When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Pretty impressive on a Mustang... Thx for posting.
My thoughts also!!! That 590Ft/Lbs is huge. Also looks like they went really soft on the cam with this motor. I recall a GM engineer saying as much, due to emissions. He also proclaimed that there was a lot of power to be gained with a cam. Makes sense as the Tq curve nose dives after 4800 RPM.
These numbers might be even more impressive than Vengeance Racing's 585/617 results on a Dynojet (though they're both accurate, from what I've seen, Dynojet numbers will typically read higher than a Mustang dyno's results).
My thoughts also!!! That 590Ft/Lbs is huge. Also looks like they went really soft on the cam with this motor. I recall a GM engineer saying as much, due to emissions. He also proclaimed that there was a lot of power to be gained with a cam. Makes sense as the Tq curve nose dives after 4800 RPM.
What kind of #'s does the Hellcat put down?
Ignition dynode the Hellcat at 671.64rwhp and 606.10rwtq.
12-06-2014, 12:25 AM
My thoughts also!!! That 590Ft/Lbs is huge. Also looks like they went really soft on the cam with this motor. I recall a GM engineer saying as much, due to emissions. He also proclaimed that there was a lot of power to be gained with a cam. Makes sense as the Tq curve nose dives after 4800 RPM.
