Performance Results Dyno sheets, Timeslips, Track Records, Who has the Fastest C5 Corvette?

12.4 QT finally

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2017, 10:49 AM
  #1  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default 12.4 QT finally

I finally got my 60ft under 2.0! Ran a 12.44 on n/a motor at Evadale Raceway on Test and Tune day. I do not have a picture of the slip right now since I am at my office but I will post it tonight when I get home. But what I do have is a few pictures.







Engine:
-Rebuilt with stock LS1 bottom end, LS2 timing chain, Melling Performance oil pump, Custom grind for N/A Comp cam (Sorry I do not know the specs, it was already in the engine before I could get the numbers off the back to call them), stock gaskets (full through)

Heads:
-Shaved bottom LS1 heads (10.2:1 compression) with stock rockers, 918 beehive valve springs, stainless steel valve retainers, stock valves, Trick Flow chromoly push rods (74 long .080 ball tip), LS7 lifters

Intake & Ignition:
-LS6 intake manifold, LS6 throttle body, stock fuel rails, stock LS6 injectors, K&N cold air intake with carbon fiber oil-less filter, stock coil pack, Duralast Gold spark plug wires, NGK tr55 spark plugs

Exhaust:
- OBX Racing LT headers, OBX Racing X-pipe with test cats, Home-made straight pipes with stainless steal tips, rear o2 sensor delete

Cooling System:
-DeWitts Racing Radiator with internal transmission cooler, 160 thermo, SP dual racing fans (set to 175 degrees), Dex-Cool Extended Life (40%) Distilled water (60%), B&M external transmission cooler

Transmission:
-LMR custom built stage 3 4L60e (graded for 800 rwhp, but we shall see), Yank pro series 3200 stall torque converter, stock drive shaft, stock differential (2.72 gear ratio), stock axles

Suspension:
-Stock C5 coupe suspension with air-ride, active handling, and competition drive mode, lowering all the way on stock bolts (from ground to body approx 3.5", nose lowered a tad more than rear)

Wheels & Tires:
- Stock alloy rims (front 17x8.5 rear 18x95), front tire Nitto Motivo guide (stock size), rear tire Nitto NT05 street radial (stock size)

Body & Weight reduction:
-VIS Carbon Fiber 4" Cowl Hood with TRACKSPEC T1 louvers (weighs 15 lbs compared to 76 lbs stock hood), stripped trunk of carpet and panels (weighed approx 45 lbs), removed floor mats (not much help but did it anyway lol), car approx weights 3100 without driver compared to stock weight of 3,212

Tune & HP:
-LMR tune 378 rwhp, 382 rwtq, 93 octane pump gas

Let me know what yall think and give me any tips for a better time whether it be mods or racing.
Old 06-05-2017, 12:51 PM
  #2  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Your next mod without a doubt should be rear gears. 12.44 with a 2.72 rear end (if I read that correctly) is really not bad. 3.73's or 3.90's would make that a whole different animal.
Old 06-05-2017, 01:21 PM
  #3  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NosLaser
Your next mod without a doubt should be rear gears. 12.44 with a 2.72 rear end (if I read that correctly) is really not bad. 3.73's or 3.90's would make that a whole different animal.
Thanks, and yes you read correctly lol and ok, I was having some others tell me to do the 3.42 due to my stall being a 3200, I don't really understand their logic though, since I don't really have that knowledge to argue with haha
Old 06-05-2017, 01:56 PM
  #4  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by X2142
Thanks, and yes you read correctly lol and ok, I was having some others tell me to do the 3.42 due to my stall being a 3200, I don't really understand their logic though, since I don't really have that knowledge to argue with haha
I wouldnt be surprised if just a rear gear change alone could get that 60' down into the 1.7x range and your ET down near the 12.0 range, maybe even clip a high 11, but I'd know more after seeing your slip.
Old 06-05-2017, 01:59 PM
  #5  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NosLaser
I wouldnt be surprised if just a rear gear change alone could get that 60' down into the 1.7x range and your ET down near the 12.0 range, maybe even clip a high 11, but I'd know more after seeing your slip.
My 60ft now is a 1.9 if I remember correctly. I believe if I had wider tire and slicks, 17x11, I'd help alot too, I don't have very good traction at the launch with these tires. the 12.4 was from a 2000 rpm launch. If I had sticky tires, I could do a high rpm and get a better 60ft.
Old 06-05-2017, 07:05 PM
  #6  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

The slip picture as promised


Old 06-05-2017, 09:22 PM
  #7  
Roddy13
Burning Brakes
 
Roddy13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 935
Received 101 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

That's a 12 flat with a 3.42 or 3.73 rear
Old 06-06-2017, 01:22 AM
  #8  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roddy13
That's a 12 flat with a 3.42 or 3.73 rear
I think I'd have traction issues with those gears and the tire size that I am on. I have tractions issues now and not fully able to stall to the full potential of my stall with the 2.72 gears.
Old 06-06-2017, 06:10 AM
  #9  
Jackie Chan
Burning Brakes
 
Jackie Chan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 882
Received 83 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

60' could probably improve in its current form. What air pressure are you running and how much of a burnout?
Old 06-06-2017, 08:48 AM
  #10  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jackie Chan
60' could probably improve in its current form. What air pressure are you running and how much of a burnout?
20 and just a short dust off, I avoid water box burning out on these tires. It makes them too slippery. Ran the 12.4 avoid water box burn
Old 06-06-2017, 10:26 AM
  #11  
Jackie Chan
Burning Brakes
 
Jackie Chan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 882
Received 83 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I always had my best 60s on street tires by making them smoke. A dust off isnt going to help, too long and they get a little slippery. I would easuly be bottom 1.8s on street tires on a decent track prep and my buddies would get 1.7s some times. Play around with longer burnouts and see what happens.
Old 06-06-2017, 10:48 AM
  #12  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jackie Chan
I always had my best 60s on street tires by making them smoke. A dust off isnt going to help, too long and they get a little slippery. I would easuly be bottom 1.8s on street tires on a decent track prep and my buddies would get 1.7s some times. Play around with longer burnouts and see what happens.
Except dusting them off made me have my fastest run , but regardless, I did try various times in the water box. Had a couple of the pros there help me and they all said the water box isn't working for my tires except making them shitty. At first they said the same thing as you did by trying longer, well I ran a 14.9 from the *** end kicking out on me twice... A shorter time in the box, I ran a 13 flat which wasn't good either, so they made a dry path for me to try without it. At first I stalled up to 2700 rpm and ran a 12.6, one of them said try a lower stall on the street tires, so then I stalled to 2000 rpm and BAM 12.4, almost dead hook. It felt perfect almost immediately. And for anyone curious or thinking I used the box wrong, I'd burn in box then let off the gas and sling the water off while exiting the box and reverse back before the pre-stage sensor.
Old 06-06-2017, 11:41 AM
  #13  
Jackie Chan
Burning Brakes
 
Jackie Chan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 882
Received 83 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Dont get street tires wet. Just do a burnout
Old 06-06-2017, 11:50 AM
  #14  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jackie Chan
Dont get street tires wet. Just do a burnout
That I didn't try, next test and tune I will
Old 06-06-2017, 11:53 AM
  #15  
Jackie Chan
Burning Brakes
 
Jackie Chan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 882
Received 83 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I think if you play around with your burnout and launch rpm you will easily get 1.8s or Better
Old 06-06-2017, 11:54 AM
  #16  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jackie Chan
I think if you play around with your burnout and launch rpm you will easily get 1.8s or Better
Hopefully, with a better burn on dry, I can stall it higher and get the good traction I wish for lol
Old 06-13-2017, 03:17 PM
  #17  
ZAZZ
Advanced
 
ZAZZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 96
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

with some 3.42 gears and some good drag radials like M/Ts and playing around with the launch you should def. be in the 11s...

my old LT1 Camaro had nothing but a LT4 cam, 52mm throttle body, headers and 3.73 gears and on drag radials I ran 12.60s at 110 mph.. that car weighed a good 300 lbs more than yours and had 50 less hp..

have fun

Get notified of new replies

To 12.4 QT finally

Old 06-13-2017, 03:25 PM
  #18  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZAZZ
with some 3.42 gears and some good drag radials like M/Ts and playing around with the launch you should def. be in the 11s...

my old LT1 Camaro had nothing but a LT4 cam, 52mm throttle body, headers and 3.73 gears and on drag radials I ran 12.60s at 110 mph.. that car weighed a good 300 lbs more than yours and had 50 less hp..

have fun
That's what alot of guys down here are saying, and thanks Those are good numbers
Old 06-13-2017, 03:28 PM
  #19  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default




Over at a buddy's shop, he had some of these 15x10 rims with slicks on them laying around. We got bored and decided to see if they fit on the vette as a joke... well they did and it became more serious than a joke lol I'll have to raise the *** end about an 1" or so because the fenders touch the wheels when I launch. After I raise it, I gonna test them on the track yes I know they look strange on there and probably touch a soft spot on some people but hell, they are free and here, why not test? lol
Old 06-13-2017, 03:28 PM
  #20  
Volk2142
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Volk2142's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 622
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Tire size is 10-27-15, I believe


Quick Reply: 12.4 QT finally



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.