Anybody remove rubber dam / three sections bottom of front of car and if so, why?
#1
Anybody remove rubber dam / three sections bottom of front of car and if so, why?
I notice that the air dams, three pieces that are located on the bottom of the car in front tear, get messedup easily. I have the two of the outer sides ripped. I was thinking of removing these three pieces. Anybody done this? Also, would it keep tranny cooler due to better air flow? Ger.
#2
Pro
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: New Orleans LA
Posts: 696
Received 191 Likes
on
116 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15-'16
I notice that the air dams, three pieces that are located on the bottom of the car in front tear, get messedup easily. I have the two of the outer sides ripped. I was thinking of removing these three pieces. Anybody done this? Also, would it keep tranny cooler due to better air flow? Ger.
JV
#3
Sr.Random input generator
#4
Go Canes!
I removed them on my C6 because they were in the way of the splitter I installed. I like them on my c7 because to me the are a wairning of when I will ground out.
Z51's only have them on the sides, not in the middle.
Z51's only have them on the sides, not in the middle.
#5
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,085
Received 8,926 Likes
on
5,332 Posts
The Z06 doesn't come with the center section. Removing the side pieces doesn't help with transmission cooling. I imagine removing the center section on your Stingray may not help either. If it was that simple to resolve temperature problems GM would do that in a heart beat. Why would they spend money putting a part in place if it wasn't required. You do have to be careful about making changes to cars because you think you know more than the engineers that designed the cars. They had to justify the cost of the parts being purchased and installed.
Bill
Bill
#8
Moderator/Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida BWO Dayton, Cincinnati, Bloomsbury NJ, Cincinnati
Posts: 18,225
Received 3,819 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
2015 C7 of the Year Finalist
Took them off my C6 and I took them off the C7. Unless you run 150 MPH every day during your driving, as they are designed for high speed functionality, they really don't help that much. I like the look with them off.
Elmer
Elmer
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
#11
Le Mans Master
why are they there on base cars and not performance models if they're for cooling?
#12
Moderator/Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida BWO Dayton, Cincinnati, Bloomsbury NJ, Cincinnati
Posts: 18,225
Received 3,819 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
2015 C7 of the Year Finalist
#14
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,223
Received 1,694 Likes
on
1,240 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
I took mine off because I couldn't stand the scraping. It's a cleaner look too.
The following users liked this post:
white90conv (01-03-2017)
#15
Le Mans Master
Did it on my C6's too -- never a cooling issue, even here in the desert southwest. I didn't like the goofy "rubber mudflap" look in front of the front tires and they scraped on every single entrance-- annoying on a daily driver.
#16
Safety Car
Not positive but I can tell you I did an LT1 swap in my 1984 C4 and removed them only to find the car would over heat on the highway. At first this made no sense to me I could drive at low speeds all day in tragic at 190deg no problem but sure enough 15 miles at 60 plus the car would creep up to 230 and overheat.
After discussing with a couple of people we decided perhaps the shields were there to disturb airflow at speed and stop a venturee affect at highway speed not allowing air to pass over the radiator.
Now keep in mind the C7 actually has a grill and does not only take air from under the car so not really the same situation just food for thought.
After discussing with a couple of people we decided perhaps the shields were there to disturb airflow at speed and stop a venturee affect at highway speed not allowing air to pass over the radiator.
Now keep in mind the C7 actually has a grill and does not only take air from under the car so not really the same situation just food for thought.
Last edited by FD2BLK; 12-20-2016 at 11:18 PM.
#17
Moderator/Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida BWO Dayton, Cincinnati, Bloomsbury NJ, Cincinnati
Posts: 18,225
Received 3,819 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
2015 C7 of the Year Finalist
Not positive but I can tell you I did an LT1 swap in my 1984 C4 and removed them only to find the car would over heat on the highway. At first this made no sense to me I could drive at low speeds all day in tragic at 190deg no problem but sure enough 15 miles at 60 plus the car would creep up to 230 and overheat.
After discussing with a couple of people we decided perhaps the shields were there to disturb airflow at speed and stop a venturee affect at highway speed not allowing air to pass over the radiator.
Now keep in mind the C7 actually has a grill and does not only take air from under the car so not really the same situation just food for thought.
After discussing with a couple of people we decided perhaps the shields were there to disturb airflow at speed and stop a venturee affect at highway speed not allowing air to pass over the radiator.
Now keep in mind the C7 actually has a grill and does not only take air from under the car so not really the same situation just food for thought.
Bottom breathers need the flap. The C7 is not a bottom breather, nor was the C6.
Elmer
Last edited by eboggs_jkvl; 12-21-2016 at 09:28 AM.
#19
Moderator/Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida BWO Dayton, Cincinnati, Bloomsbury NJ, Cincinnati
Posts: 18,225
Received 3,819 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
2015 C7 of the Year Finalist