C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What a dreadful day at the dealership

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2018, 04:53 PM
  #181  
NavyBlue2
Burning Brakes
 
NavyBlue2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 762
Received 123 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gavinvr4
$65k is the final price from the stealership *banging my head * should I do it
It is now 2018.
So it comes down to either You wants the car more than the Dealer who wants to sell you that car.

So if you're in no hurry, then stick with the 62 offer.
If dealer hasn't sold the car by the end of the week or month, he'll def comes back to you with a lower price.

For used cars, I'd ignore whatever-color book or what the market says it's worth, just like houses & art, it's up to whatever the buyer wants to pay for it.

If the market for that car is 68, and the Dealer lists it at 66 (below "market" price), then there's something wrong since most will usually list it above & have room for negotiation / haggling down.
Old 01-04-2018, 06:39 PM
  #182  
tail_lights
Race Director
 
tail_lights's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: SE TEX
Posts: 10,581
Received 252 Likes on 210 Posts

Default

Wife and I had a similar incident at a Hyundai dealer (like they can be picky LOL). Sales manager claimed my numbers couldn't work and that if we wait no one would pay what they were offering on the Focus we were trading in Went to the next Hyundai dealer down the road (this was all in Houston BTW) and although it took a bit longer than I wanted we rode out of there in a brand new 2016 Accent that my wife was happy with and 'numbers' that I knew could be done (they gave us 1000 more for the Focus as well)
Old 01-04-2018, 06:44 PM
  #183  
Walter Raulerson
Melting Slicks
 
Walter Raulerson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,624
Received 526 Likes on 354 Posts
Default Dealers and Profit

Do dealers EVER lose ANY money on a car deal?
The following users liked this post:
PobreWey (01-04-2018)
Old 01-04-2018, 07:07 PM
  #184  
PobreWey
Racer
 
PobreWey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2017
Location: Calgary
Posts: 274
Received 86 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Good job standing your ground. Even though the money is insignificant.... some of us are petty like that

I'd base your decision on this. If the car was just sold for $65,000 ... would you be going crazy wishing you paid that instead of tried to save 1k or would you say oh well and shop around patiently?
Old 01-04-2018, 09:36 PM
  #185  
gavinvr4
Racer
Thread Starter
 
gavinvr4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2017
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 311
Received 73 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PobreWey
Good job standing your ground. Even though the money is insignificant.... some of us are petty like that

I'd base your decision on this. If the car was just sold for $65,000 ... would you be going crazy wishing you paid that instead of tried to save 1k or would you say oh well and shop around patiently?
If the vehicle was sold to someone else...no biggie. I would just have to wait till the next potential right one around. I was never a big fan of yellow but something about yellow on this vehicle is growing on me.
Old 01-04-2018, 10:13 PM
  #186  
direct007
Melting Slicks
 
direct007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 3,248
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,026 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Walter Raulerson
Do dealers EVER lose ANY money on a car deal?
In the short run...Yes. In the big picture, no. If it's the end of the month and the dealer may get a six figure bonus if they sell x amount of cars and they are two cars short. It could make sense to lose thousands on those last two cars because of the back end bonus. Of course that could be like hitting the lottery for the buyer as the buyer would never know and this will apply to new cars, not used.
The following 2 users liked this post by direct007:
Foosh (01-04-2018), Mike Mercury (01-05-2018)
Old 01-04-2018, 11:33 PM
  #187  
patentcad
Drifting
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 1,630
Received 757 Likes on 321 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by direct007
In the short run...Yes. In the big picture, no. If it's the end of the month and the dealer may get a six figure bonus if they sell x amount of cars and they are two cars short. It could make sense to lose thousands on those last two cars because of the back end bonus. Of course that could be like hitting the lottery for the buyer as the buyer would never know and this will apply to new cars, not used.
When car sales or profitability get soft they can make such little profit on each car transaction that even WITH the manufacturers back end money (which virtually all car brands offer to franchised dealers) their sales operations aren't profitable overall - service and parts carry the business sometimes. That's not typical, but it happens. Just because you sell a car at 'dealer cost' but then there's say $400 on the back end - that may not be enough profit over say 130 cars sold that month to pay for the sales dept. salaries and expenses.

As for this preposterous notion that a party in a financial transaction is a 'liar' for not disclosing their true financial position - well I guess that makes EVERYBODY in such a negotiation, buyer and seller alike - a liar. Which is what some people here think - but that it only applies to the car dealer. Which is utterly ridiculous. By the way, while I was in the car biz for 10 years, that ended 26 years ago, so since then I've strictly been on the consumer side of the desk.

P.S. If you buy cars new off the lot you're going to get hammered on depreciation more than if you buy used- but buying a Corvette used at a realistic price is much harder than with other cars for a bunch of reasons, and I think #1 is we want what we want (equipment, color, etc.) and there are FAR fewer used Corvettes on the market than say Silverado pickup trucks (you know like 1/10 as many). And if you're going to buy a Corvette new, far better to wait until the car softens up 3+ years into a new generation - than to buy in the first year or two when it's waiting lists and MSRP only. I bought in 2017 and I figure that the same car in 2014 might have cost like $8K+ more.

Last edited by patentcad; 01-04-2018 at 11:34 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by patentcad:
direct007 (01-05-2018), Foosh (01-04-2018), OntarioOrangeC3 (01-05-2018)
Old 01-04-2018, 11:40 PM
  #188  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Well said in the last two posts above.
Old 01-05-2018, 09:04 AM
  #189  
JALLEN4
Melting Slicks
 
JALLEN4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,613
Received 2,164 Likes on 1,005 Posts
Default

I can tell you that dealers lose money on new cars far more often than one might think. For various reasons, there are cars that just don't sell and you do not have the option to send them back. Just on a pure dollar and cents accounting, the average dealer will lose often in the course of a year. If you factor in the actual selling costs of a transaction, that total number increases dramatically.

The other factor the non-participant does not factor in is the used car trade. There is not a guaranteed market even when the trade is acquired for wholesale. Often in the course of the year the trade simply doesn't sell on your lot and a considerable loss occurs when the car is wholesaled to another dealer or taken to auction.

All of this happens regardless of what incentives the factory offers. At the end of the day, most dealers will make a profit somewhere in the chain of potential profit centers. The average dealer has at least six profit centers and many have several more.
Old 01-05-2018, 10:32 AM
  #190  
OntarioOrangeC3
Melting Slicks
 
OntarioOrangeC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2017
Location: Rochester New York
Posts: 2,398
Received 220 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
You know this HOW?

Just so you know, in a large business "low balling" is the norm.
No one expects less.
I never stated my opinion as fact. That's all it is...my opinion, based on how things progressed. Just like other opinions expressed here. Could I be wrong? Yup. We'll never know unless the OP cared to tell us.

Good to know low balling is the norm. Thanks for the business lesson. How about being unreasonable/unrealistic (take your pick) when a good deal is staring at you in the face? You know, like offering $4000 under a price that's already fair. Is that the norm also & to be expected?
Old 01-05-2018, 11:30 AM
  #191  
mammoth713
Melting Slicks
 
mammoth713's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,049
Received 554 Likes on 277 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OntarioOrangeC3
I never stated my opinion as fact. That's all it is...my opinion, based on how things progressed. Just like other opinions expressed here. Could I be wrong? Yup. We'll never know unless the OP cared to tell us.

Good to know low balling is the norm. Thanks for the business lesson. How about being unreasonable/unrealistic (take your pick) when a good deal is staring at you in the face? You know, like offering $4000 under a price that's already fair. Is that the norm also & to be expected?
​​​​​
$4k off of a $66k transaction is only 6% discount.... Why do so many people in this thread think dealers are entitled to their sticker price and nothing less.. wtf?

With any purchase ... The price is listed. You can offer whatever you want. They may come down in price, they may not. If no one buys their product, the market may force them to ultimately lower their price. Capitalism 101

It's not insulting offering a 6% discount on a purchase... And especially not one that is a low volume used sports car during off season...

You can go into home Depot and ask for a discount on a damaged piece of wood.. they might give you a break or say tough ****. Then it's up to you to buy it or not. That simple.

For the guy to get attacked for proposing purchasing their car for 6% is far from being a "low ball"

Sounds to me like sales manager is an entitled dick
The following users liked this post:
NavyBlue2 (01-05-2018)
Old 01-05-2018, 11:50 AM
  #192  
LimeRay
Pro
 
LimeRay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Posts: 718
Received 353 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

OP, let it sit and see what they come back with. They know you are anxious and will use that against you.
Old 01-05-2018, 02:22 PM
  #193  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mammoth713
​​​​​
Why do so many people in this thread think dealers are entitled to their sticker price and nothing less.. wtf?
Because sometimes sticker is the final price or close. You don't negotiate on one of Kerbeck's, MacMulkin's, or Criswell's special sales prices, yet people pay those without question. If you do, they just tell you that's it, final price, and you won't get a call back.

Last edited by Foosh; 01-05-2018 at 02:22 PM.
Old 01-05-2018, 02:27 PM
  #194  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
If in fact he was as rude as you portrayed, there's no excuse for that. On the other hand, your offer was rather ridiculous, and basically a trade-in value price. Perhaps that's what he was trying to convey to you. They are entitled to a fair profit, and certainly aren't in business to lose money.
Wait did I miss something, the car was 66k and he offered 62k? How is that a ridiculous offer?
Old 01-05-2018, 02:30 PM
  #195  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thegame
Wait did I miss something, the car was 66k and he offered 62k? How is that a ridiculous offer?
Because it is $6-7K below market value, defined by recent comparable sales prices on identically equipped cars, on a vehicle already listed at 40% below original MSRP. I shouldn't have used the term "ridiculous" and said "low-ball" instead.

At any rate, it was refused . . . moot point, move along now, nothing more to see here.

Last edited by Foosh; 01-05-2018 at 02:34 PM.
Old 01-05-2018, 02:34 PM
  #196  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Because it is $6-7K below market value, on a car already listed at 40% below original MSRP. I shouldn't have used the term "ridiculous" and said "low-ball" instead.

At any rate, it was refused . . . moot point, move along now, nothing more to see here.
Vettes depreciate faster than they accelerate. Not exactly breaking news. None the less, I still say if the dealer is asking 66k offering 62k is far from lowballing. Unless he wrote 62k on a napkin, crumbled it and threw it in the sales guys face
Old 01-05-2018, 02:37 PM
  #197  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

You clearly missed the point. Comparable sales numbers matter, and he didn't get the car for $62K . . . end of story.

Get notified of new replies

To What a dreadful day at the dealership

Old 01-05-2018, 02:37 PM
  #198  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Because sometimes sticker is the final price or close. You don't negotiate on one of Kerbeck's, MacMulkin's, or Criswell's special sales prices, yet people pay those without question. If you do, they just tell you that's it, final price, and you won't get a call back.
I don't know about MacMulkin or Crisswell but I know with Kerbeck the cars are new. There is not much wiggle room on those new car deals. The car was used, there is room to negotiate on any used car. Dealer sounds like a bunch of turds.

Last edited by thegame; 01-05-2018 at 02:37 PM.
Old 01-05-2018, 02:38 PM
  #199  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
You clearly missed the point. Comparable sales numbers matter, and he didn't get the car for $62K . . . end of story.
No I totally get the point. Seems you just want to be argumentative and express the same lame point over and over. You don't work at a dealership do you? Agree to disagree, move along as you said.
Old 01-05-2018, 02:48 PM
  #200  
thill444
Le Mans Master
 
thill444's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: New England
Posts: 5,363
Received 4,100 Likes on 2,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thegame
I don't know about MacMulkin or Crisswell but I know with Kerbeck the cars are new. There is not much wiggle room on those new car deals. The car was used, there is room to negotiate on any used car. Dealer sounds like a bunch of turds.
The dealer felt the car was priced to sell at the listed price. And indeed it is. It is below market value. This isn't rocket science. Many used cars dealers to price their cars above market value and there is room to negotiate.

This simply is not one of those situations where the car was marked up high enough to negotiate right now.

Perhaps if it sits for awhile longer the dealer will drop the price, but it sure seems like they are at their bottomline.

Last edited by thill444; 01-05-2018 at 02:58 PM.


Quick Reply: What a dreadful day at the dealership



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.