ME Mules in hiding now..? - Page 2 - CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette, be it mid-engine, Zora, or whatever form it may take.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ME Mules in hiding now..?

Old 12-02-2018, 02:13 PM
  #21  
Michael A
CF Senior Member
 
Michael A's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Ventura County CA
Posts: 3,953
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zaro Tundov View Post

TPP would have helped contain China by forming a pacific trade pact that excluded China. It had issues, but they could have been fixed if the political will and leadership were there. Instead we have rising raw material costs and crops rotting in storage. Nobody wins in a tit for tat tariff battle, most of all the consumer.
We wouldn't be in this situation if there was political will over the past 30 years, with China stealing our intellectual property, and imposing huge tariffs on U.S. goods. Go try to build a car or sell a car in China. Good luck with that. Meanwhile China is now the largest car market. How long are we going to get screwed over before we do something about it?

Last edited by Michael A; 12-02-2018 at 02:18 PM.
Michael A is offline  
Old 12-03-2018, 01:40 PM
  #22  
jimmyb
CF Senior Member
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 6,458
Thanked 842 Times in 457 Posts
Default

BGA capacity is NOT 74,000
LMC is a consulting firm that throws stuff out there to drum up business for themselves. I can find no evidence that LMC is employed by GM in ANY capacity, and based on that, LMC's guess of BGA's capacity is worthless. It's too bad it's gotten so much play, once again confirming that one should not believe everything one reads on the internet.

Last edited by jimmyb; 12-03-2018 at 01:50 PM.
jimmyb is offline  
Old 12-03-2018, 05:26 PM
  #23  
Foosh
CF Senior Member
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland/DC Metro
Posts: 14,779
Thanked 5,849 Times in 3,418 Posts
Default

That nonsense LMC number only keeps getting play because one of the least credible people in this discussion keeps posting it in this forum, but the vast majority understand that's not a real number, and most of the rest of the posts are rebuttals of his unfounded assertions.

It's purely a theoretical number if a plant could actually run with no shutdowns 24/7/365, which is not practical. The current claimed 27% rate is also derived from that number, meaning it's not a realistic number either.

The new/reconfigured plant, by most accounts, was not built to increase capacity, per se, but to improve corporate agility, quality, and efficiency. Actual full capacity is more realistically 50K units per year running 2 shifts 11 months a year. That 3rd 8 hour period is necessary for maintenance and repairs.

By most accounts, C7 production is still profitable at the current decreased production rate.

Last edited by Foosh; 12-03-2018 at 05:54 PM.
Foosh is online now  


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Sponsored Ads
Vendor Directory

Contact Us About Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: