Reduced Engine Power warning at track
#21
The tune in the VE table running out too lean on the top end. Also one of the other tables other than in the VE will do the same thing on the power being dropped. I am no tuner at all but have had my problems in the c5 with diff tuners that said they were a tuner.
I also know the c7 is a big diff's in the tuning with the computers in this car plus the DI inj on them.
I also know the c7 is a big diff's in the tuning with the computers in this car plus the DI inj on them.
#22
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
If you have a full stock car yes 100% I would take it back 10 times are until they got it correct by what they are telling us what the car will do. Robert
#23
Same issue yesterday
I had the same issue yesterday in my 2017 z06 with m7. Bone stock except a Bms drop in air filter. Car has 1485 miles on it.
I wish i was on the track when I had a problem. I was in "Mexico" on a tollway. trooper was hiding under a bridge; I cruised up at 90 mph. He of course tried to pull me over. I started rowing the gear when I hit 165 mph my car said reduced power. I kept hammering it for another mile or so it wouldn't go over 156 mph. Then trooper #2 entered. Luckily the first trooper was a 1/2 mile back. Trooper #2 had some else pulled over I took the exit 300 ft in front of him. Tested brakes out! Continued rowing the gears and got away but wtf. I spent $70k on this car and I barely got away with no boost.
i called on star when I was clear they said it was a misfire code.
I wish i was on the track when I had a problem. I was in "Mexico" on a tollway. trooper was hiding under a bridge; I cruised up at 90 mph. He of course tried to pull me over. I started rowing the gear when I hit 165 mph my car said reduced power. I kept hammering it for another mile or so it wouldn't go over 156 mph. Then trooper #2 entered. Luckily the first trooper was a 1/2 mile back. Trooper #2 had some else pulled over I took the exit 300 ft in front of him. Tested brakes out! Continued rowing the gears and got away but wtf. I spent $70k on this car and I barely got away with no boost.
i called on star when I was clear they said it was a misfire code.
Last edited by Glockaddict7; 06-23-2017 at 10:18 AM.
#24
I had the same issue yesterday in my 2017 z06 with m7. Bone stock except a Bms drop in air filter. Car has 1485 miles on it.
I wish i was on the track when I had a problem. I was in "Mexico" on a tollway. trooper was hiding under a bridge; I cruised up at 90 mph. He of course tried to pull me over. I started rowing the gear when I hit 165 mph my car said reduced power. I kept hammering it for another mile or so it wouldn't go over 156 mph. Then trooper #2 entered. Luckily the first trooper was a 1/2 mile back. Trooper #2 had some else pulled over I took the exit 300 ft in front of him. Tested brakes out! Continued rowing the gears and got away but wtf. I spent $70k on this car and I barely got away with no boost.
i called on star when I was clear they said it was a misfire code.
I wish i was on the track when I had a problem. I was in "Mexico" on a tollway. trooper was hiding under a bridge; I cruised up at 90 mph. He of course tried to pull me over. I started rowing the gear when I hit 165 mph my car said reduced power. I kept hammering it for another mile or so it wouldn't go over 156 mph. Then trooper #2 entered. Luckily the first trooper was a 1/2 mile back. Trooper #2 had some else pulled over I took the exit 300 ft in front of him. Tested brakes out! Continued rowing the gears and got away but wtf. I spent $70k on this car and I barely got away with no boost.
i called on star when I was clear they said it was a misfire code.
#26
No onstar didn't tell me crap; just some long intake system blah blah... misfire. yes there's quite a bit of stuff on my exhaust. Only the outside two tips they are black. The inside tips are pretty clean.
#27
ok. Well, between a few of us hopefully Chevy will solve the issue. I go to Service on Tuesday and they know i want them to call the Engineers in Pontiac Michigan before re-setting any codes.
#28
i am getting this right? Only 4 people on the forum have actually driven there 17 z06 to 170 mph? Are all 4 of us m7's?
#29
maybe 5? Another guy at Pocono on Wednesday had the exact same issue with his 2016 Automatic 3LZ. All his temps were fine. All i know is that i paid for a car capable of 195 mph or so and i wont stand for anything less. i will most likely never get it that fast but i dont want to worry about a stupid check engine light and reduced power mode on the track.
#30
maybe 5? Another guy at Pocono on Wednesday had the exact same issue with his 2016 Automatic 3LZ. All his temps were fine. All i know is that i paid for a car capable of 195 mph or so and i wont stand for anything less. i will most likely never get it that fast but i dont want to worry about a stupid check engine light and reduced power mode on the track.
#31
Pro
I've been having similar issue...
After only a few laps... not heat related... but under heavy load... hard road track acceleration, short shifting at @ 5,800 rpm.
When it first did this it didn't specify the MAP sp I thought it might be IC pump cavitation. Dealer drained and purged the IC reservoir of excess air. Took car back to track to test and this is what happened. Car is scheduled to go back to dealer Monday.
Many others have had similar issues. There are several GM TB's.
After only a few laps... not heat related... but under heavy load... hard road track acceleration, short shifting at @ 5,800 rpm.
When it first did this it didn't specify the MAP sp I thought it might be IC pump cavitation. Dealer drained and purged the IC reservoir of excess air. Took car back to track to test and this is what happened. Car is scheduled to go back to dealer Monday.
Many others have had similar issues. There are several GM TB's.
#32
Safety Car
I've been having similar issue...
After only a few laps... not heat related... but under heavy load... hard road track acceleration, short shifting at @ 5,800 rpm.
When it first did this it didn't specify the MAP sp I thought it might be IC pump cavitation. Dealer drained and purged the IC reservoir of excess air. Took car back to track to test and this is what happened. Car is scheduled to go back to dealer Monday.
Many others have had similar issues. There are several GM TB's.
After only a few laps... not heat related... but under heavy load... hard road track acceleration, short shifting at @ 5,800 rpm.
When it first did this it didn't specify the MAP sp I thought it might be IC pump cavitation. Dealer drained and purged the IC reservoir of excess air. Took car back to track to test and this is what happened. Car is scheduled to go back to dealer Monday.
Many others have had similar issues. There are several GM TB's.
#33
Pro
There is also an extensive thread from GSpeed where they determined there is a design flaw with the IC cooling system, causing the pump to cavitate and shut down entirely for 3 minutes at a time... when that happens the engine will throw a P0106 code and "Engine Power Reduced" but water temp and oil temps are fine and the code doesn't actually specify anything about MAP or other fault... just the code number.
My car is a 2017 Z07 A8 convertible. I have a friend who ran his 2015 Z06 A8 coupe at the track with me a couple weeks ago and he had same issues... he experiences high temps running in "D"... Reduced Power messages even when temps weren't excessive. He pushes his car harder than I do and his issues were much worse than mine (more frequent) but essentially similar.
Mark
#34
I've seen that one too... I don't believe my issue is related to broken valve spring either. There is a thread on the forum where another fellow had this issue and it tracked back to a broken connection related to the air cleaner system.
There is also an extensive thread from GSpeed where they determined there is a design flaw with the IC cooling system, causing the pump to cavitate and shut down entirely for 3 minutes at a time... when that happens the engine will throw a P0106 code and "Engine Power Reduced" but water temp and oil temps are fine and the code doesn't actually specify anything about MAP or other fault... just the code number.
My car is a 2017 Z07 A8 convertible. I have a friend who ran his 2015 Z06 A8 coupe at the track with me a couple weeks ago and he had same issues... he experiences high temps running in "D"... Reduced Power messages even when temps weren't excessive. He pushes his car harder than I do and his issues were much worse than mine (more frequent) but essentially similar.
Mark
There is also an extensive thread from GSpeed where they determined there is a design flaw with the IC cooling system, causing the pump to cavitate and shut down entirely for 3 minutes at a time... when that happens the engine will throw a P0106 code and "Engine Power Reduced" but water temp and oil temps are fine and the code doesn't actually specify anything about MAP or other fault... just the code number.
My car is a 2017 Z07 A8 convertible. I have a friend who ran his 2015 Z06 A8 coupe at the track with me a couple weeks ago and he had same issues... he experiences high temps running in "D"... Reduced Power messages even when temps weren't excessive. He pushes his car harder than I do and his issues were much worse than mine (more frequent) but essentially similar.
Mark
#35
Le Mans Master
Not worth much, but my guess is that since this happens at speed and not on dynos, it's because the mass of air being ingested by the MAF exceeds limits of what they expected, or what the MAF can actually meter.
Basically, it's an "assert", saying that "We'll never see more than X grams/sec of air or something must be wrong", and then you get the motor at peak torque with cool air plus ram air effect and it exceeds that anticipated limit, and the code is thrown.
I think this because I remember having to fix a bug in my C4LT1 computer. There was an assert that said "Wheel speed sensor will only increase at rate of X" but my car was eventually faster than that, so it threw a code and wouldn't upshift.
The problem with this theory is that cars that have been modified would be taking in even MORE air, if they're making much more power, so they should hit that too, but don't seem to.
Basically, it's an "assert", saying that "We'll never see more than X grams/sec of air or something must be wrong", and then you get the motor at peak torque with cool air plus ram air effect and it exceeds that anticipated limit, and the code is thrown.
I think this because I remember having to fix a bug in my C4LT1 computer. There was an assert that said "Wheel speed sensor will only increase at rate of X" but my car was eventually faster than that, so it threw a code and wouldn't upshift.
The problem with this theory is that cars that have been modified would be taking in even MORE air, if they're making much more power, so they should hit that too, but don't seem to.
#36
Not worth much, but my guess is that since this happens at speed and not on dynos, it's because the mass of air being ingested by the MAF exceeds limits of what they expected, or what the MAF can actually meter.
Basically, it's an "assert", saying that "We'll never see more than X grams/sec of air or something must be wrong", and then you get the motor at peak torque with cool air plus ram air effect and it exceeds that anticipated limit, and the code is thrown.
I think this because I remember having to fix a bug in my C4LT1 computer. There was an assert that said "Wheel speed sensor will only increase at rate of X" but my car was eventually faster than that, so it threw a code and wouldn't upshift.
The problem with this theory is that cars that have been modified would be taking in even MORE air, if they're making much more power, so they should hit that too, but don't seem to.
Basically, it's an "assert", saying that "We'll never see more than X grams/sec of air or something must be wrong", and then you get the motor at peak torque with cool air plus ram air effect and it exceeds that anticipated limit, and the code is thrown.
I think this because I remember having to fix a bug in my C4LT1 computer. There was an assert that said "Wheel speed sensor will only increase at rate of X" but my car was eventually faster than that, so it threw a code and wouldn't upshift.
The problem with this theory is that cars that have been modified would be taking in even MORE air, if they're making much more power, so they should hit that too, but don't seem to.
#37
Not worth much, but my guess is that since this happens at speed and not on dynos, it's because the mass of air being ingested by the MAF exceeds limits of what they expected, or what the MAF can actually meter.
Basically, it's an "assert", saying that "We'll never see more than X grams/sec of air or something must be wrong", and then you get the motor at peak torque with cool air plus ram air effect and it exceeds that anticipated limit, and the code is thrown.
I think this because I remember having to fix a bug in my C4LT1 computer. There was an assert that said "Wheel speed sensor will only increase at rate of X" but my car was eventually faster than that, so it threw a code and wouldn't upshift.
The problem with this theory is that cars that have been modified would be taking in even MORE air, if they're making much more power, so they should hit that too, but don't seem to.
Basically, it's an "assert", saying that "We'll never see more than X grams/sec of air or something must be wrong", and then you get the motor at peak torque with cool air plus ram air effect and it exceeds that anticipated limit, and the code is thrown.
I think this because I remember having to fix a bug in my C4LT1 computer. There was an assert that said "Wheel speed sensor will only increase at rate of X" but my car was eventually faster than that, so it threw a code and wouldn't upshift.
The problem with this theory is that cars that have been modified would be taking in even MORE air, if they're making much more power, so they should hit that too, but don't seem to.
This is issue is happening on a 5th gear pull!
Last edited by Glockaddict7; 07-05-2017 at 02:21 AM.
The following users liked this post:
goshendad (06-26-2017)
#38
Any Grandsports have this issue? Or is it only Z06's so far? I've been 155 mph in my M7 GS with no issues. But that's it so far.
Last edited by rb185afm; 06-24-2017 at 05:27 PM.
#39
#40
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts