Michelin Pilot Super Sport tread compound - Run flat versus non-Run flat
#1
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Michelin Pilot Super Sport tread compound - Run flat versus non-Run flat
There are a good number of posts from people asking if the tread compound on the MPSS run flat is different than the MPSS non-run flat. I've not been able to find a definitive answer to this question.
As I'm switching to non-run flats I wanted a definitive answer. I'm switching for a several reasons. The main one being I've bent all 4 of my wheels running the ZP tires. I drive my car pretty hard and all in the twisties. I'm hoping the softer sidewall will absorb some energy and stop bending my wheels. GM just replaced 3 of my 4 wheels under warranty. The 4th was bent but not beyond acceptable runout. A good number of other owners who utilize the car as I have bent a bunch of wheels as well. If you drive hard on them with the ZP tires they will bend. They are pretty much cheap ***, junk wheels and not suitable for cars driven hard. I'm hoping this will solve my bent wheel problem as I don't want to have to buy "real" forged wheels for the street. I have a set of 18" forged on the way for track usage.
Another lesser reason is I only get about 4,500 miles out of a set and the non-run flats are less expensive. I'm buying 3 to 4 sets of tires a year with just street usage and it's just a weekend car! They also weigh less than the run flats.
I contacted Michelin directly and asked the question. I was informed by Michelin the tread compound is exactly the same on the two tires.
I also contacted Tire Rack and asked the same question. They also informed me the compound was exactly the same. I put more faith in the answer from Michelin but it was nice to get the same answer from Tire Rack.
I do realize the sidewall construction is different as is the weight. Sizing in non-run flat is also a little different than OEM but not enough to make a difference.
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
I also asked Michelin if they could provide the tire spring rate for all four tires listed above. I'm thinking I might have to have Mike Levitas write me a custom DSC Sport Magnetic Shock Controller file for the non-run flat tires due to the different tire spring rates. Michelin informed me they do not provide/publish the spring rates for their tires.
I'll drive the car and get a feel before I determine if a custom DSC Sport shock controller file is needed. I won't know for sure for a month or so as I only mounted the front non-run flats today. I have maybe another month of rubber left on my rear run flats which I'll run until they are shot....
Rick
As I'm switching to non-run flats I wanted a definitive answer. I'm switching for a several reasons. The main one being I've bent all 4 of my wheels running the ZP tires. I drive my car pretty hard and all in the twisties. I'm hoping the softer sidewall will absorb some energy and stop bending my wheels. GM just replaced 3 of my 4 wheels under warranty. The 4th was bent but not beyond acceptable runout. A good number of other owners who utilize the car as I have bent a bunch of wheels as well. If you drive hard on them with the ZP tires they will bend. They are pretty much cheap ***, junk wheels and not suitable for cars driven hard. I'm hoping this will solve my bent wheel problem as I don't want to have to buy "real" forged wheels for the street. I have a set of 18" forged on the way for track usage.
Another lesser reason is I only get about 4,500 miles out of a set and the non-run flats are less expensive. I'm buying 3 to 4 sets of tires a year with just street usage and it's just a weekend car! They also weigh less than the run flats.
I contacted Michelin directly and asked the question. I was informed by Michelin the tread compound is exactly the same on the two tires.
I also contacted Tire Rack and asked the same question. They also informed me the compound was exactly the same. I put more faith in the answer from Michelin but it was nice to get the same answer from Tire Rack.
I do realize the sidewall construction is different as is the weight. Sizing in non-run flat is also a little different than OEM but not enough to make a difference.
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
I also asked Michelin if they could provide the tire spring rate for all four tires listed above. I'm thinking I might have to have Mike Levitas write me a custom DSC Sport Magnetic Shock Controller file for the non-run flat tires due to the different tire spring rates. Michelin informed me they do not provide/publish the spring rates for their tires.
I'll drive the car and get a feel before I determine if a custom DSC Sport shock controller file is needed. I won't know for sure for a month or so as I only mounted the front non-run flats today. I have maybe another month of rubber left on my rear run flats which I'll run until they are shot....
Rick
Last edited by rikhek; 03-29-2017 at 06:40 PM.
Popular Reply
04-11-2017, 12:33 PM
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Well, that didn't work out the way I drew it up. The car went from very good on the ZP tires to VERY, VERY bad on the non ZPs.
The spring rate of the ZP tires versus the non ZP is different enough to make the chassis terrible. The car went from planted to junk. Sidewall flex, roll, bounce and general wallowing about combined with the inability to maintain contact patch made the tires unacceptable for my usage. It was worse than getting a bad set of slicks on a race car. Just terrible.
Not even the DSC Sport magnetic shock controller could compensate for the vastly different spring rate.
The car went bad with just the front non ZP tires mounted. As stated above I only had the front non ZPs mounted as my rear ZPs still had some life left.
Some might think running non ZPs on the front and ZPs on the back resulted in a ill handling car but that is not the case. IMHO, I've driven and raced enough cars, both street and full on race cars to have a good feel for what a chassis is doing. It would have went even worse if I had the non ZPs on the rear
Keep in mind I only use my car for recreational purposes. All my driving on street tires is spirited driving on challenging, fun roads out in the country. I don't drive the car in town or for general transportation, just fun.
I imagine the non ZPs would be fine for most people but mine are coming off. I'm giving them back to Michelin under their 30 day exchange program. I'll be mounting new ZPs in OEM sizes tomorrow.
I guess I'll just have to buy a set of forged wheels for the street as I have for the track as the OEM wheels bend with the ZPs. I'd rather buy a set of wheels and have a GREAT, properly tuned chassis with the ZPs rather than an ill handling car that's no fun to drive.
Oh well, I tried.
Rick
The spring rate of the ZP tires versus the non ZP is different enough to make the chassis terrible. The car went from planted to junk. Sidewall flex, roll, bounce and general wallowing about combined with the inability to maintain contact patch made the tires unacceptable for my usage. It was worse than getting a bad set of slicks on a race car. Just terrible.
Not even the DSC Sport magnetic shock controller could compensate for the vastly different spring rate.
The car went bad with just the front non ZP tires mounted. As stated above I only had the front non ZPs mounted as my rear ZPs still had some life left.
Some might think running non ZPs on the front and ZPs on the back resulted in a ill handling car but that is not the case. IMHO, I've driven and raced enough cars, both street and full on race cars to have a good feel for what a chassis is doing. It would have went even worse if I had the non ZPs on the rear
Keep in mind I only use my car for recreational purposes. All my driving on street tires is spirited driving on challenging, fun roads out in the country. I don't drive the car in town or for general transportation, just fun.
I imagine the non ZPs would be fine for most people but mine are coming off. I'm giving them back to Michelin under their 30 day exchange program. I'll be mounting new ZPs in OEM sizes tomorrow.
I guess I'll just have to buy a set of forged wheels for the street as I have for the track as the OEM wheels bend with the ZPs. I'd rather buy a set of wheels and have a GREAT, properly tuned chassis with the ZPs rather than an ill handling car that's no fun to drive.
Oh well, I tried.
Rick
#3
did you mean to write that the sizing difference is backwards for each set?
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
vs
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 345/25/20 non-run flat.
Does this mean the non-runflats should be purchased at a size bigger to match width? Note that there are sometimes 3-4 different types of the "same" tire. For example, a MPSS 245/35/19 has 3 different "styles" with different tread widths.
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
vs
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 345/25/20 non-run flat.
Does this mean the non-runflats should be purchased at a size bigger to match width? Note that there are sometimes 3-4 different types of the "same" tire. For example, a MPSS 245/35/19 has 3 different "styles" with different tread widths.
Last edited by BrunoTheMellow; 03-29-2017 at 05:37 PM.
#4
Safety Car
Thread Starter
did you mean to write that the sizing difference is backwards for each set?
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
vs
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 345/25/20 non-run flat.
Does this mean the non-runflats should be purchased at a size bigger to match width?
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
vs
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 345/25/20 non-run flat.
Does this mean the non-runflats should be purchased at a size bigger to match width?
However, the tread width on the non-run flat 325 is 13.1" versus 13.0" on the OEM 335 run flat. The section width on the 325 is 13.2" versus 13.5" on the 335. I'm more interested in tread width than section width.
The 325 also comes with 9/32" tread versus 7.8/32" on the 335. I'll take the extra tread depth as I'm lucky to get 4,500 miles out of a set of tires on the street.
Michelin makes two different 295/30/19 non-run flat tires. One is a GM spec tire for a Camaro and is the more expensive one of the two. I opted for the less expensive non Camaro tire...
Rick
Last edited by rikhek; 03-29-2017 at 05:44 PM.
#5
Leeds.io
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Cross River, New York
Posts: 4,594
Received 398 Likes
on
239 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14-'15-'16
NCM Sinkhole Donor
Rick. I see the measurements above but do they appear to be any skinnier? Not inches wise just general look when on the car.
Thanks!
Best,
Gene
Thanks!
Best,
Gene
Last edited by phantasms; 03-29-2017 at 05:44 PM.
#6
Safety Car
Thread Starter
I don't know. As stated above I only had the 295 front non-run flats mounted today. I still have a few runs through the twisties left on my rear 335 run flats. I'll run these on the back with the non-run flats on the front until they are shot in less than a month by my best guesstimate.
I really don't think anybody will be able to tell with the naked eye. You're only talking 0.3" narrower section width on a pretty big tire and, the tread width is actually wider on the 325.
Rick
Last edited by rikhek; 03-29-2017 at 05:51 PM.
The following users liked this post:
phantasms (03-29-2017)
#7
Interesting, there seems to be no rhyme or reason. Be careful with choosing which tire to buy for each size. My brother bought some MPSS 275/35R20 front tires and they have MASSIVE ridges in between and he complains a lot about understeer on his mustang (which he didn't have before)
#9
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Interesting, there seems to be no rhyme or reason. Be careful with choosing which tire to buy for each size. My brother bought some MPSS 275/35R20 front tires and they have MASSIVE ridges in between and he complains a lot about understeer on his mustang (which he didn't have before)
Not sure what he bought but not an issue in my/our situation.
And it does make sense from an engineering standpoint. The ZP construction mandates variances in section width to get the ability to run flat. This changes the geometry of the rest of the tire. The only questionthat has never been definitively answered is regarding the tread compound composition.
The tread pattern on the non-run flat is identical to the ZP. No ridges or other cosmetic differences as you observed on your brothers.
Myself and many others before me have made similar changes on C6 and C5 Corvettes as the Goodyears run flats they used to provide as OEM tires were garbage.
In post number 2 it's stated he's already running the same setup as I. A good number of others on the forum are as well. I was just trying to put the tread compound question to bed....
Thanks for the info.
Rick
Last edited by rikhek; 03-29-2017 at 06:20 PM.
#10
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Also, most can't remember the last time they had a flat, if ever, that left them stranded.....
#11
Bruno,
Not sure what he bought but not an issue in my/our situation.
And it does make sense from an engineering standpoint. The ZP construction mandates variances in section width to get the ability to run flat. This changes the geometry of the rest of the tire. The only questionthat has never been definitively answered is regarding the tread compound composition.
The tread pattern on the non-run flat is identical to the ZP. No ridges or other cosmetic differences as you observed on your brothers.
Myself and many others before me have made similar changes on C6 and C5 Corvettes as the Goodyears run flats they used to provide as OEM tires were garbage.
In post number 2 it's stated he's already running the same setup as I. A good number of others on the forum are as well. I was just trying to put the tread compound question to bed....
Thanks for the info.
Rick
Not sure what he bought but not an issue in my/our situation.
And it does make sense from an engineering standpoint. The ZP construction mandates variances in section width to get the ability to run flat. This changes the geometry of the rest of the tire. The only questionthat has never been definitively answered is regarding the tread compound composition.
The tread pattern on the non-run flat is identical to the ZP. No ridges or other cosmetic differences as you observed on your brothers.
Myself and many others before me have made similar changes on C6 and C5 Corvettes as the Goodyears run flats they used to provide as OEM tires were garbage.
In post number 2 it's stated he's already running the same setup as I. A good number of others on the forum are as well. I was just trying to put the tread compound question to bed....
Thanks for the info.
Rick
From michellin website:
OE [Vehicle Manufacturer] Sidewall Marking: K# = Ferrari, MO= Mercedes-Benz, N# = Porsche, TPC = GM, * = BMW
These will give different thread patterns, section widths, weights, tread widths, etc. For example, tire rack sells two MPSS 295/35r19 versions as you said. Here are the details. That is a large difference in weight and thread width.
295/30ZR19
(100Y) XL
TPC Spec
thread depth 9/32" weight 31 lbs. sect width 11.8" thread width 10.7"
295/30ZR19
(100Y) XL
thread depth 10/32" weight 28 lbs. sect. width 11.9" thread width 11.5"
Like you said, you picked the "other" which has a much wider thread width. That is good to know for others before they purchase.
Last edited by BrunoTheMellow; 03-29-2017 at 07:01 PM.
#12
Melting Slicks
The really interesting part is the non-TPC tire has a deeper tread, a wider tread, and still weighs 3lbs less.
#13
Instructor
I realize you run your car hard on the "twisty's", but you must be HAMMERING some fairly nasty **** to bend a rim. Tons of people track their cars HARD without bending rims. Do you hit some significant potholes?
There are a good number of posts from people asking if the tread compound on the MPSS run flat is different than the MPSS non-run flat. I've not been able to find a definitive answer to this question.
As I'm switching to non-run flats I wanted a definitive answer. I'm switching for a several reasons. The main one being I've bent all 4 of my wheels running the ZP tires. I drive my car pretty hard and all in the twisties. I'm hoping the softer sidewall will absorb some energy and stop bending my wheels. GM just replaced 3 of my 4 wheels under warranty. The 4th was bent but not beyond acceptable runout. A good number of other owners who utilize the car as I have bent a bunch of wheels as well. If you drive hard on them with the ZP tires they will bend. They are pretty much cheap ***, junk wheels and not suitable for cars driven hard. I'm hoping this will solve my bent wheel problem as I don't want to have to buy "real" forged wheels for the street. I have a set of 18" forged on the way for track usage.
Another lesser reason is I only get about 4,500 miles out of a set and the non-run flats are less expensive. I'm buying 3 to 4 sets of tires a year with just street usage and it's just a weekend car! They also weigh less than the run flats.
I contacted Michelin directly and asked the question. I was informed by Michelin the tread compound is exactly the same on the two tires.
I also contacted Tire Rack and asked the same question. They also informed me the compound was exactly the same. I put more faith in the answer from Michelin but it was nice to get the same answer from Tire Rack.
I do realize the sidewall construction is different as is the weight. Sizing in non-run flat is also a little different than OEM but not enough to make a difference.
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
I also asked Michelin if they could provide the tire spring rate for all four tires listed above. I'm thinking I might have to have Mike Levitas write me a custom DSC Sport Magnetic Shock Controller file for the non-run flat tires due to the different tire spring rates. Michelin informed me they do not provide/publish the spring rates for their tires.
I'll drive the car and get a feel before I determine if a custom DSC Sport shock controller file is needed. I won't know for sure for a month or so as I only mounted the front non-run flats today. I have maybe another month of rubber left on my rear run flats which I'll run until they are shot....
Rick
As I'm switching to non-run flats I wanted a definitive answer. I'm switching for a several reasons. The main one being I've bent all 4 of my wheels running the ZP tires. I drive my car pretty hard and all in the twisties. I'm hoping the softer sidewall will absorb some energy and stop bending my wheels. GM just replaced 3 of my 4 wheels under warranty. The 4th was bent but not beyond acceptable runout. A good number of other owners who utilize the car as I have bent a bunch of wheels as well. If you drive hard on them with the ZP tires they will bend. They are pretty much cheap ***, junk wheels and not suitable for cars driven hard. I'm hoping this will solve my bent wheel problem as I don't want to have to buy "real" forged wheels for the street. I have a set of 18" forged on the way for track usage.
Another lesser reason is I only get about 4,500 miles out of a set and the non-run flats are less expensive. I'm buying 3 to 4 sets of tires a year with just street usage and it's just a weekend car! They also weigh less than the run flats.
I contacted Michelin directly and asked the question. I was informed by Michelin the tread compound is exactly the same on the two tires.
I also contacted Tire Rack and asked the same question. They also informed me the compound was exactly the same. I put more faith in the answer from Michelin but it was nice to get the same answer from Tire Rack.
I do realize the sidewall construction is different as is the weight. Sizing in non-run flat is also a little different than OEM but not enough to make a difference.
- Fronts are 285/30/19 run flat and 295/30/19 non-run flat.
- Rears are 335/25/20 run flat and 325/25/20 non-run flat.
I also asked Michelin if they could provide the tire spring rate for all four tires listed above. I'm thinking I might have to have Mike Levitas write me a custom DSC Sport Magnetic Shock Controller file for the non-run flat tires due to the different tire spring rates. Michelin informed me they do not provide/publish the spring rates for their tires.
I'll drive the car and get a feel before I determine if a custom DSC Sport shock controller file is needed. I won't know for sure for a month or so as I only mounted the front non-run flats today. I have maybe another month of rubber left on my rear run flats which I'll run until they are shot....
Rick
#14
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Do a Search on the word "bent" in titles and thread body and you'll see a bunch of guys are bending wheels. I was surprised until I saw it was a fairly common occurrence.
Last edited by rikhek; 03-29-2017 at 09:28 PM.
#15
Melting Slicks
Well I thought I only bent my right front. Turns out my rear wheel is bent too. These wheels are turds. No question they are not engineered to deal with the stresses of the ZP tires. Both wheels have bends on the inner bead where the ZP tire is reinforced.
Last edited by spearfish25; 03-30-2017 at 10:56 AM.
The following users liked this post:
FastestBusaAround (07-19-2017)
#17
Melting Slicks
My front wheel's bend was painfully obvious and the flattened portion could be seen just by looking at it. The rear I didn't notice until this morning when the dealer put it on their balancer and checked the runout.
Last edited by spearfish25; 03-30-2017 at 11:14 AM.
#18
Le Mans Master
Last time I called OnStar for a flat they couldn't make it. No trucks available in the area. Too bad, No Soup For You!
Runflats may use the same rubber compound, but I presume the sidewall construction is beefed up or that there are other construction differences with the tire that would cause it to ride different (presumably more stiffly in the runflat)?
Runflats may use the same rubber compound, but I presume the sidewall construction is beefed up or that there are other construction differences with the tire that would cause it to ride different (presumably more stiffly in the runflat)?
#19
Safety Car
Thread Starter
I was having new tires installed and the tech called me and informed me all 4 were bent. He saw it as they rotated when he was balancing. As stated above this explained my son's observation that the car had a vibration.
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,100
Received 2,478 Likes
on
1,941 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"
I realize you know very well how to handle your car from your posts/threads. But, I urge you to be cautious since you now have two non-runflats on the front (plus they are new), and two runflats on the rear, and they are not new tires. You have at least three things going on that are not standard.