TVS2300 on my Z06
07-22-2017, 04:50 PM
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
TVS2300 on my Z06
I've had the Maggie installed on my Z06 for about a few months now. Car made 545 RWHP completely stock - switching to the TVS2300 with an 80mm pulley, tune, and Attack Blue filter in the stock airbox bumped it up to 629 RWHP on 91 octane.
Well I finally got around to adding some water injection, I'm using an AEM frequency based controller with dual large nozzles. Due to fuel delivery concerns on this otherwise stock car, I started with a 50/50 water/methanol mix and 91 octane to end up with 712 RWHP on the smallest (70mm) pulley I had available - but still not enough boost.
Next up I'll be adding a 20% overdrive lower pulley for more boost. I'm currently at about 15 psi and over 25 degrees of timing. I have plenty of fuel so I'll probably switch the injection mixture to 70/30 water/meth (to consumer less methanol) and raise boost to the 18-20 psi range. I'll probably still need a 103 throttle body and aftermarket CAI to hit my goal of 800 RWHP (and 150 MPH 1/4 mile trap speeds) but at least I'm finally making some progress toward that goal.
Well I finally got around to adding some water injection, I'm using an AEM frequency based controller with dual large nozzles. Due to fuel delivery concerns on this otherwise stock car, I started with a 50/50 water/methanol mix and 91 octane to end up with 712 RWHP on the smallest (70mm) pulley I had available - but still not enough boost.
Next up I'll be adding a 20% overdrive lower pulley for more boost. I'm currently at about 15 psi and over 25 degrees of timing. I have plenty of fuel so I'll probably switch the injection mixture to 70/30 water/meth (to consumer less methanol) and raise boost to the 18-20 psi range. I'll probably still need a 103 throttle body and aftermarket CAI to hit my goal of 800 RWHP (and 150 MPH 1/4 mile trap speeds) but at least I'm finally making some progress toward that goal.
The following 2 users liked this post by 2highpsi:
thebishman (07-22-2017),
TKO Performance (07-24-2017)
07-22-2017, 07:37 PM
#3
Race Director
how's it fitting under the hood
07-22-2017, 09:57 PM
#4
Instructor
Thread Starter
Yes, this is the TVS2300 upgrade (5k).
I can notice an occasional whine from it at part throttle and a light scream at WOT. I expect that it won't be quite as quite with a CAI
The SC fits completely in the location of the stock blower. Clears the stock hood with ease and required no other modifications.
I can notice an occasional whine from it at part throttle and a light scream at WOT. I expect that it won't be quite as quite with a CAI
The SC fits completely in the location of the stock blower. Clears the stock hood with ease and required no other modifications.
07-22-2017, 11:31 PM
#8
Race Director
07-22-2017, 11:31 PM
#9
Drifting
Surprised more people have gone this direction. Nice numbers with room to grow.
07-24-2017, 04:51 PM
#10
Former Vendor
07-24-2017, 05:08 PM
#11
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,076
Received 1,817 Likes
on
1,085 Posts
How does this compare with the gains that people have gotten with pulley ratios and meth injection etc., who didn't switch to a different blower?
07-24-2017, 06:51 PM
#14
Instructor
Thread Starter
No idea, its a mustang twin roller dyno. I'm sure it would be over 700 on a Dynojet. I will say that there is still a but of Torque Management through the mid range that I haven't completely worked out yet...
Overall the power numbers seem pretty good from this dyno, the Camaro made 730 RWHP and went 9.93@140 full weight (+200lb driver) at a +800 DA which is pretty much exactly what I'd expect from that power level. I'm planning to take the Z06 to the track in about 2 weeks, hopefully I can scrounge up some sticky tires before then.
Overall the power numbers seem pretty good from this dyno, the Camaro made 730 RWHP and went 9.93@140 full weight (+200lb driver) at a +800 DA which is pretty much exactly what I'd expect from that power level. I'm planning to take the Z06 to the track in about 2 weeks, hopefully I can scrounge up some sticky tires before then.
07-24-2017, 07:14 PM
#15
Former Vendor
No idea, its a mustang twin roller dyno. I'm sure it would be over 700 on a Dynojet. I will say that there is still a but of Torque Management through the mid range that I haven't completely worked out yet...
Overall the power numbers seem pretty good from this dyno, the Camaro made 730 RWHP and went 9.93@140 full weight (+200lb driver) at a +800 DA which is pretty much exactly what I'd expect from that power level. I'm planning to take the Z06 to the track in about 2 weeks, hopefully I can scrounge up some sticky tires before then.
Overall the power numbers seem pretty good from this dyno, the Camaro made 730 RWHP and went 9.93@140 full weight (+200lb driver) at a +800 DA which is pretty much exactly what I'd expect from that power level. I'm planning to take the Z06 to the track in about 2 weeks, hopefully I can scrounge up some sticky tires before then.
Stock 545 rwhp how much torque?
Maggie 2300 with 13psi made 629 rwhp how much rwtq?
Just curious on numbers.
07-24-2017, 07:22 PM
#16
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,076
Received 1,817 Likes
on
1,085 Posts
07-24-2017, 07:49 PM
#17
Team Owner
07-24-2017, 07:53 PM
#18
Team Owner
Want to avoid meth.
The stock blower I have been avoiding the pulley swap as that raise's the ITA's This has more volume. But really no hurry as a 2.9 or 2.9 could come out or maybe out not sure
07-24-2017, 08:04 PM
#19
Team Owner
I've had the Maggie installed on my Z06 for about a few months now. Car made 545 RWHP completely stock - switching to the TVS2300 with an 80mm pulley, tune, and Attack Blue filter in the stock airbox bumped it up to 629 RWHP on 91 octane.
Well I finally got around to adding some water injection, I'm using an AEM frequency based controller with dual large nozzles. Due to fuel delivery concerns on this otherwise stock car, I started with a 50/50 water/methanol mix and 91 octane to end up with 712 RWHP on the smallest (70mm) pulley I had available - but still not enough boost.
Next up I'll be adding a 20% overdrive lower pulley for more boost. I'm currently at about 15 psi and over 25 degrees of timing. I have plenty of fuel so I'll probably switch the injection mixture to 70/30 water/meth (to consumer less methanol) and raise boost to the 18-20 psi range. I'll probably still need a 103 throttle body and aftermarket CAI to hit my goal of 800 RWHP (and 150 MPH 1/4 mile trap speeds) but at least I'm finally making some progress toward that goal.
Attachment 48116430
Well I finally got around to adding some water injection, I'm using an AEM frequency based controller with dual large nozzles. Due to fuel delivery concerns on this otherwise stock car, I started with a 50/50 water/methanol mix and 91 octane to end up with 712 RWHP on the smallest (70mm) pulley I had available - but still not enough boost.
Next up I'll be adding a 20% overdrive lower pulley for more boost. I'm currently at about 15 psi and over 25 degrees of timing. I have plenty of fuel so I'll probably switch the injection mixture to 70/30 water/meth (to consumer less methanol) and raise boost to the 18-20 psi range. I'll probably still need a 103 throttle body and aftermarket CAI to hit my goal of 800 RWHP (and 150 MPH 1/4 mile trap speeds) but at least I'm finally making some progress toward that goal.
Attachment 48116430
07-24-2017, 09:23 PM
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,076
Received 1,817 Likes
on
1,085 Posts
I wouldn't be eager to add a meth injection system either, but right now, it's among the more viable options we have available.