Mid-Engine C8 Corvette to boast near six-figure price, arrive in 2019 - Page 7 - CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

Go Back  CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion > C8 Corvette > C8 General Discussion
Reload this Page >

Mid-Engine C8 Corvette to boast near six-figure price, arrive in 2019

Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette, be it mid-engine, Zora, or whatever form it may take.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mid-Engine C8 Corvette to boast near six-figure price, arrive in 2019

Old 05-15-2018, 08:37 PM
  #121  
Yarbie
CF Senior Member
 
Yarbie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 71 Times in 58 Posts
Default

GM is going to make the new C8 and future models a much more high end offering so the $56,000 corvette is going bye bye.
all of the whiners crying about it not being affordable need to buy a Camaro.

Those folks are the ones that think like that are stretching their bank accounts thin just to drive a vette.

get over it!!!!!!!

buy a mustang or a challenger.

Corvettes are about to become a car that only a FEW will be able to afford.

Last edited by Yarbie; 05-15-2018 at 08:38 PM.
Yarbie is online now  
Old 05-15-2018, 08:45 PM
  #122  
BrownVette
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Posts: 274
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem View Post
"Utility?"
In a Sportscar?
Buying a Sportscar for its utility is like dating Scarlett Johansson for her culinary skills.


She did make me some pretty awesome pancakes this morning lol
BrownVette is offline  
Old 05-15-2018, 09:26 PM
  #123  
Suns_PSD
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,167
Thanked 233 Times in 190 Posts
Default

Forced induction engines get poor mpg, particularly when on boost and when running regular octane fuel for about 7 reasons: 1) lower effective compression required to reduce pre-ignition, 2) richer fuel mixture to reduce pre-ignition, 3) retarded ignition timing to reduce pre-ignition, 4) additional parasitic drag to run component, 5) increased weight. 6) additional coolers so more air resistance, 7) additional pumps to run.
Suns_PSD is offline  
Old 05-15-2018, 10:09 PM
  #124  
MitchAlsup
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,783
Thanked 72 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5 View Post
I also have a picture of my 7.0L Z06 averaging 33.0 MPG for 450 mile trip from Springfield, MO to Natchez, MS.
I now have a picture of my GLE 450 getting 32.2 MPG over 244 miles.

But my point was that a C7 has way smaller frontal area than a great big SUV--and thus its aero resistance should be significantly lower ( then the GLS) and its milage should reflect same.
MitchAlsup is offline  
Old 05-15-2018, 10:13 PM
  #125  
MitchAlsup
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,783
Thanked 72 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suns_PSD View Post
Forced induction engines get poor mpg, particularly when on boost and when running regular octane fuel for about 7 reasons: 1) lower effective compression required to reduce pre-ignition, 2) richer fuel mixture to reduce pre-ignition, 3) retarded ignition timing to reduce pre-ignition, 4) additional parasitic drag to run component, 5) increased weight. 6) additional coolers so more air resistance, 7) additional pumps to run.
So, if this is true, then why can I get 32MPG in a GLS?

Which weighs more than a Vette (by close to 1000 pounds) has close to 1.6X the frontal area of the Vette, and in my case the 450 engine is definitely Twin Turbo.
Attached Images  
MitchAlsup is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 12:56 AM
  #126  
dcbingaman
CF Senior Member
 
dcbingaman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,011
Thanked 186 Times in 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Destrukt View Post
You must have not been following GM's story on why they went through drastic changes in making the C7. They wanted to appeal to MORE people specifically the YOUNGER generation. Good luck achieving that with your guess about the C8. By the way, the "Halo Viper" has ended production. I wonder why?
I agree - the Audi R8 is reportedly dead and the Acura NSX is on death’s door. The business case does not close for ANY Corvette or ANY GM sports car unless they can sell 33,000 of them a year.

I think the GM Authority report may be based on the car that would go to Australia, which may NOT be the base model. Export Corvettes have been upmarket versions in the recent past. For instance, if the Australian base model is actually a Z06-equivalent with an LT4, then $89k makes sense, and would imply a base model with an LT1 for the US market at ~$70K. I think GM is betting they can sell 33,000 cars a year IF they can keep the US base model within $10K of the C7, AND they can expand export sales. Even so, they are hedging the bet by keeping the C7 in production for at least 2 more years.

As they say, we’ll see !!

Last edited by dcbingaman; 05-16-2018 at 12:59 AM.
dcbingaman is online now  
Old 05-16-2018, 02:35 AM
  #127  
Corvette#2
CF Senior Member
 
Corvette#2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,349
Thanked 82 Times in 74 Posts
Default

With 505hp, that won't be close to Ferrari beating, unless they can get the weight waaaaay down, which I highly doubt. A 488 has 660hp and weighs about 3200. A 505hp m/e corvette would need to weigh only 2500lbs to be equivalent. I really don't see that happening. Maybe the high spec models will eventually, but surely not the base.

And anyone that thinks m/e corvette will cost 200k is smoking crack. Who would buy it over an exotic ? Not many, unless the performance was off the charts.

Last edited by Corvette#2; 05-16-2018 at 02:37 AM.
Corvette#2 is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 03:57 AM
  #128  
lt4obsesses
CF Senior Member
 
lt4obsesses's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 4,532
Thanked 81 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dcbingaman View Post


I agree - the Audi R8 is reportedly dead and the Acura NSX is on death’s door. The business case does not close for ANY Corvette or ANY GM sports car unless they can sell 33,000 of them a year.

I think the GM Authority report may be based on the car that would go to Australia, which may NOT be the base model. Export Corvettes have been upmarket versions in the recent past. For instance, if the Australian base model is actually a Z06-equivalent with an LT4, then $89k makes sense, and would imply a base model with an LT1 for the US market at ~$70K. I think GM is betting they can sell 33,000 cars a year IF they can keep the US base model within $10K of the C7, AND they can expand export sales. Even so, they are hedging the bet by keeping the C7 in production for at least 2 more years.

As they say, we’ll see !!
Some good points, especially about exports. The one thing that I can't really wrap my head around is the idea of bringing out the ME and still producing the C7 simultaneously. I say that because from a marketing standpoint it's like saying, "Here you go, we've finally built the car we've been toying with for 50 years. But we're not sure you're gonna like it, so we'll keep making the old one, just in case you don't."
We're not sure you're gonna like it is not a winning sales pitch.

The only thing that would make any sense in that scenario is if the mid engine car came out as an ultra high performance model out of the gate. A special car following it's own generational timeline. Then in 2 years the C8, as the successor to the C7, in traditional FE format is revealed. I just don't see them rolling out a new generation while still building the last one. If the mid engine is the C8, they will tell us this is the latest and greatest and old one is obsolete in comparison.
lt4obsesses is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 10:43 AM
  #129  
nexxis
CF Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 93
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

It’s possible to have 2 configurations of mid-engine and front-engine. These small block engines are pretty easy to fit even in the rear of a C7.
After all, there’s vents and wings that exist on both Z06 and base model that are non-functional on the latter.

Don’t get me wrong, I still want an ME (as long as it’s not $89k), but there’s a lot of freaking out going on for a car that doesn’t exist lol

Last edited by nexxis; 05-16-2018 at 10:44 AM.
nexxis is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 12:52 PM
  #130  
c5arlen
CF Member
 
c5arlen's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Sioux Falls South Dakota
Posts: 91
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default

That was for enduring nagging. A necessary survival skill for the married man.
You got that, man!
c5arlen is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 03:18 PM
  #131  
pdiddy972
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 8,682
Thanked 308 Times in 198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Corvette#2 View Post
With 505hp, that won't be close to Ferrari beating, unless they can get the weight waaaaay down, which I highly doubt. A 488 has 660hp and weighs about 3200. A 505hp m/e corvette would need to weigh only 2500lbs to be equivalent. I really don't see that happening. Maybe the high spec models will eventually, but surely not the base.

And anyone that thinks m/e corvette will cost 200k is smoking crack. Who would buy it over an exotic ? Not many, unless the performance was off the charts.
A Grand Sport was only 2 secs behind the 488GTB at 2016's Lightning Lap. The Z06 stomped it.

Last edited by pdiddy972; 05-17-2018 at 02:03 PM.
pdiddy972 is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 03:46 PM
  #132  
JoesC5
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 39,140
Thanked 1,180 Times in 855 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MitchAlsup View Post
So, if this is true, then why can I get 32MPG in a GLS?

Which weighs more than a Vette (by close to 1000 pounds) has close to 1.6X the frontal area of the Vette, and in my case the 450 engine is definitely Twin Turbo.
Since it has a EPA rating of 17 city and 22 highway, I think you had better hermetically seal it in a vault, as it's a one of a kind SUV.

Bet I could leave Fernley, NV(elev 4,160 feet) on I-80 and drive the 244 miles to Emeryville, CA(elev 26 feet) and get around 60 MPG average for that 244 mile downhill run in my Z06. Driving back wouldn't be so great, though.

While I haven't driven from Fernley, NV, I have driven from Truckee, CA down to Emeryville, CA on I-80. Left Truckee with a half tank of gas and I had to stop in Sacramento to drain some gas out of my tank, as it was near overflowing.

Last edited by JoesC5; 05-16-2018 at 04:06 PM.
JoesC5 is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 04:27 PM
  #133  
Jimbob26
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Location: Danville California
Posts: 941
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray View Post
If we assume the article is correct and the base ME starts at $89k, then the typical Corvette (based upon current profiles) Stingray (not GS or Z06) leaves BG at an average MSRP of $69,000 - $14,000 above starting price, then the average ME will be priced at $103,000.
There are a boatload of people who can and do stretch to afford a $69k car that just can't afford a $103,000 car; and more to the point for anyone to suggest with a 50% increase in base price that GM will sell 30,000+ per year C8's is just insane. The number of single car models that cost $100,000 or more and sell at more than 30,000 units per year in the US is = ZERO. Corvette won't change that.
Once Corvette goes mid-engine only, you remove those who use the Corvette for anything but track or weekend around town use - I am willing to bet those people represent 25-30% of buyers; from there you can also remove 75% of the approximate 18% (6,000/yr) of buyers who purchase convertibles as there can me no mid-engine convertible; and that leaves you with a pool of buyers (not factoring in the cost issues) that is 40% smaller than the current Corvette pool.
If GM does go down the ME only plan, I hope the plan amortizes the tooling and costs for an average of 10,000 cars per year - because if they don't and GM loses money on the C8 (something it hasn't done since the early days of the C1), the Corvette will disappear in any form forever.
I think there may a be a ME convertible on the horizon. Ferrari has the F360, F430, 458 Spyder and 488 Spyder, and all are mid-engined. You can't tell me the Italians have more engineering capability than our GM engineers.
Jimbob26 is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 04:52 PM
  #134  
LIE2ME
CF Senior Member
 
LIE2ME's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: Camden SC
Posts: 3,434
Thanked 288 Times in 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem View Post
"Utility?"
In a Sportscar?
Buying a Sportscar for its utility is like dating Scarlett Johansson for her culinary skills.
Hey, Scarlett made me breakfast last Saturday morning. She's a GREAT cook!......
LIE2ME is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 07:05 PM
  #135  
Suns_PSD
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,167
Thanked 233 Times in 190 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MitchAlsup View Post
So, if this is true, then why can I get 32MPG in a GLS?

Which weighs more than a Vette (by close to 1000 pounds) has close to 1.6X the frontal area of the Vette, and in my case the 450 engine is definitely Twin Turbo.
Unless you compare that exact vehicle under the same conditions to a NA version, your statement is essentially nonsense.

So a good comparison of the exact same vehicle, with identical gearing and architecture would be like a C6GS vs. a C6 ZR1 or a C7GS vs C7Z06. In both of these comparisons the NA engine wins handily in regards to mpg.

In the Autocross section right now member 'Poor-sha' compared a C7GS vs a C7Z06 on the same track and compared many parameters of their lap times. One parameter that was noted was mpg, where the GS got approximately DOUBLE the fuel economy of what the Z06 got. Such is the reality of a Forced Induction car under boost. Fact is a built NA GS would be a far superior track car to the C7Z but I digress...

Last edited by Suns_PSD; 05-16-2018 at 09:59 PM.
Suns_PSD is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 07:34 PM
  #136  
Walter Raulerson
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 490
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire View Post
As a McLaren and C7Z owner, I don't want an $89K base mid engine car. There's no way the quality will be anywhere near that of exotics at that price point. I'd much prefer the car to start in the $200K range and be an exotic killer. I, for one, am not interested in buying an updated Fiero.

Keep the front engine platform similarly priced to where it is, and offer us a Ford GT fighter for a little less dough and I'm in.
Most of us don't have near $300,000 to buy cars with so we want a Corvette Mid Engine that we can pay for and enjoy
Walter Raulerson is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 07:36 PM
  #137  
Walter Raulerson
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 490
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tolnep View Post
so.. The base or near base price of the c8 will be 120,000$? In two years.

Or is that australian dollars? If us dollars that puts it out of reach of the tradition corvette buyer.
zr1 next decade???
Walter Raulerson is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 07:41 PM
  #138  
Walter Raulerson
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 490
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray View Post
If we assume the article is correct and the base ME starts at $89k, then the typical Corvette (based upon current profiles) Stingray (not GS or Z06) leaves BG at an average MSRP of $69,000 - $14,000 above starting price, then the average ME will be priced at $103,000.
There are a boatload of people who can and do stretch to afford a $69k car that just can't afford a $103,000 car; and more to the point for anyone to suggest with a 50% increase in base price that GM will sell 30,000+ per year C8's is just insane. The number of single car models that cost $100,000 or more and sell at more than 30,000 units per year in the US is = ZERO. Corvette won't change that.
Once Corvette goes mid-engine only, you remove those who use the Corvette for anything but track or weekend around town use - I am willing to bet those people represent 25-30% of buyers; from there you can also remove 75% of the approximate 18% (6,000/yr) of buyers who purchase convertibles as there can me no mid-engine convertible; and that leaves you with a pool of buyers (not factoring in the cost issues) that is 40% smaller than the current Corvette pool.
If GM does go down the ME only plan, I hope the plan amortizes the tooling and costs for an average of 10,000 cars per year - because if they don't and GM loses money on the C8 (something it hasn't done since the early days of the C1), the Corvette will disappear in any form forever.


Who are these "just about everyone " thinks the C8 will be a front engine model? Didn't GM show dealers a peek at the car and wasn't it a MID ENGINE CAR?
Walter Raulerson is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 09:03 PM
  #139  
tbasco 6
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 559
Thanked 33 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MitchAlsup View Post
So, if this is true, then why can I get 32MPG in a GLS?

Which weighs more than a Vette (by close to 1000 pounds) has close to 1.6X the frontal area of the Vette, and in my case the 450 engine is definitely Twin Turbo.
Who averages 60mph for 244 miles?
tbasco 6 is offline  
Old 05-17-2018, 04:55 AM
  #140  
lt4obsesses
CF Senior Member
 
lt4obsesses's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 4,532
Thanked 81 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Walter Raulerson View Post
Who are these "just about everyone " thinks the C8 will be a front engine model? Didn't GM show dealers a peek at the car and wasn't it a MID ENGINE CAR?
Sure, they showed them "a" mid engine Corvette. This really doesn't mean anything more than they are most likely going to produce a mid engine Corvette. However, there may also be a new generation FE Corvette to follow shortly behind.

Let's not forget that GM has officially said nothing about any new Corvette to date.
lt4obsesses is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Mid-Engine C8 Corvette to boast near six-figure price, arrive in 2019


Sponsored Ads
Vendor Directory

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: