C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Finally can reset OLM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2018, 12:11 AM
  #41  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Joe, you are the king of going down rabbit holes and started this entire ridiculous discussion. Changing oil is so freaking cheap and simple. Even you should be able to understand that, as well as that tilting at windmills is a fool's errand.

Last edited by Foosh; 03-14-2018 at 12:16 AM.
Old 03-14-2018, 12:12 AM
  #42  
Skid Row Joe
Team Owner
 
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 27,306
Received 4,000 Likes on 2,887 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
Foosh, GM can't use GMVIS to deny a warranty claim. No where does it state that you need to use a GM facility to get an oil change. In fact to require to do this would actually be illegal.
Common sense is a rare thing around here.

It's lunacy to think that oil changes need to be GMVISed.
Old 03-14-2018, 12:14 AM
  #43  
Steve_R
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Anger Island
Posts: 45,945
Received 3,289 Likes on 1,399 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

It appears we have a few preschoolers in this thread.
The following users liked this post:
Foosh (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 12:19 AM
  #44  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Yep, I'm done with trying to communicate with them. Internal ignore button is now permanently on.

He can't seem to figure out that neither I, nor anyone else ever said GMVIS is grounds for denying warranty claims and provided guidance for alternative means for complying with warranty guidance. It's just the easiest method for playing it safe. MAGA.

Last edited by Foosh; 03-14-2018 at 12:38 AM.
Old 03-14-2018, 12:23 AM
  #45  
owc6
Team Owner
 
owc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 24,550
Received 4,186 Likes on 2,679 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
I have no argument. That's what has become the folly of some here.

You might want to inspect/respond to my questions posed well beforehand. My questions were simple enough. What convoluted them were the rabbit holes some like Foosh chose to go off on. As well as the lady you just responded to.
Please rephrase them, Joe, because many of us have tried to answer them, but we are evidently talking across each other.

At this point, none of us understand what your real question is.

otherwise I'm done.
The following 3 users liked this post by owc6:
BRussell (03-14-2018), Foosh (03-14-2018), Steve_R (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 12:38 AM
  #46  
Skid Row Joe
Team Owner
 
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 27,306
Received 4,000 Likes on 2,887 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by owc6
Please rephrase them, Joe, because many of us have tried to answer them, but we are evidently talking across each other.

At this point, none of us understand what your real question is.

otherwise I'm done.
You and others responded to things I never even brought up.

I then restated the (2) focal points above.

Foosh engineered it into an oil free for all thread. Now, my GM factory warranty validity has been zeroed in on.

I'm afraid to start my car without the engine blowing up.
Old 03-14-2018, 12:40 AM
  #47  
owc6
Team Owner
 
owc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 24,550
Received 4,186 Likes on 2,679 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
You and others responded to things I never even brought up.

I then restated the (2) focal points above.

Foosh engineered it into an oil free for all thread. Now, my GM factory warranty validity has been zeroed in on.

I'm afraid to start my car without the engine blowing up.
Ok, then what exactly is your question?
The following users liked this post:
Foosh (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 01:15 AM
  #48  
Skid Row Joe
Team Owner
 
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 27,306
Received 4,000 Likes on 2,887 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
Still must have a default to zero based on time, if after 1-year. Suppose you've driven it zero miles. It'd be a no-brainer that the oil and filter are still new. So, why would it be necessary to do so?


Guess I'm not understanding completely. If the system times out miles left to change in 1-year time anyway, it won't matter how many miles you've driven. The call will be to change oil/filter after 1-year, even if your new oil and filter isn't driven even one mile. Right?

Explain how GM is going to prove whether or not the oil/filter was changed? Esp. when resetting the OLM has nothing to do with changing the oil & filter?........
ow6,

Right about here ^^^^ is where Foosh and one other went off the rails.

So, now, Foosh has decided that GM will void my factory warranty.

My C7 is less than 4-months old, and has 905 miles on it.
Old 03-14-2018, 01:34 AM
  #49  
owc6
Team Owner
 
owc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 24,550
Received 4,186 Likes on 2,679 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
ow6,

Right about here ^^^^ is where Foosh and one other went off the rails.

So, now, Foosh has decided that GM will void my factory warranty.

My C7 is less than 4-months old, and has 905 miles on it.
I tried to go back to the post you referenced to answer each "question" and it was greatly edited.

At this point you should just enjoy your Vette, follow the OLM and not worry.
The following users liked this post:
Steve_R (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 07:29 AM
  #50  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 921 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Right we agree, and all I said all along. Now that wasn't so hard was it?

I'm well aware of cases on many vehicles where people have never changed the oil, and after 50K miles, the engines still haven't blown up. It's only when they do on rare occasion that the problems begin for those who haven't been smart.
We agree on that point, not in the way you communicate it. A subtle, but important difference.
Old 03-14-2018, 07:30 AM
  #51  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 921 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Steve_R
It appears we have a few preschoolers in this thread.
Naw, just sticklers for language, communication, and engineering.

As an engineer I take offense to non-data driven fear.
Old 03-14-2018, 07:46 AM
  #52  
Patman
Race Director
 
Patman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 15,069
Received 1,919 Likes on 1,191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe

I'm afraid to start my car without the engine blowing up.
Considering the fact that you admitted to running 87 octane in it, you should be afraid
Old 03-14-2018, 07:56 AM
  #53  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
We agree on that point, not in the way you communicate it. A subtle, but important difference.
And we agree on that point as well.

I didn't care for the way you communicated it, in light of the fact that following the guidance is so cheap and simple. You can legitimately question GM's guidance as a knowledgeable engineer, but until it's changed, that's an exercise in futility. Most importantly, it just confuses those who are already confused even further, which is a not so subtle and important difference.

Last edited by Foosh; 03-14-2018 at 08:03 AM.
Old 03-14-2018, 08:30 AM
  #54  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 921 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patman
Considering the fact that you admitted to running 87 octane in it, you should be afraid
Why?

Premium is recommended, not required for the LT1 (and I think even the LT4).
Old 03-14-2018, 08:32 AM
  #55  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 921 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
And we agree on that point as well.

I didn't care for the way you communicated it, in light of the fact that following the guidance is so cheap and simple. You can legitimately question GM's guidance as a knowledgeable engineer, but until it's changed, that's an exercise in futility. Most importantly, it just confuses those who are already confused even further, which is a not so subtle and important difference.
That may be true, but I think those who are looking to circumvent or understand the OLM don't fall into that supremely confused category. They know what they are doing, and are trying to understand what the car is doing (because it doesn't make sense to them, until they understand what the time component is).
Old 03-14-2018, 10:07 AM
  #56  
Patman
Race Director
 
Patman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 15,069
Received 1,919 Likes on 1,191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
Why?

Premium is recommended, not required for the LT1 (and I think even the LT4).

Try running 87 octane on a 100 degree day and going full throttle. The sounds your engine makes will make you cringe. The computer won't be able to take out enough timing to keep it from pinging.

And most definitely you'll destroy and LT4 almost right away, as they even say not to run less than 91.
Old 03-14-2018, 10:12 AM
  #57  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 921 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patman
Try running 87 octane on a 100 degree day and going full throttle. The sounds your engine makes will make you cringe. The computer won't be able to take out enough timing to keep it from pinging.

And most definitely you'll destroy and LT4 almost right away, as they even say not to run less than 91.
OK so the LT4 is premium, but not the LT1.

Here in Michigan 100 degree days are not a problem. Most people run cars which recommend premium with regular. I personally don't, but there is nothing wrong with it.

Get notified of new replies

To Finally can reset OLM

Old 03-14-2018, 10:32 AM
  #58  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

That recommendation has changed. The 18 owner's manual now clearly says 87 is not recommended.
Old 03-14-2018, 11:47 AM
  #59  
TEXHAWK0
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
TEXHAWK0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Longview Texas
Posts: 8,847
Received 787 Likes on 539 Posts

Default

I posted the most simple post of all time, and it just won't die.

Note, I changed the oil before I let it go to zero.

Last edited by TEXHAWK0; 03-14-2018 at 11:50 AM.
The following users liked this post:
WKM (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 12:02 PM
  #60  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 921 Likes on 614 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
That recommendation has changed. The 18 owner's manual now clearly says 87 is not recommended.
Wonder why? Did they move it to 89?

That like the oil change strikes me as GM doing a slipshod engineering job on the initial C7 development. An extended warranty is looking more like a must have than a want.


Quick Reply: Finally can reset OLM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM.