When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The sensors yes, but the appearance no. I read an article a year or so ago that someone had patented a process by which the sensors could be hid behind an otherwise smooth surface without causing issues. In short, bumpers will look like plain old bumpers soon.
That is exactly how it is done with my two 2017 DD’s of different brands, i.e., they function perfectly without looking bad. So if other than GM brands can do it, GM can.
Does anyone know of a GM car that does it this attractive way please?
Thank God GM is putting sensors in the bumpers. It's hard to believe that anyone would throw a hissy-fit over the presence of the little round sensors -- why not throw a tanrum over the existence of side-view mirrors because they mess up the appearance of the car.
Thank God GM is putting sensors in the bumpers. It's hard to believe that anyone would throw a hissy-fit over the presence of the little round sensors -- why not throw a tanrum over the existence of side-view mirrors because they mess up the appearance of the car.
I have been driving for 28 years, using my mirrors, I have never backed into anything. Sensors are not needed. If I can save $10, I would like them left out.
I have been driving for 28 years, using my mirrors, I have never backed into anything. Sensors are not needed. If I can save $10, I would like them left out.
I have been driving for 28 years, using my horse and wagon, I have never backed into anything. Automobiles are not needed. If I can save a $1, I would like them left out.
I have been driving for 28 years, using my horse and wagon, I have never backed into anything. Automobiles are not needed. If I can save a $1, I would like them left out.
I know some of this has been discussed, but a few observations...
First time I've noticed a recognizable grill pattern (ZR1-style)
Roof line breaks in these positions can only mean retractable roof.
Buttresses look thicker that I thought (was thinking C3-ish) rising up at about a 45 degree angle on both sides - very 488 Spider. Glad to see what looks like engine venting on the back deck - clear plexi vents would be cool. Also can see rear view mirror cam for when top up, parking cam above license plate and bumper sensors for active cruise and blind spot alarm. A co-worker has an Escalade with the rear view mirror cam - incredible HD wide unobstructed view - but can be used as a conventional mirror as well. Glad to see it on the ME.
Is this bottom gray tray just a diffuser or an active under car wing as part of the active aero? Would be in line with current Corvette race tech - plus require less wing up top.
Not a fan of the chunky buttresses on this car or the Ferrari--especially because they don't align with the seats; they're offset to either side. Much prefer the C3 version--sleek, sexy, refined. But the point is to discern reality and I agree; we got the fat ones.
Why would Chevy introduce a new and radical camo element at this stage? And it's not trivial. Whether foam or whatever, it took some thought and a bit of engineering to stick this thing on. It doesn't comport with any of the other spy shots and it doesn't comport with the red front end shot either.
Why would Chevy introduce a new and radical camo element at this stage? And it's not trivial. Whether foam or whatever, it took some thought and a bit of engineering to stick this thing on. It doesn't comport with any of the other spy shots and it doesn't comport with the red front end shot either.
What the hell?
I wouldn't read anything into it. The red bumper from the paint shop is it. This is just cammo. Theyr'e finally showing enough that we can see the grill pattern so they're blocking the middle... just enough for adequate cooling.
I wouldn't read anything into it. The red bumper from the paint shop is it. This is just cammo. Theyr'e finally showing enough that we can see the grill pattern so they're blocking the middle... just enough for adequate cooling.
I'm sorry but that makes no sense. They've run all the prototypes with the gaping mouth and no proboscis for a freaking year.
Why would Chevy introduce a new and radical camo element at this stage? And it's not trivial. Whether foam or whatever, it took some thought and a bit of engineering to stick this thing on. It doesn't comport with any of the other spy shots and it doesn't comport with the red front end shot either.
What the hell?
I believe there is misdirection going on, as Elegant stated. They left the bulky padding in the center. What is visible here may be the paint shop fascia, but with intake inserts/grills (which we are seeing here) that show up looking tapered toward the center line, and are more pronounced because of the white camo. I recall seeing the white camo'd intake grills on the ZR1 test mules. The C5 style front seems too derivative in this application. I could be wrong. We'll just have to wait and see
05-17-2018, 07:34 PM
