When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My guess is it was not done, period. This is typical salesman BS, just coming from higher up. Why has no actual data been provided if this car truly achieved that. Wouldn't the powers that be want that data posted in every media source possible if it they actually had it. I will gladly retract my statement if the performance is verified through unbiased testing but my guess is it won't be. Why haven't they provided cars for testing to the big name organizations? I think they are trying to secure as many sales as possible before the real data is made public. My thoughts are GM's tactic is if/when their claim is shown to be inaccurate individuals with orders will be too attached to let it go.
Probably done with a "one foot roll out", which is cheating in my book. Even if it is at 3 or over 3 by a tick or two, its still an impressive feat and a bargain for the performance.
My guess is it was not done, period. This is typical salesman BS, just coming from higher up. Why has no actual data been provided if this car truly achieved that. Wouldn't the powers that be want that data posted in every media source possible if it they actually had it. I will gladly retract my statement if the performance is verified through unbiased testing but my guess is it won't be. Why haven't they provided cars for testing to the big name organizations? I think they are trying to secure as many sales as possible before the real data is made public. My thoughts are GM's tactic is if/when their claim is shown to be inaccurate individuals with orders will be too attached to let it go.
Looks like you will have to retract your statement already as NO this didn't come from a saleman's BS, this came straight from the CEO on the day of the reveal...did you miss the entire launch of the C8 Corvette?? He also said the car would have a starting price of under 60K, did you happen to miss that also??? This came straight from the CEO so yes they have the data to back up their claims. And lastly yes it will get posted in every media source out there once the car is made available for the media to actually test!
OP yes you can guarantee that launch control was used on a perfect day on a perfect track.However most people seem to think the car is actually going to hit 0-60 in 2.8-2.9 sec range, guess we will see.
Last edited by Rockstar08; Jul 31, 2019 at 02:49 PM.
So GM told a bold faced lie at the reveal? The 2020 can't achieve 0-60 in under 3 seconds because a couple geniuses here said so. Good to know that we are all clear on this one.
I'm sure we will all be on the edge of our chairs waiting for the self appointed experts to give us their actual 0-60 metric.
Let's wait for the official test results. If anything, GM usually understates the stats. Pro drivers can usually knock some time off. Though the 'driver mod' has become less important with DCT and launch control.
Looks like you will have to retract your statement already as NO this didn't come from a saleman's BS, this came straight from the CEO on the day of the reveal...did you miss the entire launch of the C8 Corvette?? He also said the car would have a starting price of under 60K, did you happen to miss that also??? This came straight from the CEO so yes they have the data to back up their claims. And lastly yes it will get posted in every media source out there once the car is made available for the media to actually test!
OP yes you can guarantee that launch control was used on a perfect day on a perfect track.
Please re-read my statement and make sure you understand it before you respond. I watched the whole reveal live and saw the "claim" which is typical salesman BS regardless of who said it.
I said it in another post and I'll say it again here, do you guys always believe what people say when they're trying to sell you something!?
I say all this as someone who is in love with the C8 and will buy the Z version but for now, why so secretive with the data to back up your claim GM?
And yes I will use this car for what it was designed for, the track (real track, not drag strip). Display333, you're right, it won't matter for you cars 'n coffee guys. Whatever it is 3.2, 3.5, I'm sure it'll still be very fast but I will blown away if the unbiased testers achieve GM's claim.
0-60 is the stupidest performance metric out there anyway, who cares?
Let’s start using 60-130, half mile, full mile, and 1/4 mile times
Its an especially stupid yet very telling metric for cars that are traction limited like most C7 cars. I had a supercharged Camaro SS that was slower 0-60 than when it was stock but it dynod 650whp compared to 390whp when it was stock. Even rolling at 60mph the car would break them loose if you matted the throttle. Useless.
That said, 0-60 is what most of us will do with our cars daily for fun. 99.9999% of the times the cars will not see 130mph though i do agree that 1/4 mile trap speeds and 60-130mph is a good indication of top end power for sure.
My guess is it was not done, period. This is typical salesman BS, just coming from higher up. Why has no actual data been provided if this car truly achieved that. Wouldn't the powers that be want that data posted in every media source possible if it they actually had it. I will gladly retract my statement if the performance is verified through unbiased testing but my guess is it won't be. Why haven't they provided cars for testing to the big name organizations? I think they are trying to secure as many sales as possible before the real data is made public. My thoughts are GM's tactic is if/when their claim is shown to be inaccurate individuals with orders will be too attached to let it go.
I see what you're saying and agree that everyone has some sort of bias, but I am mainly referring to the professional testing organizations that aren't trying to sell me the car.
My guess is it was not done, period. This is typical salesman BS, just coming from higher up. Why has no actual data been provided if this car truly achieved that. Wouldn't the powers that be want that data posted in every media source possible if it they actually had it. I will gladly retract my statement if the performance is verified through unbiased testing but my guess is it won't be. Why haven't they provided cars for testing to the big name organizations? I think they are trying to secure as many sales as possible before the real data is made public. My thoughts are GM's tactic is if/when their claim is shown to be inaccurate individuals with orders will be too attached to let it go.
Yep...another one of them there conspiracies! Just like we landed on the moon and the earth is round. All salesmen telling them lies!
I could be mistaken, but I could've sworn at reveal they said models with additional packages would be sub 3 sec, not the base. Take my hazy recollection for what it's worth, not much, lol.
As for whether launch control was engaged, I would bet my house that it was. Auto trans, even dct, are dogs without launch control engaged.
I could be mistaken, but I could've sworn at reveal they said models with additional packages would be sub 3 sec, not the base. Take my hazy recollection for what it's worth, not much, lol.
As for whether launch control was engaged, I would bet my house that it was. Auto trans, even dct, are dogs without launch control engaged.
Yes, they said it was with the Z51 option, I would also guess it required the FE4 option.
I could be mistaken, but I could've sworn at reveal they said models with additional packages would be sub 3 sec, not the base. Take my hazy recollection for what it's worth, not much, lol.
As for whether launch control was engaged, I would bet my house that it was. Auto trans, even dct, are dogs without launch control engaged.
I think they were discussing the Z51 when that statement was made, but a non-Z51 car would probably perform the same in this case.