightNarwhal
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TheMidnightNarwhal's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 185
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VY427
The topic of the thread is...is the Z51 completely useless if no track use? A big reason why the option certainly is useful on the road is its shorter 1st-3rd gear ratios (2nd and 3rd especially important for passing power around town). The car feels quicker (the snappy) and is quicker (the 0.2 you mentioned) with them. Now, those 0.2 may not mean much to the average owner who isn't tracking, however, if the car feels quicker and has more satisfying passing power, doesn't that make the Z51 a useful option for road use?
My comment wasn't in regard to the whole topic, it was a reply to the other person explaining he wants a faster acceleration.

And no it doesn't make it more useful, I'm plenty sure a stock Corvette has enough power to pass someone.
Old 06-07-2016, 01:59 PM
  #146  
themonk
Team Owner
 
themonk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
Posts: 97,155
Received 1,456 Likes on 799 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by SASprof
Ahhh, but all things are not equal. The Z51 is heavier, which directly impacts acceleration.
true but the tighter gears I would guess compensate for the minimal weight difference. Look at GM's promos for the C7, all tests and performance data in 2014 were done using the Z51.

http://www.corvetteblogger.com/docs/...teBrochure.pdf

455 HP and 29 MPG HWY, STANDARD Completely
redesigned, the standard 6.2L LT1 V8 engine boasts
455 horsepower and 460 lb.-ft. of torque and offers
29 MPG highway1
— an unprecedented combination.
With the available performance exhaust and the
available Z51 Performance Package, it can achieve up
to 460 horsepower, 465 lb.-ft. of torque and a 0 to 60
time of 3.8 seconds. Compact engine design lowers
the hood line and vehicle center of gravity. And an
available dry-sump oil system delivers oil through
high g-force cornering.
Old 06-07-2016, 02:32 PM
  #147  
RedC7AZ
Race Director
 
RedC7AZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Posts: 16,854
Received 534 Likes on 334 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by themonk
true but the tighter gears I would guess compensate for the minimal weight difference.
I guess one can spin the question however they like....
Are the minimally tighter gears enough to compensate for the additional 150lb weight gain?

Last edited by RedC7AZ; 06-07-2016 at 02:34 PM.
Old 06-07-2016, 02:56 PM
  #148  
AUTO_X_AL
Drifting
 
AUTO_X_AL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: South Lyon MI
Posts: 1,729
Received 62 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedC7AZ
I guess one can spin the question however they like....
Are the minimally tighter gears enough to compensate for the additional 150lb weight gain?

My car was 3388 with a full tank of gas in 2LT trim. That puts it at 3340 empty. That's about a 42 lb deficit. You could add 10 lbs because I have 18/19's on the car that are a few lbs lighter than the stock 19/20's.

Last edited by AUTO_X_AL; 06-07-2016 at 03:00 PM.
Old 06-07-2016, 03:33 PM
  #149  
driver9
Drifting
 
driver9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,485
Received 109 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally postted by AUTO_X_AL:
My car was 3388 with a full tank of gas in 2LT trim. That puts it at 3340 empty. That's about a 42 lb deficit. You could add 10 lbs because I have 18/19's on the car that are a few lbs lighter than the stock 19/20's.

The Corvette holds 18.6 gallons of fuel per the manual. At 6 lbs/gallon that's 111.6 pounds of fuel, not the 48 lbs your calculation shows.

If your full-fuel car weighs 3388, that puts it at 3277 empty.

Last edited by driver9; 06-07-2016 at 03:35 PM. Reason: typo "fuelm,"
Old 06-07-2016, 04:52 PM
  #150  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by driver9
I think the primary reason Z51s have the 19 and 20" wheels is because the brakes are larger and won't fit in the 18/19" wheels.

Not sure if there's a mechanical reason that magnetic ride control comes with 19/20s. Maybe so, but it's just as likely that GM marketing wants to sell you a wheel upgrade if you want to buy magnetic ride.

.
Nope, it's due to suspension tuning. If they want to use the same shocks they have to have the same wheel sizes.
Old 06-07-2016, 05:32 PM
  #151  
driver9
Drifting
 
driver9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,485
Received 109 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS3 MN6
Nope, it's due to suspension tuning. If they want to use the same shocks they have to have the same wheel sizes.
I'm confused.

First, I'm not sure what you mean by "they have to have the same wheel sizes." Doesn't the Z51 configuration have two wheel sizes, 19 front, 20 rear?

And as far as the rest of it, somebody above said that they are running the 18/19 combo on their Z51-configured Stingray.

Any clarification is appreciated.

.
Old 06-07-2016, 07:15 PM
  #152  
SASprof
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
SASprof's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 1,268
Received 156 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by themonk
true but the tighter gears I would guess compensate for the minimal weight difference.
Good point. Tighter gears certainly compensate for the added weight. I don't know if they fully compensate, under-compensate, or over-compensate. I think it's safe to assume the engineers did their job.
Old 06-07-2016, 07:26 PM
  #153  
SASprof
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
SASprof's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 1,268
Received 156 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedC7AZ
I guess one can spin the question however they like....
Are the minimally tighter gears enough to compensate for the additional 150lb weight gain?
Let's assume they are. That would put us back to square one, a wash, with neither car having an acceleration advantage.

The base car would have a slight MPG advantage and closer lower gear spacing; not that any performance enthusiast would care.
Old 06-07-2016, 07:29 PM
  #154  
Fcal
Drifting
 
Fcal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: By The Hook NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 193 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

When it comes down to it, who needs a Corvette?
We buy them because we want them, not need them.
If you want a Z51, get a Z51. If you want a Z06 and only drive it to church, that's fine too.
I don't track my Z51, but I drive it hard.
The following users liked this post:
promocop (06-07-2016)
Old 06-07-2016, 08:11 PM
  #155  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by driver9
I'm confused.

First, I'm not sure what you mean by "they have to have the same wheel sizes." Doesn't the Z51 configuration have two wheel sizes, 19 front, 20 rear?

And as far as the rest of it, somebody above said that they are running the 18/19 combo on their Z51-configured Stingray.

Any clarification is appreciated.

.
Same size tire as Z51 for only Mag Ride is because the computer calibration is done for the Z51 tire sizes. Everything on a car has electronic calibration. If they sold the car with the smaller sizes, a new calibration file and tune would be required.

Once you get the car, you can put whatever wheels you want on it, but you're no longer optimized to the calibration.
The following users liked this post:
driver9 (06-07-2016)
Old 06-07-2016, 08:48 PM
  #156  
Citation
Racer
 
Citation's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Location: Sayre PA
Posts: 374
Received 123 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Some of those commenting in this thread have driven all the configurations more than around the block. Some have only driven one. As a Chevrolet Dealer and Corvette enthusiast I get to drive them all. Great fun. My personal car is a Z51 with Mag Ride and manual trans. I do an occasional track day, and would have no other configuration. I'm a suspension junkie, even my motorcycles have 4 way adjustable shocks.

I consider the standard suspension damping too soft for even moderate street driving. In particular the rear damping rebound is too loose. That said its juts fine for the majority of owners and my customers who enjoy knowing what their car is capable of, but will never go around corners at high speed, especially on a rough road where the lack of damping makes the rear end squirrely. If you want a Corvette to cruise, and thats the majority of my buyers, then the standard car is perfect.

In spite of my own choice, I personally feel the best choice for most buyers is the standard car plus magnetic ride. That gives them the lower spring rates and better ride, but still the option to have computer controlled and adjustable damping. Even on Tour mode my Z51+mag ride is a bit stiffer than a standard car, but you wouldn't realize it unless you drive one car and then the other.

Your mileage may vary.
The following 4 users liked this post by Citation:
Bunk (06-11-2016), drs (06-09-2016), Foosh (06-10-2016), Woodson (06-07-2016)
Old 06-07-2016, 08:56 PM
  #157  
RedC7AZ
Race Director
 
RedC7AZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Posts: 16,854
Received 534 Likes on 334 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SASprof
Good point. Tighter gears certainly compensate for the added weight. I don't know if they fully compensate, under-compensate, or over-compensate. I think it's safe to assume the engineers did their job.
You know what they say when we assume.

The only way to determine if the gearing really compensate for all the added weight is to drag race a non z51 and Z51 side by side 0-60 with as few variables as possible. Until that happens we really don't know for sure which is really faster.

We do know for sure the Non Z51 owners think theirs is faster and the Z51 owners think theirs is faster.

Get notified of new replies

To Is the Z51 completely useless if no track use?

Old 06-07-2016, 09:02 PM
  #158  
nhz51
Instructor
 
nhz51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 212
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Citation

In spite of my own choice, I personally feel the best choice for most buyers is the standard car plus magnetic ride. That gives them the lower spring rates and better ride, but still the option to have computer controlled and adjustable damping. Even on Tour mode my Z51+mag ride is a bit stiffer than a standard car, but you wouldn't realize it unless you drive one car and then the other.

Your mileage may vary.
That's what I ordered. Felt a good midpoint between the soft base and track Z51 suspensions.
Old 06-07-2016, 09:56 PM
  #159  
Skid Row Joe
Team Owner
 
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 27,319
Received 4,001 Likes on 2,888 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheMidnightNarwhal
My comment wasn't in regard to the whole topic, it was a reply to the other person explaining he wants a faster acceleration.

And no it doesn't make it more useful, I'm plenty sure a stock Corvette has enough power to pass someone.
True again.

Explaining why someone needs the Z51 vs. the base non-Z51 on-the-street, (non-tracker) is what's missing in this thread. The $5K difference in price is noteworthy.
Old 06-07-2016, 10:33 PM
  #160  
JerryU
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Support Corvetteforum!
 
JerryU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,498
Received 9,625 Likes on 6,629 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
True again.

Explaining why someone needs the Z51 vs. the base non-Z51 on-the-street, (non-tracker) is what's missing in this thread. The $5K difference in price is noteworthy.
Thought I did a good job in post #49 of defining why I got the Z51 or equivalent in all 4 of my Vettes including the C7 and I don't track my car.

I discuss why you can benefit from a dry sump when aggressively driving on a 270 degree Interstate exit ramp! In a nut shell that is more of a sustained lateral "g" turn than on most race tracks! I also like the fast transient response and on our flat, good quality roads my 2014 doesn't even have mag shocks and the ride is fine. For my September 2013 build the Z51 was a $2800 option.

Last edited by JerryU; 06-07-2016 at 10:43 PM.


Quick Reply: Is the Z51 completely useless if no track use?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.