Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Will the Mid-Engine sportscar GM is developing supplement, replace or ?
Mid-Engine car will supplement the standard Front Engine/RWD lineup of Corvettes
133
66.17%
Mid-Engine car will replace the FR car and the era of traditional Corvette is dead
39
19.40%
The Mid-Engine car won't be a Corvette or even a Chevrolet
29
14.43%
Voters: 201. You may not vote on this poll

Let's get folks on record, will the mid-engine REPLACE or supplement the front engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2017, 03:18 AM
  #21  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Well that's a relief...at least the obvious outcome carries the majority.
Old 07-11-2017, 03:22 PM
  #22  
LIStingray
Melting Slicks
 
LIStingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,299
Received 461 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlanAutoSports
Well that's a relief...at least the obvious outcome carries the majority.
I thought the obvious outcome is the ME is a Cadillac
Old 07-11-2017, 07:15 PM
  #23  
ddlanes
Instructor
 
ddlanes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Location: Santa Rosa California
Posts: 240
Received 160 Likes on 68 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C2 of the Year Winner - Unmodified
2022 C8 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
2016 C1 of the Year Finalist
Default

Old 07-11-2017, 08:49 PM
  #24  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray
I thought the obvious outcome is the ME is a Cadillac
I believe it will similar to the new NSX (small 6 cyl. TT Hybrid)
Old 07-12-2017, 06:57 AM
  #25  
Goaty
Pro
 
Goaty's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 654
Received 199 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

The rumor that keeps getting reported by the rags is that the mid-engine will by a separate model from the front-engine C7 and they will both be produced for a few years. Then the C8 will switch to mid-engine a few years later and there will be no more front-engine car.
The following 3 users liked this post by Goaty:
BigEC6 (08-16-2017), Boiler_81 (07-12-2017), sunsalem (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 07:15 AM
  #26  
gurneyeagle
Burning Brakes
 
gurneyeagle's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Posts: 928
Received 630 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Goaty
The rumor that keeps getting reported by the rags is that the mid-engine will by a separate model from the front-engine C7 and they will both be produced for a few years. Then the C8 will switch to mid-engine a few years later and there will be no more front-engine car.

Agreed, and this should have been option #4 in the poll.
The following 3 users liked this post by gurneyeagle:
BigEC6 (08-16-2017), Boiler_81 (07-12-2017), sunsalem (07-13-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 08:47 PM
  #27  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

FACTS:

The C7 will be the last front engine design.

The front engine will run in succession with the mid engine car until the C7 ends production, at which point the mid engine will be the only corvette platform produced.

Count on it. Go ahead and bookmark this post.

Last edited by Paulchristian; 07-13-2017 at 09:44 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Paulchristian:
Boiler_81 (07-14-2017), sunsalem (07-13-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 10:45 PM
  #28  
roadbike56
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
roadbike56's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Holly Springs NC
Posts: 14,378
Received 1,609 Likes on 1,037 Posts
St. Jude Donor '16-'17,'22,'24

Default

Interesting thread. Lots of opinions.
There is however, one fact. Previously stated on these forums, the panel manufacturer has filed an expansion plan for their plant. This was filed with the planning commission where they are located. The reason for the expansion was explained in this document. Apparently they need to expand because GM will be buying panels for a new vehicle while they continue to manufacture the current C7 panels. They will co-manufacture for about 2 to 3 years.
They didn't say what the new vehicle was, what brand it was only that the buyer of the panels would be GM. This supports that if these panels are for the ME car, and everything points in that direction, it will co-exist with the C7. They did not say what would happen to the space used for C7 panels after the 2 to 3 year period.
Old 07-13-2017, 09:53 AM
  #29  
rsinor
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
rsinor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 701
Received 362 Likes on 168 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by roadbike56
Interesting thread. Lots of opinions.
There is however, one fact. Previously stated on these forums, the panel manufacturer has filed an expansion plan for their plant. This was filed with the planning commission where they are located. The reason for the expansion was explained in this document. Apparently they need to expand because GM will be buying panels for a new vehicle while they continue to manufacture the current C7 panels. They will co-manufacture for about 2 to 3 years.
They didn't say what the new vehicle was, what brand it was only that the buyer of the panels would be GM. This supports that if these panels are for the ME car, and everything points in that direction, it will co-exist with the C7. They did not say what would happen to the space used for C7 panels after the 2 to 3 year period.
With the upcoming introduction of a new twin turbo V8 XLR Cadillac there will be no need for a second Cadillac that is mid engine, twin turbo V8 now being tested by Cadillac is not configured for use as a mid engine. ME vehicle is going to be Corvette. my .02
Old 07-13-2017, 10:00 AM
  #30  
alamo1974
Drifting
 
alamo1974's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: boerne texas
Posts: 1,420
Received 82 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fyreline
The people who know don't talk.

The people who talk don't know.
Old 07-13-2017, 10:44 AM
  #31  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsinor
With the upcoming introduction of a new twin turbo V8 XLR Cadillac there will be no need for a second Cadillac that is mid engine, twin turbo V8 now being tested by Cadillac is not configured for use as a mid engine. ME vehicle is going to be Corvette. my .02
Cadillac and Corvette both have a common problem, so they are both seeking similar solutions. The problem being demographics of their buyers. Both brands need to attract new eyes and new attention.

Cadillac is focusing itself to BMW and Corvette to Porsche. These are your blueprints to how both will move forward.

Corvette needs more models, expand the lineup and attract younger buyers who want MORE. Corvette needs a better buyer experience. Guys don't want to spend 120k and get a Cobalt dealer experience.

Cadillac is targeted at younger white collar guys with families that still want excitement and the executive who wants luxury and performance. The ATS aims at the younger M3 buyer, etc. BMW found a place for i8, an ME car, in very low numbers. If Cadillac ever used the ME platform, it'd be to do something hybrid, techie, just the same.

I theorize that GM/Corvette is pushing to be a standalone sub-brand. Not to the extent that there are separate dealerships entirely, but potentially push dealers to have divided showrooms, separate entrances, etc. Will dealers who want the ME on their lot be pushed to this, in order to get allocation in the early phases? Bob Lutz spoke about how they wanted to move Pontiac to become an entirely RWD brand before the shutdown. I think a lot of things were in motion prior to the bankruptcy, that are somewhat being rekindled and reworked.

Fact is, racing is doing well for Corvette and now Cadillac. It's creating excitement for both brands that they can capitalize on and their programs are tiny compared to the german brands.

There is a large surge toward performance SUV's with Ferrari announcing it's building one. Porsche Cayenne is the strongest selling model in the Porsche brand. Corvette and Cadillac are sleepin on this sector and they shouldn't be.

I think the fact is, GM, financially has had its struggles and it needs to make very calculated moves with its investment. It didn't build on to the plant, to cut the entire Front engine corvette lineup...not a chance in hell. It's expanding the lineup for sure...and it's doing so long term.
The following 2 users liked this post by KnightDriveTV:
skank (07-13-2017), sunsalem (07-13-2017)
Old 07-13-2017, 12:11 PM
  #32  
LIStingray
Melting Slicks
 
LIStingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,299
Received 461 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlanAutoSports
I theorize that GM/Corvette is pushing to be a standalone sub-brand. Not to the extent that there are separate dealerships entirely, but potentially push dealers to have divided showrooms, separate entrances, etc. Will dealers who want the ME on their lot be pushed to this, in order to get allocation in the early phases?
The biggest flaw in your suggestion is unless you do away with 90% of the Chevy dealers: those are the ones which sell less than 10 Corvettes per year, and probably another 7% of dealers that sell less than 25 Corvettes per year - leaving roughly 100 Chevy dealers to sell Corvettes, there in no way financially any dealer could survive either splitting their showroom up or having a stand-alone showroom.
Right now the only GM dealer in the country that has a stand-alone Corvette showroom and facility is Kerbeck, and it sells 1,200+ Corvette's per year (even MacMulkin, which sells over 1,000 Corvettes per year only has a separate area in its huge showroom for Corvettes).
Old 07-13-2017, 12:29 PM
  #33  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray
The biggest flaw in your suggestion is unless you do away with 90% of the Chevy dealers: those are the ones which sell less than 10 Corvettes per year, and probably another 7% of dealers that sell less than 25 Corvettes per year - leaving roughly 100 Chevy dealers to sell Corvettes, there in no way financially any dealer could survive either splitting their showroom up or having a stand-alone showroom.
Right now the only GM dealer in the country that has a stand-alone Corvette showroom and facility is Kerbeck, and it sells 1,200+ Corvette's per year (even MacMulkin, which sells over 1,000 Corvettes per year only has a separate area in its huge showroom for Corvettes).
You might be taking my suggestion a bit too far. I'm questioning if GM leverages allocation of the ME to dealers like Kerbeck and others who dedicate more of their property to a legit "sub brand". I'm certainly not suggesting you take Corvette out of the hands of the dealer network...absolutely not, that'd be foolish.

What I'm proposing is, Corvette as a sub-brand can elevate the buyer experience. Buying a 65k dollar stingray is one thing, but buying a 105k Z06 or 130k ME Corvette should have it's customer perks. You should feel as if you've graduated as a customer. How do you do that? Standalone dealerships would be excessive, but split showroom, expanded and separate customer service area, etc...all possible. You look at the top selling Corvette dealers and leverage allocation of the ME to those who are willing to be "top dealers" and have the showroom/customer experience for it.

Clearly the ME will be allocated, first and foremost, to the big dogs like you've named. Gm loves those guys because they move cars. GM can have a prize though, in a special ME car of limited production...nothin wrong with requiring dealers to jump through a couple hoops to get it...have skin in the game.


Just a theory brother...but if I were GM, I'd be looking to compound on the success of the Corvette brand...more models, standalone in some way, etc.
The following 3 users liked this post by KnightDriveTV:
BigEC6 (07-21-2017), skank (07-13-2017), sunsalem (07-13-2017)
Old 07-17-2017, 08:12 PM
  #34  
Mikado463
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Mikado463's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 4,512
Received 450 Likes on 312 Posts

Default

I voted with my heart .......
Old 07-17-2017, 09:59 PM
  #35  
Steve Garrett
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve Garrett's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 25,365
Received 7,753 Likes on 4,182 Posts
CORVETTE TODAY Host
St. Jude Donor'15

Default

Originally Posted by AlanAutoSports
I theorize that GM/Corvette is pushing to be a standalone sub-brand.



^^^ This.....
Old 07-17-2017, 11:10 PM
  #36  
CFHay
Burning Brakes
 
CFHay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Posts: 858
Received 98 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

When the C7 debuted there were rumblings of a standalone brand of sorts coming along. There were even talks of a trim below the Stingray.
Old 07-18-2017, 02:03 AM
  #37  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CFHay
When the C7 debuted there were rumblings of a standalone brand of sorts coming along.
IIRC, the GM Board voted it down...they didn't want to gut the Chevrolet division.

Get notified of new replies

To Let's get folks on record, will the mid-engine REPLACE or supplement the front engine

Old 07-18-2017, 06:06 PM
  #38  
Larry/car
Race Director
 
Larry/car's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Manheim Pennsylvania
Posts: 10,742
Received 621 Likes on 423 Posts

Default

I purchased a 2017 convertible to ride out the changes planed in the next few years for the Corvette. When the assembly line stops who knows when production will actually restart. I am not sure I want a mid-engine car at a price over $100,000.

Last edited by Larry/car; 07-18-2017 at 06:09 PM.
Old 07-18-2017, 07:57 PM
  #39  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Contrary to what the naysayers have said, there is no good reason to assume a Corvette ME will be > $100k.
The following 3 users liked this post by sunsalem:
Boiler_81 (07-19-2017), jimmyb (08-02-2017), tbrenny33 (07-18-2017)
Old 07-18-2017, 10:32 PM
  #40  
tbrenny33
Burning Brakes
 
tbrenny33's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 904
Received 62 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
Contrary to what the naysayers have said, there is no good reason to assume a Corvette ME will be > $100k.
I agree, i think there is absolutely a chance there are 2 or 3 ME models and the entry is priced around 70-75k placed between the stingray and Z06.
The following 2 users liked this post by tbrenny33:
Boiler_81 (07-19-2017), sunsalem (07-19-2017)


Quick Reply: Let's get folks on record, will the mid-engine REPLACE or supplement the front engine



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.