C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why I am happy I never lowered my C7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2018, 03:10 PM
  #41  
Avanti
Race Director
 
Avanti's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Bonneville Salt Flats, 223mph Aug. '04
Posts: 17,418
Received 5,213 Likes on 3,457 Posts

Default

Yeah, who would possibly want their tires centered in the wheel-well?
Old 08-14-2018, 03:16 PM
  #42  
Steve_R
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Anger Island
Posts: 45,945
Received 3,289 Likes on 1,399 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
It's purely a looks thing.
It was for me. I don't, and won't, track mine like I did my C6 because my C7 is a vert. I didn't like the huge gaps between the tires and fenders so I lowered it over 4 years ago. I don't care if anybody else likes it or not, or thinks it was "asinine" (to quote a previous response) since I own it and it affects nobody else.



The following users liked this post:
dsword (08-15-2018)
Old 08-14-2018, 03:21 PM
  #43  
GroverDill
Advanced

 
GroverDill's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Rathdrum ID
Posts: 82
Received 52 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

https://www.benzworld.org/forums/w21...ml#post4787232
Old 08-14-2018, 03:24 PM
  #44  
Steve_R
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Anger Island
Posts: 45,945
Received 3,289 Likes on 1,399 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

OK, some guy in a Mercedes hit a manhole over 7 years ago.

How is that even remotely related to this discussion?


Old 08-14-2018, 03:26 PM
  #45  
GroverDill
Advanced

 
GroverDill's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Rathdrum ID
Posts: 82
Received 52 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Just thought the picture was kinda funny

Old 08-14-2018, 03:46 PM
  #46  
robert miller
Team Owner
 
robert miller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes on 1,529 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Steve_R
I lowered my ‘14 all the way on the stock bolts when I bought it over 4 years ago. It’s my daily driver. I’ve never wished I hadn’t. To each their own.
Old 08-14-2018, 04:03 PM
  #47  
Parcival
Drifting
 
Parcival's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: San Francisco Ca
Posts: 1,498
Received 405 Likes on 296 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve_R
It was for me. I don't, and won't, track mine like I did my C6 because my C7 is a vert. I didn't like the huge gaps between the tires and fenders so I lowered it over 4 years ago. I don't care if anybody else likes it or not, or thinks it was "asinine" (to quote a previous response) since I own it and it affects nobody else.

hear ya, I Was judgmental with “asinine” but I applaud your ability to modify your property as u see fit!

Only U have to live with it, or else decide that something u liked the look of once needs to be reversed one day, like getting a prominent tattoo of “Mama’s Boy” or the name of the first girl u lost your virginity to, etc.

Last edited by Parcival; 08-14-2018 at 04:06 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Steve_R (08-14-2018)
Old 08-14-2018, 07:23 PM
  #48  
vetten76
Drifting
 
vetten76's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego CA.
Posts: 1,362
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

After living with a lowered C6 for 5 years and replacing 6 splitters, I ain’t gonna lower my 19 GS. I can finally drive around without scraping. I’m loving the stock front end of my car. Seldom touch.
The following users liked this post:
Parcival (08-15-2018)
Old 08-14-2018, 08:22 PM
  #49  
Zjoe6
Moderator
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Zjoe6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: SE WI
Posts: 10,585
Received 3,938 Likes on 2,425 Posts
Default

I used to scrape my 2004 z06 air dam all the time. Stock height. 2019 Grand Sport not once. Like it.

Last edited by Zjoe6; 08-14-2018 at 08:22 PM.
Old 08-15-2018, 11:47 AM
  #50  
RUU
Melting Slicks
 
RUU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 2,187
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Steve_R
OK, some guy in a Mercedes hit a manhole over 7 years ago.

How is that even remotely related to this discussion?
I think it's amazingly the exact same section of road would need resurfacing after only 7 years. And that that manhole doesn't look like it's aged a day in that time!
The following users liked this post:
GroverDill (08-15-2018)
Old 08-15-2018, 01:11 PM
  #51  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by owc6

FWIW, I have yet to hear why they are coming out of the factory with over an inch difference between one extreme and the other.
The explanation I have heard that makes some sense is the factory doesn't want the car damaged (getting it ON and OFF the truck) during transportation to a dealer.
I can see it from that perspective.

Reasons to lower the C7:
1) Aesthetics --- Sportscars should look sporty for the road, not for off-roading.
2) Lowering the center of gravity for better handling/aero performance.

Notice how low the C7.R (and its competitors) rides:
Old 08-15-2018, 01:14 PM
  #52  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Using the GTLM or other race cars as an example of why lowering is beneficial is faulty logic. Race car suspensions have been specifically set up with the appropriate suspension components to run at that height, and they are often set up specifically to work best on a particular circuit, based upon practice and pre-race testing on that circuit. They're also not dealing with potholes and broken pavement.

Street C7s have not, which is why a recommended ride height is published that allows the suspension to work best at it's full potential.

Last edited by Foosh; 08-15-2018 at 01:24 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Foosh:
ImpliedConsent (08-20-2018), Parcival (08-15-2018)
Old 08-15-2018, 01:30 PM
  #53  
fatsport
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
fatsport's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Fl
Posts: 2,412
Received 894 Likes on 538 Posts
Default



Perfect height imo, advertised on Chevy's website
Originally Posted by Foosh
Factory ride height specs are below. Measurements are taken from the ground vertically right over the wheel center to the center point of the fender lip. For proper suspension performance it should be within these specs.

Those specs are a joke. I'd bet the rear is right at 28"
Old 08-15-2018, 01:31 PM
  #54  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
Using the GTLM or other race cars as an example of why lowering is beneficial is faulty logic. Race car suspensions have been specifically set up with the appropriate suspension components to run at that height, and they are often set up specifically to work best on a particular circuit, based upon practice and pre-race testing on that circuit. They're also not dealing with potholes and broken pavement.

Street C7s have not, which is why a recommended ride height is published that allows the suspension to work best at it's full potential.
Your assumption that the negative effects on suspension geometry/travel (if any- I'm not even sure there are any) offsets benefits of lower CG (and to a lesser extent, aero) are just as baseless as assertions that the lower CG/aero overcomes negative impact on geometry/travel (again, if any).
At least lowering CG by an inch and having the splitter lower to the ground is actually known to have positive effects. Other than pure hunch, there is nothing to say the suspension geometry is negatively impacted. I'm not saying it is or isn't, but unless you actually have some sort of data, evidence, calculation, etc that lowering hurts handling, you're literally just making stuff up.
The following users liked this post:
Steve_R (08-15-2018)
Old 08-15-2018, 01:32 PM
  #55  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fatsport


Perfect height imo, advertised on Chevy's website



Those specs are a joke. I'd bet the rear is right at 28"
:yup:

I'm willing to bet that thing is not the spec height
The following users liked this post:
fatsport (08-15-2018)
Old 08-15-2018, 01:33 PM
  #56  
PatternDayTrader
Race Director
 
PatternDayTrader's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Lansing MI
Posts: 17,982
Received 1,056 Likes on 769 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fatsport
Those specs are a joke. I'd bet the rear is right at 28"
If you want to look a certain way then lower it, but if you want max performance then you better not forfeit that first inch or so of suspension travel.
Old 08-15-2018, 01:34 PM
  #57  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PatternDayTrader
If you want to look a certain way then lower it, but if you want max performance then you better not forfeit that first inch or so of suspension travel.
Unless you're maxing out suspension travel, it shouldn't be an issue.

Get notified of new replies

To Why I am happy I never lowered my C7

Old 08-15-2018, 01:35 PM
  #58  
PatternDayTrader
Race Director
 
PatternDayTrader's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Lansing MI
Posts: 17,982
Received 1,056 Likes on 769 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by village idiot
Your assumption that the negative effects on suspension geometry/travel (if any- I'm not even sure there are any) offsets benefits of lower CG (and to a lesser extent, aero) are just as baseless as assertions that the lower CG/aero overcomes negative impact on geometry/travel (again, if any).
At least lowering CG by an inch and having the splitter lower to the ground is actually known to have positive effects. Other than pure hunch, there is nothing to say the suspension geometry is negatively impacted. I'm not saying it is or isn't, but unless you actually have some sort of data, evidence, calculation, etc that lowering hurts handling, you're literally just making stuff up.
If that's you in your avatar, then you should know damn well how important the first inch of suspension travel is.
Old 08-15-2018, 01:36 PM
  #59  
PatternDayTrader
Race Director
 
PatternDayTrader's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Lansing MI
Posts: 17,982
Received 1,056 Likes on 769 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by village idiot
Unless you're maxing out suspension travel, it shouldn't be an issue.
Oh give me a break.
Lowering the car means you sit on a stiffer damping curve right from he start.

Last edited by PatternDayTrader; 08-15-2018 at 01:36 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Parcival (08-15-2018)
Old 08-15-2018, 01:49 PM
  #60  
fatsport
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
fatsport's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Fl
Posts: 2,412
Received 894 Likes on 538 Posts
Default

Do as I say, not as I advertise
How did they get it this low?


Chevy's website. Way too low.

Last edited by fatsport; 08-15-2018 at 01:50 PM. Reason: spelling
The following users liked this post:
dsword (08-15-2018)


Quick Reply: Why I am happy I never lowered my C7



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.