Notices
C8 General Discussion The place to discuss the next generation of Corvette.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C8 may kill Corvette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2019, 04:07 PM
  #81  
C7pimp
Drifting
 
C7pimp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,747
Received 768 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
I sure would like to know what the rationale was at Acura for the sales flop mid engine NSX. They apparently thought it would sell as they built a dedicated factory to build approximately 2,000 NSX's annually(but are barely able to sell 150 annually).

Then BMW and Toyota spends tons of money on bringing a new front engine Z4 and Supra to market. Why are two successful auto companies(that have never declared bankruptcy) going against the mid-engine design for a new sports car in 2019? Are they intentionally bringing a new front engine sports car to market in 2019/2020 because they are looking for a sales failure? I doubt it.

Maybe there could be some reasoning behind having both a front engine Corvette and a mid-engine Corvette on the dealer's sales floor simultaneously.
The NSX was disgustingly overpriced. That's why.
The following 2 users liked this post by C7pimp:
427bob (03-27-2020), kenownr (01-30-2019)
Old 01-18-2019, 04:18 PM
  #82  
Atari_Prime
Drifting
 
Atari_Prime's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,500
Received 555 Likes on 315 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
I sure would like to know what the rationale was at Acura for the sales flop mid engine NSX. They apparently thought it would sell as they built a dedicated factory to build approximately 2,000 NSX's annually(but are barely able to sell 150 annually).

Then BMW and Toyota spends tons of money on bringing a new front engine Z4 and Supra to market. Why are two successful auto companies(that have never declared bankruptcy) going against the mid-engine design for a new sports car in 2019? Are they intentionally bringing a new front engine sports car to market in 2019/2020 because they are looking for a sales failure? I doubt it.

Maybe there could be some reasoning behind having both a front engine Corvette and a mid-engine Corvette on the dealer's sales floor simultaneously.
The NSX is a tough one. They created a luxury mid-engine car rather than a track demon. So that added some dollars to the price. They also made the engine very middle of the road, so its not as fast as a lot of its competition. It ends up being a high priced luxury cruiser as a result. A pretty one, but that's not a big market. Also, it is very very much a halo car. They never had any intention or expectation of it making money.

The new BMW Z4 will sell and sell well. But it is more of a Boxster competitor than anything else. It's peppy but not fast, and the styling is a bit conservative. It's designed to be a moderate volume selling convertible and will be.

Not sure what to say about the Supra. It's a flop. It's ugly. It's underpowered. It's overmarketed. It doesn't live up to the icon of it's name. It is essentially a fancy GT86 and they will either end up making a lot of base models or it will go away very quickly.
Old 01-18-2019, 04:25 PM
  #83  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C7pimp
The NSX was disgustingly overpriced. That's why.
Exactly, and a great object lesson of what happens when you over-reach on price on a brand new model with no established reputation.
Old 01-18-2019, 04:41 PM
  #84  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,214
Received 13,163 Likes on 5,988 Posts

Default

A mid-engine V8 American car for < $70K is a compelling proposition. If they build it, buyers will come.

I hope they have some awesome colors... I want C4 Turquoise Metallic on my C5 with some race gold centered wheels with a polished lip!
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (01-18-2019)
Old 01-18-2019, 04:42 PM
  #85  
Kodiak Bear
Drifting
 
Kodiak Bear's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,269
Received 715 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

IMO, the NSX is over weight, over priced and over styled (whatever that means). The non turbo track version is a lot closer to what I would consider a spiritual successor to the original car.

Last edited by Kodiak Bear; 01-18-2019 at 04:42 PM.
Old 01-18-2019, 04:46 PM
  #86  
Foosh
Team Owner
 
Foosh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,434
Received 16,668 Likes on 8,311 Posts

Default

Nonetheless, I suspect the NSXs would fly out the door if there were an $80K model.

Last edited by Foosh; 01-18-2019 at 05:06 PM.
Old 01-18-2019, 05:45 PM
  #87  
Supermassive
Melting Slicks
 
Supermassive's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Argyle, Texas
Posts: 2,260
Received 794 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
I sure would like to know what the rationale was at Acura for the sales flop mid engine NSX. They apparently thought it would sell as they built a dedicated factory to build approximately 2,000 NSX's annually(but are barely able to sell 150 annually).

Then BMW and Toyota spends tons of money on bringing a new front engine Z4 and Supra to market. Why are two successful auto companies(that have never declared bankruptcy) going against the mid-engine design for a new sports car in 2019? Are they intentionally bringing a new front engine sports car to market in 2019/2020 because they are looking for a sales failure? I doubt it.

Maybe there could be some reasoning behind having both a front engine Corvette and a mid-engine Corvette on the dealer's sales floor simultaneously.
Ok, so the Acura was a car that everyone wanted after the fact, much like the Supra...these cars sold in limited numbers and had the anti Japanese car culture in America at the time to thank for it. The new NSX though was a failure due to more than a few things. First was price, it simply was over priced for what it delivered. It was universally reviewed as less than exciting, which is exactly what no one wants from a sports car. It wasn't exotic enough to warrant the price, and its looks are very polarizing. The car is quick and capable but has the soul of a sewing machine. It also failed because of the decade worth of hype and teases, only to be released to mediocre reception because it was nothing like what anyone actually wanted.

Japanese auto makers are ridiculously tone deaf when it comes to sports cars. The GT-R came out and absolutely wrecked the competition and its price was amazing...now its over-priced and obsolete. The platform is 11 years old now, and Nissan has pretty much forgotten about it. The new Supra is another tone deaf submission from Japan, its a reskinned BMW Z4 with less power...I mean who are they using for market analysis for these things. They said that they didn't want to mess with the identity of the GT86 by putting a manual in the new Supra...a car that costs half as much as the new Supra somehow affects it because of "identity". There is zero interesting cars coming from Japan right now, they are simply a bunch of manufacturers that make similar looking crossovers now.

Now on to the Corvette. Again.

There is no reason for GM to make a front engine car at the same time as the mid engine. None. It makes no financial sense. It doesn't make sense to dilute the brand and make a confusing array of Corvette branded vehicles. It doesn't make sense to try to milk a couple more years out of the C7 and its declining sales figures. The front and mid engine at the same time pipe dream is literally just for those stuck on stupid and I mean to be harsh here. The front engine Corvette has lasted for 65 years, mostly because the brass at GM was hesitant to go mid engine for fear of the unknown. Now we have GM establishing Cadillac as an EV centered brand, discontinuing production of sedans, and going mid engine with the Corvette in a bid to remain relevant in today's automotive culture. The front engine sports car is a beautiful machine, no argument there, but it is hampered by its layout in a performance aspect. Considering how amazing the Corvette has been at setting lap records throughout history, it will be interesting to see how GM fares at making a sports car with the engine in the right spot.

Just like the fools who cut off their noses to spite their faces over tail lights and missed out on the greatest Corvette platform of all time (I mean this, I respect older cars and classics, but the C7 was simply the best handling, fastest, best interior, and most modern Corvette relative to the time it was released), the C8 will turn away some of those too stubborn to realize just how amazing it is that we will for the first ever, be able to own a mid engine supercar for a fraction of the cost of the usual mid engine suspects from Lamborghini, McLaren, and Ferrari. It is also amazing because it will be more powerful and cost much less than any Porsche 911 as the P-brand has gone full luxury sports car on the auto world and priced itself out of the reach of the average sports car buyer. For the price of entry to a 911 that starts over $100k now, you would likely be able to option a really kick *** C8 that will trounce a lowly Carrera 4S in pretty much every performance metric.
The following 2 users liked this post by Supermassive:
dreamr616 (01-18-2019), PurpleLion (01-18-2019)
Old 01-18-2019, 07:25 PM
  #88  
jcp911s
Melting Slicks
 
jcp911s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,584
Received 1,583 Likes on 795 Posts

Default

All of these cars are Lifestyle/Fashion purchases using discretionary income left over when you've bought everything else. You don't buy them because you need them, you buy them simply because you can.

The competition for a Corvette is not a Porsche or Acura. Its a boat, an airplane, a beach house, a collector car, or a safari vacation.

If the car is good looking, fast and exciting it will sell. Do you look and feel good driving it? It will sell. If it is dull, it won't.
Old 01-18-2019, 07:26 PM
  #89  
punky
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
punky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 8,084
Received 3,862 Likes on 1,912 Posts

Default

It is abundantly clear that the C8 is not designed for the aging chrome wheel and round taillight fist pounders. The majority of that crew already have their last Corvette. A totally new ME format is just recipe that GM needs to keep this American icon viable for many years to come.
The following 2 users liked this post by punky:
dreamr616 (01-18-2019), PurpleLion (01-18-2019)
Old 01-18-2019, 07:41 PM
  #90  
AORoads
Team Owner
 
AORoads's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,104
Received 2,481 Likes on 1,944 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"

Default

I don't think it's all about cost-but it certainly does count for something. There are so many makes and models that are considered "sports cars" that sell in medium, light and very light numbers. This is what I believe (or hope) that GM looked at very closely and not just with focus groups or fan clubs. The list of cadavers, or cadavers-still-being-produced as "sports cars" is quite long. As just examples, not an exhaustive list: from Audi you've got two---R8 and TT. From BMW, how many US annual sales are there for the old Z4---mid- to very-low 4 digits per year. The Acura NSX is/was sad---it was sad in the late 90s to its demise, and it is doing so again. The Nissan GTR is also a sad case of triple-digit sales annually.

It really isn't a matter of individual opinions on this forum, or any other forum because Corvette doesn't sell in the low thousands----it has to sell in 5-digit numbers or it's dead. That's why $169K was stoopid. It's also why what "jschindler" said is NOT out of the realm of being good critical analysis of the Corvette market and buyer. Imagine this: all those car manufacturers above who have a long history of making cars have missed the mark. And there are others who have recently gone away like Viper. The jury is out on Toyota Supra, for now, but the '86" they make isn't selling in tens of thousands even tho its price is low at $26.5K (recent years has dropped below 10K units/year). It's also out for the Z4 BMW.

The total number of "sports car" buyers who will buy ANY car with 2 seats only is relatively small, and smaller than the total since many buyers won't buy their sports car with a Chevrolet nameplate. Simple fact of life. Still, Chevrolet has sold more "sports cars" annually with its Corvette than just about all others imported to the US.

Again, it has little to do with our individual opinions because we only make up a portion---a fraction of the Corvette buying public. And we had better hope GM and Corvette have hit a home run with the C8 to continue the big number of sales to those who are NOT on these forums, don't care to be on them, etc. That's where the Corvette nameplate's sales will rise or fall---on "our" buying the C8---AND THE OTHERS who know nothing about forums.
Old 01-18-2019, 11:39 PM
  #91  
RACE U
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
RACE U's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Louisville Ky NCM Lifetime Member 429 (Member Since 1993)
Posts: 3,257
Received 261 Likes on 182 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13, '16

Default

Originally Posted by gthal
Here's another thought...

GM does not NEED to sell 30,000 Corvettes to be successful and profitable. Look at Lamborghini, Ferrari, McLaren, etc. Who knows, they may choose to go down the route of a higher priced (higher margin) and lower volume Corvette. That wouldn't kill the Corvette, it would simply change their business model around the car. I'm not suggesting that is what they will do, I'm just saying that everyone seems to think they need to sell a bazillion cars to survive and that's simply not the case. Completely depends on their strategy and what they want to do with the Corvette as a halo car/brand.

Maybe the car becomes a $120,000 car with 10,000 units a year and that is what GM wants from a strategic perspective for whatever the reason. It doesn't kill the Corvette, it just changes it.
All of those nameplates you list above have had a heck of a time in recent years staying in business. Most have been sold, whole or in part, or have merged into other car companies....so I hope relying on their financial success is not what GM has in mind for Corvette.
Old 01-19-2019, 12:47 AM
  #92  
C2C3C4C6
Racer
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
C2C3C4C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Glen Cove New York
Posts: 267
Received 54 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by punky
It is abundantly clear that the C8 is not designed for the aging chrome wheel and round taillight fist pounders. The majority of that crew already have their last Corvette. A totally new ME format is just recipe that GM needs to keep this American icon viable for many years to come.
You might have something there, it isn't the Vette that might go away, it's us septuagenarians who watched Route 66 and whose first Vettes had chrome bumpers that are going to exit.
Old 01-19-2019, 02:16 AM
  #93  
lt4obsesses
Le Mans Master
 
lt4obsesses's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 5,139
Received 481 Likes on 261 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray
That statement is the biggest unknown and likely flaw in any analysis of predicting C8 mid-engine sales. Where are the gains going to come from? Let's be honest there aren't many people from the huge pool of owners of minivans, suvs or pickups at any price point who are going to all of a sudden buy a ME C8; similarly you aren't going to get many converts who are presently buying high end sedans to switch to a much less utilitarian C8; and beyond that, the biggest selling 2 seat sports car in the USA is the Miata - there aren't many people cross-shopping a $30k Miata with a $70k Corvette. The entire 2 seat sports car market in the US for cars costing $55-120k beyond the Corvette is about 23,000 vehicles sold annually, of which there are only 3 competing models that are mid-engine: 14,000 of those are Porsche 911's & 718's and the other ME is the Alfa 4C selling less than 300 per year. I would suggest there won't be a huge number of Porsche buyers saying "I'd rather have a Corvette" and even if you get 90% of the Alfa buyers, so what. In addition the number of people cross-shopping a Ferrari, Lambo, McLaren, Ford GT or Bugatti with any Corvette is at best a handful, and a ME Corvette isn't going to change that.
There's really no argument against any of this. The high end, Ferrari, McLaren, etc buyer isn't just buying a car, they're buying a badge, a status. There is a better chance of some cross over from Porsche from those that buy that mainly because the current Corvette doesn't do it for them, being front engine. If the Corvette is better than the 911's and 718's, they will probably move over. But it won't be in the thousands. What this does leave out are those that really desire a mid engine 'exotic' that can afford a Corvette, but just don't want it as is, but would jump on the mid engine version. This pool of buyers might be fairly deep. I also think the number of Corvette faithful that will jump ship over engine placement is going to be rather small.
The following users liked this post:
PurpleLion (01-19-2019)
Old 01-19-2019, 09:58 AM
  #94  
Dt86
Safety Car
 
Dt86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Poughkeepsie New York
Posts: 4,017
Received 482 Likes on 342 Posts
Default

Theres some very interesting points being brought up here. The C8 is a total game changer for Corvette. I just want to see how much of it actually resembles the Corvette brand or if it's going to be completely euro styled like so many GM products are becoming. If it doesn't have any styling cues that say "thats a Corvette " and you only know its a Corvette because it says it and has the badging then it is no longer a Corvette in my opinion. Its just a performance car they stuck the Corvette name on.
Old 01-19-2019, 11:13 AM
  #95  
vdavenp802
Drifting
 
vdavenp802's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,587
Received 87 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C2C3C4C6
Do you think such a radical departure from the proven Corvette formula has the potential of killing off the Vette? We will see.
Yes it will Kill the Corvette as we know it. How many mid engine Mustangs do you see.
I rest me case.
Ford GT,ooooh, big sales numbers, off the charts, cheap, yeah and did i mention the racing prowess.
Do you really need more evidence. GM overall needing to cut costs a new marque will not get it done.
Old 01-19-2019, 11:24 AM
  #96  
SouthernSon
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
SouthernSon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Deal's Gap 2004 NCM Motorsports track supporter
Posts: 13,915
Received 1,103 Likes on 717 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jschindler


I think you are missing something important. The advantages of a mid engine are lost on the majority of Corvette owners. The typical owner is not the performance freak. It's the older guy who likes to be seen in it and likes the utility of the cargo space, and the day-to-day functionality.


This could make a difference in sales. Has there ever been a rear ME that had enough room for luggage to take a weekend get away? I can't recall one right off hand. Maybe GM has found the secret to room in the front.

Old 01-19-2019, 11:41 AM
  #97  
brit z06
Advanced
 
brit z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: Surrey England
Posts: 68
Received 170 Likes on 41 Posts
Finalist 2020 C7 of the Year -- Unmodified
Default

My Corvette Dealer (the only one in the UK) tells me that the C8 will be available in right hand drive which up till now no Corvette has been.
I personally like the left hand drive as I think its part of the experience of driving an American car but the majority of "car guys " in the UK would nt consider a LHD.
If the price is competitive I think they will sell really well ,just like the Mustang has since Ford started selling it here with the wheel on the right.
Remember the UK is nt the only country that drives on the left ie. Australia, New Zealand ,Japan, India etc all potential markets for the C8.

Get notified of new replies

To C8 may kill Corvette

Old 01-19-2019, 11:44 AM
  #98  
Zaskar
Advanced
 
Zaskar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2013
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 63
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Well said!!
Old 01-19-2019, 11:57 AM
  #99  
jcp911s
Melting Slicks
 
jcp911s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,584
Received 1,583 Likes on 795 Posts

Default

I have always driven sports cars. I tracked/raced 911s, and used a 3.2 Carrara as a DD for 15 years. I have a '71 C3 Vert, and a Z51. I don't consider myself a dinosaur, but the fact remains that younger people (GenX, Gen Y, Millenials) have other priorities. Careers, college loans, kids, mortgages... gees what a s**tty life!

I sold my Alfa, spent 4 years driving my sister-in-law's hand me down Volvo, (driving to Harrisburg, we has to stop mid-way to add a quart of oil each way). living in a rowhouse in Philly, working 60 hour weeks and going to night school on the El in my spare time.

Surprise surprise, I bought an old rental house and restored it, we got promotions, I bought a used 911 for $17K. I pulled it into the garage (which did not even have a door at that time) and it was the proudest moment of my life.

There is a new generation of buyers that will appreciate great cars, and will buy them when they can... Corvettes are not "old guy" cars, its just that it takes alot of time before you can afford to buy one.
Old 01-19-2019, 12:02 PM
  #100  
tcinla
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tcinla's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,275
Received 619 Likes on 357 Posts
Default

My first job out of school was for Electronic Data Systems in the early 90’s (do the math... ), a wholly owned subsidiary of GM. My first assignment was in the Detroit HQ in the Export Vehicle OP - EXVOP (Quality) team. My specific job was coding an app to I take and report on the quality Inspection Data specifically for the Corvettes being sold in Japan at the time. There was a market for them back then even w/o drive reconfiguration.

Originally Posted by brit z06
My Corvette Dealer (the only one in the UK) tells me that the C8 will be available in right hand drive which up till now no Corvette has been.
I personally like the left hand drive as I think its part of the experience of driving an American car but the majority of "car guys " in the UK would nt consider a LHD.
...C8.


Quick Reply: C8 may kill Corvette



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.