Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Code name Zerv

Old 02-15-2018, 05:29 PM
  #641  
WKM
Racer
 
WKM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Winterville North Carolina
Posts: 413
Received 105 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
To me that picture confirms it, this is a non-argument brake size is fine. Remember the Z06 has two brake sizes. It's still one model.

Can they always add a bigger engine later? Sure, but this mid-engine car isn't coming out with some "base" car like people think it would. It's going to be ZR1 levels of performance and up.
I can’t remember the exact price, but I do remember Tadge saying it wasn’t that much more than the base pricing now.
Old 02-15-2018, 05:31 PM
  #642  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NewYuriCity
Brakes are relatively small front and back and only steel, non-slotted brakes have been seen on the mules. The current GS and Z06 are both available with slotted steel brakes or carbon ceramic, and considering no vehicle has been seen testing with either of these it is not going to be immediately available on the new model.
Historically GM at IVER has used substitution parts. Most IVERs lack even "real" headlamps and tail lamps (they use cobbled together parts).

I would not discount lack of slots in the rotors as any meaningful information. Size, yes, but construction, no. Brake cars (which would be used to tune the ABS, TCS and Stabilitrak) are usually at the brake supplier and can be updated to the correct parts as needed.

Carbon Ceramic not being caught in the wild could be on purpose. But even if they have them, my assumption would be like the Z06 it's an upgrade.

The thing about IVER cars (or any early stage "real" bodied development vehicle) is that the cars just have to be "representative" and that outside of the actual functional groups, you don't need specific up to date parts.

Vehicle dynamics will eventually update their cars to have all the parts, but that's after brakes, suspension, and steering get all the initial kinks worked out.
Old 02-15-2018, 05:34 PM
  #643  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WKM
I can’t remember the exact price, but I do remember Tadge saying it wasn’t that much more than the base pricing now.
Tadge has not confirmed the existence of a mid-engine car therefore he would not comment on it.

You're thinking of a canned response to a generic "next generation" question.

The thing is, what you call next generation (or what you think it is) and what Tadge is actually speaking about are not really the same thing.

Company spokes people know this, and that's why they answer how they do. Generic words have no meaning.

You might as well ask, "is it dark at night?"
Old 02-15-2018, 05:43 PM
  #644  
NoOne
Team Owner
 
NoOne's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Auburn Hills MI
Posts: 34,551
Received 503 Likes on 247 Posts

Default

I have a hard time believing that the ME car will stand alone, meaning that it is not a total replacement for the current Corvette.

GM has never I do not believe had a unique engine beyond the original ZR1. For them to develop a DOHC smaller displacement TT engine for 1-2 cars would be totally out of their norm.
Old 02-15-2018, 05:48 PM
  #645  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

The 4.2L and 5.5L are also being co-developed for Cadillac’s upper end vehicles. For example, it is no coincidence that this year Cadillac’s DPi race cars were reduced from 6.2L to 5.5L?
Old 02-15-2018, 05:51 PM
  #646  
Jeff V.
Le Mans Master
 
Jeff V.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,978
Received 4,086 Likes on 1,971 Posts

Default

It would also be very odd for them to release the replacement for something while the current version is still in production. The only times I've seen them do that is for low end fleet vehicles. Malibu, Impala, and low option work truck versions of the Silverado. 2019 would have to be the last model year of the C7, and that's super unlikely.
The following users liked this post:
LT1 Z51 (02-15-2018)
Old 02-15-2018, 06:09 PM
  #647  
JerriVette
Race Director
 
JerriVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Bergen county NJ
Posts: 15,822
Received 3,947 Likes on 2,177 Posts

Default

Malibu classic comes to mind....same for the two generation impalas..

Usually the older generation is kept around for rental companies and other fleet business thereby protecting the newer generation residuals.

Do rental companies or fleets buy corvettes?

If not I would not expect the front mid engine corvette to remain in production once the c8 is in production.
Old 02-15-2018, 06:12 PM
  #648  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JerriVette
Malibu classic comes to mind....same for the two generation impalas..

Usually the older generation is kept around for rental companies and other fleet business thereby protecting the newer generation residuals.

Do rental companies or fleets buy corvettes?

If not I would not expect the front mid engine corvette to remain in production once the c8 is in production.
Mid-engine is not c8. And yes the mid-engine and the C7 will remain in production together.
The following 2 users liked this post by LT1 Z51:
Shaka (02-17-2018), skank (05-13-2018)
Old 02-15-2018, 06:23 PM
  #649  
NewYuriCity
Racer
 
NewYuriCity's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 282
Received 235 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
Historically GM at IVER has used substitution parts. Most IVERs lack even "real" headlamps and tail lamps (they use cobbled together parts).

I would not discount lack of slots in the rotors as any meaningful information. Size, yes, but construction, no. Brake cars (which would be used to tune the ABS, TCS and Stabilitrak) are usually at the brake supplier and can be updated to the correct parts as needed.

Carbon Ceramic not being caught in the wild could be on purpose. But even if they have them, my assumption would be like the Z06 it's an upgrade.

The thing about IVER cars (or any early stage "real" bodied development vehicle) is that the cars just have to be "representative" and that outside of the actual functional groups, you don't need specific up to date parts.

Vehicle dynamics will eventually update their cars to have all the parts, but that's after brakes, suspension, and steering get all the initial kinks worked out.
I would think a critical system such as the brakes would need to be representative of the final iteration to be of any use for testing, but this is all just my interpretation of what we've seen so far. Your guess is as good as mine, but it's fun to think about until the big day comes
Old 02-15-2018, 06:43 PM
  #650  
OnPoint
The Consigliere
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OnPoint's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,243
Received 5,423 Likes on 2,268 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
Mid-engine is not c8. And yes the mid-engine and the C7 will remain in production together.
I've wondered for a while (as many of us have) whether the ME would be a replacement of the FE platform, or an addition model to be joined by a FE C8.

Curiously - while we haven't seen any obvious FE C8 mules, we've obviously got the ME mules roaming around. I'd love to see them add the ME as an additional model. But I also wouldn't be shocked to see the FE dropped.
The following users liked this post:
vettesweetnos (09-15-2021)
Old 02-15-2018, 07:37 PM
  #651  
NoOne
Team Owner
 
NoOne's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Auburn Hills MI
Posts: 34,551
Received 503 Likes on 247 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NewYuriCity
I would think a critical system such as the brakes would need to be representative of the final iteration to be of any use for testing, but this is all just my interpretation of what we've seen so far. Your guess is as good as mine, but it's fun to think about until the big day comes

Depends on who is testing. In my department we'd drive some pretty Frankenstein looking cars because for 90 percent of what we were testing not much else mattered.

HVAC/Cooling/Powertrain usually get the earliest cars to test and nail their stuff down, which they almost always end up changing except Powertrain, but they tend to be first in and get the most access.

You would think there are cars to go around but there are not. Depending on the product mix some vehicles get nearly 0 development.

2WD Jeeps its akin to the mechanic taking it for a spin in the parking lot and calling it good.

In the end I could honestly care less what it looks like. When I bought my C7 my benchmark was if it was better than the C6 I'm good. I'm more interested in pricing and power levels.

If this is going down the road of a Caddy or what LT1 Z51(and not what I am thinking) is saying this is not going to be a under 80k vehicle. In fact I'd think in the low 100's optioned up to the mid 130's.

I'd still buy one but planning for a 80K purchase versus a 120K purchase are two different things.

It has gotta have over 550hp out of the box and a DCT at that price otherwise there are other cars to consider.

Last edited by NoOne; 02-15-2018 at 07:41 PM.
Old 02-15-2018, 07:38 PM
  #652  
Jeff V.
Le Mans Master
 
Jeff V.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,978
Received 4,086 Likes on 1,971 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NewYuriCity
I would think a critical system such as the brakes would need to be representative of the final iteration to be of any use for testing, but this is all just my interpretation of what we've seen so far.
Right now it seems like they're mostly doing cold weather testing. I don't think production-intent brakes are a critical part of that. As the weather gets warmer and they start doing vehicle dynamics (handling) testing, then brakes would be important.
Old 02-15-2018, 07:41 PM
  #653  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NewYuriCity
I would think a critical system such as the brakes would need to be representative of the final iteration to be of any use for testing, but this is all just my interpretation of what we've seen so far. Your guess is as good as mine, but it's fun to think about until the big day comes
My information isn't a guess, it's an informed opinion. I've worked on numerous GM programs (and other OEMs), and I'm telling you that even things like tie rod ends (which are also very important), knuckles, and yes, even brakes where not final job one intent designs on all cars (examples all from the ATS).

Really it depends on why they car is being built. Parts, contrary to public belief are NOT tested at the vehicle level. They are tested at the unit or component level. The only reason test cars get built is to deal with "system integration" issues. There is some overall durability testing (and those cars do get updated), but really the purpose of vehicles is to tune things as a system (so the function of vehicle dynamics). The other reason would be to do feature work. It's hard to verify if your lane-keeping or auto parking tune works right unless you have a whole car. However the functional aspects are all tested on the bench.
Old 02-15-2018, 07:42 PM
  #654  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OnPoint
I've wondered for a while (as many of us have) whether the ME would be a replacement of the FE platform, or an addition model to be joined by a FE C8.

Curiously - while we haven't seen any obvious FE C8 mules, we've obviously got the ME mules roaming around. I'd love to see them add the ME as an additional model. But I also wouldn't be shocked to see the FE dropped.
ME is a MY 2019, FE C8 is a MY 2021 (at the earliest). You won't see FE mules until 2019, IVERs until 2020.
Old 02-15-2018, 07:43 PM
  #655  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

We could be getting into an argument of semantics. Is the ME the next Corvette, yes! However, might GM choose not to call it an eight generation Corvette (C8), instead calling it something else, absolutely.

We do not know two things necessary to settle this difference of opinion:

1) What is GM’s official name for the ME going to be called (not talking about ZERV, ZORA or anything like that) but what generation will they call it?
2) We do not have definitive proof that the front engined C7 is going away at any time, in fact conversely we do not even any definitive proof that the C7 is going on for both the 2020 and the 2021 model years — though many believe that it is going to continue for both.

Only time will tell, and in the interim, while opinions are strong, GM-verified facts have yet to surface.

Last edited by elegant; 02-15-2018 at 07:44 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (02-17-2018)
Old 02-15-2018, 07:46 PM
  #656  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jeff V.
Right now it seems like they're mostly doing cold weather testing. I don't think production-intent brakes are a critical part of that. As the weather gets warmer and they start doing vehicle dynamics (handling) testing, then brakes would be important.
You'd be surprised.

If it's powertrain cold weather testing, the rest of the car could be a rolling husk of garbage.

Brake winter testing is done at the brake suppliers facilities (in this case Bosch). So it depends on where the pictures were taken.

Also during a program, you usually only get two winters. They take whatever garbage they have the first winter, do as much as they can. The second winter they take a near production version and do a delta tuning.

Final tuning of cars doesn't take place until 3-4 months before serial production. If this car is a MY 2019 (and I think it is), then this 2018 winter testing is the **** show of whatever cars we have lets get er done.
Old 02-15-2018, 08:08 PM
  #657  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by elegant
We could be getting into an argument of semantics. Is the ME the next Corvette, yes! However, might GM choose not to call it an eight generation Corvette (C8), instead calling it something else, absolutely.

We do not know two things necessary to settle this difference of opinion:

1) What is GM’s official name for the ME going to be called (not talking about ZERV, ZORA or anything like that) but what generation will they call it?
2) We do not have definitive proof that the front engined C7 is going away at any time, in fact conversely we do not even any definitive proof that the C7 is going on for both the 2020 and the 2021 model years — though many believe that it is going to continue for both.

Only time will tell, and in the interim, while opinions are strong, GM-verified facts have yet to surface.
We did have something from a supplier of the composite body panels. They announced that they had work for the C7 Corvette thru 2020 or 2021. I can't remember which year, but I do remember the press announcement.

While not from GM, and while that CAN change, it seems like a manufacturing investment announcement related to this program was made with definite intent to a specific model year.

Get notified of new replies

To Code name Zerv

Old 02-15-2018, 08:17 PM
  #658  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,195
Received 13,147 Likes on 5,983 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
The mid-engine car will be faster than a Ford GT. Because it will be faster than a ZR1.

The mid-engine isn't like normal generations, the lowest car isn't coming out first. Rather the car with the big engine is coming out. Because it has to slot in above the ZR1 as C7 production is not ceasing when the mid-engine comes out.

This is what I mean by marketing and different nameplates. The mid-engine is not a replacement for the current C7 corvette. It is a compliment for it. The C8 corvette comes later, and much to the hope of many here will remain a front engine car.

Now will the front engine version continue to have "go-fast" versions like the current Z06 and ZR1. Unlikely. I feel that Corvette as we know it gets put in a space under the mid-engine and over the V8 Camaro in terms of performance.
I really hope you're wrong... but I know you're in the business, not a moron, and have connections. I want a mid-engine NA/RWD/manual for $65kish... one can dream.
The following users liked this post:
WKM (02-15-2018)
Old 02-15-2018, 08:54 PM
  #659  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,338
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tool Hoarder
I really hope you're wrong... but I know you're in the business, not a moron, and have connections. I want a mid-engine NA/RWD/manual for $65kish... one can dream.
I'll be clear, I don't know where the exact line is. I just know there is a FE C8 program independent of the ME program.

So we can, I think, safely assume two things based on that. The current "base" Corvette Stingray, Z51 will be FE C8. The current ZR1 will be replaced by an ME car.

The question is, what happens in the Z06 space, and maybe more importantly the Grand Sport space. I think IF, and this is a big if, you only get a Grand Sport if the Z06 stays with FE. If there is no go-fast wide body, there is no Grand Sport.

While this doesn't box exactly with your pricing, I could see a Z06 ME type car going for $80k. But less than that is a tough sell. I think GM has to somewhat delineate in cost structure the FE and the ME. But that cost is entirely dependent on where the Z06 falls.

MAYBE we get lucky and there is overlap like with the Camaro.
The following users liked this post:
RapidC84B (02-15-2018)
Old 02-15-2018, 09:34 PM
  #660  
Jeff V.
Le Mans Master
 
Jeff V.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,978
Received 4,086 Likes on 1,971 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1 Z51
If this car is a MY 2019 (and I think it is), then this 2018 winter testing is the **** show of whatever cars we have lets get er done.
There were some **** show cars in late '16 and early '17. The ones that had a C7 mid section grafted on to them.

I'll wager a cup of coffee that the ME car is MY2020. It'd fit with a NAIAS 2019 intro. Even if they did something crazy like Frankfurt (Sept) that's too late for MY2019.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Code name Zerv



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.