Rick Conti C7 Anouncement in C7 General
The following users liked this post:
Viper (01-18-2019)
#23
Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,314 Likes
on
990 Posts
I'm just going to say, lets not forget two GM mules that have never surfaced as a product yet:
This was full ZR1 aero, but a Stingray hood implying naturally aspirated engine. We know from GrandSport though, they said even the stage 3 aero was too much drag for the LT1 power level. So...we still could see a surprise variant using the parts bin and possibly a different engine. That engine could very well also be in the car seen below the Corvette here. I acknowledge the roll bar was low and weird and while it had the wing, it also had no front aero at all really...it did come from a GM garage though, and it had SOME purpose...no one can say factually what it was. To me, it says two things very clearly...ZR1 wing with no room for a supercharger.
Below is a ZL1 1LE with no rear wing and carbon brakes, which would imply Z28 mule possibly. Could we be seeing Z06X and Z28 as big aero, naturally aspirated parts bin cars borrowing from all the current bin and adding in a new engine?
This was full ZR1 aero, but a Stingray hood implying naturally aspirated engine. We know from GrandSport though, they said even the stage 3 aero was too much drag for the LT1 power level. So...we still could see a surprise variant using the parts bin and possibly a different engine. That engine could very well also be in the car seen below the Corvette here. I acknowledge the roll bar was low and weird and while it had the wing, it also had no front aero at all really...it did come from a GM garage though, and it had SOME purpose...no one can say factually what it was. To me, it says two things very clearly...ZR1 wing with no room for a supercharger.
Below is a ZL1 1LE with no rear wing and carbon brakes, which would imply Z28 mule possibly. Could we be seeing Z06X and Z28 as big aero, naturally aspirated parts bin cars borrowing from all the current bin and adding in a new engine?
Last edited by KnightDriveTV; 01-17-2019 at 06:13 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by KnightDriveTV:
#24
The Corvette team knows how to make an amazing car but has no clue on how to create a "special edition" Corvette! Adding cheap stickers and tacky tack-ons does not make for a special car! Look into how Porsche does it and start making true "special or limited edition" models and see how much of a true premium you can get and create an instant classic!
#25
Le Mans Master
The Corvette team knows how to make an amazing car but has no clue on how to create a "special edition" Corvette! Adding cheap stickers and tacky tack-ons does not make for a special car! Look into how Porsche does it and start making true "special or limited edition" models and see how much of a true premium you can get and create an instant classic!
The following users liked this post:
ShagVette (01-18-2019)
The following 4 users liked this post by RACE U:
The following users liked this post:
Malum1 (01-17-2019)
#28
#29
Le Mans Master
That was the anniversary correct? That was a nice car.
I forgot about that one. I was never a fan of the overkill white 35th anniversary. Too white for my taste.
I forgot about that one. I was never a fan of the overkill white 35th anniversary. Too white for my taste.
#30
Melting Slicks
A de-contented lighter weight C7 Grand Sport with ZR1 Aero with the new NA OHV LT2 engine with (7sp manual) thats going to be in the C8 front engined Corvette.
Last edited by skank; 01-18-2019 at 10:04 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Shaka (01-18-2019)
#31
The following users liked this post:
tooold2race (01-18-2019)
#32
Safety Car
The following users liked this post:
skank (01-18-2019)
#33
I know those model #/order codes that were discussed a while ago said 2020, but could those numbers be for this "special edition"? Maybe the 2019 SE will now be a 2020 model to give the C8 development team a little breathing room to get things right.
#34
Team Owner
#35
Team Owner
#36
Well, technically he was correct, it was not needed. I can't recall hearing a '14 A6 owner reporting any problems or complaining about that transmission. He had to know the A8 was coming in the 2015 MY.
Last edited by Foosh; 01-18-2019 at 03:17 PM.
#37
Melting Slicks
So what Tadge really says is "as you see, there is no structure around here (gesturing toward the transmission)". IOW, the transmission is simply bolted onto the rear axle with no supports or structural pieces around it. Since the A10 fits in the the "same space" as the A8, according to the GM official media release, there is no reason not to use the A10 in a refreshed C7. Further, since the A10 is massively better than the A8, substituting it is simply a no-brainer.
"A unique triple-clutch assembly in the middle of the 10-speed’s architecture is a primary enabler for packaging 10-speed content in the same space as GM’s six- and eight-speed transmissions." https://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/...0speed-gm.html
#39
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,243
Received 5,432 Likes
on
2,268 Posts
Hey, why don't we check with Tadge in person and see what he actually says about the transmission in the C7? Go to the 2:00 mark --
So what Tadge really says is "as you see, there is no structure around here (gesturing toward the transmission)". IOW, the transmission is simply bolted onto the rear axle with no supports or structural pieces around it. Since the A10 fits in the the "same space" as the A8, according to the GM official media release, there is no reason not to use the A10 in a refreshed C7. Further, since the A10 is massively better than the A8, substituting it is simply a no-brainer.
"A unique triple-clutch assembly in the middle of the 10-speed’s architecture is a primary enabler for packaging 10-speed content in the same space as GM’s six- and eight-speed transmissions." https://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/...0speed-gm.html
So what Tadge really says is "as you see, there is no structure around here (gesturing toward the transmission)". IOW, the transmission is simply bolted onto the rear axle with no supports or structural pieces around it. Since the A10 fits in the the "same space" as the A8, according to the GM official media release, there is no reason not to use the A10 in a refreshed C7. Further, since the A10 is massively better than the A8, substituting it is simply a no-brainer.
"A unique triple-clutch assembly in the middle of the 10-speed’s architecture is a primary enabler for packaging 10-speed content in the same space as GM’s six- and eight-speed transmissions." https://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/...0speed-gm.html
To use the A10 trans in the C7 they'd have to do the tooling for a new transmission case (as current A10 is single piece case, bolted directly to the engine, and this application would require 2-piece case), plus bellhousing and tailshaft housing and tailshaft. Certainly doable, but rather than throwing $$ at doing that, if they continue the FE variant (an unknown at this point), they'd likely just skip that and go DCT across the board for the auto.