Performance car of the year - C8 has some stiff competition
#1
Performance car of the year - C8 has some stiff competition
There has been a lot of talk about how the current front engine rear wheel drive has to go to mid engine to improve overall performance. It will be interesting to see how successful GM will be in making that happening given the competency of the current platform.
R&T's 2019 performance car of the year competition included a very competent Ferrari and Maclaren mid engine supercar.and yet the current C7 design won the competition. Road and track PCOTY
Kinda wondering just how much better the can the C8 be...
R&T's 2019 performance car of the year competition included a very competent Ferrari and Maclaren mid engine supercar.and yet the current C7 design won the competition. Road and track PCOTY
Kinda wondering just how much better the can the C8 be...
Popular Reply
12-16-2018, 08:54 AM
Drifting
Here’s an interesting read that notes, in simple terms, some of the distinct driving characteristics of FE, RE, and ME RWD vehicles.
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-d...t-handling.htm
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-d...t-handling.htm
#2
There has been a lot of talk about how the current front engine rear wheel drive has to go to mid engine to improve overall performance. It will be interesting to see how successful GM will be in making that happening given the competency of the current platform.
R&T's 2019 performance car of the year competition included a very competent Ferrari and Maclaren mid engine supercar.and yet the current C7 design won the competition. Road and track PCOTY
Kinda wondering just how much better the can the C8 be...
R&T's 2019 performance car of the year competition included a very competent Ferrari and Maclaren mid engine supercar.and yet the current C7 design won the competition. Road and track PCOTY
Kinda wondering just how much better the can the C8 be...
#3
From the recent spy videos, the C8 barely has any body roll and the engine quickly recovers it's RPM from tight corners.
Then engine sounds like a flat plane high revving TT engine.
With great suspension and powerful engine, it should be better than C7.
Then engine sounds like a flat plane high revving TT engine.
With great suspension and powerful engine, it should be better than C7.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (12-16-2018)
#4
Le Mans Master
So long and they keep doing what they have been doing, they're going to keep getting what they've been getting. Change the format, but don't change the formula.
#5
Drifting
Here’s an interesting read that notes, in simple terms, some of the distinct driving characteristics of FE, RE, and ME RWD vehicles.
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-d...t-handling.htm
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-d...t-handling.htm
The following 6 users liked this post by Vernon:
1SG_Ret (12-16-2018),
ArmchairArchitect (12-16-2018),
ByByBMW (12-16-2018),
elegant (12-16-2018),
MrBrightside (12-16-2018),
and 1 others liked this post.
#6
Safety Car
Here’s an interesting read that notes, in simple terms, some of the distinct driving characteristics of FE, RE, and ME RWD vehicles.
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-d...t-handling.htm
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/how-d...t-handling.htm
#7
Banned Scam/Spammer
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Philadelphia PA (Birthplace of the USA, UNESCO World Heritage City)
Posts: 4,004
Received 3,916 Likes
on
1,616 Posts
What are all the other 2020 sports cars being released? New Porsche 911 (nothing drastic changing), Supra (yawn), what else?
I think the C8 is in a great position to get the spotlight in the year it's released.
I think the C8 is in a great position to get the spotlight in the year it's released.
Last edited by ArmchairArchitect; 12-16-2018 at 10:50 AM.
The following users liked this post:
mre1974 (12-17-2018)
#9
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Deal's Gap 2004 NCM Motorsports track supporter
Posts: 13,915
Received 1,103 Likes
on
717 Posts
You bring up an interesting point but I have my doubts of the validity. With more weight bias toward the rear one can trailbrake deeper into a turn. There are those that can take advantage of this.
#11
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,657
Received 4,116 Likes
on
1,470 Posts
2020 C8 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
No offense but I never trust magazines or websites for "the best". Follow the money.
The following 3 users liked this post by Sin City:
#12
Le Mans Master
current zr1 will have a let up initially if just the lt1 will 5xx hp is released
zr1 can go pretty ez to 780+ with light mods I hope the c8 is lighter
zr1 can go pretty ez to 780+ with light mods I hope the c8 is lighter
#13
Drifting
Without knowing ANY real stats on the ME car and only speculation isn't just a bit premature to assume that the vehicle will have 'stiff competition' for performance car of the year for 2020 or 2021? And let's face it...depending on how much money GM pays for ads with each magazine will have something to do with the rankings whether you want to admit it or not.
#14
Melting Slicks
And those are oversimplifications as well and there are many more possibilities.
I suspect the ZR1 out braked the others due to either tire compound or tire size.
#15
Obviously that can be overcome with very large and powerful braking systems like we see in the Z06 and ZR1, which both produce incredibly short braking distances. Put those same systems on an ME car, weighing about the same, it will more than likely best those distances.
Physics is physics, and in order to make an FE performance car stop really fast, you need to put really big brakes on the front to handle the added front weight transfer on an FE vehicle during heavy braking.
Last edited by Foosh; 12-17-2018 at 12:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
vndkshn (12-17-2018)
#16
Melting Slicks
Alot of things factor into braking performance. As you mentioned, different systems on the different cars is definitely part of the story. There are likely pad compound differences between the different cars which has a massive difference. I have two different pads for one of my cars, one is a low dust ceramic for the street, another a very aggressive race compound for the track. The braking feel and braking distances between the two are enormous.
Vehicle weight (probably similar between the cars mentioned) combined with pad compound, combined with tire compound, combined with tire size... all of that can easily explain the difference in straight line braking distances in a magazine test.
The following users liked this post:
Foosh (12-17-2018)
#17
The devil is always in the details... every configuration has benefits and weaknesses... great engineering can make any configuration work... poor engineering can make any one awful.
Rear-engine was designed to build cheap cars for post-war Europe (VW and ICONIC Renault Dauphine), but I've raced a 911 for 20 years, and can tell you, when properly set-up, it is amazingly quick.
FE-rear drive is used because it is cheap, and allows you to build huge road-locomotives... ever drive a 50s-60s full sized Chevy/Ford/Chrysler... mom, dad and three screaming rug-rats, and handle miserably... but NASCAR has been building incredibly fast cars for decades.
ME is best on paper, but offers terrible packaging for a street car. Plus, if not done right, the CG is right in the center... like a top.. which means they naturally want to spin... Right Now!... Hello Wall!
The C7 is a Front/ME design with the engine behind the front wheels and a roughly 50/50 weight distribution. Works.
Rear-engine was designed to build cheap cars for post-war Europe (VW and ICONIC Renault Dauphine), but I've raced a 911 for 20 years, and can tell you, when properly set-up, it is amazingly quick.
FE-rear drive is used because it is cheap, and allows you to build huge road-locomotives... ever drive a 50s-60s full sized Chevy/Ford/Chrysler... mom, dad and three screaming rug-rats, and handle miserably... but NASCAR has been building incredibly fast cars for decades.
ME is best on paper, but offers terrible packaging for a street car. Plus, if not done right, the CG is right in the center... like a top.. which means they naturally want to spin... Right Now!... Hello Wall!
The C7 is a Front/ME design with the engine behind the front wheels and a roughly 50/50 weight distribution. Works.
#18
Melting Slicks
Rear-engine was designed to build cheap cars for post-war Europe (VW and ICONIC Renault Dauphine), but I've raced a 911 for 20 years, and can tell you, when properly set-up, it is amazingly quick.
FE-rear drive is used because it is cheap, and allows you to build huge road-locomotives... ever drive a 50s-60s full sized Chevy/Ford/Chrysler... mom, dad and three screaming rug-rats, and handle miserably... but NASCAR has been building incredibly fast cars for decades.
FE-rear drive is used because it is cheap, and allows you to build huge road-locomotives... ever drive a 50s-60s full sized Chevy/Ford/Chrysler... mom, dad and three screaming rug-rats, and handle miserably... but NASCAR has been building incredibly fast cars for decades.