10.2 Stock ZR1
#21
Scraping the splitter.
How do you know somebody doesn't have a ZR1 with adequate break in miles on it?
How many miles are on the car that apparently ran a 10.2?
Why do you think the engine will "blow" if it doesn't have enough miles on it?
The break in is primarily for the clutch (M7 cars) and differential. Once the engine is running for a short period, there's nothing to "break in". Change the oil and it's good to go. This isn't the 1960's.
S.
How many miles are on the car that apparently ran a 10.2?
Why do you think the engine will "blow" if it doesn't have enough miles on it?
The break in is primarily for the clutch (M7 cars) and differential. Once the engine is running for a short period, there's nothing to "break in". Change the oil and it's good to go. This isn't the 1960's.
S.
#22
How do you know somebody doesn't have a ZR1 with adequate break in miles on it?
How many miles are on the car that apparently ran a 10.2?
Why do you think the engine will "blow" if it doesn't have enough miles on it?
The break in is primarily for the clutch (M7 cars) and differential. Once the engine is running for a short period, there's nothing to "break in". Change the oil and it's good to go. This isn't the 1960's.
S.
How many miles are on the car that apparently ran a 10.2?
Why do you think the engine will "blow" if it doesn't have enough miles on it?
The break in is primarily for the clutch (M7 cars) and differential. Once the engine is running for a short period, there's nothing to "break in". Change the oil and it's good to go. This isn't the 1960's.
S.
#23
One reason is that SOME post "just got my ZR1" then on You Tube they are drag racing. One guy raced his at 495 miles and said so .Also if the engine doesn't need to be 'BROKEN IN" why does GM say to do it? Is this to protect GM? If it wasn't necessary why wouldn't they say "hey once you get your car just go drive the crap out of it don't worry about how fast you go" Doesn't it tell the new owner how to break the brakes in also?
#24
Fran??
#25
Le Mans Master
without drag radials 755 hp will be a smoke screen even at the digs.
the z06 with 650 was traction limited, another 105 isn't going to make it better.
10.6 on street tires is impressive, and 10.2 on drag radials is pretty good.
I agree with above, tranny and diff take more breakin than the engine. the new engines are happy pretty quickly and do most of the break in within the first hour of running.
time to go to MIR and see for myself!
the z06 with 650 was traction limited, another 105 isn't going to make it better.
10.6 on street tires is impressive, and 10.2 on drag radials is pretty good.
I agree with above, tranny and diff take more breakin than the engine. the new engines are happy pretty quickly and do most of the break in within the first hour of running.
time to go to MIR and see for myself!
#26
#27
For the life of me I cant understand why some people are so......loony. In this ridiculous argument over "stock" or "not stock" because of a set of tires I've noticed the racers of the group can make a clear distinction that tires are traction aids only. No HP was added nor a tune. The car is still stock, but on sticky tires. Racers know that "not stock" means the MECHANICALS or TUNING of the car was altered.. Only people that dont race would even make the asinine claim the car isnt stock due to tires.
#28
Melting Slicks
For the life of me I cant understand why some people are so......loony. In this ridiculous argument over "stock" or "not stock" because of a set of tires I've noticed the racers of the group can make a clear distinction that tires are traction aids only. No HP was added nor a tune. The car is still stock, but on sticky tires. Racers know that "not stock" means the MECHANICALS or TUNING of the car was altered.. Only people that dont race would even make the asinine claim the car isnt stock due to tires.
Last edited by racerns; 04-25-2018 at 12:09 AM.
#29
Team Owner
without drag radials 755 hp will be a smoke screen even at the digs.
the z06 with 650 was traction limited, another 105 isn't going to make it better.
10.6 on street tires is impressive, and 10.2 on drag radials is pretty good.
I agree with above, tranny and diff take more breakin than the engine. the new engines are happy pretty quickly and do most of the break in within the first hour of running.
time to go to MIR and see for myself!
the z06 with 650 was traction limited, another 105 isn't going to make it better.
10.6 on street tires is impressive, and 10.2 on drag radials is pretty good.
I agree with above, tranny and diff take more breakin than the engine. the new engines are happy pretty quickly and do most of the break in within the first hour of running.
time to go to MIR and see for myself!
#30
Instructor
it was wfarmer.z trying to beat his 10.12 in negative DA. How do I know? I was there and watched the runs at MIR and I know Will. The car couldn't back up the 10.12 from Richmond Dragway, but it wasn't for lack of trying. He was having some issues with tire shake and stability during the passes. He was not happy with the new set of rear tires he had just installed on the exact same wheels as the previous 10.12 pass. 10.2@134 was his best due to these tire issues. He was able to beat his best 60' time as I read the scoreboard and saw a 1.53 on one of his passes. No worries...he will resolve this issue and try again soon.
The following 3 users liked this post by Stephen02Z06:
#32
it was wfarmer.z trying to beat his 10.12 in negative DA. How do I know? I was there and watched the runs at MIR and I know Will. The car couldn't back up the 10.12 from Richmond Dragway, but it wasn't for lack of trying. He was having some issues with tire shake and stability during the passes. He was not happy with the new set of rear tires he had just installed on the exact same wheels as the previous 10.12 pass. 10.2@134 was his best due to these tire issues. He was able to beat his best 60' time as I read the scoreboard and saw a 1.53 on one of his passes. No worries...he will resolve this issue and try again soon.
#34
Instructor
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan City Indiana
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One reason is that SOME post "just got my ZR1" then on You Tube they are drag racing. One guy raced his at 495 miles and said so .Also if the engine doesn't need to be 'BROKEN IN" why does GM say to do it? Is this to protect GM? If it wasn't necessary why wouldn't they say "hey once you get your car just go drive the crap out of it don't worry about how fast you go" Doesn't it tell the new owner how to break the brakes in also?
Anxious to hear your response.
#35
Burning Brakes
#36
Instructor
The following users liked this post:
keagan (04-27-2018)
#39
Race Director
#40
Racer
Member Since: Nov 2017
Location: Wentzville MO & Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 408
Received 198 Likes
on
102 Posts
For the life of me I cant understand why some people are so......loony. In this ridiculous argument over "stock" or "not stock" because of a set of tires I've noticed the racers of the group can make a clear distinction that tires are traction aids only. No HP was added nor a tune. The car is still stock, but on sticky tires. Racers know that "not stock" means the MECHANICALS or TUNING of the car was altered.. Only people that dont race would even make the asinine claim the car isnt stock due to tires.
Last edited by blb078; 04-27-2018 at 04:14 PM.