chazcron's 3D model work in progress
#1221
Drifting
The rendering gurus here are just stuck trying to put lipstick on a pig (i.e. the IVers). So they’re severely handicapped because they can’t think “out of the box” as to what the new C8 could really look like. It wouldn’t surprised me if GM actually created special ugly fenders, front and rear ends just to incite confusion and the crazy amount of speculation we’ve seen on here. That’s just my 2¢. YMMV.
#1222
Burning Brakes
This is actually a pretty hilarious statement, because, when the first renders started coming out, drawn up by a few folks thinking "out[side] of the box", they too were lambasted by some, because their renders "looked nothing like the camo'd cars"... these guys can't win for losing...
#1223
Race Director
#1225
A few detail shots in first time Torch Red. I lit for the rear and spun the car for the front, so the lighting isn't as complimentary to the hood strakes. Oh, and my headlights blow up close.
Tom, it'll never be seen in ortho, and you are probably right about it being out too far, but I just can't bring myself to blunt the front end any further. FWIW, the renders line up pretty well in perspective. (But, yeah, probably too far out.) I guess time or leaks may tell.
Tom, it'll never be seen in ortho, and you are probably right about it being out too far, but I just can't bring myself to blunt the front end any further. FWIW, the renders line up pretty well in perspective. (But, yeah, probably too far out.) I guess time or leaks may tell.
The following 13 users liked this post by chazcron:
bgspot (01-23-2019),
Darion (01-23-2019),
elegant (01-23-2019),
firstvettesoon (01-23-2019),
Foosh (01-23-2019),
and 8 others liked this post.
#1227
Safety Car
I too love the color, and I like the discussion about different modeling consequences. Well done gentlemen.
#1228
would be nice to see this color as Porsche and Lamborghini both have similar Miami Blue color and looks great on exotic.
Colors like this will attract a younger audience .
Great Job Chaz.
#1229
A few detail shots in first time Torch Red. I lit for the rear and spun the car for the front, so the lighting isn't as complimentary to the hood strakes. Oh, and my headlights blow up close.
Tom, it'll never be seen in ortho, and you are probably right about it being out too far, but I just can't bring myself to blunt the front end any further. FWIW, the renders line up pretty well in perspective. (But, yeah, probably too far out.) I guess time or leaks may tell.
Tom, it'll never be seen in ortho, and you are probably right about it being out too far, but I just can't bring myself to blunt the front end any further. FWIW, the renders line up pretty well in perspective. (But, yeah, probably too far out.) I guess time or leaks may tell.
#1231
Pro
Yeah I’d agree that Chazcron is doing some really nice renders but in the end, they’re renders based on the camo disguise which GM has purposely made ugly to confuse anyone catching a glimpse of them. The camo is doing the job intended. I honestly think GM’s disguise team has done a great job of grafting lots and lots of ugly styling accents all over the IVers. GM Styling knows the future of the Corvette depends on a really awesome looking ME that can compete, style-wise, with the best in the world.
#1232
Somba master
I agree, Chaz has done a fantastic job, and his renders look great in all the colors he’s done. I don’t know how the actual car is gonna come out, but I like it WAY better than the C7. No maturity to that design IMHO.
I just hope the real thing comes out looking like what Chaz has come up with.
I just hope the real thing comes out looking like what Chaz has come up with.
#1233
I had a similar thought last night. They extend a conditional offer to come and see the car IF I sign a NDA and agree not to post any more renders... Tough choice. Sorry guys, I'd take it in a heartbeat.
The following users liked this post:
Foosh (01-23-2019)
#1234
They wouldn’t do that Chaz. GM is getting way too much FREE feedback from the Corvette faithful and car lovers in general, all due to your beautiful work! Thanks again for sharing!
#1235
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: Myrtle Beach South Carolina
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 183 Likes
on
121 Posts
Originally Posted by chazcron
A few detail shots in first time Torch Red. I lit for the rear and spun the car for the front, so the lighting isn't as complimentary to the hood strakes. Oh, and my headlights blow up close.
Tom, it'll never be seen in ortho, and you are probably right about it being out too far, but I just can't bring myself to blunt the front end any further. FWIW, the renders line up pretty well in perspective. (But, yeah, probably too far out.) I guess time or leaks may tell.
Tom, it'll never be seen in ortho, and you are probably right about it being out too far, but I just can't bring myself to blunt the front end any further. FWIW, the renders line up pretty well in perspective. (But, yeah, probably too far out.) I guess time or leaks may tell.
Keep up the great work.
#1236
Safety Car
Thanks for that side view. To my eye, and I realize you are working with the camo pics, the top of red line is just to high. Bringing that down more like the C8.R pics would lower the headlight a bit, possibly coming a bit forward and lower the top of the nose while at it. Not sure any of that is able to be done with current pedestrian safety regs and minimum lighting heights required.
PC
PC
Last edited by Darion; 01-23-2019 at 10:13 AM.
#1237
Thanks for that side view. To my eye, and I realize you are working with the camo pics, the top of red line is just to high. Bringing that down more like the C8.R pics would lower the headlight a bit, possibly coming a bit forward and lower the top of the nose while at it. Not sure any of that is able to be done with current pedestrian safety regs and minimum lighting heights required.
PC
PC
like it or not, this image of the front fenders show exactly how much space there is between the wheel well and the top of the fender. Of course the image is taken at a top down angle so it appears deeper than it actually is. You must compare the headlight opening on the side to get a better idea of the thickness.
#1238
Safety Car
Thanks for that side view. To my eye, and I realize you are working with the camo pics, the top of red line is just to high. Bringing that down more like the C8.R pics would lower the headlight a bit, possibly coming a bit forward and lower the top of the nose while at it. Not sure any of that is able to be done with current pedestrian safety regs and minimum lighting heights required.
PC
PC
I traced this render off my monitor Nov. 17. It was from one of the first spy shots.
I think the front of the car is mostly fake including the height of the fenders, including lamps, and the nose and side glass. Here is the correct height from an aesthetic perspective at least.
I'm still sticking to my side scoop and hood outlet at least for the HP version.
#1239
Safety Car
like it or not, this image of the front fenders show exactly how much space there is between the wheel well and the top of the fender. Of course the image is taken at a top down angle so it appears deeper than it actually is. You must compare the headlight opening on the side to get a better idea of the thickness.
PC
The following users liked this post:
firstvettesoon (01-23-2019)
#1240
The renders are outstanding, big thanks to those putting the time into doing those. I hope the car doesn't look like the renders as I find it uninspiring bordering on ugly and see it as a real missed opportunity to design a gorgeous exotic body on a mid-engine platform.
The following 3 users liked this post by Goaty: