C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

Hot Dragstrip Action: C7 Corvette Z06 Versus Lamborghini Gallardo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2016, 01:18 PM
  #1  
Detroit Steel
CorvetteForum Editor
Thread Starter
 
Detroit Steel's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2014
Posts: 905
Received 58 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Hot Dragstrip Action: C7 Corvette Z06 Versus Lamborghini Gallardo



With proven performance names like AMP behind the Z06 and Underground Racing behind the Lambo, you just know that this race won't take very long.

Read the rest on the Corvette Forum homepage. >>
The following 2 users liked this post by Detroit Steel:
SLEEKVET (07-30-2016), Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016)
Old 07-28-2016, 01:57 PM
  #2  
Snorman
Scraping the splitter.
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Snorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,115
Received 1,028 Likes on 486 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15

Default

However, it quickly becomes clear that the Z06 has a little more muscle than the Lamborghini.

The TTG ran over 173 mph to the C7Z's 148 mph.
S.
The following 3 users liked this post by Snorman:
Lavender (07-29-2016), Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016), tail_lights (07-28-2016)
Old 07-28-2016, 08:27 PM
  #3  
kaup30
Intermediate
 
kaup30's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2010
Location: Corpus christi Tx
Posts: 47
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Prettttty sure I know owner of this vette.. He's a GM for local Chevy dealer that sold me my Z51 couple months back. Tried to get to take his for test drive.. But didn't happen.

Over 1100hp, all sorts of craziness under the hood that I don't think I'm at liberty to share.
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016)
Old 07-28-2016, 08:46 PM
  #4  
DRLC5
Le Mans Master
 
DRLC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Cape Coral FL
Posts: 5,815
Received 340 Likes on 226 Posts

Default

Damn, they both haul the mail. That lambo mph is impressive. The Z was sleeping at the tree.
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 07:33 AM
  #5  
bac22
Le Mans Master
 
bac22's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Epping NH
Posts: 8,213
Received 186 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Snorman

The TTG ran over 173 mph to the C7Z's 148 mph.
S.
Yeah, I'm a bit confused by this, if the Lambo was doing 173MPH at the line how was the vette at 148MPH able to beat it in the 1/4 mile time wise? I'm not a 1/4 mile racer so I don't know if time/mph are related in 1/4 runs?

Last edited by bac22; 07-29-2016 at 07:34 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 10:57 AM
  #6  
0Speed Syndicate
Former Vendor
 
Speed Syndicate's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Posts: 184
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The Gallardo is a 6-Speed 2R owned and driven by Micah at Advance Diesel and Motorsports down here. Sixty was around 2.2 and he was running around 130mph at the 1/8. It's tough launching a big turbo 6-Speed with no two-step.

The C7 Z is owned by Skip and built by AMP. It's procharged and automatic. Its the current 1/4 C7 Z record holder at 9.3x and the current 1/2 mile record holder at 183.

bac22: the Gallardo made it to the finish line first and won while the Vette's elapsed time to the finish line was quicker.

Corvette Forum: Thank you for your continued support as media partners!
The following users liked this post:
SteveDoten@ARH (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 11:05 AM
  #7  
blown81bu
Safety Car
 
blown81bu's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,562
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

The Lambo RED LITE!!!....meaning left to soon...the vette went faster ET...so vette won twice
The following 2 users liked this post by blown81bu:
Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016), SteveDoten@ARH (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 11:18 AM
  #8  
rflow306
Racer
 
rflow306's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
Received 99 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blown81bu
The Lambo RED LITE!!!....meaning left to soon...the vette went faster ET...so vette won twice
watch the video again, the Lambo did not leave early.
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 11:29 AM
  #9  
0Speed Syndicate
Former Vendor
 
Speed Syndicate's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Posts: 184
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown81bu
The Lambo RED LITE!!!....meaning left to soon...the vette went faster ET...so vette won twice
No one red lit. Also, look down the track on the barrier. You will see it illuminate white. That is the winning lane.

Originally Posted by rflow306
watch the video again, the Lambo did not leave early.
Correct.
Old 08-31-2016, 01:28 PM
  #10  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,991
Received 466 Likes on 369 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=bac22;1592730376]Yeah, I'm a bit confused by this, if the Lambo was doing 173MPH at the line how was the vette at 148MPH able to beat it in the 1/4 mile time wise? I'm not a 1/4 mile racer so I don't know if time/mph are related in 1/4 runs?[/QUOTE

The corvette had a lower et because it had a quicker acceleration early in the run when compared to the lambo but latter in the run the lamba was pulling harder and out mph the vette. The lambo has lots of power as shown by the 173 mph.
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (08-31-2016)
Old 08-31-2016, 01:45 PM
  #11  
ZoratZ06
Burning Brakes
 
ZoratZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 1,215
Received 959 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

The bigger question is...how much power is in the Lambo if it's running 173mph quarters?!!! That's insane...1100whp Vette and still didn't crack 150mph...The Lambo was 25mph faster on a soft launch!! WTF! 1600whp?
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (08-31-2016)
Old 08-31-2016, 01:52 PM
  #12  
Dabigsnake
Pro
 
Dabigsnake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Posts: 744
Received 106 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=bjankuski;1592962774]
Originally Posted by bac22
Yeah, I'm a bit confused by this, if the Lambo was doing 173MPH at the line how was the vette at 148MPH able to beat it in the 1/4 mile time wise? I'm not a 1/4 mile racer so I don't know if time/mph are related in 1/4 runs?[/QUOTE

The corvette had a lower et because it had a quicker acceleration early in the run when compared to the lambo but latter in the run the lamba was pulling harder and out mph the vette. The lambo has lots of power as shown by the 173 mph.
WTF? Fact is the time starts when the car leaves and breaks the stage light, not when the tree goes down. Therefore, as what happened here, the Lambo cut a good light,(reaction time) while the Vette slept at the light. The winner is always the car to get to the end first. The vette ran an honest 1/4 mile time that was quicker than the Lambo, but he lost the race. Rematch with both reacting and launching equally, the Vette should win, with the Lambo closing in on him at the top end, finish line.

The Lambo had a 095 reaction time to the Vettes 748 (top of board at finish line after start) that is a .653 deficit that he left on the table. That doesn't equate to deducting that from any ET, only to the time to the end of the finish lights. ET is from broken light to broken light, has nothing to do with reaction time. Keep in mind the tree going green only tell you you can go now without jumping (relighting). it does not start any timing other than reaction times measurements.

Last edited by Dabigsnake; 08-31-2016 at 02:09 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (08-31-2016)
Old 08-31-2016, 02:53 PM
  #13  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,991
Received 466 Likes on 369 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=Dabigsnake;1592962945]
Originally Posted by bjankuski

WTF? Fact is the time starts when the car leaves and breaks the stage light, not when the tree goes down. Therefore, as what happened here, the Lambo cut a good light,(reaction time) while the Vette slept at the light. The winner is always the car to get to the end first. The vette ran an honest 1/4 mile time that was quicker than the Lambo, but he lost the race. Rematch with both reacting and launching equally, the Vette should win, with the Lambo closing in on him at the top end, finish line.

The Lambo had a 095 reaction time to the Vettes 748 (top of board at finish line after start) that is a .653 deficit that he left on the table. That doesn't equate to deducting that from any ET, only to the time to the end of the finish lights. ET is from broken light to broken light, has nothing to do with reaction time. Keep in mind the tree going green only tell you you can go now without jumping (relighting). it does not start any timing other than reaction times measurements.
Are you questioning or correcting me or just helping explain that to the original poster? I was just explaining how the vette had a lower ET, the reation time as noted has nothing to do with the ET. If both cars had the same RT the vette would have won the race but the Lambo would have been closing fast. (Big HP)
The following users liked this post:
Speed Syndicate (08-31-2016)
Old 08-31-2016, 03:51 PM
  #14  
MacMulkin
Platinum Supporting Dealership
 
MacMulkin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Nashua NH
Posts: 4,472
Received 4,105 Likes on 919 Posts

Default

There's a bunch of other good ones over at VetteTube:

http://www.vettetube.com/corvette-vi...te-z06-videos/
__________________
Call 603-888-1121 or Contact Us today!

Corvette Sales & Incentives







Get notified of new replies

To Hot Dragstrip Action: C7 Corvette Z06 Versus Lamborghini Gallardo




Quick Reply: Hot Dragstrip Action: C7 Corvette Z06 Versus Lamborghini Gallardo



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.