Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2020 will be mid engine release, and 2021 will be a new front engine model also?...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2018, 03:07 AM
  #141  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

mid engines dont have as long of crumple zones in the front, not as safe. They dont have battering ram to get cars out of their way, not as safe. The end.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:09 AM
  #142  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

people who say " i agree with you but"... and then go on for 2 minutes... they dont actually agree. They just have a skill to try to disarm people from arguing with them as they disagree.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:10 AM
  #143  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

front engine cars are safer, apples to apples, assuming one cockpit technology is carried to the other car as well...

Agree or disagree?

Its very simple. If you say "but... blah blah blah..." then we dont agree
Old 07-10-2018, 03:13 AM
  #144  
mammoth713
Melting Slicks
 
mammoth713's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,049
Received 554 Likes on 277 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mikec7z
people who say " i agree with you but"... and then go on for 2 minutes... they dont actually agree. They just have a skill to try to disarm people from arguing with them as they disagree.
OR........ I agree with you, GENERALLY SPEAKING, and I'm EXPANDING further on the NUANCES of the statement...

or is that not possible in your world?

jeez.... lol

Last edited by mammoth713; 07-10-2018 at 03:15 AM.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:16 AM
  #145  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

the nuances are a distraction from the fact.. they arent as safe.

btw, i too am an engineer, i just dont brag about it to force people to believe my ideas, i use logic.

im going to use one last logic, that a 5 year old would follow, and we will see if you follow my point and why your nuances dont matter whatsoever on an apples to apples rigid as possible cockpit.....

...
Old 07-10-2018, 03:26 AM
  #146  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

we have a vehicle, and on the front of that vehicle, is a giant metal weight that weights 100,000 lbs.

Behind the 100,000 lbs is a 2 ft crumple zone... and behind the crumple zone is a cockpit... as rigid as possible.

We take this vehicle, and we go run red lights for sport.

First car we T bone... the 100,000 lb block of metal hits their car and blasts them out of the way. We keep moving just fine. The crumple zone, not affected. Our cockpit... perfectly fine.

We continue on.

We do this for the rest of the evening, blast 100 or more cars... we are fine.

Then a genius comes along and says "Lets make this like a ferrari!... lets put the weight in the back of us!"

So we say, okay.

Next car we hit.. our 2 ft crumple zone is gone... in .01 seconds, and guess how much speed we have lost in that process... zilch... the 100,000 lbs just keeps us moving at the same speed before our crumple zone collapsed. And now... the guy we are hitting, his vehicle is now colliding with our cockpit. his vehicle is going pretty much the same direction it was .1 seconds ago... and that direction is still into us.

It hits our rigid cockpit.

1 of 3 things happens...

either our cockpit crushes and we die. (reality back here on planet earth and not la la land)

or our cockpit doesn't crush, because it is made out of super magical material, and the vehicle we hit, gets blasted out of the way and we continue on... and we can keep playing this game all night without the crumple zone because it was pointless since we have the super magic material for a cockpit and 100,000 lbs of momentum behind us, so we will blast everyone out of our way.

or option 3, we finally hit something else that weighs 100,000 lbs and is as rigid as we are, and we come to a stop instantly. Not crushed, but the steering wheel just broke your neck and ribs and your are dying.

you see the point? a front engine, will always be safer than a mid or rear engine, apples to apples. There are no nuances. WHatever the nuances are, you add them to the front engine car, and now its the winner.

you are giving me a headache that you dont understand this yet.

Last edited by Mikec7z; 07-10-2018 at 03:32 AM.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:29 AM
  #147  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

i forgot one of the key points... in the front engine... when you finally hit something that also weights 100,000 lbs... now the 2 ft crumple zone decelerates the cockpit over 2 feet.

In the mid engine... the crumple zone is totally destroyed, with zero deceleration... and at that point, you either have a magic cockpit that stops you intantly (which hurts, or you have a normal cockpit, which collapses... either way, you are toast)

This is an exaggerated example to help ANYONE understand, there is no safety advantage to a mid engine car when the nose is shorter. NONE

Corvette ME nose is shorter, FACT. The end, goodnight. goodbye, either agree, or nuance away... and i disagree with your nuances.

Last edited by Mikec7z; 07-10-2018 at 03:48 AM.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:37 AM
  #148  
mammoth713
Melting Slicks
 
mammoth713's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,049
Received 554 Likes on 277 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mikec7z
the nuances are a distraction from the fact.. they arent as safe.

btw, i too am an engineer, i just dont brag about it to force people to believe my ideas, i use logic.

im going to use one last logic, that a 5 year old would follow, and we will see if you follow my point and why your nuances dont matter whatsoever on an apples to apples rigid as possible cockpit.....

...
I'm not bragging.. believe me I wish I owned real estate and just cruised around the world for fun

I mentioned I'm a satellite engineer to qualify my statements

If you hold the cockpit rigidity constant as ideal, then, generally speaking, the smaller front crumple zone would present itself as an inherent challenge for the ME design to overcome.

Your idealized situation doesn't address the fact that the motor behind the ideally stiff cockpit would now be a moot point and considered regular mass with the rest of the rear of the car, etc... but whatever.

The devils are in the details, cant go thru life saying
SUN BAD
CARS BAD
FOOD GOOD
BEER GOOD
WOMEN GOOD
WOMEN BAD
MONEY GOOD
POLITICS BAD
RELIGION GOOD

life is full of nuance...

I got your point the first time you said it for the record. The difference is you're saying "whatever you put on the ME, you can apply it to the front-engine and make it better!!" .............. yeah! I agree! My point was they could potentially spend some $$$ on researching a better crumple zone that performs "better-than-average-given-the-constraints", and thus make the ME perform safety wise as good as a "non-super-engineered-front-engine-car-layout-design".....

Last edited by mammoth713; 07-10-2018 at 03:51 AM.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:49 AM
  #149  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

"things are to be made as simple as possible, but no more."
Einstein

You missed the first half of that sentence.
Old 07-10-2018, 03:50 AM
  #150  
Mikec7z
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
Mikec7z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,465
Received 647 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

e=mc2... but... blah blah blah blah...

no. e=mc2. Its complicated enough. My statements, complicated enough. There is no other relevant nuance.
Old 07-10-2018, 08:26 AM
  #151  
dfettero
Burning Brakes
 
dfettero's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Posts: 923
Received 219 Likes on 136 Posts
Default 18 thicknesses of Al

The current C7 has 18 different thicknesses of Al and a variety of joining methods.
Don't you think the safety engineers are smart enough do proper crumble zones with the ME.
Think of the liability for failing to do so.



[QUOTE=Mikec7z;1597567296]mid engines dont have as long of crumple zones in the front, not as safe. They dont have battering ram to get cars out of their way, not as safe. The end.[/QUOTE
Old 07-10-2018, 08:44 AM
  #152  
C7nut
Pro

 
C7nut's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Posts: 683
Received 337 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mikec7z
we have a vehicle, and on the front of that vehicle, is a giant metal weight that weights 100,000 lbs.

Behind the 100,000 lbs is a 2 ft crumple zone... and behind the crumple zone is a cockpit... as rigid as possible.

We take this vehicle, and we go run red lights for sport.

First car we T bone... the 100,000 lb block of metal hits their car and blasts them out of the way. We keep moving just fine. The crumple zone, not affected. Our cockpit... perfectly fine.

We continue on.

We do this for the rest of the evening, blast 100 or more cars... we are fine.

Then a genius comes along and says "Lets make this like a ferrari!... lets put the weight in the back of us!"

So we say, okay.

Next car we hit.. our 2 ft crumple zone is gone... in .01 seconds, and guess how much speed we have lost in that process... zilch... the 100,000 lbs just keeps us moving at the same speed before our crumple zone collapsed. And now... the guy we are hitting, his vehicle is now colliding with our cockpit. his vehicle is going pretty much the same direction it was .1 seconds ago... and that direction is still into us.

It hits our rigid cockpit.

1 of 3 things happens...

either our cockpit crushes and we die. (reality back here on planet earth and not la la land)

or our cockpit doesn't crush, because it is made out of super magical material, and the vehicle we hit, gets blasted out of the way and we continue on... and we can keep playing this game all night without the crumple zone because it was pointless since we have the super magic material for a cockpit and 100,000 lbs of momentum behind us, so we will blast everyone out of our way.

or option 3, we finally hit something else that weighs 100,000 lbs and is as rigid as we are, and we come to a stop instantly. Not crushed, but the steering wheel just broke your neck and ribs and your are dying.t.
Actually, there's a fourth point... Your 100000 lb block of iron would be useless in that scenario . The ME is predicted to have automatic braking. The car would have stopped before crashing , LOL......
Old 07-10-2018, 09:41 AM
  #153  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

I guess we need to buy Volvos.
Old 07-10-2018, 09:51 AM
  #154  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
If people based their car buying decision on items like this everyone would be driving f350's.
Exactly. The OP can't seem to decide what he wants his thread to be about....Porsches that don't exist....safety of FE verses ME architecture....will there be an FE Corvette after 2021....?
What we DO know is the OP has got WAY too much sugar in his diet. He reminds me of 2016SS or whatever that guy's many handles were (he got banned every time). I feel confident the OP is on his way to a similar fate.

Last edited by jimmyb; 07-10-2018 at 10:03 AM.
Old 07-10-2018, 10:14 AM
  #155  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,195
Received 13,149 Likes on 5,983 Posts

Default

You guys realize the Tesla model S had the best front impact crash test results of any car ever made right? Removing the engine allows engineers to make the entire front a crumple zone.
Old 07-10-2018, 10:18 AM
  #156  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

^^^^^
Oh boy, now you've done it....
Old 07-10-2018, 10:23 AM
  #157  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tool Hoarder
You guys realize the Tesla model S had the best front impact crash test results of any car ever made right? Removing the engine allows engineers to make the entire front a crumple zone.
You think so?


The following users liked this post:
Oneslackr (07-10-2018)

Get notified of new replies

To 2020 will be mid engine release, and 2021 will be a new front engine model also?...

Old 07-10-2018, 12:17 PM
  #158  
vetteman41960
Burning Brakes
 
vetteman41960's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 969
Received 1,051 Likes on 442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Exactly. The OP can't seem to decide what he wants his thread to be about....Porsches that don't exist....safety of FE verses ME architecture....will there be an FE Corvette after 2021....?
What we DO know is the OP has got WAY too much sugar in his diet. He reminds me of 2016SS or whatever that guy's many handles were (he got banned every time). I feel confident the OP is on his way to a similar fate.
One can only hope your correct. Last thing the forum needs is another expert at all things C7 and someone willing to insult others while claiming to have inside knowledge of future GM products or plans. Aka another forum genius.
I bet this guy is the life of the party!!
The following users liked this post:
3 Z06ZR1 (07-21-2018)
Old 07-10-2018, 01:08 PM
  #159  
wilfie
Advanced
 
wilfie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2015
Posts: 65
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Am I the last dog into this (friendly) fight?
I agree with OP. I don't see GM saying well that was fun spending 100's of millions on a FE Lets throw it out and start over. The FE is a pinnacle or close to it of FE design. The options to massage the design are numerous, cost efficient and GM will milk it for all it's worth. If it was my business call that would be it. How it positions it and sells it remains to be seen.
Old 07-10-2018, 01:39 PM
  #160  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wilfie
Am I the last dog into this (friendly) fight?
I agree with OP. I don't see GM saying well that was fun spending 100's of millions on a FE Lets throw it out and start over. The FE is a pinnacle or close to it of FE design. The options to massage the design are numerous, cost efficient and GM will milk it for all it's worth. If it was my business call that would be it. How it positions it and sells it remains to be seen.
U would be assuming that the markets for an FE Corvette and ME Corvette don’t overlap. Otherwise one cannibalizes the other. And GM needs the unit count for economies of scale.

Last edited by Dominic Sorresso; 07-10-2018 at 06:52 PM.


Quick Reply: 2020 will be mid engine release, and 2021 will be a new front engine model also?...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.