Halltech TRIC Tunnel Ram Induction Cold-air
#281
Folks I kinda lost lock on the target.
What are we discussing and what exactly is the point of contention?
What are we discussing and what exactly is the point of contention?
#282
Advanced
By all means post your before and after "headers & tune" results. As far as wrong info. goes you have your info. and I have mine.
By the way this is not my first "pressurized" street vehicle. I had (just sold) a "street" V6 air conditioned not so light 87 Buick which ran in the 9's last time I had it to a MIR track rental on drag radials and a Zero boost launch on the foot brake. It makes my new car look like a VW.
By the way this is not my first "pressurized" street vehicle. I had (just sold) a "street" V6 air conditioned not so light 87 Buick which ran in the 9's last time I had it to a MIR track rental on drag radials and a Zero boost launch on the foot brake. It makes my new car look like a VW.
Here's mine: M7 with halltech and stock tune 603/578 and 593/600. Added TSP 1 7/8" headers and tune and made 621/600 and 625/616. I was hoping for mid 630s hp/tq, but overall I'm happy with it and love the sound.
#283
Safety Car
Pass 1) 1.531 60ft., 10.589 et @131.24 mph.
Pass 2) 1.582 60ft., 10.584 et @133.20 mph.
Notes:
1) Spinning on second pass, I tried to come out harder.
2) It looks like in this back to back example that a slower by (.05) 60ft. netted approx. a 2 MPH gain in the 1/4 mile. I have seen this many times over the years at the track. No Science Expert here but maintaining a higher "Wheel Speed" may have something to do with it or just maybe a much hotter car was responsible?
3) Running the AFE-1 CAI, with the Gray "low flow" air filter on OEM MPSS tires, 260 lb. driver with some gas in the tank at Capitol Raceway on 93 octane gas "only".
Pass 2) 1.582 60ft., 10.584 et @133.20 mph.
Notes:
1) Spinning on second pass, I tried to come out harder.
2) It looks like in this back to back example that a slower by (.05) 60ft. netted approx. a 2 MPH gain in the 1/4 mile. I have seen this many times over the years at the track. No Science Expert here but maintaining a higher "Wheel Speed" may have something to do with it or just maybe a much hotter car was responsible?
3) Running the AFE-1 CAI, with the Gray "low flow" air filter on OEM MPSS tires, 260 lb. driver with some gas in the tank at Capitol Raceway on 93 octane gas "only".
#284
Drifting
Pass 1) 1.531 60ft., 10.589 et @131.24 mph.
Pass 2) 1.582 60ft., 10.584 et @133.20 mph.
Notes:
1) Spinning on second pass, I tried to come out harder.
2) It looks like in this back to back example that a slower by (.05) 60ft. netted approx. a 2 MPH gain in the 1/4 mile. I have seen this many times over the years at the track. No Science Expert here but maintaining a higher "Wheel Speed" may have something to do with it or just maybe a much hotter car was responsible?
3) Running the AFE-1 CAI, with the Gray "low flow" air filter on OEM MPSS tires, 260 lb. driver with some gas in the tank at Capitol Raceway on 93 octane gas "only".
Pass 2) 1.582 60ft., 10.584 et @133.20 mph.
Notes:
1) Spinning on second pass, I tried to come out harder.
2) It looks like in this back to back example that a slower by (.05) 60ft. netted approx. a 2 MPH gain in the 1/4 mile. I have seen this many times over the years at the track. No Science Expert here but maintaining a higher "Wheel Speed" may have something to do with it or just maybe a much hotter car was responsible?
3) Running the AFE-1 CAI, with the Gray "low flow" air filter on OEM MPSS tires, 260 lb. driver with some gas in the tank at Capitol Raceway on 93 octane gas "only".
Greg
#285
Team Owner
Same way with the headers! They work!
This forum has good entertainment!
#286
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Norwalk ohio
Posts: 8,927
Received 640 Likes
on
358 Posts
2019 Corvette of the Year Winner
St. Jude Donor '15
I have the intake....and want to believe the ram air makers a difference, but short of documented results i am not parting with my retirement donut money.
The following users liked this post:
dar02081961 (10-06-2016)
#287
Team Owner
looking for quantitative results for the ram air pieces. we have seen the results for the intake, that isnt a question here. what we havent seen are any results except butt dynos that the ram air increases power.
I have the intake....and want to believe the ram air makers a difference, but short of documented results i am not parting with my retirement donut money.
I have the intake....and want to believe the ram air makers a difference, but short of documented results i am not parting with my retirement donut money.
Changes in your 60ft make a HUGE difference between runs let alone figuring out just
how much gained from just this mod. But as Halltech says you can see the old boost gauge is up higher than before and you can feel more power twisting the car.
I think it adds also the nomex feels good as well. All the Halltech stuff is good for your Corvette' performance. IMO!
Much better than no Halltech stuff. The stock car is slower with out for dam sure.
But it is cheap and you get a different filter that does help the intake with the small end cap.
#288
looking for quantitative results for the ram air pieces. we have seen the results for the intake, that isnt a question here. what we havent seen are any results except butt dynos that the ram air increases power.
I have the intake....and want to believe the ram air makers a difference, but short of documented results i am not parting with my retirement donut money.
I have the intake....and want to believe the ram air makers a difference, but short of documented results i am not parting with my retirement donut money.
I don't think you will see any quantifiable data on just the ram air improvement. RAM air benefits for street cars has been argued about since the 60's. Just too many variables to show any absolutes.
However there is a simple way to show if the TRIC improves airflow.
If someone with HP tuner's can log mass air flow in grams per second. You can compare the before and after logs. This will allow you to compare the amount of air reaching the MAF sensor at different car speeds and engine rpms. This wont directly show you how much hp is gained. But it will show you the difference in the amount of air the RAM system is providing versus the system without the TRIC. This will be noticed in boost as well.
Also it will not show the benefit of increased throttle response in everyday driving at speed. One of the benefits of a decent ram air system is when you are at closed throttle or part throttle cruise there is a slight pressure build up at the throttle blade and in the CAI ducting. When you open the throttle the momentary pressure drop in the intake manifold and the CAI ducting isn't as bad so you notice it in throttle response. There is also a small benefit because there isn't as much "pumping loss" from the suction required to pull air through a restrictive filter and replenish ("fill") the vacuum in the ducting created by the sudden opening of the throttle.
So I agree that it will be hard as hell to prove the TRIC alone improves power. But the theory is definitely sound and has been proven to work in many different applications over the years. Whether it's worth the trouble or not is probably up to the individual. After all what are talking here....maybe 5...10 or 15 horsepower?
I learned a long time ago if you are trying to go faster, getting more air to the engine is most always a good thing.
Last edited by dar02081961; 10-06-2016 at 05:40 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by dar02081961:
Halltech (10-07-2016),
jbsblownc5 (10-19-2016)
#289
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Norwalk ohio
Posts: 8,927
Received 640 Likes
on
358 Posts
2019 Corvette of the Year Winner
St. Jude Donor '15
Being an engineer....I live by the following saying that I saw above the desk of a Ford Area Paint Manager (customer)...in god we trust...all others bring data...that was more than 35 years ago, but one that I have kept near to my heart.....
The following 3 users liked this post by firstgear:
#290
Team Owner
Then ARH 2 inch jethot coated were installed and tomorrow morning
after a good nights sleep and a fresh change of mobil one she will get a fresh tune.
I'm hoping for 635-635 rwhp as well! Plus with the nannies eased she should be much faster! c
#291
I just ordered my intake and TRIC from Halltech. I will be running in the TX Mile in a week and a half so should have some decent comparisons. There are usually bone stock Z's out there as well as modified so will be able to get a good idea if it makes a difference for the mile run. I even thought about making a run without it, and installing it between runs to see if there are any differences on the speed slip. I'll be in a 2017.
Last edited by h3mpking; 10-19-2016 at 11:02 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by h3mpking:
dar02081961 (10-19-2016),
jbsblownc5 (10-19-2016)
#292
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: CA
Posts: 11,218
Received 897 Likes
on
403 Posts
2017 C5 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '08
Thanks.
I don't think you will see any quantifiable data on just the ram air improvement. RAM air benefits for street cars has been argued about since the 60's. Just too many variables to show any absolutes.
However there is a simple way to show if the TRIC improves airflow.
If someone with HP tuner's can log mass air flow in grams per second. You can compare the before and after logs. This will allow you to compare the amount of air reaching the MAF sensor at different car speeds and engine rpms. This wont directly show you how much hp is gained. But it will show you the difference in the amount of air the RAM system is providing versus the system without the TRIC. This will be noticed in boost as well.
Also it will not show the benefit of increased throttle response in everyday driving at speed. One of the benefits of a decent ram air system is when you are at closed throttle or part throttle cruise there is a slight pressure build up at the throttle blade and in the CAI ducting. When you open the throttle the momentary pressure drop in the intake manifold and the CAI ducting isn't as bad so you notice it in throttle response. There is also a small benefit because there isn't as much "pumping loss" from the suction required to pull air through a restrictive filter and replenish ("fill") the vacuum in the ducting created by the sudden opening of the throttle.
So I agree that it will be hard as hell to prove the TRIC alone improves power. But the theory is definitely sound and has been proven to work in many different applications over the years. Whether it's worth the trouble or not is probably up to the individual. After all what are talking here....maybe 5...10 or 15 horsepower?
I learned a long time ago if you are trying to go faster, getting more air to the engine is most always a good thing.
I don't think you will see any quantifiable data on just the ram air improvement. RAM air benefits for street cars has been argued about since the 60's. Just too many variables to show any absolutes.
However there is a simple way to show if the TRIC improves airflow.
If someone with HP tuner's can log mass air flow in grams per second. You can compare the before and after logs. This will allow you to compare the amount of air reaching the MAF sensor at different car speeds and engine rpms. This wont directly show you how much hp is gained. But it will show you the difference in the amount of air the RAM system is providing versus the system without the TRIC. This will be noticed in boost as well.
Also it will not show the benefit of increased throttle response in everyday driving at speed. One of the benefits of a decent ram air system is when you are at closed throttle or part throttle cruise there is a slight pressure build up at the throttle blade and in the CAI ducting. When you open the throttle the momentary pressure drop in the intake manifold and the CAI ducting isn't as bad so you notice it in throttle response. There is also a small benefit because there isn't as much "pumping loss" from the suction required to pull air through a restrictive filter and replenish ("fill") the vacuum in the ducting created by the sudden opening of the throttle.
So I agree that it will be hard as hell to prove the TRIC alone improves power. But the theory is definitely sound and has been proven to work in many different applications over the years. Whether it's worth the trouble or not is probably up to the individual. After all what are talking here....maybe 5...10 or 15 horsepower?
I learned a long time ago if you are trying to go faster, getting more air to the engine is most always a good thing.
This is very good info!!
I've got the Halltech and tric ram air, and will do some testing on it...
The following users liked this post:
dar02081961 (10-19-2016)
#293
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: CA
Posts: 11,218
Received 897 Likes
on
403 Posts
2017 C5 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '08
I just ordered my intake and TRIC from Halltech. I will be running in the TX Mile in a week and a half so should have some decent comparisons. There are usually bone stock Z's out there as well as modified so will be able to get a good idea if it makes a difference for the mile run. I even thought about making a run without it, and installing it between runs to see if there are any differences on the speed slip. I'll be in a 2017.
Comparing your MPH to stock Zs will be a real good comparison, also taking off the tric for a run will also be quite telling...
#294
Drifting
Thanks.
I don't think you will see any quantifiable data on just the ram air improvement. RAM air benefits for street cars has been argued about since the 60's. Just too many variables to show any absolutes.
However there is a simple way to show if the TRIC improves airflow.
If someone with HP tuner's can log mass air flow in grams per second. You can compare the before and after logs. This will allow you to compare the amount of air reaching the MAF sensor at different car speeds and engine rpms. This wont directly show you how much hp is gained. But it will show you the difference in the amount of air the RAM system is providing versus the system without the TRIC. This will be noticed in boost as well.
Also it will not show the benefit of increased throttle response in everyday driving at speed. One of the benefits of a decent ram air system is when you are at closed throttle or part throttle cruise there is a slight pressure build up at the throttle blade and in the CAI ducting. When you open the throttle the momentary pressure drop in the intake manifold and the CAI ducting isn't as bad so you notice it in throttle response. There is also a small benefit because there isn't as much "pumping loss" from the suction required to pull air through a restrictive filter and replenish ("fill") the vacuum in the ducting created by the sudden opening of the throttle.
So I agree that it will be hard as hell to prove the TRIC alone improves power. But the theory is definitely sound and has been proven to work in many different applications over the years. Whether it's worth the trouble or not is probably up to the individual. After all what are talking here....maybe 5...10 or 15 horsepower?
I learned a long time ago if you are trying to go faster, getting more air to the engine is most always a good thing.
I don't think you will see any quantifiable data on just the ram air improvement. RAM air benefits for street cars has been argued about since the 60's. Just too many variables to show any absolutes.
However there is a simple way to show if the TRIC improves airflow.
If someone with HP tuner's can log mass air flow in grams per second. You can compare the before and after logs. This will allow you to compare the amount of air reaching the MAF sensor at different car speeds and engine rpms. This wont directly show you how much hp is gained. But it will show you the difference in the amount of air the RAM system is providing versus the system without the TRIC. This will be noticed in boost as well.
Also it will not show the benefit of increased throttle response in everyday driving at speed. One of the benefits of a decent ram air system is when you are at closed throttle or part throttle cruise there is a slight pressure build up at the throttle blade and in the CAI ducting. When you open the throttle the momentary pressure drop in the intake manifold and the CAI ducting isn't as bad so you notice it in throttle response. There is also a small benefit because there isn't as much "pumping loss" from the suction required to pull air through a restrictive filter and replenish ("fill") the vacuum in the ducting created by the sudden opening of the throttle.
So I agree that it will be hard as hell to prove the TRIC alone improves power. But the theory is definitely sound and has been proven to work in many different applications over the years. Whether it's worth the trouble or not is probably up to the individual. After all what are talking here....maybe 5...10 or 15 horsepower?
I learned a long time ago if you are trying to go faster, getting more air to the engine is most always a good thing.
The following 2 users liked this post by ktoonsez:
dar02081961 (10-19-2016),
Halltech (10-19-2016)
#295
Just to be clear, we are not going to charge our customers here that have ordered already for these upgrades.
We have approximately 48 orders, with 9 left to fill this week.
We will ship everyone the front plug and rear plate as soon as they are designed and ready to go. i.e. no charge for this upgrade.
If you have any concerns about water, you can run the TRIC, just be aware and use common sense.
This upgrade will give you peace of mind, and most of all allow road racers to remove the rear plate for the track, and still have colder ambient air available to the intake. The Ram Air benefit would likely not be functional with the rear plate removed.
Jim
We have approximately 48 orders, with 9 left to fill this week.
We will ship everyone the front plug and rear plate as soon as they are designed and ready to go. i.e. no charge for this upgrade.
If you have any concerns about water, you can run the TRIC, just be aware and use common sense.
This upgrade will give you peace of mind, and most of all allow road racers to remove the rear plate for the track, and still have colder ambient air available to the intake. The Ram Air benefit would likely not be functional with the rear plate removed.
Jim
Any updates on the plug and plate?
#296
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
Posts: 12,986
Received 582 Likes
on
312 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09
Sorry this has taken so long, but the plant that we use has been super busy. This is what we have come up with. What do you think?
Stainless steel plate.
Stainless steel plate.
__________________
"World Class Performance for your Corvette"
Intake Design and Engineering since 1999
Halltech Systems, LLC
262-510-7600
For service email:
orders@halltechsystems.com
www.halltechsystems.com
"World Class Performance for your Corvette"
Intake Design and Engineering since 1999
Halltech Systems, LLC
262-510-7600
For service email:
orders@halltechsystems.com
www.halltechsystems.com
Last edited by Halltech; 10-26-2016 at 05:56 PM.
#297
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
Posts: 12,986
Received 582 Likes
on
312 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09
email debbie@halltechsystems.com with your ship to address and credit card. Shipping will be around $5.80
#298
[QUOTE=Halltech;1593336360]Sorry this has taken so long, but the plant that we use has been super busy. This is what we have come up with. What do you think?
Looks good. I just requested mine. The first day I put the TRIC on it decided to pour so did not get a good test drive in. Looking forward to the plate.
Looks good. I just requested mine. The first day I put the TRIC on it decided to pour so did not get a good test drive in. Looking forward to the plate.
#299
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: CA
Posts: 11,218
Received 897 Likes
on
403 Posts
2017 C5 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '08
Perfect, I just sent an email requesting the plate...
I'm headed to the dyno this monday, to get baseline #s, then I'll add Torco, make a few pulls, then add your intake, and make some more pulls.
I'm headed to the dyno this monday, to get baseline #s, then I'll add Torco, make a few pulls, then add your intake, and make some more pulls.
#300
Race Director
The Stainless Plates are done and available. Just asking folks that want them to pay shipping only. We'll make the plate and screws available free for those that were on the list.
email debbie@halltechsystems.com with your ship to address and credit card. Shipping will be around $5.80
email debbie@halltechsystems.com with your ship to address and credit card. Shipping will be around $5.80
I cut my TRIC to install the plate (easy to do with a utility knife) and drilled a couple holes, and today went to Home Depot and got a couple speed nut plates and winged bolts.
Here's the TRIC with the plate removed:
And below is with the plate installed:
I plan to install it in the next day or so, and then give it and the Stinger intake a workout at a track event at Daytona Dec 9-11. I think with the two of them I should get a nice power boost - especially at the higher speeds at that track.
BTW - the TRIC blocks air into the right wheel well and may affect the cooling of that brake. However, I've got a 2016, but got the brake cooling ducts that come with a 2017. I think there won't be any interference between them and the TRIC, and they get their air from under the car, so should give good cooling air to that brake even with the TRIC installed and the plate closing the end of it. I'll report after installation how they both fit in that area.
.
Last edited by BEZ06; 11-30-2016 at 10:15 PM.