Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

May Car & Driver has ME on the cover...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2018, 01:35 PM
  #41  
DickieDoo
Drifting
 
DickieDoo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: Maple Ontario
Posts: 1,440
Received 181 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ltomn
If this is the car, I would reconsider my deposit on one. I am not at all thrilled with the simplicity nor the apparent weight of the car. It looks overweight to me! I have higher expectations for design from the GM design team. They are much more talented then this. This is not a car that will thrill a world wide crowd. At least not from the design arena.
those were my initial thoughts about the C7 ! I ended up buying one!
Old 04-11-2018, 01:39 PM
  #42  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chrjones2
I loved driving my gt350 before i traded it on my z06, but i completely agree with you.
Ehhh, its a bit different in a midengine application though.
Old 04-11-2018, 01:49 PM
  #43  
OnPoint
The Consigliere
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OnPoint's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,247
Received 5,444 Likes on 2,270 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Ehhh, its a bit different in a midengine application though.
The physics of the internal harmonics of a flat plane crank isn't, though.
The following 2 users liked this post by OnPoint:
JerriVette (04-11-2018), NewYuriCity (04-11-2018)
Old 04-11-2018, 02:11 PM
  #44  
Walter Raulerson
Melting Slicks
 
Walter Raulerson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,624
Received 526 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K.I.T.T.
I renewed my Car and Driver subscription recently, in response to a mailer they sent, but sent a letter with the renewal saying if the magazine was going to continue to spew its anti-Trump politicized bs, they can cancel me instead. I bought the mag to support one of the few mags left, and to read about cars, not see cartoon drawings of Trump and hear their political views from their ever shrinking pulpit.

Surprisingly...my subscription ceased. So be it.
No politics please
The following 5 users liked this post by Walter Raulerson:
alienranch (04-12-2018), BIG Dave (04-14-2018), IronV (04-11-2018), Stingray23 (04-11-2018), sunsalem (04-12-2018)
Old 04-11-2018, 02:11 PM
  #45  
NewYuriCity
Racer
 
NewYuriCity's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 282
Received 235 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Proportions look all off. Hopefully one of the few who's actually seen the car and are willing to comment will weigh in, but here's a quick adjustment I did (I'm not good at photoshop or anything, I did this in powerpoint lol)

Back wheel looks too small and the whole car looks like it was stretched in the vertical dimension, hopefully it looks more like this:

The following 20 users liked this post by NewYuriCity:
alienranch (04-12-2018), AORoads (04-12-2018), Burlbark (04-12-2018), CorvetteBrent (04-13-2018), elegant (04-11-2018), FrankLP (04-11-2018), Glendows (04-12-2018), JerriVette (04-11-2018), LB001 (04-12-2018), LoganExplosion (04-13-2018), Mike Campbell (04-12-2018), Rapid Fred (04-11-2018), rcooper (04-15-2018), snow (04-12-2018), SpeedyD (04-11-2018), sunsalem (04-12-2018), TBRDS (08-23-2019), VETTE-NV (04-12-2018), z edge (04-11-2018), Zerski (04-13-2018) and 15 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 04-11-2018, 02:14 PM
  #46  
88BlackZ-51
Race Director
 
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Posts: 10,745
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

That looks way nicer then the C7 body. Finally!!!!!
Old 04-11-2018, 02:15 PM
  #47  
Rapid Fred
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Rapid Fred's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Chadds Ford PA
Posts: 10,087
Received 1,314 Likes on 754 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FLS2K
Tough crowd. ��
I’m a less is more kind of guy so this works for me. I’d argue this car is designed well, not styled. Big difference.
I’m a “less is more” guy as well (though some “surface interest,” which this render has, doesn’t hurt.). I just think the thing is way too bulky looking. Nothing a couple inches off the top of the hood AND an inch off the top of the rear fenders wouldn’t fix. What do you think of Yuri’s subtle stretch job? Add another inch or so of window height for the requisite “airiness” and you’ve got a proper ME Vette!

Last edited by Rapid Fred; 04-11-2018 at 02:18 PM. Reason: Yuri’s mod
The following users liked this post:
CorvetteBrent (04-13-2018)
Old 04-11-2018, 02:17 PM
  #48  
Jeff V.
Le Mans Master
 
Jeff V.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,978
Received 4,086 Likes on 1,971 Posts

Default

NewYuriCity's version is a lot better. It still looks plain (not his fault) but at least the proportions somewhat resemble the test cars we've seen.

It's like C&D had someone verbally describe the car to an artist who has never drawn cars before.
Old 04-11-2018, 02:17 PM
  #49  
firstvettesoon
Melting Slicks
 
firstvettesoon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,058
Received 1,906 Likes on 750 Posts
Default

certainly looks better. Nice job.
Too bad they left off or changed "known" details.
Old 04-11-2018, 02:20 PM
  #50  
Walter Raulerson
Melting Slicks
 
Walter Raulerson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,624
Received 526 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

Don't buy it if you don't like it
Old 04-11-2018, 02:56 PM
  #51  
f-16pilotTX
Racer
 
f-16pilotTX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 433
Received 274 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by firstvettesoon
certainly looks better. Nice job.
Too bad they left off or changed "known" details.
FVS, hi

Couldnt have said it any better! C&D definitely seen the final car and for sure left out “known” details and some proportions. I will ask on behalf of everyone else, can you please edit this rendering with your touch? As in change the proportions and add your special, unique talents? I think everyone would really appreciate that!
Cheers,
Austin
The following 4 users liked this post by f-16pilotTX:
elegant (04-11-2018), NewYuriCity (04-11-2018), Rapid Fred (04-11-2018), rcooper (04-15-2018)
Old 04-11-2018, 03:42 PM
  #52  
elegant
Safety Car
 
elegant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,639
Received 2,680 Likes on 1,231 Posts

Default

As FVS has repeatedly cautioned us, when we see the final car in person, it will look much better than any rendering.

When 150 of us were invited to the C7 reveal — all of us having seen the Jalopnik pictures before then, about 15% were not thrilled with the car on the bus ride to the reveal. At the reveal were able to walk around it as much as we wanted. Latter, when we gathered in the hotel lobby that evening to discuss it, all but 1 or 2 of the 150 were in “C7 happy heaven” with what they had seen.

I remain very excited about what GM reveal to us next January!!!
The following users liked this post:
CorvetteBrent (04-13-2018)
Old 04-11-2018, 03:43 PM
  #53  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NewYuriCity
Proportions look all off. Hopefully one of the few who's actually seen the car and are willing to comment will weigh in, but here's a quick adjustment I did (I'm not good at photoshop or anything, I did this in powerpoint lol)

Back wheel looks too small and the whole car looks like it was stretched in the vertical dimension, hopefully it looks more like this:

I think the proportions are off, but I'd imagine that rendering is 85% of the way there. Fact is...if you can buy that under 100k, people are going to be lining up at the door.
Old 04-11-2018, 04:20 PM
  #54  
CorvettoBrando
Instructor
 
CorvettoBrando's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Posts: 220
Received 172 Likes on 96 Posts
Default Looks like an FE car more than a ME

Thanks for sharing. Proportions up front and sides are way off. The way this is shown, all visibility advantages afforded by a ME configuration are "rendered" useless. There is no hood bulge as drawn by the artist. Rocker panel to bottom window sill height is exaggerated, and there is no body taper / coke-bottle shape seen in countless spy photos and many descriptions by folks in this forum. Rear of the car shown is wrong - lights, vents, top edge of deck with integrated third brake lamp, etc. Artist missed a lot of design details. Not impressed.
Old 04-11-2018, 05:13 PM
  #55  
IronV
Burning Brakes
 
IronV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area CALIFORNIA
Posts: 802
Received 495 Likes on 260 Posts
Default God no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good lord. I hope this isn't the real thing. My worst fears are realized. Chunky monkey. Not an ounce of sex or excitement about it. As much shape as an effing 914. It looks about as contemporary as a Fiero.

GOD DAMMIT, LET IT BE WRONG!
Old 04-11-2018, 05:17 PM
  #56  
IronV
Burning Brakes
 
IronV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area CALIFORNIA
Posts: 802
Received 495 Likes on 260 Posts
Default It sucks

Originally Posted by firstvettesoon
certainly looks better. Nice job.
Too bad they left off or changed "known" details.
it sucks
Old 04-11-2018, 05:18 PM
  #57  
FrankLP
Miles of Smiles
Support Corvetteforum!
 
FrankLP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 3,181
Received 540 Likes on 365 Posts
2016 C5 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by firstvettesoon
certainly looks better. Nice job.
Too bad they left off or changed "known" details.

Get notified of new replies

To May Car & Driver has ME on the cover...

Old 04-11-2018, 05:30 PM
  #58  
IronV
Burning Brakes
 
IronV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area CALIFORNIA
Posts: 802
Received 495 Likes on 260 Posts
Default Car and Driver was Way off on the C7 THANK GOD

Originally Posted by Chrjones2
Does anyone remember how close car and driver was when they posted their c7 render? Im trying to find the magazine cover
But Jalopnik had it almost spot on.

Last edited by IronV; 04-11-2018 at 06:04 PM. Reason: spelling
Old 04-11-2018, 05:32 PM
  #59  
IronV
Burning Brakes
 
IronV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area CALIFORNIA
Posts: 802
Received 495 Likes on 260 Posts
Default Great Caesar's Ghost...

Originally Posted by elegant
Based on the many spy pictures, the more I look at C&D’s rendering, the more I am struck by four things. I am confident GM will “fix” all four.

1) Too bland;
2) Front hood is too high and the bulge is too wide;
3) The upwards curve in rear fender is no where as tall and bold as it will be;
4) The rear fender needs to have more of a “coke bottle”/C3 shape from the side view, but also in a bird’s eye view.
I hope to god you're right.
Old 04-11-2018, 05:38 PM
  #60  
IronV
Burning Brakes
 
IronV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area CALIFORNIA
Posts: 802
Received 495 Likes on 260 Posts
Default I can't look at it any longer--PRE{POSTERIOUS

I can't look at it anymore. That 3/4 view from the rear is so freaking fat and ugly. As pointed out by others, just the distance from the top of the wheel well to the top of the fender is PREPOSTEROUS. Preposterious!

I have to take a break.
The following 2 users liked this post by IronV:
CorvetteBrent (04-13-2018), Huskerman (04-14-2018)


Quick Reply: May Car & Driver has ME on the cover...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.