Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C8 Engine Revealed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2018, 09:57 AM
  #81  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rkreigh
I fail to see why folks think that dohc engines are less reliable, heavy clunky engines

with dohc and variable cam timing sure it's a bit more complicated, but this stuff is pretty mature and gm did this way back in 2007 with the ecotec so it will be fine
It's the old paradigm; people hate change.
But this too will pass when the new engines hit.
The following users liked this post:
JerryU (01-12-2018)
Old 01-12-2018, 10:42 AM
  #82  
NY09C6
Le Mans Master
 
NY09C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,813
Received 627 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
But this too will pass when the new engines hit.
So will the money in our wallets.
Old 01-12-2018, 11:13 AM
  #83  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
They have their place. But corvette has always been a budget sports car. It's far cheaper to punch out a 5.3 to 6.2 to make the horse power than go dohc to rev it to 8500 to make the same HP. The low end torque is also far more enjoyable. This move by GM is all about cafe, not what's better.
DOHC motor using LS7 block, same dimensions as LS7 and lower.And 750hp NA. All the torque u would want.
http://www.thedrive.com/video/11943/mercury-racings-new-750-hp-corvette-based-crate-engine-is-one-mean-green-machine?
Old 01-12-2018, 11:29 AM
  #84  
RedLS6
Drifting
 
RedLS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 1,922
Received 1,729 Likes on 783 Posts

Default

/\ /\ They advertise the weight of the Mercury engine to be around 560 pounds.
Old 01-12-2018, 11:38 AM
  #85  
NY09C6
Le Mans Master
 
NY09C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,813
Received 627 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso
DOHC motor using LS7 block, same dimensions as LS7 and lower.And 750hp NA. All the torque u would want.
http://www.thedrive.com/video/11943/mercury-racings-new-750-hp-corvette-based-crate-engine-is-one-mean-green-machine?
It has the torque because it has the cu. It would never meet cafe due to the cu and could not be used by GM for that reason. The torque loss comes from the loss of cu. GM is dealing with that torque loss with turbos. And total power with rpm. The rpm requires the dohc setup. The turbo/dohc motor will be much more expensive than current engines.

Last edited by NY09C6; 01-12-2018 at 11:39 AM.
Old 01-12-2018, 12:51 PM
  #86  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
The turbo/dohc motor will be much more expensive than current engines.
I don't see how it could be THAT much more expensive.
Ford has been using non-turbo DOHC engines in their Mustangs for more than 20 years now...
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (01-12-2018)
Old 01-12-2018, 01:06 PM
  #87  
PurpleLion
Burning Brakes
 
PurpleLion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,068
Received 857 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
This move by GM is all about cafe, not what's better.
I beg to differ. This move is about creating an international HALO car for General Motors. It is GM telling the world that they are back in a big way! And that their sports car is equal to the best available at 1/2 to 1/3rd the price.

An OHV engine will just not get the job done!
Old 01-12-2018, 01:33 PM
  #88  
NY09C6
Le Mans Master
 
NY09C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,813
Received 627 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
I don't see how it could be THAT much more expensive.
Ford has been using non-turbo DOHC engines in their Mustangs for more than 20 years now...
Don't forget the two turbos and the associated inter cooling.

Last edited by NY09C6; 01-12-2018 at 01:33 PM.
Old 01-12-2018, 01:46 PM
  #89  
JerryU
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
JerryU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,485
Received 9,619 Likes on 6,625 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
. The turbo/dohc motor will be much more expensive than current engines.
Not when they retool the Tonawanda engine plant to make them instead of the old standby V8!

I'm told one reason the current small block has the same bore spacing as the one in my '56 is the billions spent on that plant for precise tooling and automation! The plant has evolved to being capable of making truck engines and high hp ones for cars.

Once trucks go over to diesels to meet corporate cafe that plant will probably make the 650 hp 3.5 Liter V6 as the high performance engine future!

Heck if Ford can get 647 Chevy should be able to get 3 more!

Last edited by JerryU; 01-12-2018 at 01:47 PM.
Old 01-12-2018, 03:31 PM
  #90  
JustinStrife
Team Owner
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27,567
Received 96 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PurpleLion
I beg to differ. This move is about creating an international HALO car for General Motors. It is GM telling the world that they are back in a big way! And that their sports car is equal to the best available at 1/2 to 1/3rd the price.

An OHV engine will just not get the job done!
The fact that you said the OHV engine wont get it done, shows you are clueless.
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (01-12-2018)
Old 01-12-2018, 04:42 PM
  #91  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleLion
I beg to differ. This move is about creating an international HALO car for General Motors. It is GM telling the world that they are back in a big way! And that their sports car is equal to the best available at 1/2 to 1/3rd the price.

An OHV engine will just not get the job done!
In the context you laid out, I completely agree.
Imagine the response if Ferrari, Lamborghini, MB, etc. announced they were dumping DOHC and going to pushrods...

Originally Posted by NY09C6
Don't forget the two turbos and the associated inter cooling.
The LT4's SC isn't particularly expensive...nor is the Superchargers Ford uses.
Old 01-12-2018, 06:30 PM
  #92  
Atari_Prime
Drifting
 
Atari_Prime's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,500
Received 555 Likes on 315 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
They have their place. But corvette has always been a budget sports car. It's far cheaper to punch out a 5.3 to 6.2 to make the horse power than go dohc to rev it to 8500 to make the same HP. The low end torque is also far more enjoyable. This move by GM is all about cafe, not what's better.
Not true. Corvette has always been a premium sports car. All the way back to the beginning. In the later decades European cars just became much more expensive.
Old 01-12-2018, 06:41 PM
  #93  
PurpleLion
Burning Brakes
 
PurpleLion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,068
Received 857 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JustinStrife
The fact that you said the OHV engine wont get it done, shows you are clueless.
Perhaps it would help your reading comprehension if I had written my statement in a single paragraph!

An OHV engine will just not get the job done, i.e. the job being the creation of an INTERNATIONAL halo car! Sure, an OHV engine might fly in the US, but it will not hack it in the rest of the world. This is precisely why GM is creating the new DOHC engines.

Last edited by PurpleLion; 01-12-2018 at 06:51 PM.
Old 01-12-2018, 06:47 PM
  #94  
JustinStrife
Team Owner
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27,567
Received 96 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PurpleLion
Perhaps it would help your reading comprehension if I had included my statement in a single paragraph!
My reading comprehension is fine.
Old 01-12-2018, 06:53 PM
  #95  
NY09C6
Le Mans Master
 
NY09C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,813
Received 627 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
The LT4's SC isn't particularly expensive...nor is the Superchargers Ford uses.
Supercharges will be eliminated by cafe. GM is not going to design a new platform that uses them. It would be foolish.

Last edited by NY09C6; 01-12-2018 at 06:53 PM.
Old 01-12-2018, 06:59 PM
  #96  
NY09C6
Le Mans Master
 
NY09C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,813
Received 627 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Atari_Prime
Not true. Corvette has always been a premium sports car. All the way back to the beginning. In the later decades European cars just became much more expensive.
I assuming you are much older than I am. Ever since I've been in the market they are half or a third of the premium cars and purchasable by blue collar workers. I've yet to see an average guy buy a Ferrari or Lambo.
Old 01-12-2018, 07:55 PM
  #97  
JustinStrife
Team Owner
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27,567
Received 96 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
I assuming you are much older than I am. Ever since I've been in the market they are half or a third of the premium cars and purchasable by blue collar workers. I've yet to see an average guy buy a Ferrari or Lambo.
My dad bought a brand new 69 Corvette out of college as he was going into Naval Flight Training. The only new car he ever owned. The Corvette was always attainable by blue collar workers. I don't see that being the case for much longer if people get their way on transforming the car into something else.

Get notified of new replies

To C8 Engine Revealed

Old 01-12-2018, 08:10 PM
  #98  
Walter Raulerson
Melting Slicks
 
Walter Raulerson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,624
Received 526 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elegant
No argument from me that more than a few Chevy dealers need to up their servicing skills re our Corvettes.

At the same time, just as we do not always go to the closest restaurant, hire the financial advisor in nearest proximity to our work/homes, choose a doctor based on how close he/she is from us, a hell of a lot of responsibility does lie on us!

Similar to how we choose the above, we need to research/investigate/choose prior to our taking our Corvettes in to be serviced at any dealership.

I now drive by a Chevy dealer who was 4 miles away (now closed), drive by a large one about 20 miles away, and choose to drive 38 miles each way to an outstanding Chevy dealership. The Corvette Tech there is outstanding.

We need to be an integral part of the choosing the right dealership for our Corvettes — and we all also hope that GM takes internal steps to improve the skills for all dealers they certify as being Corvette maintenance/repair certified.
I just hate the trial and error angle. WE lose. the dealer gets paid even if they screw up and we have to go fins another dealer to fix what someone didn't
Old 01-13-2018, 02:21 AM
  #99  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AORoads
With where those tailpipes are located, it sure looks more like a rear-engine car than a mid-engine. Of course, I don't make the definitions as witnessed by a front engine that's considered a mid-front engine car. I'll get used to it. Eventually.
Considering the transmission and axles are behind the motor.....yeah, it's mid. Tailpipes really aren't a determining factor.
Old 01-13-2018, 05:40 AM
  #100  
PurpleLion
Burning Brakes
 
PurpleLion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,068
Received 857 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AORoads
Of course, I don't make the definitions as witnessed by a front engine that's considered a mid-front engine car. I'll get used to it. Eventually.
Actually, I wouldn't worry about getting used to it. The term "mid-front" or "front-mid" was invented by marketing / advertising people not engineers. The 1908 Ford Model T qualifies as a front mid car as well as 80% of all front engine cars ever manufactured. The term "front mid" is meaningless. There have been some cars over the years wherein the engine was placed far enough back in the chassis that weight distribution and handling were improved (i.e. Indy roadsters, some Panoz race cars, etc...), but, this list does not include the Corvette or most of the other front engine production cars.

Regarding engine placement, the operative terms are, as always, front, mid and rear!

I suppose that if someone really wanted to coin a valid "front mid" term they could change the current definition from "engine mass behind the front axle" to "engine mass within one foot of the center of the wheelbase". However, does anyone really care? A mid engine car is, and always will be superior to any "front" variation for a sports car. Simple physics!

Please note - "superior" when all other factors are equivalent.


Quick Reply: C8 Engine Revealed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.