Bolt-on Procharger 1/4 mile times?
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Bolt-on Procharger 1/4 mile times?
Hi guys, I have a 19 Z that should be arriving any day now. Instead of spending money on the factory blower I having been thinking about just swapping to a Procharger. I was just wondering how much faster you have gone with just the Procharger without getting into the cam etc.
#2
Pro
Hi guys, I have a 19 Z that should be arriving any day now. Instead of spending money on the factory blower I having been thinking about just swapping to a Procharger. I was just wondering how much faster you have gone with just the Procharger without getting into the cam etc.
#4
Pro
#5
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes
on
213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Doing an F1A build now and my original thoughts were staying close to bolt on with just meth, but chose to go with supplemental port injection hearing more advice and feedback from good people here (ProSpeed ACM + G1Pro intake + WeaponX 550lph low side) to hopefully get me closer to 800 wheel. Problem is finding a tuner close to where I live that will pull it all together. Hoping I didn't regret making this build so complex. I have a brand new Alky Kit that I am just holding on to in case I have to fall back to it. I wanted this is going to be a great experience and enjoyable especially doing most of the work myself, not something I regret.
What 1/4 mile times are you looking for? M7 or A8? Tires?
What 1/4 mile times are you looking for? M7 or A8? Tires?
Last edited by C5-VERT; 06-15-2018 at 08:53 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Ben@WeaponX (06-15-2018)
#6
Le Mans Master
I imagine it really makes up ground from 100mph To 150. And willl push the car to a much higher top speed.
#7
Drifting
You'll probably find bolt on PC Z's going same times or slower in the quarter than bolt on stock cars.
#8
Le Mans Master
A Procharger will make mad power up top and a lot less down low. On the street it will be less fun to drive.
In the quarter mile, properly tuned, it -could- be faster. But make sure you understand thet tradeoffs in going from a positive displacement blower to a centrifugal. It's not all winning.
In the quarter mile, properly tuned, it -could- be faster. But make sure you understand thet tradeoffs in going from a positive displacement blower to a centrifugal. It's not all winning.
#9
Pro
A Procharger will make mad power up top and a lot less down low. On the street it will be less fun to drive.
In the quarter mile, properly tuned, it -could- be faster. But make sure you understand thet tradeoffs in going from a positive displacement blower to a centrifugal. It's not all winning.
In the quarter mile, properly tuned, it -could- be faster. But make sure you understand thet tradeoffs in going from a positive displacement blower to a centrifugal. It's not all winning.
#10
Former Vendor
Had a guy at sac was running 9.60s. Pulley/meth/cam/heads/long tubes/intake.
ended up going procharger and went 9.51. Gained 4 mph top end but lost a lot of low/mid. He said car pulls great at higher revs but for drag racing he said he should of just spent it on a bigger blower.
car also made 170 more at wheels peak.... but along the power curve was a lot less.
ended up going procharger and went 9.51. Gained 4 mph top end but lost a lot of low/mid. He said car pulls great at higher revs but for drag racing he said he should of just spent it on a bigger blower.
car also made 170 more at wheels peak.... but along the power curve was a lot less.
Last edited by NORCAL-SS; 06-17-2018 at 05:42 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Corvette4ever (06-17-2018)
#11
Drifting
Yep, you need to be cranking some serious HP to dive deep in the time slips. My car made 864 on pump, and was running 10.4s summer. **** 60 foot, so so DA. But MPH wasnt great either. Cars going to a new tuner going forward, pretty sure its dropping boost during runs.
If i did it all over i would go with the PD blower heartbeat or 2650 non edlebrock.
If i did it all over i would go with the PD blower heartbeat or 2650 non edlebrock.
#12
Pro
Had a guy at sac was running 9.60s. Pulley/meth/cam/heads/long tubes/intake.
ended up going procharger and went 9.51. Gained 4 mph top end but lost a lot of low/mid. He said car pulls great at higher revs but for drag racing he said he should of just spent it on a bigger blower.
car also made 170 more at wheels peak.... but along the power curve was a lot less.
ended up going procharger and went 9.51. Gained 4 mph top end but lost a lot of low/mid. He said car pulls great at higher revs but for drag racing he said he should of just spent it on a bigger blower.
car also made 170 more at wheels peak.... but along the power curve was a lot less.
#13
Drifting
#14
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes
on
213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Personally don't quite understand spending $10k on a procharger and not going with complimentary additions such as fuel, long tubes, etc. If you have a budget less than $12-15k no question heads/cam/cooling with a PD blower upgraded or pulley swaps is best path. For best times and high HP PC is crushing it just a few searches finds many like this:
#15
Drifting
Personally don't quite understand spending $10k on a procharger and not going with complimentary additions such as fuel, long tubes, etc. If you have a budget less than $12-15k no question heads/cam/cooling with a PD blower upgraded or pulley swaps is best path. For best times and high HP PC is crushing it just a few searches finds many like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds-uLUQgGk4
#16
Former Vendor
Personally don't quite understand spending $10k on a procharger and not going with complimentary additions such as fuel, long tubes, etc. If you have a budget less than $12-15k no question heads/cam/cooling with a PD blower upgraded or pulley swaps is best path. For best times and high HP PC is crushing it just a few searches finds many like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds-uLUQgGk4
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes
on
213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Easily. I am up to near $25k on my build already minus my signature wheels/cup2's. That's without cam/heads. That's my point. You won't make the most of a ProCharger build without fuel, exhaust, valvetrain. Even clutch, tanny mods. For $12-15k in my opinion you are better off with 2.3 or just heads/cam/long tubes/tune. The stock blower with additional cooling / pulley and heads/cam will easily make best use of stock fuel system as we all know and be a better road car. We all know going past that magical 800+ number requires a LOT more in terms of fuel, valvetrain, etc. Same problem I just ran into.
Guess I took this thread off topic my fault. Just may help those who run into the same issues I did...
Guess I took this thread off topic my fault. Just may help those who run into the same issues I did...
#18
Former Vendor
Easily. I am up to near $25k on my build already minus my signature wheels/cup2's. That's without cam/heads. That's my point. You won't make the most of a ProCharger build without fuel, exhaust, valvetrain. Even clutch, tanny mods. For $12-15k in my opinion you are better off with 2.3 or just heads/cam/long tubes/tune. The stock blower with additional cooling / pulley and heads/cam will easily make best use of stock fuel system as we all know and be a better road car. We all know going past that magical 800+ number requires a LOT more in terms of fuel, valvetrain, etc. Same problem I just ran into.
Guess I took this thread off topic my fault. Just may help those who run into the same issues I did...
Guess I took this thread off topic my fault. Just may help those who run into the same issues I did...
wish ya the best on your build
#19
Burning Brakes
Yeah doing a procharger as just a bolt on mod is worthless and you will more than likely be slower at the drag strip then just doing simple bolt ons to the factory setup. It's all about that 60' in the quarter mile and the procharger is going to be a comparative turd out of the hole. Unless you are doing a fuel system, cam, converter, etc the procharger is never going to be able to make enough bottom end to get that 60' down to where it needs to be to really shine.
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes
on
213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Just like those catless downpipes you make for the money and for most builds those will give you 80% of what you need for a third less than long tubes. Finding that nice line between cost per horsepower is all about research and also real world testing. It's also great to have so many options today. Thanks for the kind words!