C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Noise reduction / stereo upgrade project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2019, 07:10 AM
  #21  
ZO6 cracker
Drifting
 
ZO6 cracker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Location: Orwigsburg Pa
Posts: 1,894
Received 693 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Matthewstorm
Did you have to disable your noise cancelling mic?
So far everything I read up on especially this seems to give you a problem with the audio system. The C7 seems like it will be a challenge to upgrade the whole system. I had my C5 Z06 done which I sold to get my C7 Z06. My C5 had sound deadening done. Which I plan on having the crazy cowboy insulation kit done to my C7. I have a friend who I been dealing with for years doing all my installs on my cars. I will be chatting with him to see what options I can do with a system in my C7. I do have the 1LZ so it is the 9 speaker system I believe. But I only got the car. It is stored for the winter. Only has 50 miles on it. I want to drive it first and get some miles on it. I may chose just to have my installer do the sound deadening kit. Or just wait if i’m going to upgrade the sound system.
Old 01-13-2019, 07:21 AM
  #22  
2016C7.paul
Racer
 
2016C7.paul's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 254
Received 91 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snampro
1. I went with the 10 inch Pioneers after considering others. I even orders some JL 10s and found they were too small. The Pioneer 10s, like the 8, lined up perfectly. The shallow JL 10s were significantly more expensive, which honestly wasn't a problem, but again, the speakers were too small and the mount holes did not line up. I didn't try all the ones you listed. If you do, make sure to let everyone know the outcome.

2. The larger size of the Pioneer is why it fits, others did not line up and would require fab. I considered several different 10s and even ordered a set of JLs, but I found that only the Pioneer 10s har mounting holes that fit the car and did not require an adapter. The JL shallow 10s were considerably more expensive, which I didn't really care about, but again, they did not line up with the stock mounting holes.

2. The larger size of the Pioneer 10s is why it fit in the car. Others were too small and would require fab work I didn't want to deal with on principle. I wanted this to look as stock as possible, just sound better.

3. I actually just ordered the JL coaxial 3.5 inchers first, and when they fit, just went with them.
OK, I'm sold on the Pioneers. I'm not willing to play the guessing game on sizing on the others. The reviews are solid and the price is right. If they don't work out, or they get blown out, they won't be expensive to replace.

I'm also sold on the JL 3.5s. Solid reviews.

Last question before I start ordering some shiznit...how did you arrive at the Kilmat's vs Dynamat or Noico? Dynamat seems to have a rep for being overpriced. I read a couple reviews saying beware Kilmat smell in hot weather (butyl), but Dynamat is made of the same stuff. Did you come across Noico in your research?
Old 01-13-2019, 07:39 AM
  #23  
wlittle49
Racer
 
wlittle49's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Location: Chiggerbranch, MS
Posts: 329
Received 101 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

I did the extreme sound deadening on my C7 and could not tell a bit of difference before and after.
The following users liked this post:
JMKarian (11-13-2019)
Old 01-13-2019, 08:09 AM
  #24  
snampro
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
snampro's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Posts: 751
Received 367 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2016C7.paul
OK, I'm sold on the Pioneers. I'm not willing to play the guessing game on sizing on the others. The reviews are solid and the price is right. If they don't work out, or they get blown out, they won't be expensive to replace.

I'm also sold on the JL 3.5s. Solid reviews.

Last question before I start ordering some shiznit...how did you arrive at the Kilmat's vs Dynamat or Noico? Dynamat seems to have a rep for being overpriced. I read a couple reviews saying beware Kilmat smell in hot weather (butyl), but Dynamat is made of the same stuff. Did you come across Noico in your research?
I think the measurand was "value", meaning performance for cost. The Kilmat had great reviews and was significantly cheaper. Once I ordered it and it arrived, I was satisfied with the quality and just stuck with it. I went with 80 versus 50 mil just on judgement, wanting to maximize the result.

I'll post more details about how I wired in the speakers and more small details when I get a chance.
The following users liked this post:
2016C7.paul (01-13-2019)
Old 01-13-2019, 11:23 AM
  #25  
jamiejam1
Intermediate
 
jamiejam1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2019
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 39
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

So Im planning the Upgrade on my C7 As well... ( I own a shop in South Fl) what Ive found thusfar is that the Midrange in the door is a 4 Ohm Load driver and the 10" door sub is a 1 Ohm Load but that the sub is passively crossed over with the tweeter ( If the graphic wiring breakdown is accurate This now makes me wonder what the impedience is on the tweeter.. If its 4 ohm then the Impedience will be about 2.5 in parallel. so those mid-subs are definitely Out! At this point I have gotten the NAV TV gm 650 Integration ( Im a Nav TV Dealer) Im going to swap the 1" tweeter in the dash and the Midranges with ARC Audio RS1 and RS3's Im still working on the door subs now. Currently the amp Plans are the Arc Audio X2 1100.5 (2 of them ) and the PS8 Digital processor 31 band EQ with phase and time alignment. Once I have a plan of attack in the doors Its game on. for Install Im keeping it simple all amps on the floor then build a panel that fill flush the amps up to the Hump. sub placement will be rather simple. Single 8" arc sub in a box firing 45 degrees utilizing the little storage unit as part of the box eliminating the need to make a bulky box sitting in the corner...
Input and thoughts are appreciated...

Last edited by jamiejam1; 01-13-2019 at 12:15 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by jamiejam1:
2016C7.paul (01-13-2019), JMII (01-14-2019)
Old 01-13-2019, 07:00 PM
  #26  
2016C7.paul
Racer
 
2016C7.paul's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 254
Received 91 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamiejam1
So Im planning the Upgrade on my C7 As well... ( I own a shop in South Fl) what Ive found thusfar is that the Midrange in the door is a 4 Ohm Load driver and the 10" door sub is a 1 Ohm Load but that the sub is passively crossed over with the tweeter ( If the graphic wiring breakdown is accurate This now makes me wonder what the impedience is on the tweeter.. If its 4 ohm then the Impedience will be about 2.5 in parallel. so those mid-subs are definitely Out! =.
Jamie, what do you think of OP's speaker selection? ( PIONEER TS-SW2502S4 and JL Audio C2-350x)
Old 01-13-2019, 07:28 PM
  #27  
2016C7.paul
Racer
 
2016C7.paul's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 254
Received 91 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Here is the NAV TV gm 650 Jamie referenced in #25
Looks like a nice product but not cheap at $849

Old 01-14-2019, 08:31 AM
  #28  
JMII
Safety Car
 
JMII's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: Margate, FL
Posts: 4,303
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,349 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamiejam1
I own a shop in South Fl) what Ive found thusfar is that the Midrange in the door is a 4 Ohm Load driver and the 10" door sub is a 1 Ohm Load but that the sub is passively crossed over with the tweeter
Someone posted a picture showing the mid range was 3.2 ohms. If the tweeter and woofer are wired together (as the diagram shows) due to the resistance being at different frequencies the overall ohm load might not change. In theory it would be a like a passive crossover component set and present the amp with a single, uniform load. Based on research from others apparently the woofer has no low pass, it runs full range (ugh) and only the tweeter has a high pass. If you could double check this info that would be great.

I plan on using the stock speakers except for the worthless 8" sub unless the door woofer is really 1 ohm. I believe with a decent amp and DSP processing (going JBL MS-8) the stock speakers could made to play much better. While the stock speakers are junk the poor (or no) crossovers, under powered amp and terrible Bose processing is holding them back. I think a lot can be gained just adding a decent DSP tune. With 10" door woofers, 3.5" door mids and a 3.5" center the sound stage should be excellent in this car. The tweeter placement is less then ideal and my frequency sweeps show it rolls off a bit too soon but it sure looks like you could fit just about any aftermarket tweeter in there given the large grille but I haven't seen what's behind it.

Old 01-14-2019, 09:45 AM
  #29  
ersatz928
Melting Slicks
 
ersatz928's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,498
Received 714 Likes on 457 Posts

Default


Passive cap cross-over on the tweeter (yellow part mounted to back of tweeter), no passive crossover inductor for the door woofer.

Last edited by ersatz928; 01-14-2019 at 09:46 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by ersatz928:
jamiejam1 (01-14-2019), JMII (01-14-2019)
Old 01-14-2019, 11:16 AM
  #30  
jamiejam1
Intermediate
 
jamiejam1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2019
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 39
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ersatz928

Passive cap cross-over on the tweeter (yellow part mounted to back of tweeter), no passive crossover inductor for the door woofer.
4 ohm tweeter with the 1 ohm mid sub can only mean they set this up in parallel which would put it at between 2.5 to 3 ohm load, which would then be consistent with the 3'ish ohm midrange... It also means that it (The sub) as some call it, is actually a very low Frequency playing "MID"Bass basically running at full range 60Hz to Maybe 300-400 hz. ( I may disconnect my midrange and run only the 10 and tweeter throw it on the Audio Control RTA with Pink Noise and see what frequencies are actually playin)g..... but limited to its own playable frequency response. This in itself could actually Play in as a benefit to anyone who wants to add a simple amp with high level inputs. Grabbing them at the Bose amp out, into the new sony 6 channel amp with the built in DSP @ High Level Input, you could swap out all the speakers Put in a simple 3 way setup like the new Sony 3 way system reduce the 10 in the door to a 6 1/2 with a plate, add a simple sub at the rear and call it a day.. ( Keeping in mind this is a Lower budget type of setup that eliminates things like the clean sweep, bit one, PS8 type of processors that run 600-1000 each... The worst part of it is having to run a 9 wire to each side of the car into the front stage... Audiophiles and SQ guys NEVER run rear fill speakers, cause your sound stage is always at the front....for the more budget minded this may be an option... as an SQ competitor, Im naturally going full mote on this so it should be interesting.. Love this thread cause we are getting down to the nitty gritty of this.....
Old 01-14-2019, 11:24 AM
  #31  
jamiejam1
Intermediate
 
jamiejam1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2019
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 39
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2016C7.paul
Jamie, what do you think of OP's speaker selection? ( PIONEER TS-SW2502S4 and JL Audio C2-350x)
Well I do carry Pioneer as a brand, and JL corporate, is in my back yard. That being said I think the choice of JL is a good one, the Pioneer leaves me with only one concern. The flat sub is exactly that, A subwoofer. I think that if this 10" is not capable of playing the higher mid bass frequencies there me be a hole in the frequency responses between 80 or 100 Hz up to 400 hz which is your standard snare taps going up to the low depth of the vocal frequencies.. Since the OP has already installed these I would defer that question to him for an accurate answer... As it was stated in a previous reply, apparently the 10 and tweeter are running in parallel with each other, so that mean the channel was designated as a full range mid bass with ultra low capabilities... OP? Insight?
Old 01-14-2019, 11:30 AM
  #32  
jamiejam1
Intermediate
 
jamiejam1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2019
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 39
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2016C7.paul
Here is the NAV TV gm 650 Jamie referenced in #25
Looks like a nice product but not cheap at $849

As a NAV TV Dealer I can call and see if I can work it out with NAV TV to see if I can sell it for under map and then help the forum members out....
The following users liked this post:
NortonCO (02-01-2021)
Old 01-14-2019, 11:47 AM
  #33  
pdiddy972
Race Director
 
pdiddy972's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 14,418
Received 532 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Kickass thread - *subscribed*
Old 01-14-2019, 12:40 PM
  #34  
JMII
Safety Car
 
JMII's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: Margate, FL
Posts: 4,303
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,349 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamiejam1
I may disconnect my midrange and run only the 10 and tweeter throw it on the Audio Control RTA with Pink Noise and see what frequencies are actually playin)g..... but limited to its own playable frequency response.

Audiophiles and SQ guys NEVER run rear fill speakers, cause your sound stage is always at the front
Please do!!! I'd love to know what is actually going on with this crazy system. 4 ohm tweeter plus 3.2 ohm mid plus 1 ohm woofer? The more I learn about Bose the more I hate them

Yep all front sound stage for me

And you do NOT want to grab the high level off the Bose amp, its got all kinds of volume based EQ non-sense going on. You could, but only IF you used the DSP's volume control to get around this.

Old 01-14-2019, 12:54 PM
  #35  
ZO6 cracker
Drifting
 
ZO6 cracker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Location: Orwigsburg Pa
Posts: 1,894
Received 693 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jamiejam1
Well I do carry Pioneer as a brand, and JL corporate, is in my back yard. That being said I think the choice of JL is a good one, the Pioneer leaves me with only one concern. The flat sub is exactly that, A subwoofer. I think that if this 10" is not capable of playing the higher mid bass frequencies there me be a hole in the frequency responses between 80 or 100 Hz up to 400 hz which is your standard snare taps going up to the low depth of the vocal frequencies.. Since the OP has already installed these I would defer that question to him for an accurate answer... As it was stated in a previous reply, apparently the 10 and tweeter are running in parallel with each other, so that mean the channel was designated as a full range mid bass with ultra low capabilities... OP? Insight?
So by connecting the MG650 to the headunit this will allow you to bypass the Bose amp and add your own speakers and amp and not have to worry about the noise cancellation?
Old 01-14-2019, 12:57 PM
  #36  
Jaykoh-Z51
Drifting
 
Jaykoh-Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 376 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Old 01-14-2019, 01:47 PM
  #37  
Jaykoh-Z51
Drifting
 
Jaykoh-Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 376 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Loving this thread too...

I may start by just swapping the 8" sub...then I'd like to add an amp and separate volume control to that. This may be enough for me...but, we know how THAT goes with our rides.

Get notified of new replies

To Noise reduction / stereo upgrade project

Old 01-14-2019, 01:51 PM
  #38  
Jaykoh-Z51
Drifting
 
Jaykoh-Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 376 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Snampro, how long and involved was it with removing just the 8" sub?

Saaaaay...for someone who really hasn't done that kind of tear down before. And I'll definitely order those tools you mentioned.
Old 01-14-2019, 02:10 PM
  #39  
Woodson
Le Mans Master
 
Woodson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 5,688
Received 1,364 Likes on 789 Posts

Default

Awesome write-up, much appreciated. I am going to do the sub and Kilmat as a first step. Order placed today; will post when I get around to doing the work.
Old 01-14-2019, 04:21 PM
  #40  
snampro
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
snampro's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Posts: 751
Received 367 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JeepSRT+C7
Snampro, how long and involved was it with removing just the 8" sub?

Saaaaay...for someone who really hasn't done that kind of tear down before. And I'll definitely order those tools you mentioned.
With the plastic tools, I think you could do the 8" sub in an hour. I took the carpet out of the back then took off the rear plastic panel covering the 8" sub, but I think I could take the plastic panel off without removing the carpet. I'm going to take that apart again this week to play with the 8 inch sub box and to chase the last remaining vibration in the trunk, so I'll try just removing the plastic panel. The 8 inch sub comes out easy, and the box comes off easy, too. Just take your time removing panels. Look through the threads in the how-to section of the C7 Tech forum to at least inform you of where all the clips are located, then you know exactly where to pry and pull.

When I take it out I'll take more pictures and post them here.


Quick Reply: Noise reduction / stereo upgrade project



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.