C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

GM could have used the 2300!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2018, 01:46 PM
  #21  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DAVE396LT1
No, the bogus lid they tried to stick on the 1.7L had issues. When they went back to the regular lid in 2018, all was well, was it not?
No not at all the short lid was dropped in 2016. 2017 and up 1.7's get the tall lid.
Then when you flip the blower over you can see the issue with cylinders 7-8 on the pre 2017 blower. The intercoolers stop short. 1-6 draw air right from the intercooler
7-8 draw from a pocket behind the intercoolers.

Thus 7-8 get a less cooler air charge. They fixed the issue on the 2017's by tilting the intercoolers so all the cylinders draw the same air from the intercoolers and adding the taller lid adding more room to draw air from.


Last edited by 3 Z06ZR1; 06-16-2018 at 01:52 PM.
Old 06-16-2018, 04:22 PM
  #22  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Well clearly GM need to sack all their automotive engineers and employ corvette forum People Instead! I'm sure 'we' would have no trouble designing a powertrain to meet the power, emission, econmy and cost constraints that the current lot do!...
Old 06-16-2018, 07:16 PM
  #23  
Mr. Gizmo
Le Mans Master
 
Mr. Gizmo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 5,885
Received 641 Likes on 476 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
The tool is you! All you do on this forum is troll the threads with nothing to add but personal attacks, To try cover up for your total of knowledge. No need to worry if your right or not we know your lost
around a Corvette and have no idea. .
Your such a huge a tool you chime again thinking someone was talking to you!
mean girls.
Old 06-16-2018, 10:46 PM
  #24  
ZenicaPA
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
ZenicaPA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 1,055
Received 269 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

I was looking in here for some meaningful information, there may have been a post or two along those lines but the remainder....just a bunch of mean Nancies.
The following 2 users liked this post by ZenicaPA:
AZGASSER (06-17-2018), MP&RPZ06 (06-17-2018)
Old 06-17-2018, 01:33 PM
  #25  
reasonable suspicion
Melting Slicks
 
reasonable suspicion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: what ain't no country I ever heard of
Posts: 2,220
Received 324 Likes on 247 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
Thanks! But seems you are not the one to talking about growing up.
My 2006Z06 2008 C6 2009 ZR1 2015 Z06 and 2017 z06 were all bought on the forum. Plus 5 blower kits and 4-5 sets of headers, and wheels and tires. Plus a lot more stuff you no way match my purchases here. PFFF to yourself! Plus I had a couple other Corvettes not bought here!
Great to everyone supporting the forum!

I've never supported this forum, never will..... but good for you, you're special!
Old 06-17-2018, 01:46 PM
  #26  
AZGASSER
Drifting
 
AZGASSER's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Central MO
Posts: 1,571
Received 289 Likes on 211 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
No not at all the short lid was dropped in 2016. 2017 and up 1.7's get the tall lid.
Then when you flip the blower over you can see the issue with cylinders 7-8 on the pre 2017 blower. The intercoolers stop short. 1-6 draw air right from the intercooler
7-8 draw from a pocket behind the intercoolers.

Thus 7-8 get a less cooler air charge. They fixed the issue on the 2017's by tilting the intercoolers so all the cylinders draw the same air from the intercoolers and adding the taller lid adding more room to draw air from.

Did any of these changes add to any significant improvement in performance whatsoever? I know things sound good on paper but are there any real world performance gains. GM did not change the HP/TQ rating for the engine, or change any advertising claims at all. It was a change in the cooling and SC for the ZR1 that got all the press, not a lid for the 2017+. I am just asking if there were track (drag or road course) improvements. I did change my lid from the 16 to 17 but also did a comprehensive cooling modification as I added a larger HX and expansion tank as well. I cant say the lid in and of itself did anything. I remember back someone saying that they saw a few HP improvement but was that increase noted at the track.

Last edited by AZGASSER; 06-17-2018 at 01:48 PM.
Old 06-17-2018, 02:25 PM
  #27  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZGASSER
Did any of these changes add to any significant improvement in performance whatsoever? I know things sound good on paper but are there any real world performance gains. GM did not change the HP/TQ rating for the engine, or change any advertising claims at all. It was a change in the cooling and SC for the ZR1 that got all the press, not a lid for the 2017+. I am just asking if there were track (drag or road course) improvements. I did change my lid from the 16 to 17 but also did a comprehensive cooling modification as I added a larger HX and expansion tank as well. I cant say the lid in and of itself did anything. I remember back someone saying that they saw a few HP improvement but was that increase noted at the track.
I think it was more for endurance of the cooling system. Lean on 7-8 was maybe causing heat issues more than anything. The 2015-16's seem just as fast and the same power. The blowers put out the same CFM of air. They were trying to improve the delivery as in consistence In the IAT's.
Old 06-17-2018, 04:30 PM
  #28  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
No not at all the short lid was dropped in 2016. 2017 and up 1.7's get the tall lid.
Then when you flip the blower over you can see the issue with cylinders 7-8 on the pre 2017 blower. The intercoolers stop short. 1-6 draw air right from the intercooler
7-8 draw from a pocket behind the intercoolers.

Thus 7-8 get a less cooler air charge. They fixed the issue on the 2017's by tilting the intercoolers so all the cylinders draw the same air from the intercoolers and adding the taller lid adding more room to draw air from.

I'm no engineer specialising in fluid dynamics, but I'm pretty sure that in the above case the air temp post intercooler bricks would be the same regardless of the cylinder location! After all, regardless of the cylinder, the air has been through the intercooler brick!

The real reason I can see is that the back two cylinders where not getting the air flow of the other cylinders. This was solved in the 2017 model by tilinting the bricks (that are the same length as far as I have seen) to give more plenum volume post intercooler bricks and thus more even airflow. It's has nothing to do with cooling more just getting the air into the rear most holes!
Old 06-17-2018, 04:38 PM
  #29  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
I think it was more for endurance of the cooling system. Lean on 7-8 was maybe causing heat issues more than anything. The 2015-16's seem just as fast and the same power. The blowers put out the same CFM of air. They were trying to improve the delivery as in consistence In the IAT's.
7 & 8 won't be lean they will be fat as they are not getting the airflow! The reason they did it was probably to even out the fureling / airflow. People that installed the 2017 lid (on older cars) said they picked up some power (this could have just been variances in the results).

Remember the total CFM and thus power is dictated buy the blower rpm. You could stick the supercharger on a full race 427 LT engine and it would make roughly the same power (assuming similar comp ratios, timing, etc).
Old 06-17-2018, 05:36 PM
  #30  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

The 1.7 met their goals which are more far reaching then just power potential left on the table.
The following users liked this post:
NORCAL-SS (06-18-2018)



Quick Reply: GM could have used the 2300!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.