Thanks FVS! I really like the ME you have rendered, though as at least two have noted, the rear looks a little busy. If I were GM, I would remove the “honeycombed” grills and perhaps substitute a series of parallel lines — or something similar to make it look more flowing. Just my $0.02.

I wish I had your skills with your illustrations. It looks great. One question. Why are your renditions of the tail lights so skinny with those two horizontal lines (openings?) underneath? Are they actually there? They make those tailights look out of proportion H vs W. IMO taller taillights would look much better and more in proportion as a stand alone or overall when incorporated with the entire rear facia.

EDIT: One other observation. Could the Camo pic of the ME I show actually be one without a black C7 Z51 style spoiler but rather a C7 Base skinny spoiler that is now extended to either end of the rear facia and body colored. That would be in agreement with that leaked rear facia we see on that paint dolly above. The same with that Camo car spoilers which also does not look very tall. At least the painted one shows the outer edges of that suspected low spoiler gradually blends in at the same level on either end

The actual lighting element design is unknown so this is just a compilation of what has been done in the past and in evolution of the C7 as a do me till. The two horizontal lines are not openings but merely dark areas in the lighting fixture.The actual height of the light bucket is known from the rear facia and is approximately the correct size in the rendering and can also be seen in the rear view CAD. So these proportions are fairly accurate.


for the spoiler, the only thing we really know is that in some of the camo images it appears to go all the way across and dip down in the middle but this could be a ploy.

C7pimp As described it as being similar to the C7/Z06 spoiler but who knows. I would like to see something a little more refined and sculpted

FVS: “The actual height of the light bucket is known from the rear facia and is approximately the correct size in the rendering and can also be seen in the rear view CAD. So these proportions are fairly accurate.”

FVS, I think that is a correct assumption about the opening size proportions, and the CAD drawing you posted appears to do likewise with a very small horizontal line underneath the headlight within that open space. Take another look at it. So could you make a version of this latest ME rear view from above incorporating changes I suggested in my last post?