Will the C8 have adaptive cruise control?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Will the C8 have adaptive cruise control?
Seriously considering a new C8. I was wondering if it will offer adaptive cruise control? It's becoming fairly common place with higher end newer cars. I don't believe the C7 offered it. My last Corvette was a 2013 427 and it wasn't offered. My 2015 Audi S7 has it and I will never own another car without it. Any rumors?
Popular Reply
06-11-2019, 09:22 AM
I like the concept, and we recently purchased our first car so equipped, an Alfa Romeo Giulia TI Sport Q4. It works well, and one can choose from among preset following distances.
However, I've noticed one "limitation" in its utility on densely trafficked freeways, where traffic is still moving at a reasonable speed, and which is an every day fact of life where we live. Even when set to the closest following distance the system allows, it maintains so much space between you and the vehicle ahead other drivers continually jockey to fill that gap. Thus, the system is constantly adjusting, is slow to re-establish the programmed distance, and that means even more vehicles filling that gap.
As a result, I don't bother using it under the above conditions, which means I don't use it much at all.
However, I've noticed one "limitation" in its utility on densely trafficked freeways, where traffic is still moving at a reasonable speed, and which is an every day fact of life where we live. Even when set to the closest following distance the system allows, it maintains so much space between you and the vehicle ahead other drivers continually jockey to fill that gap. Thus, the system is constantly adjusting, is slow to re-establish the programmed distance, and that means even more vehicles filling that gap.
As a result, I don't bother using it under the above conditions, which means I don't use it much at all.
The following users liked this post:
Art17 (06-11-2019)
The following users liked this post:
Art17 (06-11-2019)
#4
Le Mans Master
The few cars I've driven with it I hated....
The following 2 users liked this post by 4thC4at60:
23/C8Z (06-24-2019),
Vet Interested (11-16-2019)
#5
Instructor
It's a great feature, it should be standard, there are brand new cars at 20-25k right now that have it. The Equinox I just bought for my wife has it.
The following users liked this post:
Art17 (06-11-2019)
The following users liked this post:
Art17 (06-11-2019)
#7
Instructor
#8
I like the concept, and we recently purchased our first car so equipped, an Alfa Romeo Giulia TI Sport Q4. It works well, and one can choose from among preset following distances.
However, I've noticed one "limitation" in its utility on densely trafficked freeways, where traffic is still moving at a reasonable speed, and which is an every day fact of life where we live. Even when set to the closest following distance the system allows, it maintains so much space between you and the vehicle ahead other drivers continually jockey to fill that gap. Thus, the system is constantly adjusting, is slow to re-establish the programmed distance, and that means even more vehicles filling that gap.
As a result, I don't bother using it under the above conditions, which means I don't use it much at all.
However, I've noticed one "limitation" in its utility on densely trafficked freeways, where traffic is still moving at a reasonable speed, and which is an every day fact of life where we live. Even when set to the closest following distance the system allows, it maintains so much space between you and the vehicle ahead other drivers continually jockey to fill that gap. Thus, the system is constantly adjusting, is slow to re-establish the programmed distance, and that means even more vehicles filling that gap.
As a result, I don't bother using it under the above conditions, which means I don't use it much at all.
Last edited by Foosh; 06-11-2019 at 09:33 AM.
The following 7 users liked this post by Foosh:
23/C8Z (06-24-2019),
4thC4at60 (06-11-2019),
ArmchairArchitect (06-11-2019),
Cardinal Flyer (11-19-2019),
ColdPIzza (06-11-2019),
and 2 others liked this post.
#9
Melting Slicks
No thanks - I am really hoping the C8 will continue to offer (and even improve on) a straightforward driver engaging experience. I don't need my car pacing itself 10 meters behind traffic and then lift of the throttle or apply the brakes every time someone fills the gap in front of me...
The following 6 users liked this post by oregonsharkman:
23/C8Z (06-24-2019),
ArmchairArchitect (06-11-2019),
duanesZ06 (06-23-2019),
green2000 (06-19-2019),
Mike Mercury (06-19-2019),
and 1 others liked this post.
#10
Yep, in many heavy traffic situations, it's more trouble than it's worth. On a leisurely road trip with moderate or less traffic, it's a nice-to-have feature.
I wouldn't really care one way or the other whether the C8 is equipped with it or not. Quite frankly, I'd prefer these cars to get lighter, and not keep adding more tech. However, that's not where things are headed, not consistent with the majority of consumers who want more tech, and it's foolish to wish for things that just aren't going to happen.
I wouldn't really care one way or the other whether the C8 is equipped with it or not. Quite frankly, I'd prefer these cars to get lighter, and not keep adding more tech. However, that's not where things are headed, not consistent with the majority of consumers who want more tech, and it's foolish to wish for things that just aren't going to happen.
#12
Drifting
Deliberately left that option out of my regular car along with lane monitor etc. Classic cruise control is just fine for long highway runs. Think too many drivers are already inattentive, last thing we need is the car helping them to veg out.
The following users liked this post:
23/C8Z (06-24-2019)
#15
Banned Scam/Spammer
What ever happened to just paying attention and driving your car?
#16
Melting Slicks
Emergency braking has been agreed to be voluntarily standardized by 2022 by OEMs in an attempt to circumvent forced federal regulations, meaning I really doubt it will be anythingbut standard on the new gen Corvette. Once you have the hardware for AEB, you are pretty much setup for adaptive cruise, depending on exactly which implementation you want to do. I'd fully expect adaptive cruise on higher option levels, whether GM will include it on the base or make you pay for a higher trim I cannot say.
They exist on manuals as well, unless this is just an attempt to start another DCT fight. There is more you can do if the computer can also control the transmission, but for the base functionality there is no reason it can't be implemented on a manual, and many manuals have it. Especially prevalent the EU market.
Fun fact: those distances are all covered by OEM requirements, meaning from one manufacturer to another, they can vary wildly. I like one OEM that I work with, I find another to be as useless as you do in traffic. My biggest issue is sometimes it slows me down mildly enough, and it takes me a couple miles to realize that I've dropped to five below the speed limit following grandpa on his Sunday drive.
What ever happened to just keeping your foot on the gas for hours at a time?
They exist on manuals as well, unless this is just an attempt to start another DCT fight. There is more you can do if the computer can also control the transmission, but for the base functionality there is no reason it can't be implemented on a manual, and many manuals have it. Especially prevalent the EU market.
However, I've noticed one "limitation" in its utility on densely trafficked freeways, where traffic is still moving at a reasonable speed, and which is an every day fact of life where we live. Even when set to the closest following distance the system allows, it maintains so much space between you and the vehicle ahead other drivers continually jockey to fill that gap.
What ever happened to just keeping your foot on the gas for hours at a time?
Last edited by jefnvk; 06-11-2019 at 12:45 PM.
#17
It doesn't surprise me that the OEMs develop different requirements for following distances. Our Alfa has a pretty wide range of choices, and the closest distance is probably the minimal safe distance. I have no complaints about what they've done. My observation was more a testament to how badly many nasty rush-hour warriors behave, which means it really doesn't matter how small the gap is, someone will fill it. It's normal to not be able to see headlights in your rear-view mirror.
Last edited by Foosh; 06-11-2019 at 12:49 PM.
The following users liked this post:
4thC4at60 (06-11-2019)
#18
Melting Slicks
It doesn't surprise me that the OEMs develop different requirements for following distances. Our Alfa has a pretty wide range of choices, and the closest distance is probably the minimal safe distance. I have no complaints about what they've done. My observation was more a testament to how badly many nasty rush-hour warriors behave, which means it really doesn't matter how small the gap is, someone will fill it. It's normal to not be able to see headlights in your rear-view mirror.
#19
Safety Car
Only if GM improves it. It's terrible on the Cadillac because it sits so far back every one just cut you off and the car perpetually slowed down. Even on a KIA you can turn it off and have just normal cruise. If you can switch between normal and adaptive fine, if not I pray they don't put adaptive cruise in.
Last edited by WalterSobchak; 06-11-2019 at 12:57 PM.
#20
In the Alfa, the adaptive feature can be selected on or off, thus utilized as old school cruise control, but I've never used standard cruise control in heavy traffic either. The only time I've ever used it is in a longish road trip.
Last edited by Foosh; 06-11-2019 at 02:02 PM.
The following users liked this post:
jefnvk (06-11-2019)