What kind of Tranny is this?
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What kind of Tranny is this?
Just trying to fingure out what kind of tranny I have . It is a Muncie, but judging from listings by Colvin (Corvette by the Numbers) the puddle of numbers I have make mine a mutt.
Here are my numbers:
Maincase: 3851325 (64-65)
Sidecover: 3884685 (66)
Ext Housing: can't locate; is this on bellhousing?
Tailhousing: 3831731 (63)
Misc on maincase: P0829 (date?)
Does everyone agree my tranny was probably rebuilt/worked on at some point or multiple points, or is there other information indicating otherwise? I'm mainly interested in determining weather it's a Muncie 20, 21, 22. Is there any other way to tell if it's close or wide ratio besides the numbers and the sound it makes
Thanks for the help!!!!
JW
1963 convertible
Beginning modified restoration
Here are my numbers:
Maincase: 3851325 (64-65)
Sidecover: 3884685 (66)
Ext Housing: can't locate; is this on bellhousing?
Tailhousing: 3831731 (63)
Misc on maincase: P0829 (date?)
Does everyone agree my tranny was probably rebuilt/worked on at some point or multiple points, or is there other information indicating otherwise? I'm mainly interested in determining weather it's a Muncie 20, 21, 22. Is there any other way to tell if it's close or wide ratio besides the numbers and the sound it makes
Thanks for the help!!!!
JW
1963 convertible
Beginning modified restoration
#2
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by jsw585
Just trying to fingure out what kind of tranny I have . It is a Muncie, but judging from listings by Colvin (Corvette by the Numbers) the puddle of numbers I have make mine a mutt.
Here are my numbers:
Maincase: 3851325 (64-65)
Sidecover: 3884685 (66)
Ext Housing: can't locate; is this on bellhousing?
Tailhousing: 3831731 (63)
Misc on maincase: P0829 (date?)
Does everyone agree my tranny was probably rebuilt/worked on at some point or multiple points, or is there other information indicating otherwise? I'm mainly interested in determining weather it's a Muncie 20, 21, 22. Is there any other way to tell if it's close or wide ratio besides the numbers and the sound it makes
Thanks for the help!!!!
JW
1963 convertible
Beginning modified restoration
Here are my numbers:
Maincase: 3851325 (64-65)
Sidecover: 3884685 (66)
Ext Housing: can't locate; is this on bellhousing?
Tailhousing: 3831731 (63)
Misc on maincase: P0829 (date?)
Does everyone agree my tranny was probably rebuilt/worked on at some point or multiple points, or is there other information indicating otherwise? I'm mainly interested in determining weather it's a Muncie 20, 21, 22. Is there any other way to tell if it's close or wide ratio besides the numbers and the sound it makes
Thanks for the help!!!!
JW
1963 convertible
Beginning modified restoration
#3
Safety Car
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Spicewood, Texas, USA TX-Texas
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by jsw585
Just trying to fingure out what kind of tranny I have . It is a Muncie, but judging from listings by Colvin (Corvette by the Numbers) the puddle of numbers I have make mine a mutt.
Here are my numbers:
Maincase: 3851325 (64-65)
Sidecover: 3884685 (66)
Ext Housing: can't locate; is this on bellhousing?
Tailhousing: 3831731 (63)
Misc on maincase: P0829 (date?)
Does everyone agree my tranny was probably rebuilt/worked on at some point or multiple points, or is there other information indicating otherwise? I'm mainly interested in determining weather it's a Muncie 20, 21, 22. Is there any other way to tell if it's close or wide ratio besides the numbers and the sound it makes
Thanks for the help!!!!
JW
1963 convertible
Beginning modified restoration
Here are my numbers:
Maincase: 3851325 (64-65)
Sidecover: 3884685 (66)
Ext Housing: can't locate; is this on bellhousing?
Tailhousing: 3831731 (63)
Misc on maincase: P0829 (date?)
Does everyone agree my tranny was probably rebuilt/worked on at some point or multiple points, or is there other information indicating otherwise? I'm mainly interested in determining weather it's a Muncie 20, 21, 22. Is there any other way to tell if it's close or wide ratio besides the numbers and the sound it makes
Thanks for the help!!!!
JW
1963 convertible
Beginning modified restoration
I can tell you that you may have a mongrel trans assembled from parts. The main case stamp "P0829" identifies the main case as originally being installed in a 70 Corvette (VIN number should be nearby), and was built August 29 (70?). There should be a suffix after the P0829...A is M20, B is M21, C is M22.
It should be pointed out, however, if the trans is assembled from parts, there is no way of knowing what is inside. Another way of determining if the trans is M20, M21, or M22 is to count the circumferential grooves on the input shaft: I BELIEVE (wouldn't bet my life on this) if the input shaft has one groove, it's a wide ratio; if two grooves, it's a close ratio; if no grooves, it's an M22.
Edit: Two circumferential grooves on the input shaft is a WIDE RATIO...one groove is a CLOSE RATIO, and no grooves is an M22.
Last edited by JmpnJckFlsh; 01-31-2006 at 04:21 PM.
#4
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, I thought it might be a mutt....I didn't see a prefix before the date stamp, but I'll look again. Looking over the Colvin book a little closer affirms what you said, too.
What part of West Texas are you from? I am originally from Las Cruces, now living in San Antonio.
Thanks for the input and for moving this thread to the right location!
JW
What part of West Texas are you from? I am originally from Las Cruces, now living in San Antonio.
Thanks for the input and for moving this thread to the right location!
JW
#5
Safety Car
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Spicewood, Texas, USA TX-Texas
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by jsw585
Yeah, I thought it might be a mutt....I didn't see a prefix before the date stamp, but I'll look again. Looking over the Colvin book a little closer affirms what you said, too.
What part of West Texas are you from? I am originally from Las Cruces, now living in San Antonio.
Thanks for the input and for moving this thread to the right location!
JW
What part of West Texas are you from? I am originally from Las Cruces, now living in San Antonio.
Thanks for the input and for moving this thread to the right location!
JW
Las Cruces is close...I'm in FAR west Texas; as far west in Texas as you can get. I'm NCRS member 20817...Our national convention will be in SA August 1-5, and we're looking forward to it. You should join up if you're planning a restoration on your 63; it'll be a big help to you and costs next to nothing.
#6
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Originally Posted by JmpnJckFlsh
The main case stamp "P0829" identifies the main case as originally being installed in a 70 Corvette (VIN number should be nearby), and was built August 29 (70?). There should be a suffix after the P0829...A is M20, B is M21, C is M22.
#7
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So if I read you right, this could be a tranny from 1970, in which case I might expect to find a *suffix* (thanks for the correction earlier), or it could be a tranny from pre 68, in which case it would not have a suffix and could still be a M20, 21, or 22 for that matter, which would lead me to ID it from here based only on morphology. Does that sound right? Thx!
#8
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Originally Posted by jsw585
So if I read you right, this could be a tranny from 1970, in which case I might expect to find a *suffix* (thanks for the correction earlier), or it could be a tranny from pre 68, in which case it would not have a suffix and could still be a M20, 21, or 22 for that matter, which would lead me to ID it from here based only on morphology. Does that sound right? Thx!