C7 ZR1 Discussion General ZR1 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

New article w/GT2 RS and 720S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2018, 07:35 AM
  #41  
Telepierre
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Telepierre's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,938
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,253 Posts

Default

Since the launch of the GT2RS in June 17, some of this has been discussed at length at least 6 months ago on the other side of the pond.

GT2RS gas consumption is one side of the coin. The other is that GT2RS comes stock with a "weight saving race tank" @ approx. 15 gallons..with a regular/bigger 17 gal available as an option. Stock smaller tank = quicker to empty..

The 1.2 gallon I/C water sprayer tank is actually becoming an overheating/nannies issue as well due to its rapid rate of consumption..

Finally, remember the 700 DIN is calculated on 77F IATs versus the 755 (104F) SAE... so basically once that tank depletes it may be "game over" unless of course you install the ring record dry ice kit..
Old 09-06-2018, 08:02 AM
  #42  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Palantirion
- Like they didn't make their own engines in house? Oh, but they did. Besides since no OEM directly manufactures most of the parts that go on their car so there is no logic in assuming quality levels between major and minor manufacturers based on your fallacious implication.
The assembled their own engines in house- they didn't make their own engines in house though.
Old 09-06-2018, 08:23 AM
  #43  
heavychevy
Safety Car
 
heavychevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Road Atlanta You do the MATH!
Posts: 4,369
Received 179 Likes on 112 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Palantirion
- Like they didn't make their own engines in house? Oh, but they did. Besides since no OEM directly manufactures most of the parts that go on their car so there is no logic in assuming quality levels between major and minor manufacturers based on your fallacious implication.
There is plenty of logic in making that assumption with a large volume international car manufacturer with billions of dollars going into R&D and testing vs a small scale manufacturer who may simply choose a 3rd party without input on it's design structure and materials. And especially one that has the largest scale racing market in the world putting these parts to the test pretty much non stop. Test mules in the harshest of conditions around the globe, vehicles created specifically for R&D etc. If you assume otherwise, that is what's illogical.
Old 09-06-2018, 09:04 AM
  #44  
Poor-sha
Track Rat
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Poor-sha's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,444
Received 3,400 Likes on 1,372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Palantirion
- That was at Road America? If so then that translates to 8 laps at Willow, which if we estimate 1.34 minutes per lap (running 1:20s) it would mean that it would run out of gas in 32 minutes. So it could finish a single 25min session but with little reserve and hopefully no low-tank fuel starvation in 2 or the Omega. Geez, I thought the ZR1 was thirsty, but it can at least do a full session AND drive to town for gas and lunch.

I would love to see someone test the GT2-RS with and without the misters to see how much its performance falls off. It's only a little quicker than the ZR1 when the magazines are topping off the misters and controlling tests to reflect unrealistic tracking conditions.I must presume the German will fair poorly if lap times were taken 1/2 way through (or at the end of) a full session.
My ZR1 went through 16.7 gallons in 32 minutes at Summit Point. It's an 18.5 gallon tank but I wouldn't be comfortable pushing past 30 minutes given that the fuel gauge is entirely unreliable on track. It was 11 gallons in 20 minutes at VIR which also works out to about 16.5 in 30 minutes.

Last edited by Poor-sha; 09-06-2018 at 09:05 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Palantirion (09-06-2018)
Old 09-06-2018, 09:20 AM
  #45  
UnhandledException
Drifting
 
UnhandledException's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,907
Received 1,351 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Steven and I had exchanged some PMs where I promised him I wouldnt post anything critiquing ZR1 anymore not because what I am posting is inflamatory or trolling but because it is just upsetting so many people and it was never my intention to cause drama here. But I want to post one last message to clear the air.

You guys have been missing my point since day one. First and foremost, dont be suprised if one day I post pictures of my gt350 with a zr1 next to it. I actually quite like the car.

What I dont like (and I have a tendency to do the same for other things in life, its my personality) is the ignorance and people putting on blinders. What I dont like is people picking and choosing the strengths of this car and twisting the truth so they dont face the reality. People coming here and saying:

- When ZR1 does bad in a 1/4 mile race, “oh but its not meant for drag strip, its a track car”
- When it posts a bad track time (like that ZL1 comparison in Germany or very close Z06 time motor trend posted), “oh but its not meant to be a track car, its a luxury grand tourer”.

People have to understand and accept the car for what it is. The hype has to die down.

And why that has to happen is because that will make the changes in GM that we will all benefit. Enough of the band aid solutions (adding more power where the problem is not enough weight reduction). Enough of the incomplete car launches and marketing disasters (Nurburgring picture behind Z06 launch in detroit auto show but no nurburgring time, claims by Tadge about the most “track capable corvette z06” which cant complete 5 full laps.

GM is getting away with these “fiascos” because YOU, the BLINDER people let them. Its like some people will vote for a person because he/she is republican/democrat not because he/she is fit to be a president and lead others but because they are so single minded, so stubborn that they will only vote for one party. You know the type. I am trying my best here to expose that mentality gets us, the enthusiasts, nowhere.

Similar to how people made Porsche listen to make a 6MT GT3 (imagine the complex logistics and cost of this change), we, the market, can make GM listen. All it will take is people stop drinking the koolaid and be objective.

The summary is this, ZR1 is what Z06 should have been MINUS the uber extra fuel injection/downforce/carbon fiber everywhere items
that make it a $140,000 car it is. All GM had to do was to give the cooling Z06 needed in the proper form.

Furthermore, the price of $140,000 is too high for what you get. I dont understand why they couldnt price this car like they priced Z06. Z06 is priced so well, it is a bargain.

Lastly, GM needs to find a way to come up with an elegant, lightweight, bespoke track car. You guys keep making fun of my GT350 but what I like about that car is its bespoke. Its engine will never show up in any model of Ford. You keep making the argument that GM can make corvette so affordable by sharing its components with other models in their lineup. Thats BS. How can Ford make a complete bespoke engine, new transmission, completely new drive terrain that shares very little with other models?

I want GM to come up with a TRUE porsche GT3 competitor. I am not asking for them to make a car that will go faster around the lap. Thats like putting makeup on a pig. I want something unique about this track car that no other GM car besides its own variations (aka GT3 and GT3RS similarity) will have. And I want them
to sell it at an affordable price.

I want all of these things not because I am a troll or I hate Corvette. I want these things because I hate having to bend backwards to these moronic porsche dealership empire. I dont want to spend my hard earned money on a german car. I live in America and I want Americans to beat Germans.

I hope this post clarifies my point. I genuienly think we can make a change if enough of us speaks. Enough of us makes youtube videos or blogs.
Old 09-06-2018, 09:26 AM
  #46  
heavychevy
Safety Car
 
heavychevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Road Atlanta You do the MATH!
Posts: 4,369
Received 179 Likes on 112 Posts

Default

Who cares? Who are you to tell people what they should and shouldn't prioritize in their car? Who are you to tell people what to hype up based on their excitement level? And above all who are you to demand a GT3 competitor when you dont even go to the track. GM built the car they meant to build and it will outsell all the 911's put together. If you do not like it take a hike I don't want to own a C7 but I respect those that do and understand why GM builds the car they do. It has its problems, but then so do 911's, including GT3's. GM isn't trying to copy Porsche. Never have.

Get over yourself. Nobody cares. And yes you most certainly have been a troll.

Last edited by heavychevy; 09-06-2018 at 09:30 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by heavychevy:
CorvettoBrando (09-12-2018), desmophile (09-08-2018), Lavender (09-07-2018)
Old 09-06-2018, 09:39 AM
  #47  
UnhandledException
Drifting
 
UnhandledException's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,907
Received 1,351 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heavychevy
Who cares? Who are you to tell people what they should and shouldn't prioritize in their car? Who are you to tell people what to hype up based on their excitement level? And above all who are you to demand a GT3 competitor when you dont even go to the track. GM built the car they meant to build and it will outsell all the 911's put together. If you do not like it take a hike I don't want to own a C7 but I respect those that do and understand why GM builds the car they do. It has its problems, but then so do 911's, including GT3's. GM isn't trying to copy Porsche. Never have.

Get over yourself. Nobody cares. And yes you most certainly have been a troll.
Can you read my post again, especially around the parts touching on GM?

I am doing this because GM, the company behind Corvette, the one in Detroit, makes claims about their cars getting people like me interested. If they never put a nurburgring poster in their launch, never test their cars in nurburgring, if their chief engineer never made claims about “the most track readiness” but instead said, “hey guys, this is just a luxurious fast grand tourer like porsche turbo or bmw m6 or bentley or ferrari 488. Its not really for track”. I wouldnt even be here.

I believe there is a segment of corvette market that GM should carve out for a proper GT3 class car. Which the C6 Z06 truly was, wasnt it? I think they can come out with a naturally aspirated, 3250 lbs, mid 500hp, mid engine car which doesnt have heated and cooled seats and whatever other luxury items you guys want. And thats all I am saying. They can still have the “king” making 1000 hp weighing 3700 lbs. the issue right now is Z06 overheats and ZR1 is too heavy. Both cars have issue putting power down (this article you quote explains how well 911 is balanced and puts the power down). None of what I am saying is trolling. Stop the personal attacks and try and understand where I am coming from.
Old 09-06-2018, 11:02 AM
  #48  
Poor-sha
Track Rat
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Poor-sha's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,444
Received 3,400 Likes on 1,372 Posts

Default

Back to the topic of GT2RS vs ZR1. I spoke to Mike and didn't get quite as precise a weight as I'd hoped but he said the GT2RS was 3520 lbs with a full tank and him in it so about 3190 without fuel. When we spoke he said the car had about 3/4 tank and it was a 100L tank but his text with the weights said full tank. Anyway, you're looking at around 3350 lbs for a real world GT2RS without driver and with a full fuel load. I didn't ask him if the intercooler spray tank was full

For comparison, a 3ZR ZR1 manual is 3647, 1ZR subtract 35 lbs, so you're looking at a 250-300 lb delta between the cars. Running aftermarket 18" wheels and tires will bring that down closer to a 200 lb delta, you could probably drop another 100 lbs with aftermarket race seats, this really comes down to your bench for racing and your rules.

Last edited by Poor-sha; 09-06-2018 at 11:03 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Palantirion (09-06-2018)
Old 09-06-2018, 11:57 AM
  #49  
Telepierre
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Telepierre's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,938
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,253 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poor-sha
Back to the topic of GT2RS vs ZR1. I spoke to Mike and didn't get quite as precise a weight as I'd hoped but he said the GT2RS was 3520 lbs with a full tank and him in it so about 3190 without fuel. When we spoke he said the car had about 3/4 tank and it was a 100L tank but his text with the weights said full tank. Anyway, you're looking at around 3350 lbs for a real world GT2RS without driver and with a full fuel load. I didn't ask him if the intercooler spray tank was full

For comparison, a 3ZR ZR1 manual is 3647, 1ZR subtract 35 lbs, so you're looking at a 250-300 lb delta between the cars. Running aftermarket 18" wheels and tires will bring that down closer to a 200 lb delta, you could probably drop another 100 lbs with aftermarket race seats, this really comes down to your bench for racing and your rules.
:-) Ok Poor-sha; I am in kumbaya mode too...but please get back to Mike and retry because I ASSURE you the GT2RS does not have a 100L (26 gallons) Tank...that's the KC-130 refueling plane LoL...sorry but after yesterday's course of America 1:27 I am starting to loose it again.. :-)

All good!


Old 09-06-2018, 12:30 PM
  #50  
TrackAire
Drifting
 
TrackAire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,745
Received 489 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Telepierre
Since the launch of the GT2RS in June 17, some of this has been discussed at length at least 6 months ago on the other side of the pond.

GT2RS gas consumption is one side of the coin. The other is that GT2RS comes stock with a "weight saving race tank" @ approx. 15 gallons..with a regular/bigger 17 gal available as an option. Stock smaller tank = quicker to empty..

The 1.2 gallon I/C water sprayer tank is actually becoming an overheating/nannies issue as well due to its rapid rate of consumption..

Finally, remember the 700 DIN is calculated on 77F IATs versus the 755 (104F) SAE... so basically once that tank depletes it may be "game over" unless of course you install the ring record dry ice kit..
Are you serious about the dry ice kit? Just wondering if you're making a joke or if Porsche was getting sneaky just like the tires they used.........
Old 09-06-2018, 12:36 PM
  #51  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poor-sha
Back to the topic of GT2RS vs ZR1. I spoke to Mike and didn't get quite as precise a weight as I'd hoped but he said the GT2RS was 3520 lbs with a full tank and him in it so about 3190 without fuel. When we spoke he said the car had about 3/4 tank and it was a 100L tank but his text with the weights said full tank. Anyway, you're looking at around 3350 lbs for a real world GT2RS without driver and with a full fuel load. I didn't ask him if the intercooler spray tank was full

For comparison, a 3ZR ZR1 manual is 3647, 1ZR subtract 35 lbs, so you're looking at a 250-300 lb delta between the cars. Running aftermarket 18" wheels and tires will bring that down closer to a 200 lb delta, you could probably drop another 100 lbs with aftermarket race seats, this really comes down to your bench for racing and your rules.
What wheels and tires are you running to drop 50-100lbs? Keep in mind, the Porsche is factory 20/21 inch wheels.
Race seats, with all the hardware are like 25lbs or so? Are factory seats really 75lbs each? Jesus. Also, now you have a true race seat with a fixed back (not sure what the GT2 has).

Isn't the GT2RS pretty stripped out though? No infotainment, no AC, etc with its $30k super weight loss track package? I'm not sure if the 3350 you're quoting includes that package or not. I'm guessing it doesn't?
Old 09-06-2018, 01:01 PM
  #52  
Poor-sha
Track Rat
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Poor-sha's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,444
Received 3,400 Likes on 1,372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by village idiot
What wheels and tires are you running to drop 50-100lbs? Keep in mind, the Porsche is factory 20/21 inch wheels.
Race seats, with all the hardware are like 25lbs or so? Are factory seats really 75lbs each? Jesus. Also, now you have a true race seat with a fixed back (not sure what the GT2 has).

Isn't the GT2RS pretty stripped out though? No infotainment, no AC, etc with its $30k super weight loss track package? I'm not sure if the 3350 you're quoting includes that package or not. I'm guessing it doesn't?
Going from stock wheels and tires to Finspeed and CCW wheels with Pirelli slicks shaved 55 lbs same day same scales. I'm estimating on the seats as I still run the stock seats but some of the newer race starts are ~9 lbs and I can believe the stock seats with all the electric motors are 50+ lbs.
Old 09-06-2018, 01:49 PM
  #53  
Dave Schotz
Drifting
 
Dave Schotz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Chandler AZ
Posts: 1,683
Received 78 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

The GT2RS has a 60L standard and 90L optional (23.7 Gallon tank). Most everyone orders the GT cars with the optional 90L tank, just so that they don't have to refuel during most track days.

Real world, to real world... I believe we're going to see a 300lb weight difference between the two cars. Obviously slicks and race seats start to change the equation.

Best Regards
Dave
Old 09-06-2018, 02:15 PM
  #54  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dave Schotz
The GT2RS has a 60L standard and 90L optional (23.7 Gallon tank). Most everyone orders the GT cars with the optional 90L tank, just so that they don't have to refuel during most track days.

Real world, to real world... I believe we're going to see a 300lb weight difference between the two cars. Obviously slicks and race seats start to change the equation.

Best Regards
Dave
Yeah, my thoughts too. Also, I'm sure the GT2 will save a lot of weight going to smaller wheels and slicks too. 300lbs is a lot. I'd love to drop 300lbs out of my car. Most economical way I can think of is wheels/tires (50lbs, $5000), seats ($5000, 75lbs) and CCB ($7000? 40lbs). I just can't justify spending $17,000 (!) to save 165lbs though. That's a nice track car.
Old 09-06-2018, 02:19 PM
  #55  
heavychevy
Safety Car
 
heavychevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Road Atlanta You do the MATH!
Posts: 4,369
Received 179 Likes on 112 Posts

Default

No slicks still on RWS as far as I know. Voids warranty. No sure anyone has come up with a solution for 18 in wheels either. It's not plug and play that's for sure.
​​​​
That being said, at some point you reach the threshold of no longer stock.

Last edited by heavychevy; 09-06-2018 at 02:20 PM.
Old 09-06-2018, 03:24 PM
  #56  
Palantirion
Burning Brakes
 
Palantirion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Location: California
Posts: 765
Received 268 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Telepierre
... so basically once that tank depletes it may be "game over" unless of course you install the ring record dry ice kit..
- So the record was set with a modified car? Or Porsche sells the dry ice kit and thus it is OEM and thus the car is "not modified"?

Originally Posted by village idiot
The assembled their own engines in house- they didn't make their own engines in house though.
- They started with Ford short blocks. That is it. They machined those to their specs and everything else was made bespoke - heads, intakes, etc.. Except maybe some peripheral components (injectors and such) that Ford doesn't make either. The engines are hand built by one guy, like the higher-end Porches and the ZR1.

Originally Posted by heavychevy
There is plenty of logic in making that assumption with a large volume international car manufacturer with billions of dollars going into R&D and testing vs a small scale manufacturer who may simply choose a 3rd party without input on it's design structure and materials. And especially one that has the largest scale racing market in the world putting these parts to the test pretty much non stop. Test mules in the harshest of conditions around the globe, vehicles created specifically for R&D etc. If you assume otherwise, that is what's illogical.
- Volume sales give a cash flow that can lead to quality improvements via testing. But we also know that at various periods of time the "big three", while being far more fiscally solvent, had poorer quality than smaller foreign companies. The reverse has also been true. Point is: Size does not equal quality and it is foolish to assume such. Quality is the end result of an incredibly complex interaction of variables.

Originally Posted by Poor-sha
My ZR1 went through 16.7 gallons in 32 minutes at Summit Point. It's an 18.5 gallon tank but I wouldn't be comfortable pushing past 30 minutes given that the fuel gauge is entirely unreliable on track. It was 11 gallons in 20 minutes at VIR which also works out to about 16.5 in 30 minutes.
- Good to know for my future planning.

What we are seeing here is simply that HP = fuel and air. And more = more.

Last edited by Palantirion; 09-06-2018 at 03:25 PM.
Old 09-06-2018, 03:31 PM
  #57  
Telepierre
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Telepierre's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,938
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,253 Posts

Default

My weight pitch remains unchanged.
At options parity (no weissach and stripping) on GT2RS side and (1ZR package) on ZR1 side: less than 100 pounds.
At no options parity (weissach & Stripping) on GT2RS side and (3ZR package) on ZR1 side: 200 pounds.

Get notified of new replies

To New article w/GT2 RS and 720S

Old 09-06-2018, 03:38 PM
  #58  
heavychevy
Safety Car
 
heavychevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Road Atlanta You do the MATH!
Posts: 4,369
Received 179 Likes on 112 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Palantirion
- Volume sales give a cash flow that can lead to quality improvements via testing. But we also know that at various periods of time the "big three", while being far more fiscally solvent, had poorer quality than smaller foreign companies. The reverse has also been true. Point is: Size does not equal quality and it is foolish to assume such. Quality is the end result of an incredibly complex interaction of variables.
Thats a generalization not specific to Porsche who is widely regarded as a manufacturer with high durability in regards performance vehicles. One place Porsche does not cheap or on, especially with regards to GT cars, is the suspension and powertrain. Are they prone to design/engineering flaws, yes, but cheap materials? You would be reaching to even suggest such a thing. Still not comparable to Saleen or random aftermarket parts.
Old 09-06-2018, 04:46 PM
  #59  
Telepierre
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Telepierre's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,938
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,253 Posts

Default

So the record was set with a modified car? Or Porsche sells the dry ice kit and thus it is OEM and thus the car is "not modified"?
Semantics and definition of modified. I call the record car a non stock prototype.By now everybody knows about the “tire thing” (credit to Porsche German fans).The “dry ice joke” came up in the Q&A with Lars Kern where he clarified the tires and mentions different developmental setups to include the I/C system with no specifics. From there two PFF Porsche forum members’ owners of GT2RS extrapolated that the reason they were not remotely coming close to Lars video speeds at the Nurb big straight (after discounting the stripping they don’t have) is because either turbo/engine tunings OR the I/C temps. From there they found a British OEM company that provided/provides dry ice kits for the GT2RS and the joke in cheek started from there..That said they are doing the math to prove that was it.
Old 09-06-2018, 04:57 PM
  #60  
village idiot
Le Mans Master
 
village idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: DFW, Tejas!
Posts: 7,080
Received 1,913 Likes on 1,053 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Palantirion

- They started with Ford short blocks. That is it. They machined those to their specs and everything else was made bespoke - heads, intakes, etc.. Except maybe some peripheral components (injectors and such) that Ford doesn't make either. The engines are hand built by one guy, like the higher-end Porches and the ZR1.
No, they didn't use Ford short blocks in the S7. They have Ford specs (ie: Bearing sizes, bore center, head bolt patterns, etc), but they didn't use Ford short blocks. Pretty sure the heads aren't custom cast to their specs either, but I could be wrong (though I'm pretty confident).

Intake, cam, exhaust, oiling, is all designed and manufactured by Saleen.


Quick Reply: New article w/GT2 RS and 720S



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 AM.