Baltimore cops change of venue = DENIED!!!
09-10-2015, 07:03 PM
#1
CF Senior Member
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2014
Location: Monaco Sociopath
Posts: 16,165
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
Baltimore cops change of venue = DENIED!!!
never seen a more orchestrated witch hunt . . .
http://www.wbaltv.com/news/judge-to-...rials/35194954
(hope this isn't a dupe - didn't see anything else)
http://www.wbaltv.com/news/judge-to-...rials/35194954
(hope this isn't a dupe - didn't see anything else)
09-10-2015, 07:07 PM
#2
CF Senior Member
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Monmouth County NJ
Posts: 61,586
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times
in
19 Posts
They ALREADY issued a settlement. It's already done. Anyone who watched Star Trek... this will be a Cardassian style trial. They went all in on this one, they let a city burn, the left CANNOT let any of these people walk and you can guarantee that the verdict came straight from the top.
09-10-2015, 07:17 PM
#3
CF Senior Member
This issue has not been played out yet, not even close....here's a couple of reasons why.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
09-10-2015, 07:25 PM
#4
CF Senior Member
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2014
Location: Monaco Sociopath
Posts: 16,165
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
taking into consideration your second issue, perhaps the judge is a sly dog in his own right . . . . . 
Originally Posted by vette6799
This issue has not been played out yet, not even close....here's a couple of reasons why.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
09-10-2015, 07:25 PM
#5
CF Senior Member
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door. South West Florida / Livin' The Dream
Posts: 7,559
Thanked 17 Times
in
5 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12
Originally Posted by vette6799
This issue has not been played out yet, not even close....here's a couple of reasons why.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
If they do manage to seat a jury it will be a great base for an appeal if they get a conviction.
Interesting how they settled with the victim's family due to potential high litigation costs and yet by not allowing a change of venue are insuring high litigation costs! They are an incompetent lot
09-10-2015, 08:29 PM
#6
CF Senior Member
Originally Posted by Optimus_C5
If they do manage to seat a jury it will be a great base for an appeal if they get a conviction.
Interesting how they settled with the victim's family due to potential high litigation costs and yet by not allowing a change of venue are insuring high litigation costs! They are an incompetent lot
09-10-2015, 08:40 PM
#7
CF Senior Member
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Washigton, DC
Posts: 104,148
Thanked 31 Times
in
27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11, '16
Originally Posted by Optimus_C5
If they do manage to seat a jury it will be a great base for an appeal if they get a conviction.
Interesting how they settled with the victim's family due to potential high litigation costs and yet by not allowing a change of venue are insuring high litigation costs! They are an incompetent lot
Last edited by owebo; 09-10-2015 at 08:49 PM.
09-10-2015, 08:46 PM
#8
CF Senior Member
I have no idea what happened to Freddie Gray. But what I do know is....the cops are screwed.
09-11-2015, 12:20 AM
#9
CF Senior Member
these poor cops are being railroaded
09-11-2015, 01:55 AM
#10
CF Senior Member
Member Since: May 2002
Location: I helped our former POSOTUS return the wealth of America to its rightful owners one parcel of real estate at a time.
Posts: 122,186
Thanked 43 Times
in
28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18
Originally Posted by dmaxx3500
these poor cops are being railroaded
completely.
09-11-2015, 01:56 AM
#11
CF Senior Member
Member Since: May 2002
Location: I helped our former POSOTUS return the wealth of America to its rightful owners one parcel of real estate at a time.
Posts: 122,186
Thanked 43 Times
in
28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18
Originally Posted by vette6799
This issue has not been played out yet, not even close....here's a couple of reasons why.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
1. If a defendant loses, it's great appeal material. And in Baltimore, don't bet against at least one juror doing or saying something that causes a mistrial.
2. During the voir dire portion of jury selection, they may determine that it is impossible to seat an unbiased jury...and they have to do this for six cases. Motion for change of venue again filed and this time possibly granted.
09-11-2015, 11:08 AM
#12
CF Senior Member
It will be interesting to see how they spin finding the three white cops guilty and the three black cops innocent. We all know darned well that's how this is going to play out.
09-11-2015, 01:01 PM
#13
CF Senior Member
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 53,426
Thanked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12, '15
Originally Posted by Red99SS
They ALREADY issued a settlement. It's already done. Anyone who watched Star Trek... this will be a Cardassian style trial. They went all in on this one, they let a city burn, the left CANNOT let any of these people walk and you can guarantee that the verdict came straight from the top.
That "riot" didn't affect many areas in Baltimore.
For the most part, the thugs looted their own neighborhood.
09-11-2015, 01:01 PM
#14
CF Senior Member
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 53,426
Thanked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12, '15
Originally Posted by vette6799
That Baltimore City settled with Gray's estate is another reason for a change of venue as the settlement is tantamount to an admission of guilt.
09-11-2015, 01:21 PM
#15
MONARTOR
Originally Posted by Chemdawg99
@bolded...
That "riot" didn't affect many areas in Baltimore.
For the most part, the thugs looted their own neighborhood.
That "riot" didn't affect many areas in Baltimore.
For the most part, the thugs looted their own neighborhood.
09-11-2015, 01:25 PM
#16
CF Senior Member
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 53,426
Thanked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12, '15
Originally Posted by Grumpy
whew, that makes their actions ok.. Good thing Madame Mayor won't be seeking re-election
Just that the riot wasn't nearly as extensive as the national media made it out to be.
Not even close to the 1968 Baltimore riots.
http://media.nbcwashington.com/image...s_compared.jpg
