Who needs ME really?
#1
Who needs ME really?
From Car and Driver's lightning lap test:
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...lap2018results
But seriously, making this a C8 topic if the C7 ZR1 can do that what will the C8 ZR1 do?
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...lap2018results
But seriously, making this a C8 topic if the C7 ZR1 can do that what will the C8 ZR1 do?
The following 2 users liked this post by ColoradoGS:
ArmchairArchitect (09-20-2018),
rsvette12 (09-19-2018)
Popular Reply
09-19-2018, 06:43 PM
Burning Brakes
In all fairness, each year brings different testing conditions. With that said, the Ford GT was a performance flop.
Imagine a C7 ZR1 with 150lbs less weight, 50 more horsepower, with the engine in the rear, with more traction, and with far less drag. That is possibly what the C8 ZR1 will bring to the table, and that absurd. Of course, that's not to mention the idea that the driving experience of the mid-engine car will far surpass that of a front-engine car by the same manufacturer. I think that the job of Corvette engineers is to keep improving their products, and the C7 ZR1 is the best front-engine car that their constraints would allow. Shifting the product line to a mid-engine configuration gives the Corvette team much more room for improvement within their ever-expanding budget, and improve they will.
Imagine a C7 ZR1 with 150lbs less weight, 50 more horsepower, with the engine in the rear, with more traction, and with far less drag. That is possibly what the C8 ZR1 will bring to the table, and that absurd. Of course, that's not to mention the idea that the driving experience of the mid-engine car will far surpass that of a front-engine car by the same manufacturer. I think that the job of Corvette engineers is to keep improving their products, and the C7 ZR1 is the best front-engine car that their constraints would allow. Shifting the product line to a mid-engine configuration gives the Corvette team much more room for improvement within their ever-expanding budget, and improve they will.
#2
Safety Car
If I am the Ford GT engineers, I am very sad reading this, for my Ford GT costs 3x as much, yet takes another 4.5 seconds/lap.
The following 2 users liked this post by elegant:
NewYuriCity (09-19-2018),
rsvette12 (09-19-2018)
The following users liked this post:
moon2605 (09-30-2018)
#5
Burning Brakes
From Car and Driver's lightning lap test:
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...lap2018results
But seriously, making this a C8 topic if the C7 ZR1 can do that what will the C8 ZR1 do?
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...lap2018results
But seriously, making this a C8 topic if the C7 ZR1 can do that what will the C8 ZR1 do?
#6
Burning Brakes
In all fairness, each year brings different testing conditions. With that said, the Ford GT was a performance flop.
Imagine a C7 ZR1 with 150lbs less weight, 50 more horsepower, with the engine in the rear, with more traction, and with far less drag. That is possibly what the C8 ZR1 will bring to the table, and that absurd. Of course, that's not to mention the idea that the driving experience of the mid-engine car will far surpass that of a front-engine car by the same manufacturer. I think that the job of Corvette engineers is to keep improving their products, and the C7 ZR1 is the best front-engine car that their constraints would allow. Shifting the product line to a mid-engine configuration gives the Corvette team much more room for improvement within their ever-expanding budget, and improve they will.
Imagine a C7 ZR1 with 150lbs less weight, 50 more horsepower, with the engine in the rear, with more traction, and with far less drag. That is possibly what the C8 ZR1 will bring to the table, and that absurd. Of course, that's not to mention the idea that the driving experience of the mid-engine car will far surpass that of a front-engine car by the same manufacturer. I think that the job of Corvette engineers is to keep improving their products, and the C7 ZR1 is the best front-engine car that their constraints would allow. Shifting the product line to a mid-engine configuration gives the Corvette team much more room for improvement within their ever-expanding budget, and improve they will.
The following 6 users liked this post by Quinten33:
427muscle (09-23-2018),
ByByBMW (09-19-2018),
Glenn Quagmire (09-20-2018),
Mike Campbell (09-20-2018),
PurpleLion (09-19-2018),
and 1 others liked this post.
#7
Lap times really show how much the driver makes a difference in lap times. The GT already got 2:38 (while troubleshooting an issue) at this track by another driver, while the zr1 got. 2:37 too.
Last edited by eyedeekay; 09-19-2018 at 07:41 PM.
#8
Le Mans Master
I see the table, and wonder what could have happened if the ZR1 had the chassis dynamics of the C8 instead of the chassis dynamics of the C7?
more traction in acceleration,
more traction in braking
more traction in cornering.
This is why one goes mid-engine.
more traction in acceleration,
more traction in braking
more traction in cornering.
This is why one goes mid-engine.
#9
Supporting Lifetime
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 4,015
Received 1,267 Likes
on
508 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 Corvette of the Year Finalist -- Unmodified
2021 C1 of the Year Winner - Unmodified
2020 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2016 C1 of the Year Finalist
A legitimate question . . . Who needs the ME?
Apparently, Chevrolet believes that THEY do. And while I certainly don't "need" one - My current C7 is fine for me - I fully intend to give it a long, hard look when it is actually available. No first-year car for me, though. I'll let the real-world Corvette enthusiasts on this forum and elsewhere do the real-world Beta testing. Year three should be about right.
Apparently, Chevrolet believes that THEY do. And while I certainly don't "need" one - My current C7 is fine for me - I fully intend to give it a long, hard look when it is actually available. No first-year car for me, though. I'll let the real-world Corvette enthusiasts on this forum and elsewhere do the real-world Beta testing. Year three should be about right.
Last edited by fyreline; 09-19-2018 at 07:47 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by fyreline:
BarneyZ (09-20-2018),
juanvaldez (09-23-2018)
#10
Tires also make a big difference in these tests.
#12
For the record I know why we need/want a mid-engine design. Tadge has said that they've reached the end of the capabilities of front engine chassis. I was just really impressed how well the ZR-1 did. I mean that GT2RS is in another stratosphere when it comes to actual purchase price. The C8 ZR1 is going to be one for the record books.
#14
Melting Slicks
I'm retired now, but I still use a cad program for my projects around the hose and for my hobbies. As a mechanical engineer, I could not imagine a better job than to help design a ME Corvette. What an exciting opportunity for those young engineers at GM. They hit the jackpot on being at the right place at the right time. Good luck to them, and it will be good luck for all of us Corvette enthusiasts.
Why an ME? As Tadge has said, the old front engine design was limiting their possibilities. The ME IS the future.
Why an ME? As Tadge has said, the old front engine design was limiting their possibilities. The ME IS the future.
The following 2 users liked this post by JerryC5:
PurpleLion (09-20-2018),
Ryan R (09-20-2018)
#15
Race Director
Should be mentioned that the 911 is now closer to a ME than the old rear engine it was. The length of the car now puts the motor mostly forward of the rear axle. Probably not a true ME, but very close.
Ford GT is just a disappointment. Once the ZR1 stole the track times from it at several tracks, it became real obvious Ford really didn't go for it with that car.
Ford GT is just a disappointment. Once the ZR1 stole the track times from it at several tracks, it became real obvious Ford really didn't go for it with that car.
#16
Should be mentioned that the 911 is now closer to a ME than the old rear engine it was. The length of the car now puts the motor mostly forward of the rear axle. Probably not a true ME, but very close.
Ford GT is just a disappointment. Once the ZR1 stole the track times from it at several tracks, it became real obvious Ford really didn't go for it with that car.
Ford GT is just a disappointment. Once the ZR1 stole the track times from it at several tracks, it became real obvious Ford really didn't go for it with that car.
#17
Lightning lap is not reliable. Motor Trend does a far superior job in US comparing cars, only using Randy Pobst for their best drivers car competition.
#18
That said, I like Motor Trend's data better when cars are being reviewed individually or on head-2-head. Best driver's car is too many cars at once and they can't keep the conditions constant. For example, when Randy drove the C7 Grand Sport on a head-2-head episode, he couldn't praise the handling of the car more. He absolutely loved it. Later the same grand sport was one of the 10 best driver's car candidates. Because of the number of cars track testing took place over two days. The morning the grand sport got its turn it was cold (50 degrees) and had rained overnight. Definitely not weather that are good for sport cup 2 tires. When Randy did his laps he complained about the shaky grip of the grand sport. Other cars were tested the day before when it was much warmer and dry. I didn't think that was a fair evaluation or comparison.
But yes, in general, I trust Randy to drive a car over a random editor. It was still fun to see the ZR-1 do so well.
#19
From Car and Driver's lightning lap test:
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...lap2018results
But seriously, making this a C8 topic if the C7 ZR1 can do that what will the C8 ZR1 do?
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...lap2018results
But seriously, making this a C8 topic if the C7 ZR1 can do that what will the C8 ZR1 do?
Is it my imagination or was he not paddleshifting?
Last edited by sunsalem; 09-20-2018 at 01:02 PM.
#20
You've heard of race on Sunday sell on Monday. Street Cred
Of course even before that, the car mags like to time everything out to the tenth of a second and inch to rank cars.
Not that it matters to me and most but it adds the the cars cachet to challenge the best supercars at a fraction of the price.
To those who own the supercars it just means they spent more money than you!
Of course even before that, the car mags like to time everything out to the tenth of a second and inch to rank cars.
Not that it matters to me and most but it adds the the cars cachet to challenge the best supercars at a fraction of the price.
To those who own the supercars it just means they spent more money than you!