How big of a deduct?
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How big of a deduct?
I am looking at a '63 that has silver paint but it isn't the correct "Sebring Silver". What is the deduct for close but not correct?
Also the bottom of the car was blasted. The original molded finish has been removed and the fiberglass is grooved and pitted showing the raw glass hairs. The bottom can not be repaired to the correct finish. How major is this.
He is asking top dollar for this car and has NCRS judging sheets that do not reflect the actual condition of this car.
Thanks for any opinions,
Mike
Also the bottom of the car was blasted. The original molded finish has been removed and the fiberglass is grooved and pitted showing the raw glass hairs. The bottom can not be repaired to the correct finish. How major is this.
He is asking top dollar for this car and has NCRS judging sheets that do not reflect the actual condition of this car.
Thanks for any opinions,
Mike
#2
Safety Car
I had 20% of the paint points taken off one time because the judge thought the shade was too far off.
Then at national is was determined that it was pretty close, and I got full points.
There can be a lot of difference between judges at local vs regional vs national meets.
Then at national is was determined that it was pretty close, and I got full points.
There can be a lot of difference between judges at local vs regional vs national meets.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Body color carries 85 originality points - if the color is correct to the trim tag but the shade is not correct, it's a 20% deduction; if the metallic content or size isn't consistent with the original paint, it's a 50% deduction.
Body paint carries another 85 points, and relates to whether it "appears" to be lacquer as originally applied; if it's base/clear and isn't dulled in jambs and gutters and under the deck lid, you could take another big hit.
The underbody carries 17 points; the surface issue you describe would probably get a 5-10-point deduction.
Body paint carries another 85 points, and relates to whether it "appears" to be lacquer as originally applied; if it's base/clear and isn't dulled in jambs and gutters and under the deck lid, you could take another big hit.
The underbody carries 17 points; the surface issue you describe would probably get a 5-10-point deduction.
Last edited by JohnZ; 10-19-2006 at 02:16 PM.
#4
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is true. I know this paint isn't even close to Sebring Silver. There is no rainbow effect like the original color. It appears to be more of a Silver Pearl from '65.
Mike
Mike
#5
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnZ
Body color carries 85 originality points - if the color is correct to the trim tag but the shade is not correct, it's a 20% deduction; if the metallic content or size isn't consistent with the original paint, it's a 50% deduction.
The underbody carries 17 points; the surface issue you describe would probably get a 5-10-point deduction.
The underbody carries 17 points; the surface issue you describe would probably get a 5-10-point deduction.
Mike
#6
It is difficult to determine the deduction without actually seeing the car.
Was the car judged after it was painted?
What level meet?
Is the handwriting on the sheets from the same hand and are the sheets copies or originals? I would examine them closely.
Was the car judged after it was painted?
What level meet?
Is the handwriting on the sheets from the same hand and are the sheets copies or originals? I would examine them closely.
#7
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was judged at a chapter level after it had been restored. The judging sheets are original. Unfortunately the judges were, in my opinion, to lienient. it is a nice car but not an exceptional one. I have been told that it had rained the day of the judging also.
Mike
Mike
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia Burbs
Posts: 8,174
Received 235 Likes
on
77 Posts
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06
Originally Posted by hdvettes
I have been told that it had rained the day of the judging also.
#9
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the rain and rained on are not the same thing. Maybe they should state the weather conditions of the judging to help explain why they missed obvious deductions.
#10
You say that they want top dollar for the car! I would stay away from it because some of the damage you describe cannot be corrected.If you buy the car you will not be satisfied knowing that it is less than correct.I geuss my point is that no matter what price you pay the car is still not correct. JUST jmho. Viet [P.S. I had one that was not correct and never would be and it aggrevated until I sold it.]
#11
Le Mans Master
As I recall, it is possible to Top Flight a car even with an incorrect body color..., but everything else needs to be about perfect to achieve this.
#12
I don't think this car would top flight with the glass problem's. I know it would not in my area. And I am pretty sure it would not at any regional, they get much tougher to top flight the more you move up.Like I said if it were me I would forget it, because you will never be able to make it correct. If you just want a driver and are satisfied with that o.k., but that is all it will ever be, a driver. Viet
#13
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the input. I guess I am up against the fact that the car is nice yet not as nice as the seller feels it is. He is basing his opinion on his judging sheets and I have to go with my inspection of the car as it was judged. The problem is nothing better has come up for sale. So I am still looking.
Thanks for the help,
Mike
Thanks for the help,
Mike
#14
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia Burbs
Posts: 8,174
Received 235 Likes
on
77 Posts
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06
Originally Posted by hdvettes
I guess I am up against the fact that the car is nice yet not as nice as the seller feels it is. He is basing his opinion on his judging sheets and I have to go with my inspection of the car as it was judged.
#15
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Originally Posted by j3studio
This is a common issue. To me, it has to do with the fact that folks who are not serious about the NCRS do not differentiate depending on where the Top Flight was received. I've seen this a couple times at Barrett-Jackson, where a not-so-great Corvette was getting more attention than it might have deserved because of a chapter Top Flight...