When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Tragic. Did you guys see the Ed Welburn thread? Him and Peter DeLorenzo were guests on Autoline yesterday. Welburn talked about using a pencil to formulate his design ideas. He talked about the sculptors also None of you, including Chaz has no idea what he was talking about. Now read Peter's rant below to find out what you have become. You probably won't comprehend this either and this is why America is in trouble. http://www.autoextremist.com/
I'm in trouble with my wife "again" if Chazcron's depiction is close to being accurate. That is one suuweeeet vette!! Best I've seen to date. Thanks Chazcron....
Peter at Autoextremist is a wonderful read every week
Interesting. I've never heard of the Autoextremeist but after reading a few articles, not bad. He tends to ramble but then he'll say something interesting. I can't agree with all his conclusions but I appreciate that he doesn't sugar coat his opinions and gives a lot of reasons for why he reaches certain conclusions.
[Shaka] No No No! It's all wrong. You are mixing American and Portuguese styling in that pig of a picture. Get your head straight. Just stop doing what you are doing and L I S T E N to M E!!!
I drew some random lines to show you how bad your implementation and design is. Figure it out yourself! [/Shaka]
That latest car looks like it could be somewhat attractive if the proportions were correct. Example: the point of the front fascia on my GS is pretty much in line with my wheel center caps, whereas the point of fascia on your render is at or above the top of the wheel.
Shaka at least backs up his opinion or disagreement with pics/drawings to try to explain what he’s talking about. If you’re going to attempt to make fun of or discredit someone you might want to provide something to back up your position.
That latest car looks like it could be somewhat attractive if the proportions were correct. Example: the point of the front fascia on my GS is pretty much in line with my wheel center caps, whereas the point of fascia on your render is at or above the top of the wheel.
Chaz has posted several pictures of his model overlayed on a side photo of the car. The nose looks high because of the camera angle. When viewed from the side it's right where it should be.
Love your work and have enjoyed the thread. Two questions that I have not seen directly addressed. Forgive me if you have
1 on the side scoop why do you seemingly follow the hard side lines that I think most all agree are fake panels. 2. On the nose you have it drawn to a pretty aggressive point and I don’t really see that in the paint shop or Camo cars
That latest car looks like it could be somewhat attractive if the proportions were correct. Example: the point of the front fascia on my GS is pretty much in line with my wheel center caps, whereas the point of fascia on your render is at or above the top of the wheel.
Originally Posted by smithers
Chaz has posted several pictures of his model overlayed on a side photo of the car. The nose looks high because of the camera angle. When viewed from the side it's right where it should be.
That latest car looks like it could be somewhat attractive if the proportions were correct. Example: the point of the front fascia on my GS is pretty much in line with my wheel center caps, whereas the point of fascia on your render is at or above the top of the wheel.
Shaka at least backs up his opinion or disagreement with pics/drawings to try to explain what he’s talking about. If you’re going to attempt to make fun of or discredit someone you might want to provide something to back up your position.
Let me reply to you as Shaka would.
You are an idiot and you know nothing. You know 4% of what I know.
Not a very nice feeling when someone talks to you like that is it?
Based on the image of the ME rear bumper cover on the paint-line, it appears that the rear diffuser on the ME may wrap up on the rear of the quarter panels, similar to the Lambo Huracan Evo.
Love your work and have enjoyed the thread. Two questions that I have not seen directly addressed. Forgive me if you have
1 on the side scoop why do you seemingly follow the hard side lines that I think most all agree are fake panels. 2. On the nose you have it drawn to a pretty aggressive point and I don’t really see that in the paint shop or Camo cars
again, very much enjoy your work
I love what he is doing and think he is helping GM in some way. They probably have told him as long as he sticks to what has been revealed i.e. don't release the real bumper, inlet and spoiler they will keep feeding him some hints or details.to share with us.
I love what he is doing and think he is helping GM in some way. They probably have told him as long as he sticks to what has been revealed i.e. don't release the real bumper, inlet and spoiler they will keep feeding him some hints or details.to share with us.
Lol hell no..
Keep it simple. This guy is talented and studying spy shots. Period. Don't overcomplicate it
Love your work and have enjoyed the thread. Two questions that I have not seen directly addressed. Forgive me if you have
1 on the side scoop why do you seemingly follow the hard side lines that I think most all agree are fake panels. 2. On the nose you have it drawn to a pretty aggressive point and I don’t really see that in the paint shop or Camo cars
again, very much enjoy your work
My scoop rationale is covered extensively in this post here:
And while the grill looks fantastic unadorned, it’s unlikely to be so. So I put something there. We also have no idea how beautifully jeweled the headlights (and tail lights) will be, but would you be more satisfied if I just left them blank? I don’t think so. I’ve always known my renders (in hindsight) will look pretty off the mark when the real ones are revealed, but they still look better with something there rather than nothing.
Ha, they dont do that. Lol, who knows, those leaked CAD drawing could be fake for all we know!
Does seem as I'd they would have some sort of vent at the front end to exit air. If its behind the front wheels, top of fenders or the hood I have no idea and what we have seen so far doesn't indicate it.
First I'd like to say that I really appreciate and admire all of the rendering work you've produced. In my opinion the work is excellent and your continued refinement is as impressive as it is entertaining. However there are two nagging details that I possibly have all wrong, and they both revolve around the rear bumper-cover image from the paint-line, as follows:
1) It really appears that from a side-view of the car that the rear bumper-cover will not be the lowest element seen. Please reference the my Lambo image from post #1370 (above). To me, the rear bumper-cover appears to terminate across its entire width, just somewhere below the rear license plate area.
2) Please forgive my repeated mentioning of this one, however it appears to me that the two rear facing vents on the rear bumper-cover finish with a radius on their outermost vertical edges. Therefore from the same "side-view," I believe an observer would see the outer most vertical edge of these vents.
When you have some time, I'd really appreciate if you'd give both of these points some further analysis, then reply back with your thoughts.
Zoom in on the bottom part of this image. you can see there is a second rear fairing not seen on the "paint shop" image. I have known about this seam, but don't include it for aesthetic reasons. There are two parking sensors located there which I also don't include for the same reason. the other two are at the outside bottom of the two rear vents. whose innermost vents are partly visible from the sides, but certainly not their outer edge, just like the C7 image you have posted yourself.
02-01-2019, 03:12 PM
