Question-Why would someone just not buy a Porsche?
#1021
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,754
Received 536 Likes
on
279 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'08-'10-'11-'12-'13 '14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19
The following users liked this post:
Dez’sC7 (01-04-2019)
#1022
Melting Slicks
Well said Mark! I too have had many German cars and they're not all what some perceive they are! Perception of superiority overcomes actual reality. The fact is Porsche's are over-priced and you get less for more. I personally don't factor price is my liking for a car. If I like it , I like it no matter price. That said, I will buy a German car if I like it so I am not some anti German car guy. After owning many, I just don't put them on a false pedestal like some do. And as far as snobbish people, snobs will be snobs no matter what car they drive or how they look. It's just some are more delusional about their reason of being a snob than others LOL.
#1023
......is your point that everything costing more than a Corvette is not worth it and their snobs to boot? You do realize that no current Corvette outside of the ZR1 commands sticker and that will change quickly. While any Porsche GT car is far superior in holding its value. Try buying a new GT3 at MSRP. Better yet try buying a new GTRS3 or GTRS2 anywhere close to MSRP. The market sets the price and its always correct. I will never argue that Corvette is the best thing going for the money.....but we all know it’s not the best thing money can buy. No one is being delusional.
#1024
Melting Slicks
Where did you come up with that assessment? And no I couldn't care less about who's snobbish or what, I can be just as snobbish if I wanted to be! And the reason the GT cars bring a premium is because they are produced in very low quantities. How much more would the ZR1 bring if GM only produced 500-750/year for US market??? What Porsche does brilliantly is produced super low volume variants thus resulting in premiums and thus further trickles down to their lesser cars and people's perception of them. Heck, if Honda came out with a super limited version (less than a 1000) of the Civic that too would command premiums so don't let a cars premium price fool you into thinking it's somehow the best thing since sliced bread!
#1025
Drifting
I have a Diavel and Monster 1100evo. I am waiting for the new Diavel to come out to see if I want to trade the OG Diavel in. I’ve had it for almost six years....it’s been bulletproof so far as has the 1100evo..
Last edited by C82LT; 01-02-2019 at 09:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Dez’sC7 (01-03-2019)
#1026
I wished the Corvette team took a page out of Porsche's book and produce super limited variants of the Corvette as well. The ZR1 is pretty limited but not really. A few more variants like a Z06R, etc. would be nice. Sadly I don't think they have it in them! Even their anniversary special editions are nothing but tacked on stripes and decals.
#1027
Because I don't like the Style.
Identical in my Eyes
Identical in my Eyes
The following 3 users liked this post by Kruegmeister:
#1028
"Another thing customers want: an automatic transmission. So the ZR1 has one, for the first time, with eight ratios. Both it and the seven-speed manual are direct mechanical carryovers from the Z06. “We haven’t done A-to-B testing,” MacDonald says, “but the automatic is likely faster, because we have torque reduction to protect the first three gears in the manual. "
Alex MacDonald Is a GM engineer, test driver and Chevrolet vehicle-performance manager.
PS-SAE power certification has nothing to do with the transmission. It's about what the engine produces on an engine dyno under a very strict protocol.
Alex MacDonald Is a GM engineer, test driver and Chevrolet vehicle-performance manager.
PS-SAE power certification has nothing to do with the transmission. It's about what the engine produces on an engine dyno under a very strict protocol.
The C7 ZR1 has 715 lbs-ft of torque and uses a Tremec TR6070 transmission that Tremec rates at 635 lbs-ft of max input torque.
Torque management by the computer allows this, so I would think that same application would also apply to a DCT with less torque input rating than the engine's torque output.
Torque management by the computer allows this, so I would think that same application would also apply to a DCT with less torque input rating than the engine's torque output.
I surmised by your TQ management entry you were suggesting the ZR1/Z06 A8 handles the extra 200 ft-lbs (averaged throughout the power band) by way of TQ management and DCT could match that the same way (?) and they don't (?). Don’t have much time…the max torque for real DCTs on the street I could find is the 488GTB at 515 ft-lbs and GT2RS PDK at 495 ft-lbs More than willing to entertain valid references (as in real car real transmission) to the DCTs in the 650 area…if they exist..Bottom line: I reiterate (data at hand) there is a substantial delta between torque handling ability of current DCTs (all brands) versus the A8s. What are you saying?
“Both it and the seven-speed manual are direct mechanical carryovers from the Z06”
Alex MacDonald Is a GM engineer, test driver and Chevrolet vehicle-performance manager.
PS-SAE power certification has nothing to do with the transmission. It's about what the engine produces on an engine dyno under a very strict protocol
HP-SAE has everything to do with input torque validation.. However, I do agree with you that SAE J1349 testing protocol measures engine power at the engine output shaft and not transmission shaft…
By the way:
Last edited by Telepierre; 01-03-2019 at 10:05 AM.
#1031
Melting Slicks
The following 2 users liked this post by Dr. ice:
ArmchairArchitect (01-03-2019),
gthal (01-05-2019)
#1032
Talked to one admin and he said this thread is the best honeycomb trap ever devised and he is not closing it kingdom come!??
Something about keeping the rest of the forum clean!? but he also said that since I was not an "owner" nor a cyber security guy I would not understand...
Something about keeping the rest of the forum clean!? but he also said that since I was not an "owner" nor a cyber security guy I would not understand...
Last edited by Telepierre; 01-03-2019 at 01:07 PM.
#1033
#1034
Introducing 270 and 59. Nice couple ;-)
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (01-05-2019)
#1035
c5arlen - you misquoted me by omission. My original statement was:
The "stripped / sports car version" that I was referring to is the Porsche 64.
Porsche origins from Wikipedia: "One of the first assignments the new company received was from the German government to design a car for the people, that is a "Volkswagen".[3] This resulted in the Volkswagen Beetle, one of the most successful car designs of all time.[5] The Porsche 64 was developed in 1939 using many components from the Beetle."
Also, FYI the 356 was produced from 1948-1965 and was succeeded by the 901 not the other way around as you stated.
The "stripped / sports car version" that I was referring to is the Porsche 64.
Porsche origins from Wikipedia: "One of the first assignments the new company received was from the German government to design a car for the people, that is a "Volkswagen".[3] This resulted in the Volkswagen Beetle, one of the most successful car designs of all time.[5] The Porsche 64 was developed in 1939 using many components from the Beetle."
Also, FYI the 356 was produced from 1948-1965 and was succeeded by the 901 not the other way around as you stated.
Last edited by PurpleLion; 01-04-2019 at 06:18 PM.
#1036
^^^^^^
Again just adding a visual commentary for the historical contexts above.
435 and 130. Nice pair ;-)
Again just adding a visual commentary for the historical contexts above.
435 and 130. Nice pair ;-)
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (01-05-2019)
#1038
Melting Slicks
Two awesome sports cars that have evolved into highly desirable cars with super car performance capabilities. Pull out your wallet and pick your flavor! Thank goodness they both look a hell of a lot better then they did in their infancy.
#1039
Melting Slicks
* * *
Here, we encounter the price point and feasibility questions. First, can GM do it ? That’s OP’s focus it seems. To me this is trivial if Ford can (Ford Gt) , if there is not a cost cutting limitation. Next, can it be more reasonable than the Ford GT (<< half mill)? That’s the real question to me...
Here, we encounter the price point and feasibility questions. First, can GM do it ? That’s OP’s focus it seems. To me this is trivial if Ford can (Ford Gt) , if there is not a cost cutting limitation. Next, can it be more reasonable than the Ford GT (<< half mill)? That’s the real question to me...
Mass production makes Corvette's pricing possible.
The following 2 users liked this post by fsvoboda:
Foosh (01-05-2019),
Zaro Tundov (01-05-2019)
#1040
Drifting
c5arlen - you misquoted me by omission. My original statement was:
The "stripped / sports car version" that I was referring to is the Porsche 64.
Porsche origins from Wikipedia: "One of the first assignments the new company received was from the German government to design a car for the people, that is a "Volkswagen".[3] This resulted in the Volkswagen Beetle, one of the most successful car designs of all time.[5] The Porsche 64 was developed in 1939 using many components from the Beetle."
Also, FYI the 356 was produced from 1948-1965 and was succeeded by the 901 not the other way around as you stated.
The "stripped / sports car version" that I was referring to is the Porsche 64.
Porsche origins from Wikipedia: "One of the first assignments the new company received was from the German government to design a car for the people, that is a "Volkswagen".[3] This resulted in the Volkswagen Beetle, one of the most successful car designs of all time.[5] The Porsche 64 was developed in 1939 using many components from the Beetle."
Also, FYI the 356 was produced from 1948-1965 and was succeeded by the 901 not the other way around as you stated.
Last edited by Parcival; 01-05-2019 at 06:39 PM.