C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Good 1/4 time for a stock 2013 grand sport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2018, 09:42 PM
  #1  
BlacMambaGSVette13
1st Gear
Thread Starter
 
BlacMambaGSVette13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Good 1/4 time for a stock 2013 grand sport

Good 1/4 time for a stock 2013 grand sport
Old 04-25-2018, 09:52 PM
  #2  
Vette_DD
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vette_DD's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Southern Middle TN
Posts: 82,197
Received 1,276 Likes on 935 Posts
St. Jude Donor '21-'22-'23-'24

Default

Stock times by forum members.

Showroom Stock LS3 Grand Sport (2010 - 2013)
12.319 @ 115.75 - Grand SportMan - 10 A6 - (5128)
12.374 @ 116.98 - Kuhnrod - 10 A6 - (6945)
12.461 @ 116.04 - SawBladz - 13 M6 - (6916)
12.499 @ 115.35 - Paristndude - 10 M6 - (6898)
12.559 @ 115.41 - Fastenuf - 11 A6 - (5269)
12.805 @ 113.33 - PhillyLS1 - 11 M6 NPP - (5085)
Old 04-25-2018, 10:16 PM
  #3  
Vetteman Jack
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 342,883
Received 19,282 Likes on 13,960 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran


Default

Moved to C6 General.
Old 04-25-2018, 10:26 PM
  #4  
JeremyAZ
Instructor
 
JeremyAZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2017
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Geography is huuuge. Track, location, DA. Will see numbers all over. AZ is horrible for 1/4 times. MD and NY will be awesome. NM atrocious.
12.3 - 13.0 ish.
Touch to do mid 11’s in AZ with heads/Cam with the stock gearing. Drive to cali and it’s 40hp on the butt dyno.
Old 04-26-2018, 07:42 PM
  #5  
buckmeister2
Le Mans Master
 
buckmeister2's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 5,185
Received 1,206 Likes on 824 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlacMambaGSVette13
Good 1/4 time for a stock 2013 grand sport
In various magazine tests of the '10-'12 GS, trained professional drivers mostly managed 12.6 or so, with one recording a 12.4.

Now, if you think you are that good, you might get mid-12's. Personally, I think you would do well first time out with a 13.0, and deliriously happy with 12.8. Maybe after 8 or 10 runs, you can go lower, and that would be something to shoot for.
Old 04-26-2018, 10:25 PM
  #6  
Oh Boy
Melting Slicks
 
Oh Boy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Location: Lower New York
Posts: 2,396
Received 522 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by buckmeister2
In various magazine tests of the '10-'12 GS, trained professional drivers mostly managed 12.6 or so, with one recording a 12.4.
Not according to these guys. http://www.superchevy.com/features/g...2-grand-sport/
Old 04-26-2018, 10:36 PM
  #7  
Adam Cifonelli
Pro
 
Adam Cifonelli's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 532
Received 62 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Its all about the tires.. without going to DRs. Ditch the OEM RUnFlats and pick up some Conti's or Mich and you can prob run low 12s stock.
Old 04-26-2018, 10:42 PM
  #8  
buckmeister2
Le Mans Master
 
buckmeister2's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 5,185
Received 1,206 Likes on 824 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oh Boy
I hate to break it to you, but if you are reading Super Chevy, and believing it, you are already in fairytale land.

They state that the 2012 GS they had in for tests dyno'd--I can hardly type this without laughing--415 HP at the rear wheels. Yet, their stud driver only achieved 12.94 in the quarter, blaming a bad track--I am laughing again. Lastly, they say their "sister publication" has achieved a 12.2. Goody...let's see the vehicle. Super Chevy is Super-known for "Super-prepping" cars before any test.

Super Chevy does not sell magazines to lovers of Ford, Chrysler, or import products. They sell to CHEVY GUYS. So, it has been, and always will be, in their own best interest to make Chevy's look as good as they possibly can, no matter what they have to do or say. Do you recall their archived story titled something like, "Junkyard Dog: The $300 small block that dyno'd 425 HP". Lotta folks believed that story, too, but I never heard of anyone who could duplicate it.

Besides, Boy, the OP did not ask what others had achieved. He asked what HE could expect. I used some known data to give him an idea of what HE could expect. I would still be satisfied with a 13.0 on the first time out, and really stoked with a 12.8.

No harm in having a disagreement, though.
Old 04-26-2018, 11:01 PM
  #9  
Oh Boy
Melting Slicks
 
Oh Boy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Location: Lower New York
Posts: 2,396
Received 522 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by buckmeister2
I hate to break it to you, but if you are reading Super Chevy, and believing it, you are already in fairytale land.

They state that the 2012 GS they had in for tests dyno'd--I can hardly type this without laughing--415 HP at the rear wheels. Yet, their stud driver only achieved 12.94 in the quarter, blaming a bad track--I am laughing again. Lastly, they say their "sister publication" has achieved a 12.2. Goody...let's see the vehicle. Super Chevy is Super-known for "Super-prepping" cars before any test.

Super Chevy does not sell magazines to lovers of Ford, Chrysler, or import products. They sell to CHEVY GUYS. So, it has been, and always will be, in their own best interest to make Chevy's look as good as they possibly can, no matter what they have to do or say. Do you recall their archived story titled something like, "Junkyard Dog: The $300 small block that dyno'd 425 HP". Lotta folks believed that story, too, but I never heard of anyone who could duplicate it.

Besides, Boy, the OP did not ask what others had achieved. He asked what HE could expect. I used some known data to give him an idea of what HE could expect. I would still be satisfied with a 13.0 on the first time out, and really stoked with a 12.8.

No harm in having a disagreement, though.
I only put a link to a article I read, nothing more.

Last edited by Oh Boy; 04-26-2018 at 11:01 PM.
Old 04-26-2018, 11:09 PM
  #10  
buckmeister2
Le Mans Master
 
buckmeister2's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 5,185
Received 1,206 Likes on 824 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oh Boy
I only put a link to a article I read, nothing more.
And I absolutely understand that.

I am eager to see what the OP runs his first time out. I hope to run mine in the next couple months, though it will likely be rippin' hot here in Vegas.
The following users liked this post:
ddame2 (04-27-2018)
Old 04-26-2018, 11:20 PM
  #11  
Patsgarage
Team Owner
 
Patsgarage's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Outside the Quick Stop N.J.
Posts: 30,426
Received 1,596 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

FWIW, in my 13 GS 6MN I ran a 12.9 on the stock GY RFTs, after switching to Continentals my best is a 12.6 @ 117. My 60 ft times are garbage (2.2), as I do not launch the car very hard.
Old 04-27-2018, 04:18 PM
  #12  
HOXXOH
Race Director
 
HOXXOH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by JeremyAZ
Geography is huuuge. Track, location, DA. Will see numbers all over. AZ is horrible for 1/4 times. MD and NY will be awesome. NM atrocious.
12.3 - 13.0 ish.
Touch to do mid 11’s in AZ with heads/Cam with the stock gearing. Drive to cali and it’s 40hp on the butt dyno.
Stock times are all about the DA and driver. IIRC the 12.319 by grandsportman was something around a negative 1500' DA. It'd been a 12.5 in 0 DA.
You might get negative in Phoenix (1147'), but you can't get negative at Tucson (3075') without having ice on the track.

As a rough guide, add the track elevation times 1% for every 100' of elevation and 65' for every 1 degree difference from 59 F. to get the DA. Also, the rough guide for 1/4 mi times are one tenth for every 600-800' of DA.

So a 13.00 time at a 2000' track at 79 F would be equivalent to a 12.48 at sea level.

DA
2000' x 1.2 = 2400'.
79 F - 59 F = 20.
20 x 65' = 1300'.
2400' + 1300' = 3700' DA

ET
3700' / 700' = 5.28
5.28 x .1sec = .528sec
13.00 sec - .528 sec = 12.48sec

Although this calculation doesn't consider BP or humidity, it'll still get you in a ballpark number that'll give you a comparison to previous times and/or other tracks.
Old 04-27-2018, 07:26 PM
  #13  
Corvette_Ed
Race Director
 
Corvette_Ed's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Phoenix area, AZ
Posts: 15,240
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,801 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HOXXOH
Stock times are all about the DA and driver. IIRC the 12.319 by grandsportman was something around a negative 1500' DA. It'd been a 12.5 in 0 DA.
You might get negative in Phoenix (1147'), but you can't get negative at Tucson (3075') without having ice on the track.

As a rough guide, add the track elevation times 1% for every 100' of elevation and 65' for every 1 degree difference from 59 F. to get the DA. Also, the rough guide for 1/4 mi times are one tenth for every 600-800' of DA.

So a 13.00 time at a 2000' track at 79 F would be equivalent to a 12.48 at sea level.

DA
2000' x 1.2 = 2400'.
79 F - 59 F = 20.
20 x 65' = 1300'.
2400' + 1300' = 3700' DA

ET
3700' / 700' = 5.28
5.28 x .1sec = .528sec
13.00 sec - .528 sec = 12.48sec

Although this calculation doesn't consider BP or humidity, it'll still get you in a ballpark number that'll give you a comparison to previous times and/or other tracks.
Where does the 700 come from in this calculation? Trying to figure out the ET for a 1818.6 DA.
Old 04-27-2018, 09:07 PM
  #14  
Not So Fast
Le Mans Master
 
Not So Fast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: lake havasu city arizona
Posts: 7,011
Received 982 Likes on 711 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by buckmeister2
And I absolutely understand that.

I am eager to see what the OP runs his first time out. I hope to run mine in the next couple months, though it will likely be rippin' hot here in Vegas.
Plus Buckster I hear its very crowded, be lucky to get 2- maybe 3 runs in a whole night.
But whatever, I'm subscribed so do it please Did you do headers, I thought I saw you were doing it ??
NSF

Last edited by Not So Fast; 04-27-2018 at 09:08 PM.
Old 04-27-2018, 11:15 PM
  #15  
HOXXOH
Race Director
 
HOXXOH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Corvette_Ed
Where does the 700 come from in this calculation? Trying to figure out the ET for a 1818.6 DA.
The 700 is the average of the 600-800 DA I mentioned at the end of paragraph 2. The 600 is a number that better suits highly modified NA cars, while 800 is more toward stock ones. You might consider that most Vettes are closer to the middle. This doesn't work the same for power adders, since the power is not as constant or predictable.
Old 04-28-2018, 01:19 AM
  #16  
CSTYLE
Instructor
 
CSTYLE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 109
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevr...nd-sport-test/
Old 04-28-2018, 03:52 PM
  #17  
Corvette_Ed
Race Director
 
Corvette_Ed's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Phoenix area, AZ
Posts: 15,240
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,801 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HOXXOH
The 700 is the average of the 600-800 DA I mentioned at the end of paragraph 2. The 600 is a number that better suits highly modified NA cars, while 800 is more toward stock ones. You might consider that most Vettes are closer to the middle. This doesn't work the same for power adders, since the power is not as constant or predictable.
So if my math is correct, that would make my 1818.6 DA the equivalent of .2598 seconds. Nice.
Old 04-29-2018, 01:45 AM
  #18  
HOXXOH
Race Director
 
HOXXOH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,061 Likes on 1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Corvette_Ed
So if my math is correct, that would make my 1818.6 DA the equivalent of .2598 seconds. Nice.
DA is Density Altitude. It's the equivalent of standard temperature (59 F)at standard sea level pressure (29.92) with no humidity (0) and adjusted for the physical elevation normally expressed in feet. There is no time involved.

You use DA to adjust how your car would have run if it was done under the standard conditions.

Get notified of new replies

To Good 1/4 time for a stock 2013 grand sport




Quick Reply: Good 1/4 time for a stock 2013 grand sport



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.