C7 rear end sexy...or not?
#62
And I do think having an option for a more traditional rear end would be a good idea. The car would still be instantly recognizable as a Corvette with either the Camaro-y back end, or something more Corvette with four round tail lamps. Also, I think the hatch on the C7 was a cost reduction, and Chevy should still offer a large Glassback. I know between my 1977 and 1978, there was a world of difference in the cockpit. While the 77 felt closed in and dark, the 78 is open and bright. When I sat in a C7, I felt closed in and dark, just like my 77.
A midlife upgrade to the C7 could include going toward a modernized four tail light arrangement, deployable headlights (that spring down for pedestrian safety) and a full Glassback. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that such an option would quickly outsell the 'base'.
#63
#65
Administrator
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,783
Received 1,659 Likes
on
846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21
Believe it or not, I like all years of Corvettes. I think the styling of each model has beauty. I know some of the members here are upset with the C7 and some of its styling cues. I don't get too hung up on things like tail lights or sharp edges etc. If the design works, so be it. Yes both are sexy...
Took the words out of my mind
It was time to update the look of the Corvette. It was done to appeal to the next generation. I get mad complements on my car and the rear end redesign is appealing to younger folks
#66
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
I think you may have hit on one of my concerns. When the Vette had hidden headlights, it was rather unique. Now, as much as Chevy did a good job with the exposed headlamps, I still think a Corvette should have pop up headlights. It's part of what makes a Corvette a Corvette, and different from other sports cars.
And I do think having an option for a more traditional rear end would be a good idea. The car would still be instantly recognizable as a Corvette with either the Camaro-y back end, or something more Corvette with four round tail lamps. Also, I think the hatch on the C7 was a cost reduction, and Chevy should still offer a large Glassback. I know between my 1977 and 1978, there was a world of difference in the cockpit. While the 77 felt closed in and dark, the 78 is open and bright. When I sat in a C7, I felt closed in and dark, just like my 77.
A midlife upgrade to the C7 could include going toward a modernized four tail light arrangement, deployable headlights (that spring down for pedestrian safety) and a full Glassback. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that such an option would quickly outsell the 'base'.
And I do think having an option for a more traditional rear end would be a good idea. The car would still be instantly recognizable as a Corvette with either the Camaro-y back end, or something more Corvette with four round tail lamps. Also, I think the hatch on the C7 was a cost reduction, and Chevy should still offer a large Glassback. I know between my 1977 and 1978, there was a world of difference in the cockpit. While the 77 felt closed in and dark, the 78 is open and bright. When I sat in a C7, I felt closed in and dark, just like my 77.
A midlife upgrade to the C7 could include going toward a modernized four tail light arrangement, deployable headlights (that spring down for pedestrian safety) and a full Glassback. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that such an option would quickly outsell the 'base'.
The following users liked this post:
Randy G. (06-27-2016)
#67
Burning Brakes
I'm new to the corvette world (thanks to the c7), so correct me if I am wrong, but pop-up headlights haven't been on corvettes for over 10 years. And lots of other cars had them. Honestly, I find it not just old school, but cheesy.
#68
Administrator
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,783
Received 1,659 Likes
on
846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21
I think you may have hit on one of my concerns. When the Vette had hidden headlights, it was rather unique. Now, as much as Chevy did a good job with the exposed headlamps, I still think a Corvette should have pop up headlights. It's part of what makes a Corvette a Corvette, and different from other sports cars.
And I do think having an option for a more traditional rear end would be a good idea. The car would still be instantly recognizable as a Corvette with either the Camaro-y back end, or something more Corvette with four round tail lamps. Also, I think the hatch on the C7 was a cost reduction, and Chevy should still offer a large Glassback. I know between my 1977 and 1978, there was a world of difference in the cockpit. While the 77 felt closed in and dark, the 78 is open and bright. When I sat in a C7, I felt closed in and dark, just like my 77.
A midlife upgrade to the C7 could include going toward a modernized four tail light arrangement, deployable headlights (that spring down for pedestrian safety) and a full Glassback. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that such an option would quickly outsell the 'base'.
And I do think having an option for a more traditional rear end would be a good idea. The car would still be instantly recognizable as a Corvette with either the Camaro-y back end, or something more Corvette with four round tail lamps. Also, I think the hatch on the C7 was a cost reduction, and Chevy should still offer a large Glassback. I know between my 1977 and 1978, there was a world of difference in the cockpit. While the 77 felt closed in and dark, the 78 is open and bright. When I sat in a C7, I felt closed in and dark, just like my 77.
A midlife upgrade to the C7 could include going toward a modernized four tail light arrangement, deployable headlights (that spring down for pedestrian safety) and a full Glassback. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that such an option would quickly outsell the 'base'.
As a 46 year old man, I can appreciate that style. However, I can also appreciate Chevy bringing the Corvette up to date.
The following users liked this post:
mpuzach (06-26-2016)
#69
Administrator
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,783
Received 1,659 Likes
on
846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21
Better to take a C5 and modernize it yourself than to ask GM to do it.
#70
Pro
I started out skeptical, but it absolutely fits the car's lines.
#71
Safety Car
I had the 1st C7 on Long Island 9/30/13. I was amazed that virtually everyone seeing one for the first time went out of their way to remark how much they liked the rear end.
The following users liked this post:
Chemdawg99 (06-26-2016)
#74
Pro
Identify as Corvette Stingray
Try as I might, I STILL do not like Camaro tail lights on a Corvette.
Porsche modernized the 911 but kept it identifiably Porsche and identifably 911.
I think GM should at least offer an OPTION for people who want a Corvette rear end on the car. What could be wrong with that? A total win win all around.
Porsche modernized the 911 but kept it identifiably Porsche and identifably 911.
I think GM should at least offer an OPTION for people who want a Corvette rear end on the car. What could be wrong with that? A total win win all around.
I can say with confidence that everyone of us driving the C7 can tell you it completely adheres to the Corvette legacy and is the best so far. I appreciate the styling, i like it more every time I drive her.
I like the C3 and C5 look so I will buy one each.
#75
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Holly Springs NC
Posts: 14,373
Received 1,609 Likes
on
1,037 Posts
St. Jude Donor '16-'17,'22,'24
Pop-up headlights were discontinued for several reasons, not the least of which, big brother outlawed them. This occurred during the C5 manufacturing run, but the C5 was given a pass until that model run ended.
Even if they were permitted, no one will design them into a new car due to CAFE regs. Pop-up headlights are very inefficient from an aerodynamic aspect and every fraction of a mile/gallon counts.
BTW, anyone who owned a C5 knows those were awful headlights, the C6 and C7 have much better units.
Even if they were permitted, no one will design them into a new car due to CAFE regs. Pop-up headlights are very inefficient from an aerodynamic aspect and every fraction of a mile/gallon counts.
BTW, anyone who owned a C5 knows those were awful headlights, the C6 and C7 have much better units.
Last edited by roadbike56; 06-26-2016 at 11:55 PM.
#76
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Silicon Valley and Yosemite, CA
Posts: 5,511
Received 635 Likes
on
341 Posts
Sold my C6 in anticipation of the C7, as I ALWAYS am the first on my block with the new generation. When i saw it introduced, I went NOPE not for me.
Ask this in Off Topic, I would venture to say you will get a much more unbiased opinion. OK I will do it
Almost did buy one as it was a white convertible, with a light gray interior, white wheel and the dealer painted all the vents white. Seemed to reduce the Aztec aspect out of it. Simply way too many lines for me. If you love/like it great,not knocking that at all, just not my style.
I pop in periodically to see what is going on, as all Vettes are cool, IMO. This is just not for me.
Ask this in Off Topic, I would venture to say you will get a much more unbiased opinion. OK I will do it
Almost did buy one as it was a white convertible, with a light gray interior, white wheel and the dealer painted all the vents white. Seemed to reduce the Aztec aspect out of it. Simply way too many lines for me. If you love/like it great,not knocking that at all, just not my style.
I pop in periodically to see what is going on, as all Vettes are cool, IMO. This is just not for me.
#78
Burning Brakes
Yeah, off topic will provide a random sample of CF members....