Edelbrock 2650 vs 1700 swap dyno... finally numbers are in
05-28-2018, 03:26 PM
#41
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
People here want info on 2650 not a 673 rwhp car with a 2300.
once again please keep this thread about the 2650.
thanks
The following users liked this post:
jstewart (05-27-2019)
05-28-2018, 05:44 PM
#42
Thanks Tony, now back to our regularly scheduled 2650 talk 
I think a lot of people (Including myself) are more interested in seeing comparisons of boost and IAT as well as hp/tq at the same blower speed. The 2650 has a huge *** cooler brick (more like a cinder block) and is the main reason for the hood fitment issue, not the bigger rotors.
I think a lot of people (Including myself) are more interested in seeing comparisons of boost and IAT as well as hp/tq at the same blower speed. The 2650 has a huge *** cooler brick (more like a cinder block) and is the main reason for the hood fitment issue, not the bigger rotors.
05-28-2018, 05:47 PM
#43
Drifting
Who cares what you run Gasser? My 2 Z06's do just fine on pump gas and no band-aids on the weak 1.7 for me. Higher levels? 725 TQ and what HP?
on meth too? That's a laugh! You can spend all you want to on the 1.7 You went the cheap route not me! The 2300 is the better set-up. With out the meth what ]t does it run? oh you have no slips either? I set the goal to make on pump gas and made it happen.
Too bad it bothers you!
on meth too? That's a laugh! You can spend all you want to on the 1.7 You went the cheap route not me! The 2300 is the better set-up. With out the meth what ]t does it run? oh you have no slips either? I set the goal to make on pump gas and made it happen.
Too bad it bothers you!
I am glad you achieved your goal of being mediocre with your mods. I am not bashing your gains, I did the same with less money. Who F'n cares that you have 2 Z's and repeatedly let all who care know. Tool!
Last edited by AZGASSER; 05-28-2018 at 05:58 PM.
05-28-2018, 05:57 PM
#44
Drifting
I'm trying to justify my limitations. 
Hard to find a post with more BS than this one.
I have installed 2 centri kits and headers on my previous Corvette's.
Installing the 2300 blower and then another 2300 and headers myself while you drive to the shop for your install shows my limitations?
I already have the 2300 and you are still talking about the budget for it! Not adding up or making much sense. The difference is I choose not to add a meth tank to cover-up the lack luster 1.7.
Now 673 rwhp is average? Amazing high horsepower builds!
Just looks like your just jealous I have two Z06's both will have the 2300's soon.
Hard to find a post with more BS than this one.I have installed 2 centri kits and headers on my previous Corvette's.
Installing the 2300 blower and then another 2300 and headers myself while you drive to the shop for your install shows my limitations?
I already have the 2300 and you are still talking about the budget for it! Not adding up or making much sense. The difference is I choose not to add a meth tank to cover-up the lack luster 1.7.
Now 673 rwhp is average? Amazing high horsepower builds!
Just looks like your just jealous I have two Z06's both will have the 2300's soon.I am not about to compare car purchases or financial accomplishments with you. I suggest you take some of that money you are spending on your new 2300 and invest in some language and typing skills so we can all understand what you are saying.
05-28-2018, 08:51 PM
#45
Thanks Tony, now back to our regularly scheduled 2650 talk
I think a lot of people (Including myself) are more interested in seeing comparisons of boost and IAT as well as hp/tq at the same blower speed. The 2650 has a huge *** cooler brick (more like a cinder block) and is the main reason for the hood fitment issue, not the bigger rotors.
I think a lot of people (Including myself) are more interested in seeing comparisons of boost and IAT as well as hp/tq at the same blower speed. The 2650 has a huge *** cooler brick (more like a cinder block) and is the main reason for the hood fitment issue, not the bigger rotors.
Last edited by rflow306; 05-28-2018 at 08:52 PM.
05-28-2018, 09:02 PM
#46
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
i dont mind the blower sticking out of the hood. Heres the thing i just want the best bang for buck.. maggie 2650 or edelbrock 2650 or whipple 2.9.....
My current set up has no iat issues no problems in anyway. im sure im like other guys that are in the 750 rwhp range on the stock blower.... dont watn to spend 5 to 6k to only gain 60 to 70 rwhp/torque.... I want to be able to get a 850 to 900 rwhp number... GUys are doing this on the ctsv 1.9 blowers so i dont see how a 2650 or 2.9 cant do it either.
My current set up has no iat issues no problems in anyway. im sure im like other guys that are in the 750 rwhp range on the stock blower.... dont watn to spend 5 to 6k to only gain 60 to 70 rwhp/torque.... I want to be able to get a 850 to 900 rwhp number... GUys are doing this on the ctsv 1.9 blowers so i dont see how a 2650 or 2.9 cant do it either.
05-28-2018, 11:02 PM
#47
Drifting
I'd be looking for the Maggie over the Edlebrock. This will be curious to see how it shakes out an bang for buck.
06-03-2018, 02:32 AM
#48
i dont mind the blower sticking out of the hood. Heres the thing i just want the best bang for buck.. maggie 2650 or edelbrock 2650 or whipple 2.9.....
My current set up has no iat issues no problems in anyway. im sure im like other guys that are in the 750 rwhp range on the stock blower.... dont watn to spend 5 to 6k to only gain 60 to 70 rwhp/torque.... I want to be able to get a 850 to 900 rwhp number... GUys are doing this on the ctsv 1.9 blowers so i dont see how a 2650 or 2.9 cant do it either.
My current set up has no iat issues no problems in anyway. im sure im like other guys that are in the 750 rwhp range on the stock blower.... dont watn to spend 5 to 6k to only gain 60 to 70 rwhp/torque.... I want to be able to get a 850 to 900 rwhp number... GUys are doing this on the ctsv 1.9 blowers so i dont see how a 2650 or 2.9 cant do it either.
910rwhp 780trq
E85
Crawford Racing port setup
Mustang dyno
we had issues with traction on dyno
Last edited by Drew27; 06-03-2018 at 02:33 AM.
The following users liked this post:
JHEBERT (06-03-2018)
06-03-2018, 09:50 AM
#49
Racer
id be happy with that. Although id like to stay all direct injection, or have a factory controlled Pi controller like zr1. Way too easy to blow something up with aftermarket meth and pi controllers ran separately. 100% e85 and all DI would be fantastic
06-03-2018, 10:54 AM
#50
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
06-03-2018, 11:52 AM
#51
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,077
Received 1,817 Likes
on
1,085 Posts
06-03-2018, 04:46 PM
#52
Drifting
Great numbers, was expecting more torque off the whipple though. What other mods are on that car?
06-03-2018, 06:42 PM
#53
Me too, I’ve got more torque and 100 less rwhp with the 2.3.
06-03-2018, 06:57 PM
#54
Drifting
Wonder how much extra a decent cam for fueling would do.
05-25-2019, 09:36 PM
#55
Advanced
i dont mind the blower sticking out of the hood. Heres the thing i just want the best bang for buck.. maggie 2650 or edelbrock 2650 or whipple 2.9.....
My current set up has no iat issues no problems in anyway. im sure im like other guys that are in the 750 rwhp range on the stock blower.... dont watn to spend 5 to 6k to only gain 60 to 70 rwhp/torque.... I want to be able to get a 850 to 900 rwhp number... GUys are doing this on the ctsv 1.9 blowers so i dont see how a 2650 or 2.9 cant do it either.
My current set up has no iat issues no problems in anyway. im sure im like other guys that are in the 750 rwhp range on the stock blower.... dont watn to spend 5 to 6k to only gain 60 to 70 rwhp/torque.... I want to be able to get a 850 to 900 rwhp number... GUys are doing this on the ctsv 1.9 blowers so i dont see how a 2650 or 2.9 cant do it either.
05-27-2019, 09:21 AM
#56
Burning Brakes
I am also curious about the larger blower numbers. Weapon X had a Edelbrock 2650 in the shop in January when I was there to pick up my car. Ben did a nice write up on it with pictures but no further info since from them.