E38 ECU to control port injection
#2
It’s been done, so the answer would be yes. Chris Crawford (Crawford Racing)
#4
Former Vendor
The short answer is yes it can be done. I did several kits with that ECM. I moved on from it, as the cheap cost of the ECM, did not justify the lack of features.
My current lineup of port injection controllers uses the Holley EFI ECU's, and are much more capable. Closed loop WOT wideband fueling, available spark control, traction control, boost control, transmission control, nitrous control, meth control, flex fuel.. the list goes on and on.
Feel free to reach out if you want to know more.
Chris
www.crawford-racing.com
My current lineup of port injection controllers uses the Holley EFI ECU's, and are much more capable. Closed loop WOT wideband fueling, available spark control, traction control, boost control, transmission control, nitrous control, meth control, flex fuel.. the list goes on and on.
Feel free to reach out if you want to know more.
Chris
www.crawford-racing.com
#5
There you go, from the man himself
#6
The short answer is yes it can be done. I did several kits with that ECM. I moved on from it, as the cheap cost of the ECM, did not justify the lack of features.
My current lineup of port injection controllers uses the Holley EFI ECU's, and are much more capable. Closed loop WOT wideband fueling, available spark control, traction control, boost control, transmission control, nitrous control, meth control, flex fuel.. the list goes on and on.
My current lineup of port injection controllers uses the Holley EFI ECU's, and are much more capable. Closed loop WOT wideband fueling, available spark control, traction control, boost control, transmission control, nitrous control, meth control, flex fuel.. the list goes on and on.
#7
Racer
Thread Starter
The short answer is yes it can be done. I did several kits with that ECM. I moved on from it, as the cheap cost of the ECM, did not justify the lack of features.
My current lineup of port injection controllers uses the Holley EFI ECU's, and are much more capable. Closed loop WOT wideband fueling, available spark control, traction control, boost control, transmission control, nitrous control, meth control, flex fuel.. the list goes on and on.
Feel free to reach out if you want to know more.
Chris
www.crawford-racing.com
My current lineup of port injection controllers uses the Holley EFI ECU's, and are much more capable. Closed loop WOT wideband fueling, available spark control, traction control, boost control, transmission control, nitrous control, meth control, flex fuel.. the list goes on and on.
Feel free to reach out if you want to know more.
Chris
www.crawford-racing.com
When it comes to features over stock ECU, you can't beat Holley ECUs... especially WOT closed loop, that is one feature I would love to have.
Since my car is nothing crazy and in need of extra fuel, i think i will give this stock E38 ECU a chance and wire it in, take pictures, post my process/progress and hopefully help someone out.
#8
Things like WOT closed loop fueling (e92 and e38 can never do that) and real traction control that actually makes you faster instead overcorrecting and pulling FAR more power than what is needed. I’ve been trying to get funds allocated for Crawford’s system as well as a new 2650, while keeping as much hidden from Congress (the wife) as possible
John
#9
Racer
Thread Starter
In the case of the throttle, the c7 ECU controls it, you don’t. Even after I found out how to get the throttle to open much sooner than the 1.7 sec the stock tune allows for, it’s still not instant. The holley is leaps and bounds better because it is not a torque-based controller, it’s not going to check with every electronic politician before it executes YOUR commands, it’ll JUST DO IT. The stock ECU act like it needs approval from Congress (that they will deny or restrict anyway). The Holley is true black-ops, with NO oversight committee
Things like WOT closed loop fueling (e92 and e38 can never do that) and real traction control that actually makes you faster instead overcorrecting and pulling FAR more power than what is needed. I’ve been trying to get funds allocated for Crawford’s system as well as a new 2650, while keeping as much hidden from Congress (the wife) as possible
John
Things like WOT closed loop fueling (e92 and e38 can never do that) and real traction control that actually makes you faster instead overcorrecting and pulling FAR more power than what is needed. I’ve been trying to get funds allocated for Crawford’s system as well as a new 2650, while keeping as much hidden from Congress (the wife) as possible
John
The following users liked this post:
JHEBERT (02-21-2019)
#10
Thanks, that would be great. I’m still learning all of this stuff. I like the idea of adding port injection but all of the pricing looks like Mercedes, BMW, Lamborghini solutions. I’m still on a Chevy budget! 🤑