Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C8 Engine Revealed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2017, 09:51 PM
  #21  
pickleseimer
Drifting

 
pickleseimer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Olmsted Falls Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Received 321 Likes on 212 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

I'd be up for a first-year car. Hopefully they can make the car and it's engines in enough volume to take advantage of economies of scale. My friend has a fully optioned all-stock '13 Shelby GT500 (5.8 DOHC supercharged), and it stickered for far less than my '13 427 vert - not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison but makes you wonder what the possibilities are considering there were 4,885 GT500s built in '13, which was the first year for the 5.8 DOHC IIRC. The base price difference between the Boss 302 based car and the GT500 was about $13,400 in 2013.

Last edited by pickleseimer; 12-28-2017 at 09:52 PM. Reason: clarification
Old 12-29-2017, 08:02 AM
  #22  
BamaTheo
1st Gear
 
BamaTheo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Question. Will the NA LT1 receive the LT5's dual injection updates?
Old 12-29-2017, 08:46 AM
  #23  
lakemg
Melting Slicks
 
lakemg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,746
Received 908 Likes on 606 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BamaTheo
Question. Will the NA LT1 receive the LT5's dual injection updates?
I doubt it, because with it being NA and a mild engine build, it can only burn so much fuel and the stock configuration seems to have plenty of fueling capacity to feed it.
Old 12-29-2017, 11:17 AM
  #24  
DickieDoo
Drifting
 
DickieDoo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: Maple Ontario
Posts: 1,440
Received 181 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
GM's biggest concern is corporate average mpg, IMO! To get a more energy efficient engine, it needs to be a double overhead cam that can vary intake and exhaust timing independently. Probably have 4 valves per cylinder.

Then they can meet the EPA mpg fixed driving path and when max power is used (not part of the required EPA mpg test) those two turbo's provide the power. Turbo's also capture some of that wasted energy going out the exhaust.

Maybe it will be a truck engine as well! They have to improve gas mileage too!
Then they should go to solenoid operated valves... the benefits are huge, lighter, more fuel efficient, cleaner. AND more compact. See Koenigsegg electric valves
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (12-29-2017)
Old 12-29-2017, 11:31 AM
  #25  
PurpleLion
Burning Brakes
 
PurpleLion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,068
Received 857 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DickieDoo
Then they should go to solenoid operated valves... the benefits are huge, lighter, more fuel efficient, cleaner. AND more compact. See Koenigsegg electric valves
Also, with electric valves, a driver could select the typical low revving / high torque engine operational profile (using 2 of 4 vales per cylinder, etc...) OR select a high revving profile (using all 4 valves) with a higher red-line, etc...
The following users liked this post:
DickieDoo (12-29-2017)
Old 12-29-2017, 11:39 AM
  #26  
DickieDoo
Drifting
 
DickieDoo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: Maple Ontario
Posts: 1,440
Received 181 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleLion
Also, with electric valves, a driver could select the typical low revving / high torque engine operational profile (using 2 of 4 vales per cylinder, etc...) OR select a high revving profile (using all 4 valves) with a higher red-line, etc...
And release in a very limited run, new tech like this is perfect!
Old 12-30-2017, 01:07 AM
  #27  
235265283...
Pro
 
235265283...'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 538
Received 81 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
GM's biggest concern is corporate average mpg, IMO! To get a more energy efficient engine, it needs to be a double overhead cam that can vary intake and exhaust timing independently. Probably have 4 valves per cylinder.

Then they can meet the EPA mpg fixed driving path and when max power is used (not part of the required EPA mpg test) those two turbo's provide the power. Turbo's also capture some of that wasted energy going out the exhaust.

Maybe it will be a truck engine as well! They have to improve gas mileage too!
IMO, Jerry U is spot on here. CAFE compliance means turbocharged smaller displacement engines, and Corvette probably won't be an exception. Will be interesting to see if/how AFM works with turbocharging. Also, IMO, solenoid-actuated valves are a long way away for GM.
The following users liked this post:
JerryU (12-30-2017)
Old 12-30-2017, 08:26 AM
  #28  
sTz
Le Mans Master
 
sTz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 5,850
Received 2,402 Likes on 1,588 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
As predicted there is no way this double overhead cam Twin Turbo V8 could fit in a front engine Vette! Might be only 4 Liters!
But heck, Ford gets 567 hp out of a 3.5 Liter engine used in the GT! GM is smarter and can squeeze a few more from a V8!


The FordGT gets more HP... and GM being smarter? That’s debatable.

Old 12-30-2017, 11:33 AM
  #29  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

The Forgt GT is going to sell in tiny numbers compared to the ME. Look at that pathetic fuel economy of the Ford, e.g., 14 MPG combined. Ford can put up with that due to its tiny sales rate.

True, while some Corvette owners care less about MPG, especially on the distorted world of those who post on forums compared to the total purchasing group, in the real world with many driving their Corvettes long distances, others use them as DD commuters, and similar GM will need to do in this area (CAFE), and will do much better in this area.

More importantly to many, the Ford GT’s exhaust sound is not acceptable to many Corvette owners, whereas the ME’s exhaust will sound so much better.

Lastly, I am not impressed using the Ford GT as a benchmark for our ME’s, especially the they Ford’s having a V-6. As lately confirmed, ME’s twin-turbo, 32V, V-8 is what we are getting.

I give the Ford GT’s Power Plant a “B.” GM’s ME motor will rock in comparison.

Last edited by elegant; 12-30-2017 at 11:34 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by elegant:
firstvettesoon (12-30-2017), RoketRdr (12-30-2017), vetmts (12-30-2017)
Old 12-30-2017, 12:50 PM
  #30  
NemesisC5
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes on 241 Posts

Default

The ME will be produced in very limited numbers alongside the front engine C7 until it retires and front engine C8 takes its place.

ME will have exclusivity of 5.5 DOHC FI powerplant.

Front engine C8 will have the smaller DOHC NA powerplant as standard equipment providing increase in power and fuel efficiency (CAFE). Forced Induction will power upper tier model(s). 5.5 DOHC NA motor possibly slotted for ZO6 and Z28.
Old 12-30-2017, 01:29 PM
  #31  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

And the ME will also have the 4.2L option with is 32V, DOHC motor. That motor is projected to go into the ME as follows (units/year):

8,000 for 2019 through 2022; 7,000 for both 2023 & 2024.
The following users liked this post:
JerryU (12-30-2017)
Old 12-30-2017, 01:32 PM
  #32  
PurpleLion
Burning Brakes
 
PurpleLion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,068
Received 857 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Not exactly limited production numbers!
Old 12-30-2017, 03:54 PM
  #33  
JerryU
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
JerryU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,449
Received 9,606 Likes on 6,619 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sTz
[/B]

The FordGT gets more HP... and GM being smarter? That’s debatable.
Yep I misquoted the GT. With only 3.5 Liters it gets 647 hp! Actually at least the GM marketing team is smarter! No way they would let engineering say 647 hp. They would surly tell them to go back and find 3 more hp!

Last edited by JerryU; 12-30-2017 at 06:42 PM.
Old 12-30-2017, 04:41 PM
  #34  
Avanti
Race Director
 
Avanti's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Bonneville Salt Flats, 223mph Aug. '04
Posts: 17,381
Received 5,188 Likes on 3,440 Posts

Default

"...where dealing with "issues" is easier." Still going to be the neighborhood GM service department. Nothing in my experience with same would suggest a one-off would be handled any better than one-in-a-million, in terms of vehicle production numbers.
Old 12-30-2017, 06:04 PM
  #35  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

You simply cannot look at this car, particularly in person, and not salivate over it. Its like nothing else. The LaFerrari may be in the same league.
Attached Images  
The following users liked this post:
Hirohawa (12-30-2017)
Old 12-30-2017, 07:09 PM
  #36  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PurpleLion
Not exactly limited production numbers!
Exactly, while there might be a slow roll out of the ME as is typical of a new generation Corvette, the ME is not GM envisioned as a limited production vehicle (the opposite of how the ZR1 was/is envisioned). That does not mean that the top-of-the-line ZORA won’t be limited, just that the “entry model” will be made in whatever numbers customers are buying.
The following users liked this post:
JerryU (12-30-2017)
Old 12-30-2017, 07:15 PM
  #37  
JustinStrife
Team Owner
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27,567
Received 96 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso
You simply cannot look at this car, particularly in person, and not salivate over it. Its like nothing else. The LaFerrari may be in the same league.
I have seen it in person and walked right by it. Didnt interest me personally.
The following users liked this post:
vetmts (12-31-2017)

Get notified of new replies

To C8 Engine Revealed

Old 12-30-2017, 08:16 PM
  #38  
Ronstar
Racer
 
Ronstar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 287
Received 93 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elegant
And the ME will also have the 4.2L option with is 32V, DOHC motor. That motor is projected to go into the ME as follows (units/year):

8,000 for 2019 through 2022; 7,000 for both 2023 & 2024.
Only 7 or 8 thousand a year? How many corvettes are they planning on selling? What is going in the rest of them?
Old 12-30-2017, 09:15 PM
  #39  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ronstar
Only 7 or 8 thousand a year? How many corvettes are they planning on selling? What is going in the rest of them?
Lot more previously posted ME engines information here (post # 1):

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...gh-2021-a.html
Old 01-02-2018, 01:41 PM
  #40  
NemesisC5
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes on 241 Posts

Default

Will 6.2 OHV V8 be offered as third engine choice....or DOHC V8 not mentioned yet.


Quick Reply: C8 Engine Revealed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 PM.