Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Can GM actually build a Sports Car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2019, 12:57 PM
  #61  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by car junkie
No One Knows What "Sports Car" Actually Means Anymore



Remember when names used to mean something?

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cul...ar-definition/
They have a point.
More and more Muscle Cars are being called "Sports Cars."
It's ridiculous.
At the moment, there is only ONE Sports Car being produced in America.

Last edited by sunsalem; 01-02-2019 at 12:58 PM.
Old 01-02-2019, 02:18 PM
  #62  
bob53
Melting Slicks
 
bob53's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,373
Received 301 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

1. Apples to oranges comparisons of new ZR1 to used McLaren's...
2. The Z06 and ZR1 are very competitive on technical road courses. They probably handle as good as if not better than the McLaren 570 and 620.
3. The McLaren is faster in a straight line due to slightly better power:weight, ME layout, and less intrusive aero that allows it to have far less wind resistance when driving fast in a straight line.

In the end pick your poison - the C7 Z cars sacrifice top end speed due to more cost effective aerodynamic solutions to keep us from killing ourselves when driving triple digit speeds. You pay more for the more complex solution McLaren has developed. Hopefully the C8 will offer active aero to allow this platform to be a bit more competitive with these supercars. Active aero does not have to break the bank either.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (01-02-2019)
Old 01-02-2019, 03:27 PM
  #63  
z06801
Melting Slicks
 
z06801's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: NSL UT
Posts: 2,368
Received 296 Likes on 201 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SouthernSon
Yep. By the OP's logic I suppose only the Veyron is a sports car. Probably hasn't even sat in one of those vehicles mentioned. I would be happy to give the troll a ride in my ZR1 (or track prepared C5Z).
Back when my C5z was still a street car with a few track mods but stock drive train, it still did faster lap times than a 996GT3 even with a 110k on the clock.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (01-02-2019)
Old 01-02-2019, 09:09 PM
  #64  
mirage2991
Safety Car
 
mirage2991's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 4,857
Received 250 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

hell we had a 996 cup car show up in white group at PCA, I guess he was gonna show us how it was done...3 laps of my nose up his *** and he gave up (C6Zr1)...I did enjoy the 3 laps, really nice car, good driving, heck of a sweet sound...
I guess it all depends on one definition of a true sports car...the vette to me is one, bar none for the price/performance...but if you want "luxury" sports car then the P F and M cars are going to be the ones to shoot for.

Last edited by mirage2991; 01-02-2019 at 09:17 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (01-03-2019)
Old 01-02-2019, 09:53 PM
  #65  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
They have a point.
More and more Muscle Cars are being called "Sports Cars."
It's ridiculous.
At the moment, there is only ONE Sports Car being produced in America.
You have to admit that the "muscle" cars (I'm assuming you're referring to Camaro/Mustang/Challenger) are more correctly "pony" cars, and with the exception of the Challenger, the other 2 have definitely headed into SPORTS car like habits. The top end of both (ZL1/Shelby) are marketed on their ROAD course chops, not their 1/4 mile times.

I think true "Muscle" cars are being made in Germany these days, not the U.S.

Last edited by jimmyb; 01-02-2019 at 09:53 PM.
Old 01-02-2019, 11:25 PM
  #66  
Hammerhead69
Drifting
 
Hammerhead69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,373
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
At the moment, there is only ONE Sports Car being produced in America.
The Ford GT?
Old 01-02-2019, 11:36 PM
  #67  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hammerhead69

The Ford GT?
It's made in Canada by Multimatic.
Old 01-03-2019, 12:11 AM
  #68  
Hammerhead69
Drifting
 
Hammerhead69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,373
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
It's made in Canada by Multimatic.
Well I’ll be damned....
Old 01-03-2019, 12:16 AM
  #69  
lt4obsesses
Le Mans Master
 
lt4obsesses's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 5,139
Received 481 Likes on 261 Posts

Default

Given how well the Corvette performs on a track compared to the multi hundred thousand and even million dollar "sports" cars out there, the real question is what could GM build if they were to make a $250K to $400K car?

The Corvette might not have the prestige, or be hand built, or have the rarest and finest interior appointments, but it is more capable than most of the people that drive them in terms of performance. It is also attainable where those other sports cars are merely "wall art" to 99% of the people out there. Who cares if a McLaren or such might be a tick faster? What's the point if you can't actually own one?

Last edited by lt4obsesses; 01-03-2019 at 08:01 AM.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (01-03-2019)
Old 01-03-2019, 02:58 AM
  #70  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hammerhead69

The Ford GT?
FWIW, I consider it to be an "Exotic," rather than a Sportscar.

Old 01-03-2019, 05:07 AM
  #71  
Quinten33
Burning Brakes
 
Quinten33's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2017
Location: Florida
Posts: 854
Received 536 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Yeah, a carbon fiber tub with a 650hp V6 shoved in the middle is a supercar, not a sports car.
Old 01-03-2019, 11:51 AM
  #72  
Parcival
Drifting
 
Parcival's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: San Francisco Ca
Posts: 1,498
Received 405 Likes on 296 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nmbsun
When you look at the zr1 track times on youTube vs every McLaren or other mid engine sports car you soon realize that Corvette is not even in the same ball park. True, cars like McLaren are very expensive but for what you can buy a nice used McLaren for it is not much more than a new zr1. Now, the mid engine Corvette? How can Corvette compete with other mid engine cars like McLaren? Cars like the Porsche 911 make every Corvette ever built look like a wannabe. For example take the c5 Corvette. The c5 had more problems than you could shake a stick at. Not to mention that for 50k you got an interior that was nothing but cheap plastic.
For years I dreamed of the day I could buy my Dream Car the Corvette. I did buy a new c5 Corvette and I have had every problem with it ever mentioned on this Forum. If, and that is a big IF, I ever buy another sports car it will not be a wannabe Corvette!
OP not a troll, but just a silly post from a poor debater I guess.

If I wanted to convince people the next gen car was going to suck, I wouldn't go back three gens...I'd try analyzing the C7-- I don't see any issues with my two ('17 GS and Z06).
It's also spurious to say if it doesn't have all the features of the McLaren (at less $) than it's not a "sports car."
Presumably you're comparing the c5 to cars back then...Do you even remember the 996 911?...cheesy interiors were de rigeur back in '97. Mclarens are great cars, 911 are fine cars.

Maybe a used Challenger for you??

Last edited by Parcival; 01-03-2019 at 11:54 AM.
The following users liked this post:
ArmchairArchitect (01-03-2019)
Old 01-03-2019, 12:08 PM
  #73  
nmerhaut
Melting Slicks
 
nmerhaut's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,470
Received 75 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by solotronics
Ok I will take the troll bait... looking at the total cost of ownership I would have to be a multi-millionaire to comfortably afford a McLaren and not worry about anything breaking. I can afford a C7 Z06 on a modest 6 figure income not worrying too much about what might break. My personal rule is to spend at most 10% of my income on my cars. Lets take a look at some of the costs of ownership.

C7 Z06 wheel used - $200-250
MP4 wheel used - $600

C7 Z06 oil change and inspection - $95 ( can do yourself and not void warranty )
MP4 oil change and inspection - $1500 ( good luck )

C7 Z06 alignment - $140
MP4 alignment - $1500

I would love to own a McLaren but for me at this time it make more sense to invest while I am younger and hopefully will have disposable income later to spend on things like a McLaren.
Originally Posted by car junkie

No One Knows What "Sports Car" Actually Means Anymore

Remember when names used to mean something?

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cul...ar-definition/
Baruth, excellent writer and damn fine driver, as is his wife I'm told. I agree that the term "sports car" has evolved(blurred) to the point that everything and nothing is a sports car. The same story with the term "muscle car."
Old 01-03-2019, 01:13 PM
  #74  
PurpleLion
Burning Brakes
 
PurpleLion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,068
Received 857 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by car junkie
No One Knows What "Sports Car" Actually Means Anymore



Remember when names used to mean something?

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cul...ar-definition/
Great article that addresses a very relevant point. In our Orwellian world of new speak it seems anyone can manufacture a definition for words regardless of their actual meaning. Reminds me of one of my favorite peeves "front mid". When you realize that a Ford model T qualifies as a front mid car you have to wonder re the validity of the term!

The author's definition of "sports car" is more restrictive than I would suggest as I feel that the definition has evolved some over time. For example I would include some hard top, two seaters in the definition. But you have to be careful because if you include hard tops where do you draw the line between a sports car and a GT car?

The original definition of a sports car also included a weight maximum of 3,000 lbs. So, maybe a hard top under 3,000 lbs is a sports car whereas one over 3,000 lbs would be a GT car?

Last edited by PurpleLion; 01-03-2019 at 06:07 PM.
Old 01-03-2019, 07:31 PM
  #75  
F4 Phantom
Melting Slicks
 
F4 Phantom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,774
Received 490 Likes on 292 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nmbsun
When you look at the zr1 track times on youTube vs every McLaren or other mid engine sports car you soon realize that Corvette is not even in the same ball park. True, cars like McLaren are very expensive but for what you can buy a nice used McLaren for it is not much more than a new zr1. Now, the mid engine Corvette? How can Corvette compete with other mid engine cars like McLaren? Cars like the Porsche 911 make every Corvette ever built look like a wannabe. For example take the c5 Corvette. The c5 had more problems than you could shake a stick at. Not to mention that for 50k you got an interior that was nothing but cheap plastic.
For years I dreamed of the day I could buy my Dream Car the Corvette. I did buy a new c5 Corvette and I have had every problem with it ever mentioned on this Forum. If, and that is a big IF, I ever buy another sports car it will not be a wannabe Corvette!
Why are you posting in this forum and who gives a squat what the C5 wasn't.
Old 01-03-2019, 07:47 PM
  #76  
F4 Phantom
Melting Slicks
 
F4 Phantom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,774
Received 490 Likes on 292 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CorvetteBrent
The C7 ZR1 beats the $964,000 McLaren Senna on the skid pad (1.18 G to 1.12 G) and has a higher top speed (212 MPH to 208 MPH) in this month's Road & Track magazine's 2019 Performance Car of the Year test.
Which it won, BTW!
The following users liked this post:
Rapid Fred (01-03-2019)
Old 01-03-2019, 07:49 PM
  #77  
F4 Phantom
Melting Slicks
 
F4 Phantom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,774
Received 490 Likes on 292 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
They have a point.
More and more Muscle Cars are being called "Sports Cars."
It's ridiculous.
At the moment, there is only ONE Sports Car being produced in America.
Well, there is the Ford GT, but how many of them have you seen on the road? I've seen one, and I live in LA.

Get notified of new replies

To Can GM actually build a Sports Car?

Old 01-03-2019, 09:07 PM
  #78  
Parcival
Drifting
 
Parcival's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: San Francisco Ca
Posts: 1,498
Received 405 Likes on 296 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F4 Phantom
Well, there is the Ford GT, but how many of them have you seen on the road? I've seen one, and I live in LA.
i saw two on Saturday on the I280, a Mk1 and a Mk2 (correction by zfoosh, first and second gen GT). Live near San Fran.

the newer GT was driving way faster than my z06 doing 80.




Last edited by Parcival; 01-04-2019 at 06:34 PM.
Old 01-04-2019, 01:44 AM
  #79  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F4 Phantom
Well, there is the Ford GT, but how many of them have you seen on the road? I've seen one, and I live in LA.
FWIW, I doubt I will ever see one on the road (Oregon).

It isn't a car that is available for purchase by the general public; it's production numbers are just too low.
And it is filled with rareness in every area of its construction...almost to the point of qualifying as a kit car AND a race car.
My point on the GT is it isn't being made for any reason other than to be a collectable and as a vanity project by the Ford Family (nothing wrong with that IMO).
Old 01-04-2019, 10:52 AM
  #80  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,667 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Parcival

i saw two on Saturday on the I280, a Mk1 and a Mk2. Live near San Fran.

the mk2 was driving way faster than my z06 doing 80.

Those were no doubt kit cars. There is a S. African company that builds rolling chassis without engines.


Quick Reply: Can GM actually build a Sports Car?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 AM.