ME numbers!
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
ME numbers!
What are your predictions for 0-60, 1/4 mile and trap speed?
assuming 460 hp LT1 with dct
assuming 460 hp LT1 with dct
#2
Le Mans Master
Well, it better have more then those numbers even for a base car.
Heres what I'm hoping we get:
525hp 500trq w/DCT
3,250lb loaded
0-60- 3.4sec
1/4- 11.4@124
Heres what I'm hoping we get:
525hp 500trq w/DCT
3,250lb loaded
0-60- 3.4sec
1/4- 11.4@124
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (09-07-2018)
#3
Safety Car
A poll elsewhere came up with a 0-60 average time of 3.35 seconds.
Last edited by elegant; 09-05-2018 at 01:10 AM.
#4
Drifting
Thread Starter
Woule be cool but they've got to leave some room for the hipo versions...
I'm thinking 0-60 in 3.5 and 1/4 mile in 11.6 @ 123
I'm thinking 0-60 in 3.5 and 1/4 mile in 11.6 @ 123
#6
Drifting
Thread Starter
Before the c7 reveal everyone thought the base would be close to 500 hp (from 436) however it only increased by 24 hp but still sold great.
The ME should be able to put the power down better regardless
The ME should be able to put the power down better regardless
#8
Banned Scam/Spammer
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes
on
1,616 Posts
This is an interesting mental/technical exercise- assuming the same exact motor in a front engine C7 versus a rear engine C8, how much would that affect the following performance areas given that the C7 front engine already has a perfect 50/50 weight distribution and is already a mid-engined car (just front mid engine versus rear mid-engine):
- Road course lap times
- Skidpad numbers
- 0 to 60
- 1/4 mile
I'm trying to determine how much advantage a rear mid engine car has compared to a front mid-engine car, assuming an apples-to-apples comparison (ie. same motor).
- Road course lap times
- Skidpad numbers
- 0 to 60
- 1/4 mile
I'm trying to determine how much advantage a rear mid engine car has compared to a front mid-engine car, assuming an apples-to-apples comparison (ie. same motor).
Last edited by ArmchairArchitect; 09-05-2018 at 10:00 AM.
#9
Safety Car
Well, going to move about 8% of the weight to the rear. So from an acceleration perspective should improve given the weight doesnt go up. I'm not track day regular but I have done a few of the drive exotics deals and from the track a mid car is alot different than FE. Corvette was alot easier into a corner with the weight and wide tires on entry, had to be easier on exit, the ME's were sorta the opposite, drive out of the corner was much easier. Like I said, these deals get ya a chance, in my case, to drive cars I could not have and the experience is limited, which is good cause I'm a hack! One of the best gifts my wife has given me though, ton of fun. Lol
Last edited by Darion; 09-05-2018 at 10:12 AM.
#10
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: North/Central NJ - a.k.a. Gotti in the CFNE section
Posts: 7,733
Received 1,532 Likes
on
523 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
In my opinion it's not going to get to 525... its such a revolutionary change they don't need to for attraction.
Every other recent model change had an increase in HP in the 30-ish range or so. I think they go with 500 or 505 hp.
With DCT and better power to ground ability, I think 3.2-3.3 0-60 is about right . The C7 Z51 does it in 3.8
Every other recent model change had an increase in HP in the 30-ish range or so. I think they go with 500 or 505 hp.
With DCT and better power to ground ability, I think 3.2-3.3 0-60 is about right . The C7 Z51 does it in 3.8
#11
Race Director
This is an interesting mental/technical exercise- assuming the same exact motor in a front engine C7 versus a rear engine C8, how much would that affect the following performance areas given that the C7 front engine already has a perfect 50/50 weight distribution and is already a mid-engined car (just front mid engine versus rear mid-engine):
- Road course lap times
- Skidpad numbers
- 0 to 60
- 1/4 mile
I'm trying to determine how much advantage a rear mid engine car has compared to a front mid-engine car, assuming an apples-to-apples comparison (ie. same motor).
- Road course lap times
- Skidpad numbers
- 0 to 60
- 1/4 mile
I'm trying to determine how much advantage a rear mid engine car has compared to a front mid-engine car, assuming an apples-to-apples comparison (ie. same motor).
Having a 40/60 split on a ME car works better in many ways. More of the weight is over the driven axle this allows for better traction without having to have a lot of weight transfer which is not a good setup for a sports car. Can use narrower tires in the front which saves weight. Also the light front helps turn in and driving feel. It will be good.
#12
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,247
Received 5,444 Likes
on
2,270 Posts
I bet it lands around 500 hp. If it comes in at that power level, with the traction advantage of a ME over the C7, and the benefit of a DCT, if it comes in around 3,300 lbs - it'll match the C7 Z06 M7 on 0-60.
#13
Remember that ME's do not have a long drive shaft and will put more power down to the wheels per engine HP than a front engine car. So, if a C7 puts down 410whp with 460 crank, a 500 hp C8 would put down about 455whp. With traction and that weight, DCT, a C8 could possibly pull a 3.3 second 0-60. That is damn quick.
#14
If the base model is really the ~70k price point rumored, asking for more than ~475hp seems like a bit of a stretch, as does expecting 3200lb weight. Like stated, they need to leave room for the higher performance versions and going from FE to ME, from 460 to 525, losing weight, and keeping price at 70k seems like wishful thinking for one model year change.
My cautious guess would be 3400lbs, 475hp, 11.6 1/4 mile, and a $75k sticker to start. Acceleration will be insane for "only" 475hp with the extra weight over the rear wheels, since Vettes have been traction limited for decades. That would keep most people happy and still leave plenty of room for improvements on the big boy versions. It's not a pure race car and will obviously need things like leather, nav, intelligent cruise control, etc to be considered modern and keep many people happy, and along with all the govt mandated safety requirements on top of that there is no way it will be 3200lbs(hope I'm wrong!). A GS C7 is ~3450 and the ME supposed to have extra radiators, increased cooling, bigger and heavier DCT, etc. FWIW a 488 is 3250, and IMO there is no way a well loaded Vette will be lighter than that thing at a fraction of the price...losing weight is expensive.
Driveshaft length effect on drivetrain loss is negligible compared to the transmission used. A DCT has more loss than a manual, and will likely put less to the ground than a similar flywheel hp manual car. Note that we're only talking about 10hp on a 500hp car, but it is still less HP, not more.
My cautious guess would be 3400lbs, 475hp, 11.6 1/4 mile, and a $75k sticker to start. Acceleration will be insane for "only" 475hp with the extra weight over the rear wheels, since Vettes have been traction limited for decades. That would keep most people happy and still leave plenty of room for improvements on the big boy versions. It's not a pure race car and will obviously need things like leather, nav, intelligent cruise control, etc to be considered modern and keep many people happy, and along with all the govt mandated safety requirements on top of that there is no way it will be 3200lbs(hope I'm wrong!). A GS C7 is ~3450 and the ME supposed to have extra radiators, increased cooling, bigger and heavier DCT, etc. FWIW a 488 is 3250, and IMO there is no way a well loaded Vette will be lighter than that thing at a fraction of the price...losing weight is expensive.
Remember that ME's do not have a long drive shaft and will put more power down to the wheels per engine HP than a front engine car. So, if a C7 puts down 410whp with 460 crank, a 500 hp C8 would put down about 455whp. With traction and that weight, DCT, a C8 could possibly pull a 3.3 second 0-60. That is damn quick.
Last edited by PuckDracon; 09-05-2018 at 11:11 AM.
The following users liked this post:
JustinStrife (09-07-2018)
#16
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,657
Received 4,116 Likes
on
1,470 Posts
2020 C8 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Honestly I'm more concerned about weight. Will this thing be nimble? Straight line speed is good but the real fun is how it handles. The lighter the better.
The following 5 users liked this post by Sin City:
ArmchairArchitect (09-05-2018),
bgspot (09-07-2018),
Flex182 (09-06-2018),
rgregory (09-07-2018),
vettesweetnos (09-05-2018)
#17
My guess is 490hp with optional exhaust to take it to 510hp.
0-60: 3.4
1/4: 11.6 @ 125
3475lbs
0-60: 3.4
1/4: 11.6 @ 125
3475lbs
Last edited by keagan; 09-05-2018 at 12:45 PM.
#18
Team Owner
No different than the base C7 Stingray with 460 HP and an A8..
Last edited by JoesC5; 09-05-2018 at 12:49 PM.
#19
I would hope that they get all they can out of the LT2. 500hp+ would be ideal. And then the DOHC and DOHC with TT versions can reach the expected Z06 and ZR1 numbers.
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: North/Central NJ - a.k.a. Gotti in the CFNE section
Posts: 7,733
Received 1,532 Likes
on
523 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
I think 500-505 for the base, 730 to 750 for the Z06, and I think the E-Ray ZR1 hybrid is something like 900-950 with electric and gas engine
This has been said by some people that do know some things and also many mags.
This has been said by some people that do know some things and also many mags.