Tadge ANSWERED (Motor Trend 2015 Z06 vs. 2015 GT-R Nismo)
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Tadge ANSWERED (Motor Trend 2015 Z06 vs. 2015 GT-R Nismo)
#2
Turn 12!
Great News!
#3
Melting Slicks<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/3k-4k.gif" border="0">
His answer, I think, explains the presence of the M7 Z06 alongside the A8 in the teaser photo from Pobst/Motor Trend on upcoming comparison test.
#4
Burning Brakes
My thoughts:
The team responsible for media vehicles should be reprimanded and fired next time a car they prepped isn't ready for the media. Magazines tests is the time for these vehicles to show up ripped, dry and muscular. Not showing up misaligned, fat and out of shape, etc.
Last but not least please update this car yearly as Nissan does with the GT-R. Tweak and update yearly, not every 3 years. Learn, update, learn, update, improve, update, etc.
The team responsible for media vehicles should be reprimanded and fired next time a car they prepped isn't ready for the media. Magazines tests is the time for these vehicles to show up ripped, dry and muscular. Not showing up misaligned, fat and out of shape, etc.
Last but not least please update this car yearly as Nissan does with the GT-R. Tweak and update yearly, not every 3 years. Learn, update, learn, update, improve, update, etc.
#5
Safety Car
My thoughts:
The team responsible for media vehicles should be reprimanded and fired next time a car they prepped isn't ready for the media. Magazines tests is the time for these vehicles to show up ripped, dry and muscular. Not showing up misaligned, fat and out of shape, etc.
Last but not least please update this car yearly as Nissan does with the GT-R. Tweak and update yearly, not every 3 years. Learn, update, learn, update, improve, update, etc.
The team responsible for media vehicles should be reprimanded and fired next time a car they prepped isn't ready for the media. Magazines tests is the time for these vehicles to show up ripped, dry and muscular. Not showing up misaligned, fat and out of shape, etc.
Last but not least please update this car yearly as Nissan does with the GT-R. Tweak and update yearly, not every 3 years. Learn, update, learn, update, improve, update, etc.
#6
Not to defend.
We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.
I have ran 3 track days so far.
We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.
I have ran 3 track days so far.
#7
Safety Car
Not to defend.
We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.
I have ran 3 track days so far.
We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.
I have ran 3 track days so far.
Here's the thing... if you had been asked to take/drive your car for a test of this nature, I guarantee that you would have taken the time to have checked it all, regardless of whether you assumed it was still in spec or not.
#8
GM has had a policy since at least the C5 where they will make changes to the Corvette throughout the production year not just wait until the next production year begins.
#9
Burning Brakes
Not to defend.
We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.
I have ran 3 track days so far.
We just rechecked my track alignment and my settings have moved from what we set them at last month. This response had me interested so i had my race shop check mine. Seems the cam bolts may not be holding. We used loctite this time around.
I have ran 3 track days so far.
To team Vette <---Learn, update, fix. Easy!
#10
We wonder if the car settling has anything to do with it. I had the alignment done around 1000 miles on the car.
Anyone planning on tracking may need to keep a eye on this.
#11
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,804 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
The accursed eccentric bolts continue to plague the Corvette to this day. I understand why they're used, and to some extent agree with it: alignment jobs are much easier with them. But they move, specially with uber-sticky tires and lots of G-forces. The shop manual lists a certain torque setting for those bolts. I don't recall what it is currently, but it's best to just ignore that. Make sure they're MFT. Use a big ratchet and a breaker bar to help apply even more torque to them.
#12
Team Owner
It's called "cheating"
#13
Scraping the splitter.
With the bad press Dodge got by sending a bad Viper to a comparison, you'd think GM would be more diligent with this stuff.
Regarding Nissan using "octane booster", or race gas, or whatever...is anybody really surprised? This is a screen shot from their own video re: the Nismo running a 7:08 at the Nurburgring:
Last I checked, 100-octane is not "unleaded premium" in the US. And even if that's RON, it's 96-octane R+M/2, which is still not "unleaded premium" in the US. It's not unreasonable to suspect that they tweaked the fuel and timing curves to take advantage of much better fuel.
I would guess the recent tests using "octane booster", are a result of comments like this from MT's Carlos Lagos subsequent to early tests of the Nismo:
Car & Driver also commented in their July '14 test of the Nismo that it basically ran the same acceleration times as a Track model GT-R. Of note, in the C&D April '15 comparison between the Z06, Nismo and 911 TT the Z06 "Fuel Rating" is 91-octane while both the Nismo and 911 TT are 93-octane. These cars were tested in California. How did they get "93-octane" into the Nismo and 911 TT?
It was well known in the early years of the DBA GT-R's that they were octane-sensitive. The DBA's have a dynamic timing advance using feedback from a knock sensor that provides more timing with low noise conditions (i.e. higher octane, no knock). Early in the DBA cycle, tuners identified that DBA's were sensitive when running 91-octane or getting hot. Initially, the DBA's dynamic timing advance was causing issues by allowing too much timing advance. Nissan updated the DBA factory calibration to allow 3-degrees at WOT, from the original 7-degrees.
https://cobbtuning.zendesk.com/hc/en...ance-Explained
Obviously Nissan knows this, so they are likely not allowing cars to be tested with 91-octane.
I'm a big GT-R fan, it is a great car! But this isn't really kosher IMO. Cars should be tested apples-to-apples.
S.
Regarding Nissan using "octane booster", or race gas, or whatever...is anybody really surprised? This is a screen shot from their own video re: the Nismo running a 7:08 at the Nurburgring:
Last I checked, 100-octane is not "unleaded premium" in the US. And even if that's RON, it's 96-octane R+M/2, which is still not "unleaded premium" in the US. It's not unreasonable to suspect that they tweaked the fuel and timing curves to take advantage of much better fuel.
I would guess the recent tests using "octane booster", are a result of comments like this from MT's Carlos Lagos subsequent to early tests of the Nismo:
Car & Driver also commented in their July '14 test of the Nismo that it basically ran the same acceleration times as a Track model GT-R. Of note, in the C&D April '15 comparison between the Z06, Nismo and 911 TT the Z06 "Fuel Rating" is 91-octane while both the Nismo and 911 TT are 93-octane. These cars were tested in California. How did they get "93-octane" into the Nismo and 911 TT?
It was well known in the early years of the DBA GT-R's that they were octane-sensitive. The DBA's have a dynamic timing advance using feedback from a knock sensor that provides more timing with low noise conditions (i.e. higher octane, no knock). Early in the DBA cycle, tuners identified that DBA's were sensitive when running 91-octane or getting hot. Initially, the DBA's dynamic timing advance was causing issues by allowing too much timing advance. Nissan updated the DBA factory calibration to allow 3-degrees at WOT, from the original 7-degrees.
https://cobbtuning.zendesk.com/hc/en...ance-Explained
Obviously Nissan knows this, so they are likely not allowing cars to be tested with 91-octane.
I'm a big GT-R fan, it is a great car! But this isn't really kosher IMO. Cars should be tested apples-to-apples.
S.
#15
Safety Car
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: New Rochelle N.Y. 2013 Grand Sport
Posts: 3,608
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
11 Posts
I don't know much about racing but your post makes perfectly good sense to me. My '13 GS had FIVE wheel alignments in it's first 10K miles. I don't drive the car hard and I don't hit potholes. The dealer did every one under warranty and sometimes it would go out of alignment within one week. I later bought it to a good indy shop who must have really tightened them because after 8 months all is still good. So I guess those bolts do have a tendency to come loose frequently.
#16
Burning Brakes
Attachment 47869149
We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.
This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.
We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.
This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.
Let me ask you this then. Whats the fix or solution for this situation?
#17
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,804 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
Most of us that heavily track our cars have already added camber kits to them. I'm sure the usual suspects will have Stingray and Z06-based camber kits available soon, if they don't already.
#18
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,804 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
The slots in the C7's subframe are a slightly different shape, it looks like (from lawdogg's pic). That means a C7-specific set of plates would need to be developed by the aftermarket.
#19
Drifting
Attachment 47869149
We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.
This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.
We marked the washers when we set the car up last month. Notice the lines are now moved.
This sucks and can get expensive if we have to keep resetting the alignment.