Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Unlikely base MEC using “upgraded LT1”

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2018, 08:53 PM
  #101  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
How does the weight of the DOHC LT5 compare to the weight of the LSx454 that can handle up to 2500 HP.
So what?
Old 12-27-2018, 08:55 PM
  #102  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Let me ask you, if the pushrod engine is so "bad" and not "world beating" then why do world beating supercars like the Ultima GTR use it, when they could use any other engine they wanted? Its not like that car is built with being cheap in mind, its built strictly for performance driving and lap times, yet it uses the "old tech" pushrod V8. Its almost like the engine has some kind of big advantage like weight and size...oh wait it does.
Why does Saleen use a pushrod engine in their S7 super car?
Why do so many one-off supercars use the LSx and not something like a Coyote instead?
Why does a big tuner like Steve Morris build high powered V8s based off LSx architecture (4000+hp)? Why even waste the time when he could strictly build OHC engines?
If DOHC V8s are so much better why are LSx's the most commonly swapped engine on the market, being swapped into S2000s, 240SXs, Skylines, Supras, WRXs, EVOs, Mustangs, Porsche's (911s and 944s), BMWs, Miatas, 350Zs, and just about any other car out there? Why are they replacing their "high tech" DOHC / turbo engine with some low tech pushrod V8, and why more often than not does the car become lighter, handle better, and always end up being faster? Its not cost, they could easily find a junkyard Mod motor, Northstar or Japanese V8 for pretty cheap. Ill give you a hint, those engines dont fit without major cutting, and they are heavy.

Why isn't it common (or even heard of) to swap DOHC V8s into Corvettes?

Again results are what matters, not bench racing about irrelevant details. If a car is running a low 7 minute Nring time and is put held together with popsickle sticks then clearly the engineers are onto something, despite what others are doing.

Ill take whatever engine gives better results, and thus far its been a pushrod V8.

How about that there’s a ton of parts u can source from millions of trucks and so they’re cheap.
Old 12-27-2018, 08:58 PM
  #103  
JD_AMG
Instructor
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2018
Posts: 236
Received 117 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ConcernedCitizen
http://www.mercuryracing.com/mercury...-crate-engine/
You mean an ls7 like this one. I’m all in
Pretty cool until you see the cost and the fact that it probably wouldn't fit in a modern Corvette.
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (12-28-2018)
Old 12-27-2018, 09:06 PM
  #104  
JD_AMG
Instructor
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2018
Posts: 236
Received 117 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso



How about that there’s a ton of parts u can source from millions of trucks and so they’re cheap.
So what?
Mod motors are cheap, Honda 4 cylinders are cheap, and hell, SBCs are cheap for example. Other engines are cheap too, so why is the LSx being used?
Old 12-27-2018, 09:07 PM
  #105  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Pretty cool until you see the cost and the fact that it probably wouldn't fit in a modern Corvette.
What makes u say that? IF u are using the word “probably” then it isn’t a known fact, is it? And the FACT that its based on an LS7 block suggests that it could or could be made to fit since of course the V angle is a Chevy standard.
Old 12-27-2018, 09:08 PM
  #106  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
So what?
Mod motors are cheap, Honda 4 cylinders are cheap, and hell, SBCs are cheap for example. Other engines are cheap too, so why is the LSx being used?
Because they are even cheaper.
Old 12-27-2018, 09:27 PM
  #107  
NY09C6
Le Mans Master
 
NY09C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,813
Received 627 Likes on 363 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso


What makes u say that? IF u are using the word “probably” then it isn’t a known fact, is it? And the FACT that its based on an LS7 block suggests that it could or could be made to fit since of course the V angle is a Chevy standard.
If you noticed GM realized it was a boat anchor of a motor and never used it again. The LS on the other hand was a monumental success.
Old 12-27-2018, 09:33 PM
  #108  
JD_AMG
Instructor
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2018
Posts: 236
Received 117 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso


What makes u say that? IF u are using the word “probably” then it isn’t a known fact, is it? And the FACT that its based on an LS7 block suggests that it could or could be made to fit since of course the V angle is a Chevy standard.
Its over half a foot wider than an LSx engine, I doubt the C6 has that much room to fit it.
Old 12-27-2018, 09:36 PM
  #109  
JD_AMG
Instructor
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2018
Posts: 236
Received 117 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso


Because they are even cheaper.
No they're not. They are lighter/smaller/make more power than any comparable V8 or DOHC V6.
Old 12-27-2018, 10:25 PM
  #110  
Michael A
Le Mans Master
 
Michael A's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 9,597
Received 2,919 Likes on 1,361 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
IF one of them will really sound like the spied C8R that was caught running around the track in Florida I would seriously be tempted to write a check.
The sound of that engine does nothing for me. It has no roar. Thankfully the base car will have an LT1 engine, and I will be very happy with that.

Last edited by Michael A; 12-27-2018 at 11:03 PM.
Old 12-27-2018, 11:44 PM
  #111  
ConcernedCitizen
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ConcernedCitizen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2018
Location: Spring Hill, Tn.
Posts: 53
Received 37 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Well, the test mule Mercury Racing used for the sb4 is none other than the mid engine Ultima GTR, a much smaller car than the C8 is projected to be. So yes it would most definitely fit, not that it’s relevemt as the sb4 is no where near emissions compliant. I wonder what kind of hp it would scrub to make it compliant?? Anyone?
Old 12-28-2018, 12:39 AM
  #112  
NICK YOSKIN
Le Mans Master
 
NICK YOSKIN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 8,849
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

The bottom line is General Motors is trying to take the mid-engine Corvette C8 to the next level as new generation and why in the world would they put the previous-generation engine in it? To me it's that simple
The following 2 users liked this post by NICK YOSKIN:
ConcernedCitizen (12-28-2018), Dominic Sorresso (12-28-2018)
Old 12-28-2018, 01:22 AM
  #113  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6
48v hybrid systems with electric turbo assist are the likely fix (audi will be first). But you are spending more money for more complexity for similar performance to a large ci motor. Sure you will save a few dollars at the pump but you give it back in other areas.
The trend towards small hybrid turbos won't be stopped no matter how much some of us wish it to be.
I won't point out the obvious reasons for this for fear the thread will sink deeper into B.S.

Originally Posted by Michael A
The sound of that engine does nothing for me. It has no roar. Thankfully the base car will have an LT1 engine, and I will be very happy with that.
Well, there ya go.
Different strokes for different folks and all.

Originally Posted by NICK YOSKIN
The bottom line is General Motors is trying to take the mid-engine Corvette C8 to the next level as new generation and why in the world would they put the previous-generation engine in it?
Please don't be rational on this thread...no one else has.

Old 12-28-2018, 01:49 AM
  #114  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NY09C6


If you noticed GM realized it was a boat anchor of a motor and never used it again. The LS on the other hand was a monumental success.
They didn’t use it again because of the development costs for OBDII. Something GM never did again also was to never try to supercede the World Record for Distance and MPH owned by the LT5 using an LSX motor.

Look NY and Joe,

You can stomp and jump up and down all u want. You can argue about how great an in block cam, OHV motor the SBC is. And it is a great motor. But just like an FE v ME platform, the physics is against u. People like u are like Don Quixote tilting at windmills. The world is passing u by and u don’t like it. I get that, but its happening anyway.
Too bad, so sad.
Old 12-28-2018, 01:52 AM
  #115  
dcbingaman
Burning Brakes
 
dcbingaman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,193
Received 342 Likes on 207 Posts
Default mar

Originally Posted by ConcernedCitizen
Christmas facts:

The list of the most Durable auto engines in the world as rated by consumers with the fewest engine problems is absolutely dominated by Dohc engines. I didn’t bother going far enough down the list to find a manufacturer that uses pushrod engines.

The list of the most hp/liter is dominated by dohc engines. Why does this matter? Because the stupid argument that pushrod engines are lighter only works if comparing same displacement.

Some seem to think smaller displacement dohc engines need forced induction to make hp. Um, see Ferrari.

There is A 2004 interview with a GM engineer who claimed that it would cost GM $400 per unit over the price of their pushrod engines to go to dohc. This number did seem of concern though. I’ll look for the interview and post if I can find it.

Merry Christmas!!



This is just bullshit. The toughest environment, by far, for any IC engine is the offshore speed boat business. These engines are asked to provide 70-100% continuously for hours. Nearly ALL these engines are either GM or Chrysler derived OHV engines or turbines. DOHC engines break in this environment. Mercury Racing has recently started putting OHC heads on these engines, but the overwhelming majority remain OHV heads.

There are three reasons for this - simplicity (part count), durability and power to weight ratio. Volumetric efficiency (HP/Ltr) really doesn't figure into it. The only reason people seem to think proper sports cars have DOHC head engines is from racing. That however is a direct result of displacement limits in nearly every racing formula - making the HP race all about HP/Ltr. The exception that makes the rule us Can-Am, where there were no limits. "Antiquated" OHV engines of large displacement dominated this series for years until Porsche walked in with a turbo air-cooled OHC engine debuted in the 917/30, one of the greatest race cars of all time. Even that car had a hard tine in the beginning beating the McLaren 8C which had a 8-liter NA Chevy engine making over 800 HP in a chassis weighing kess than 2000#'s. These Can-Am cars would be competitive at the Rolex 24 in Daytona today, if allowed to enter - nearly 50 years after their hey-day !
The following 2 users liked this post by dcbingaman:
Shaka (12-28-2018), sunsalem (12-28-2018)
Old 12-28-2018, 06:09 AM
  #116  
LIStingray
Melting Slicks
 
LIStingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,299
Received 461 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NICK YOSKIN
The bottom line is General Motors is trying to take the mid-engine Corvette C8 to the next level as new generation and why in the world would they put the previous-generation engine in it? To me it's that simple
Except for the issue of price - a twin turbo dohc cam V8 is a lot more expensive than an LT1 - $4-6,000 more, and the Corvette market, despite what you read on here is very price sensitive. The current single best selling "model" is a Base 1LT Coupe - that is a $50,000 car (selling price). If we load in the DCT, 4.2TT V8, and all the standard stuff, the base C8 will start at $75k and it will likely price 30-35% of Corvette buyers out of the market.
The following users liked this post:
JoesC5 (12-28-2018)
Old 12-28-2018, 06:57 AM
  #117  
JD_AMG
Instructor
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2018
Posts: 236
Received 117 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ConcernedCitizen
Well, the test mule Mercury Racing used for the sb4 is none other than the mid engine Ultima GTR, a much smaller car than the C8 is projected to be. So yes it would most definitely fit, not that it’s relevemt as the sb4 is no where near emissions compliant. I wonder what kind of hp it would scrub to make it compliant?? Anyone?
No one is denying that a mid engined car can fit a big DOHC V8, Im talking about cars like the C6 (where the LS7 came from) or the current C7. The SB4 likely wouldn't fit without some serious cutting to accommodate those big *** heads.

Get notified of new replies

To Unlikely base MEC using “upgraded LT1”

Old 12-28-2018, 09:57 AM
  #118  
Savoy2001
Melting Slicks
 
Savoy2001's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,172
Received 2,477 Likes on 1,108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JerriVette


only bench racers think the corvette ohv powerplants are second teir.....but thanks for your opinion

i especially lime the repair and maintaince bills on youtube of thise finely engineered dohc german powertrains past 50k or 100k miles...

i own a nice italian afla stelvio ti sport tirbo and its a great car so Im not blind to other technology...but calling a corvette second teir shows your obvious intent ..

youll never buy a c8 for a variety of reasons and if you actually do...im sure youll change your tune ..

i look forward to the automotive press having orgasms over the first year c8 comapring it to mclaren 570s...oh wait...the c7 grand sport already matches the stunning mclaren 570 in lap time ...

so the next gen rear mid engine c8 with a dct and possibly 500 hp is not up to your standards...?

so simple...just wait for the twin turbo 5.5 liter v8 as it should have at least 620 ponies...

i think it will hold much of the technology just shown off in the silverados 2.7 liter four that produces 310 hp..

this way gm can satisfy both the normal corvette buyer like me and also cater to high rollers like you that need dohc engines so you can consider yourself first tier,

merry christmas ...we all win with the various engines coming to the c8
I just had to chime in and tell you how much I agree with your post. I think your dead on. The current crop of c7's in all varieties kick serious *** and compete with the world's best for way way less money and some people here are concerned about GM's engine choices? Corvette considered second rate or second tier because they currently use pushrod tech? Lol ok. I have some news for some of you I have family in Italy that own some amazing cars and they absolutely lust over my Callaway z06. This from Ferrari and Porsche owners. Second rate my ***. I resident that. Corvette is America's Best and it deserves respect and in the circles I know of it gets it and rightfully so.
The following 2 users liked this post by Savoy2001:
JerriVette (12-29-2018), sunsalem (12-28-2018)
Old 12-28-2018, 01:51 PM
  #119  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray
If we load in the DCT, 4.2TT V8, and all the standard stuff, the base C8 will start at $75k and it will likely price 30-35% of Corvette buyers out of the market.
That's crazy talk...NO WAY the base C8 will have the same price as a C7 Z06.
I'm bookmarking this.
Old 12-28-2018, 03:07 PM
  #120  
Shaka
Safety Car
 
Shaka's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: FLL Florida
Posts: 4,168
Received 1,331 Likes on 790 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso


They didn’t use it again because of the development costs for OBDII. Something GM never did again also was to never try to supercede the World Record for Distance and MPH owned by the LT5 using an LSX motor.

Look NY and Joe,

You can stomp and jump up and down all u want. You can argue about how great an in block cam, OHV motor the SBC is. And it is a great motor. But just like an FE v ME platform, the physics is against u. People like u are like Don Quixote tilting at windmills. The world is passing u by and u don’t like it. I get that, but its happening anyway.
Too bad, so sad.
Oh brother. Unfortunately, I can't tell you what I really think because of the Facebook type rules and algorithms employed here. I owned a 93 ZR1 and shipped it to Europe and sold it there after 8000 miles of joy. Having said that, you obviously don't know the story of the LT5. McClelland and Tony Rudd left under a cloud because of that boat anchor. Since you are a brilliant engineer and know your applied physics, peruse through this, why don't you? http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine..._yardstick.htm Perhaps with your great knowledge, you can explain some of the lap times of this primitive FE sports car, with it's push rod engine and leaf springs and all.


Quick Reply: Unlikely base MEC using “upgraded LT1”



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.