Is there any need for the brake booster to be connected to the manifold?
#1
Is there any need for the brake booster to be connected to the manifold?
As far as I can see, the C7 has a very good electric vacuum pump. The same pump used by EV's and Diesel vehicles that have little/no engine vacuum available. I'm also running a big cam, so I probably don't have much engine vacuum either.
Therefore, is there any reason why the brake booster needs to be connected to the intake manifold?
The reason I ask is that I'd ideally like to use the port on the back of my intake manifold for my IAT sensor (rather than right after the throttle body) for a more accurate air temp reading when spraying meth.
Therefore, is there any reason why the brake booster needs to be connected to the intake manifold?
The reason I ask is that I'd ideally like to use the port on the back of my intake manifold for my IAT sensor (rather than right after the throttle body) for a more accurate air temp reading when spraying meth.
Last edited by jimxms; 02-13-2019 at 04:42 PM.
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Bonneville Salt Flats, 223mph Aug. '04
Posts: 17,412
Received 5,207 Likes
on
3,453 Posts
Carefully, try and see.
#3
As far as I can see, the C7 has a very good electric vacuum pump. The same pump used by EV's and Diesel vehicles that have little/no engine vacuum available. I'm also running a big cam, so I probably don't have much engine vacuum either.
Therefore, is there any reason why the brake booster needs to be connected to the intake manifold?
The reason I ask is that I'd ideally like to use the port on the back of my intake manifold for my IAT sensor (rather than right after the throttle body) for a more accurate air temp reading when spraying meth.
Therefore, is there any reason why the brake booster needs to be connected to the intake manifold?
The reason I ask is that I'd ideally like to use the port on the back of my intake manifold for my IAT sensor (rather than right after the throttle body) for a more accurate air temp reading when spraying meth.
#4
#5
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,085
Received 8,926 Likes
on
5,332 Posts
If it wasn't needed I doubt GM would have used it. It costs money for auto companies to do something and if they don't have to do it they don't spend that money. Basic rule of thumb to apply is if it cost them something to install they did it for a reason. If it looks like there isn't a reason for something rethink what you are doing since they don't do stuff they don't have to do.
Bill
Bill
#6
If it wasn't needed I doubt GM would have used it. It costs money for auto companies to do something and if they don't have to do it they don't spend that money. Basic rule of thumb to apply is if it cost them something to install they did it for a reason. If it looks like there isn't a reason for something rethink what you are doing since they don't do stuff they don't have to do.
Bill
Bill
Last edited by jimxms; 02-17-2019 at 03:20 AM.