C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

Tadge ANSWERED (Motor Trend 2015 Z06 vs. 2015 GT-R Nismo)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2015, 08:15 AM
  #1  
Iker
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Iker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2014
Posts: 965
Received 1,275 Likes on 356 Posts

Default Tadge ANSWERED (Motor Trend 2015 Z06 vs. 2015 GT-R Nismo)

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...t-r-nismo.html
Old 03-07-2015, 08:29 AM
  #2  
JackTripper
Turn 12!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
JackTripper's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: The Beach
Posts: 5,974
Received 498 Likes on 217 Posts

Default

Great News!
Old 03-07-2015, 09:21 AM
  #3  
Steve Snake Driver
Melting Slicks<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/3k-4k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve Snake Driver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Enterprise AL
Posts: 3,056
Received 275 Likes on 150 Posts

Default

His answer, I think, explains the presence of the M7 Z06 alongside the A8 in the teaser photo from Pobst/Motor Trend on upcoming comparison test.
Old 03-07-2015, 09:59 AM
  #4  
URBAN LEGEND
Burning Brakes
 
URBAN LEGEND's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 798
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

My thoughts:

The team responsible for media vehicles should be reprimanded and fired next time a car they prepped isn't ready for the media. Magazines tests is the time for these vehicles to show up ripped, dry and muscular. Not showing up misaligned, fat and out of shape, etc.

Last but not least please update this car yearly as Nissan does with the GT-R. Tweak and update yearly, not every 3 years. Learn, update, learn, update, improve, update, etc.
Old 03-07-2015, 10:02 AM
  #5  
WA 2 FST
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
WA 2 FST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Allen TX
Posts: 4,074
Received 556 Likes on 359 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by URBAN LEGEND
My thoughts:

The team responsible for media vehicles should be reprimanded and fired next time a car they prepped isn't ready for the media. Magazines tests is the time for these vehicles to show up ripped, dry and muscular. Not showing up misaligned, fat and out of shape, etc.

Last but not least please update this car yearly as Nissan does with the GT-R. Tweak and update yearly, not every 3 years. Learn, update, learn, update, improve, update, etc.
Well said.
Old 03-07-2015, 10:06 AM
  #6  
lawdogg149
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lawdogg149's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,150
Received 61 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Not to defend.

We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.

I have ran 3 track days so far.
Old 03-07-2015, 10:09 AM
  #7  
WA 2 FST
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
WA 2 FST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Allen TX
Posts: 4,074
Received 556 Likes on 359 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lawdogg149
Not to defend.

We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.

I have ran 3 track days so far.
Good info.

Here's the thing... if you had been asked to take/drive your car for a test of this nature, I guarantee that you would have taken the time to have checked it all, regardless of whether you assumed it was still in spec or not.
Old 03-07-2015, 10:10 AM
  #8  
Redc8z06
Melting Slicks

 
Redc8z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,912
Received 1,565 Likes on 859 Posts

Default

GM has had a policy since at least the C5 where they will make changes to the Corvette throughout the production year not just wait until the next production year begins.
Old 03-07-2015, 10:11 AM
  #9  
URBAN LEGEND
Burning Brakes
 
URBAN LEGEND's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 798
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lawdogg149
Not to defend.

We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.

I have ran 3 track days so far.
Ok. Cool. I accept that.
To team Vette <---Learn, update, fix. Easy!
Old 03-07-2015, 10:19 AM
  #10  
lawdogg149
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lawdogg149's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,150
Received 61 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WA 2 FST
Good info. Here's the thing... if you had been asked to take/drive your car for a test of this nature, I guarantee that you would have taken the time to have checked it all, regardless of whether you assumed it was still in spec or not.
I would of never of checked it had it not been for his response. I usually have it checked while changing tires.

We wonder if the car settling has anything to do with it. I had the alignment done around 1000 miles on the car.

Anyone planning on tracking may need to keep a eye on this.
Old 03-07-2015, 10:47 AM
  #11  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,804 Likes on 1,144 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by lawdogg149
Anyone planning on tracking may need to keep a eye on this.
The accursed eccentric bolts continue to plague the Corvette to this day. I understand why they're used, and to some extent agree with it: alignment jobs are much easier with them. But they move, specially with uber-sticky tires and lots of G-forces. The shop manual lists a certain torque setting for those bolts. I don't recall what it is currently, but it's best to just ignore that. Make sure they're MFT. Use a big ratchet and a breaker bar to help apply even more torque to them.
Old 03-07-2015, 11:07 AM
  #12  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

It's called "cheating"
Old 03-07-2015, 11:09 AM
  #13  
Snorman
Scraping the splitter.
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Snorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,115
Received 1,028 Likes on 486 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15

Default

With the bad press Dodge got by sending a bad Viper to a comparison, you'd think GM would be more diligent with this stuff.

Regarding Nissan using "octane booster", or race gas, or whatever...is anybody really surprised? This is a screen shot from their own video re: the Nismo running a 7:08 at the Nurburgring:

Last I checked, 100-octane is not "unleaded premium" in the US. And even if that's RON, it's 96-octane R+M/2, which is still not "unleaded premium" in the US. It's not unreasonable to suspect that they tweaked the fuel and timing curves to take advantage of much better fuel.
I would guess the recent tests using "octane booster", are a result of comments like this from MT's Carlos Lagos subsequent to early tests of the Nismo:

Car & Driver also commented in their July '14 test of the Nismo that it basically ran the same acceleration times as a Track model GT-R. Of note, in the C&D April '15 comparison between the Z06, Nismo and 911 TT the Z06 "Fuel Rating" is 91-octane while both the Nismo and 911 TT are 93-octane. These cars were tested in California. How did they get "93-octane" into the Nismo and 911 TT?
It was well known in the early years of the DBA GT-R's that they were octane-sensitive. The DBA's have a dynamic timing advance using feedback from a knock sensor that provides more timing with low noise conditions (i.e. higher octane, no knock). Early in the DBA cycle, tuners identified that DBA's were sensitive when running 91-octane or getting hot. Initially, the DBA's dynamic timing advance was causing issues by allowing too much timing advance. Nissan updated the DBA factory calibration to allow 3-degrees at WOT, from the original 7-degrees.

https://cobbtuning.zendesk.com/hc/en...ance-Explained

Obviously Nissan knows this, so they are likely not allowing cars to be tested with 91-octane.
I'm a big GT-R fan, it is a great car! But this isn't really kosher IMO. Cars should be tested apples-to-apples.
S.
Old 03-07-2015, 11:49 AM
  #14  
lawdogg149
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lawdogg149's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,150
Received 61 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Name:  image-2524599333.jpg
Views: 1254
Size:  419.1 KB

We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.

This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.
Old 03-07-2015, 12:12 PM
  #15  
red2012
Safety Car
 
red2012's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: New Rochelle N.Y. 2013 Grand Sport
Posts: 3,608
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jvp
The accursed eccentric bolts continue to plague the Corvette to this day. I understand why they're used, and to some extent agree with it: alignment jobs are much easier with them. But they move, specially with uber-sticky tires and lots of G-forces.
I don't know much about racing but your post makes perfectly good sense to me. My '13 GS had FIVE wheel alignments in it's first 10K miles. I don't drive the car hard and I don't hit potholes. The dealer did every one under warranty and sometimes it would go out of alignment within one week. I later bought it to a good indy shop who must have really tightened them because after 8 months all is still good. So I guess those bolts do have a tendency to come loose frequently.
Old 03-07-2015, 12:17 PM
  #16  
URBAN LEGEND
Burning Brakes
 
URBAN LEGEND's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 798
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lawdogg149
Attachment 47869149

We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.

This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.

Let me ask you this then. Whats the fix or solution for this situation?
Old 03-07-2015, 12:22 PM
  #17  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,804 Likes on 1,144 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by URBAN LEGEND
Let me ask you this then. Whats the fix or solution for this situation?
The fix is a camber kit, but you're never going to see that OEM unfortunately. A camber plate in place of that eccentric will basically prevent the LCA from ever moving again. The issue with camber kits (the plates, specifically) is that they require the alignment tech to add or remove washers to the bolts of the UCAs, which will increase alignment complexity (the first time) dramatically. However, once aligned, it won't move.

Most of us that heavily track our cars have already added camber kits to them. I'm sure the usual suspects will have Stingray and Z06-based camber kits available soon, if they don't already.

Get notified of new replies

To Tadge ANSWERED (Motor Trend 2015 Z06 vs. 2015 GT-R Nismo)

Old 03-07-2015, 03:19 PM
  #18  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,804 Likes on 1,144 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by jvp
A camber plate in place of that eccentric will basically prevent the LCA from ever moving again.
Here's the idea, mounted on my ZR1 (but since removed and replaced with a far better one). The other side of that bolt has an identical plate that slides into the same slot on the subframe. It can't move.



The slots in the C7's subframe are a slightly different shape, it looks like (from lawdogg's pic). That means a C7-specific set of plates would need to be developed by the aftermarket.
Old 03-07-2015, 04:38 PM
  #19  
blkbrd69
Drifting
 
blkbrd69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,686
Received 71 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lawdogg149
Attachment 47869149

We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.

This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.
Would lay odds Vansteel is going to have kits out soon to lock it out like a C5 or C6.
Old 03-19-2015, 12:32 PM
  #20  
Tik
Instructor
 
Tik's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Has anyone developed a camber kit for the C7Z yet? My eccentrics slipped as well and I can sense this is going to be a real pain this season...


Quick Reply: Tadge ANSWERED (Motor Trend 2015 Z06 vs. 2015 GT-R Nismo)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.