C7 ZR1 Discussion General ZR1 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

LT5-displacement in demand? And injection set up making it to rest of the line up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2017, 02:14 PM
  #1  
Mr. Gizmo
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Mr. Gizmo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 5,886
Received 641 Likes on 476 Posts

Default LT5-displacement in demand? And injection set up making it to rest of the line up

As the thread states - will the zr1 have dod?

Can anyone describe in detail but in not to technical of terms
How gm is combining direct injection with port injection ?
In addition to blowing fire out the *** end of the car a side
Benefit is less carbon build up on the valves.

Will this port/direct injection combo make it to the lt1, lt4 as well as
Other Engines in the gm car, suv and truck line up?

This port/direct injection set up may be well worth the wait if it makes it to the paltry 650 and 460 horse vettes.

I would think production costs would be less if gm ran this injection set up across the vette engine line up.
Old 11-18-2017, 05:00 PM
  #2  
Mr. Gizmo
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Mr. Gizmo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 5,886
Received 641 Likes on 476 Posts

Default

This snippet pulled from motor trend. Looks like the car will be very sophisticated in this area with 2 fuel injectors per cylinder a port and direct. Throw dod on top of that and it’s a very busy setup flames and all.

It will be interesting to see the fuel mileage estimate and how this set up works. Will the direct injection work all the time and will the port come on when it’s full throttle similar to the c4 zr1 secondaries or will they both work all the time simultaneously.

Snippet from MT:

“Another big difference: GM’s first dual fuel-injection system. It has primary direct injection and supplemental port injection. A cool by-product: It is said to shoot flames from the exhaust.”

Last edited by Mr. Gizmo; 11-18-2017 at 05:02 PM.
Old 11-18-2017, 05:28 PM
  #3  
2016_Z06
Racer
 
2016_Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Location: Pound Town USA
Posts: 287
Received 76 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Unlikely it requires a new cylinder head as well...
Old 11-18-2017, 05:32 PM
  #4  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,063
Received 3,803 Likes on 1,143 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

I expect Tadge may touch upon this in LA, but: the engine won't have AFM (there's the -100lbs!) and both cars will get hit with a GG tax. The final FE numbers have not been determined yet.
The following users liked this post:
elegant (11-24-2017)
Old 11-18-2017, 05:56 PM
  #5  
2016_Z06
Racer
 
2016_Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Location: Pound Town USA
Posts: 287
Received 76 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jvp
I expect Tadge may touch upon this in LA, but: the engine won't have AFM (there's the -100lbs!) and both cars will get hit with a GG tax. The final FE numbers have not been determined yet.
It's likely that the zr1 won' have eco mode which defeats the gg tax on the z06 m7
Old 11-18-2017, 06:14 PM
  #6  
dmaxx3500
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
dmaxx3500's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 30,856
Received 1,183 Likes on 748 Posts

Default

I thought we got rid of the gas guzzler tax ,years ago?
Old 11-18-2017, 06:24 PM
  #7  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2016_Z06
It's likely that the zr1 won' have eco mode which defeats the gg tax on the z06 m7
The "eco" mode is not why the manual Z06 doesn't have a Gas Guzzler tax on it. You can thank CAGS for that.

I have never understood why, after NOT avoiding the GG tax anyway, GM didn't just let the A8 Z06 run WITHOUT AFM unless you selected ECO mode (like a manual). Sure would have saved them a bunch of trouble on the torque converter front!
Old 11-18-2017, 06:54 PM
  #8  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,063
Received 3,803 Likes on 1,143 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
I have never understood why, after NOT avoiding the GG tax anyway, GM didn't just let the A8 Z06 run WITHOUT AFM unless you selected ECO mode (like a manual). Sure would have saved them a bunch of trouble on the torque converter front!
This isn't really ZR1-related, but: the GG tax would have been worse with AFM configured like it is on the manual. And some fun w/emissions due to that.
Old 11-18-2017, 06:58 PM
  #9  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

^^^^

Got it, thanks.
Old 11-18-2017, 06:59 PM
  #10  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

So, JVP.

Given NO AFM on the ZR1, will they go to a carbon fiber (or some other lighter material) drive shaft?

Last edited by jimmyb; 11-18-2017 at 07:00 PM.
Old 11-18-2017, 07:06 PM
  #11  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,063
Received 3,803 Likes on 1,143 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Given NO AFM on the ZR1, will they go to a carbon fiber (or some other lighter material) drive shaft?
Unknown to me.
Old 11-19-2017, 05:16 AM
  #12  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
So, JVP.

Given NO AFM on the ZR1, will they go to a carbon fiber (or some other lighter material) drive shaft?
driveshaft will likely stay alum but the torq tube is cf
Old 11-19-2017, 06:40 AM
  #13  
fatsport
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
fatsport's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Fl
Posts: 2,412
Received 894 Likes on 538 Posts
Default

Higher redline if no AFM?
Old 11-19-2017, 06:45 AM
  #14  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,063
Received 3,803 Likes on 1,143 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by fatsport
Higher redline if no AFM?
Same redline.
Old 11-20-2017, 11:26 AM
  #15  
vetteLT193
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
vetteLT193's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Tallahassee fl
Posts: 2,147
Received 524 Likes on 314 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Gizmo
As the thread states - will the zr1 have dod?

Can anyone describe in detail but in not to technical of terms
How gm is combining direct injection with port injection ?
In addition to blowing fire out the *** end of the car a side
Benefit is less carbon build up on the valves.

Will this port/direct injection combo make it to the lt1, lt4 as well as
Other Engines in the gm car, suv and truck line up?

This port/direct injection set up may be well worth the wait if it makes it to the paltry 650 and 460 horse vettes.

I would think production costs would be less if gm ran this injection set up across the vette engine line up.
I'm guessing it's going to be similar to what Callaway did on the C4 turbos. When the injectors get too big they lose efficiency when in low demand. By combining smaller injectors with port injection they can increase gas mileage while also keeping with demand while under boost. This also means it's likely to have DOD. The port injection is also likely why the car shoots flames... the fuel is already injected under high demand so when you switch from full throttle to hard braking the fuel ends up already being sprayed so it gets spit out into the exhaust.
Old 11-21-2017, 06:18 AM
  #16  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

the big z06 di injectors and pump upped the ante but 755 likely would push that liimit a bit

the port injection allows adding more fuel and keeps the valves clean

It would have been cheaper to just build a bigger di so the engineers must have learned something from toyota and subaru who went this direction

the port injection seems to idle better for some reason, maybe better fuel atomization

rest assured there are some tecnical reasons and I'm for one happy they did. this may open some doors to back fitting this technology to the z06 for bolting on the blower and front end and

viola! you have a zr1 clone

there many things to like about the new zr1, I just hope the next iteration does the lt5 label proud and introduces dohc

with variable cam timing and dohc, we can resolve some of the current limitations and with the c8 room won't be as much of an issue

love the new zr1, but I have to admit I like my c4 LPE LT5 as well

619 HP with no blower that was in 97

FI with variable cam timing is a marriage made in heaven and gm knows it. the little ol redline lnf 2.0 made 260 hp, scale that up to 6.0 displacement with some decent heads the ecotech has pea shooters.

gm is likely going down this path to lower displacement and turbos, and fortunately they do it cheaper!
Old 11-21-2017, 11:09 AM
  #17  
Kent1999
Le Mans Master
 
Kent1999's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 6,483
Received 1,651 Likes on 825 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rkreigh
driveshaft will likely stay alum but the torq tube is cf
A CF TT is standard on all Z06, so that’s nothing new for ZR1.

As far as the ZR1 shooting flames out of the exhaust — I’m having a hard time imagining how that would be. Port or Direct injection, all of it has to pass through the cats on it’s way out. One of a Cat’s primary missions is to be hot enough to burn through unburnt matter in the exhaust stream. It is really hard to imagine enough gas getting dumped down the exhaust that some of it could pass right through a 1000 deg cat and be ignited by exiting the tailpipe. Not saying it isn’t possible, just hard to imagine.

Last edited by Kent1999; 11-21-2017 at 01:52 PM.
Old 11-24-2017, 02:51 AM
  #18  
goec2468
Instructor
 
goec2468's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 184
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kent1999
A CF TT is standard on all Z06, so that’s nothing new for ZR1.

As far as the ZR1 shooting flames out of the exhaust — I’m having a hard time imagining how that would be. Port or Direct injection, all of it has to pass through the cats on it’s way out. One of a Cat’s primary missions is to be hot enough to burn through unburnt matter in the exhaust stream. It is really hard to imagine enough gas getting dumped down the exhaust that some of it could pass right through a 1000 deg cat and be ignited by exiting the tailpipe. Not saying it isn’t possible, just hard to imagine.
The fuel is certainly hot enough in the Cat, but there is no oxygene to burn it. Once the very hot fuel leaves the exhaust system, there is plenty of oxygene and the fuel can burn.
That is how I think it works.

Regards

Götz

Get notified of new replies

To LT5-displacement in demand? And injection set up making it to rest of the line up




Quick Reply: LT5-displacement in demand? And injection set up making it to rest of the line up



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.